Fair enough Islam contains a cultural genocide construct of Other and Pathological Altruists in Canberra and elsewhere are committing Western cultural suicide on our behalf but violence to remove Islam from the Public Square sets you on a path to continually inform the same.


Natalie O'Brien, The Sydney Morning Herald, Date April 6, 2014
The Leader Of Australian Anti-Islam Group The ADL Has A Bizarre Explanation For What Radicalised Him BEN COLLINS, Business Insider Australia,  22/4/2014

Cultural development of prejudice - i.e. definition of out-groups and relative prejudice strength driving behavior meta-analysis summarizing , 113 research reports worldwide (121 cross-sectional and 7 longitudinal studies) in 2011 on age differences in ethnic, racial, or national prejudice among children and adolescents. Overall, results indicated a peak in prejudice in middle childhood (5–7 years) followed by a slight decrease until late childhood (8–10 years). Another study in 2016  found "preschoolers as young as 2–5 hold and express stereotypes and prejudice. Additionally, 7–9 year olds manifest a reduction of stereotypes and prejudice and renew it again at preadolescence, 10–12 year olds."

Research
 has also found once these cultural derived schemas are set they are difficult to reset so each of us to a significant extent derive our reality testing from unconscious processes so although certain cultural development processes can and do inform greater relative harm even systemic terror-genocide when one realises our own ethic-belief-methodology social-political systems are to a significant degree foisted upon each of us, it is therefore the cultural development processes and the cultural definitions-categories, codex templates-ideologies allowed to inform these 'inequities and harm' not only against Other but even adherents themselves which must be removed from private/public space so as not to continue to inform the same, not persons.

Fair enough Islam which clearly contains a cultural genocide construct of Other and urgently needs to be removed from informing the 'spectrum' of cultural war and subjugation of women it consistently constantly actions against Other and women.

You must attempt this non-violently otherwise whats the point you simply try and suppress a genocide construct with another. You simply become what you have been fighting against - and as Gandhi rightly pointed out the nature of how you change society is inevitably reflected in the societal institutions you create.

You utilise violence in the endgame as Muslims as a culture always do this is the nature of the societal institutions you inform as in Iran today and Germany in the 1930's.

Yes you have every right to be angry and frustrated the pathological altruists in Canberra and elsewhere are committing Western cultural suicide on our behalf, even destroying the very Democratic institutions they claim to be protecting but violence sets you on a path to continually inform the same. It is a position which fails to recognise we all believe what we believe simply by chance of where we are born and raised aged 0-5.

Yes non-violent Cultural change takes centuries, yes it is a hard slog, but whats the alternative - you simply replace one genocide construct with another be it religious or secular. What does humanity face then, a world which enables a flourishing life or simply tyranny under another name?

It is very important to be on the streets to stand, not be silent, advocating change for a better society by removing genocide constructs from the Public Square - it is not that you are wrong in terms of the threat Islam poses - but it does not really solve anything to become a threat yourselves for the very same reasons as Islam.


The approach I propose will initially not stop Islamic violence on the streets, it is inevitable given the nature of the Islamic construct of Other and the evidence of broken bodies and lives trailing from the seventh century to this very day Muslim terror and derived major schism whatever you attempt to do will occur but the focus must be on the reason why, the Islamic cultural foundation codex (textual and exemplar) inherent construct of Other, force an examination via State institutions of the veracity of the pathological altruist position Islam is not an intrinsic threat to the security of Other and Western political institutions via a royal commission, scientific research projects etc.. Then leading from this the political processes utilising State institutions and power, based upon reason justifiably derived can be framed to remove Islam (and any other genocide construct) from the Public Square. 

How do you go about it without violence as your template yet in the end have a chance of informing enabling political institutions along the way?

First as Tony Blair is saying, whatever may think of Blair's past performance, is absolutely right when Tony Blair says murder of Lee Rigby PROVES 'there is a problem within Islam' and the Ex-PM says 'the ideology behind his murder is profound and dangerous' By GLEN OWEN, MAIL ON SUNDAY POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT PUBLISHED: 21:09 GMT, 1 June 2013.

"We have to put it on the table and be honest about it. Of course there are Christian extremists and Jewish, Buddhist and Hindu ones. But I am afraid this strain is not the province of a few extremists. It has at its heart a view about religion and about the interaction between religion and politics that is not compatible with pluralistic, liberal, open-minded societies." - Tony Blair

Although Blair is right the first critical error Blair makes is to fall into the fatal trap of determining Muslim 'extremists' as a 'strain' an inferred 'distinct' ideology that moderates even those considered as the Muslim doyens of the promotion of peace and harmony are not connected directly via any shared ethical constructs straight to extremists.

That it is even possible to stipulate a 'good' or 'evil' Islam is a lie for it means neither moderate not extremists move in the same cultural time and space - do not provide any social support whatsoever for the existence of the other. It simply is not the case therefore Muslims as a culture as a whole are a threat to notions of Western secular philosophical constructs of liberty and Democracy, despite the presence of any number of personable Muslims within the Muslim behavioral variance.


The worst aspect is such a notion of Muslim extremist 'distinct' ideology is purposefully created to justify a Muslim moderate/liberal  'distinct' ideology which is utilized to generate an even more grotesque myth Islam as represented by the extremists is not the 'true' Islam.

This can be immediately be shown to be a very dangerous construct for it enables 'moderate' Muslims who are in fact the underwriters of the 'extremist' Muslims to be regarded as a societal 'good' which in time and space enables the extremist element of the same culture to grow.

Bowing to a Genocide Construct does not enable peace and security for adherents or Other.- Arif's story of love and hate in Wollongong

‘Not Islam’. It is just not going to stand up to any reasonable evaluation as increasingly the broken bodies and lives keep rolling in.

"A house divided against itself cannot stand" Lincoln 1858 - A house whose resident cultural ethical constructs of Other (non-Islamic persons & women) are inextricably in conflict cannot stand 2014.


Blair though suggests 'education' is the key, what I view as an attempted Change in Architect and Builder but this 'education' is an external cultural codex competing with the core Islamic foundation codex in the same space and time within the Western Democracies, my view is such an approach will simply slow the journey to full breakdown of Western Democracies notions of liberty particularly regards Other and women.

Why?

Because the Islamic genocidal and misogynistic cultural codex has precedence in the learning process in the first critical years 0-5. It is too late research appears to be indicating attempts to change informed prejudice after this is pointless and anyway the Islamic codex remains intact within the Public Square to continue to inform the exact same Muslim cultural behavioral variance, both factors mean Tony Blair's solution will not stop the Final solution from whichever direction it comes from just at best slow its progress. It may even tend to speed up major schism as the Islamic cultural forces clearly recognise the external threat to its world view.

What is the alternative? As Tony Blair says it is not going to be easy.

How do you go about it. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why is it One Is and One Is-Not When both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."?

National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) & Society for Personality and Social Psychology (SPSP) "The time has come for us to be honest with ourselves and indeed each other." Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president, 2015

“To make one exception means to make them all.” - Clothing such as the Muslim headscarf, hijab, burqa... is a political cultural statement and informs adherence and respect for the ideological constructs attached to it which hold tragic consequences for women.