Saturday, April 26, 2014

Bowing to a Genocide Construct does not enable peace and security for adherents or Other.- Arif's story of love and hate in Wollongong


Bowing to a Genocide Construct does not enable peace and security for adherents or Other.


Arif's story of love and hate in Wollongong By GEMMA KHAICY Illawarra Mercury April 25, 2014, 10:30 p.m

Change the Architect and Builder or Change Nothing.

"Khan says his faith promotes peace, and was the reason he studied for a masters of social work."

Khan's faith also promotes terror and major schism you cannot have it both ways.

Islam either promotes peace or it does not - you cannot have a cultural behavioral variance which promotes peace and consistently constantly in time and space promotes terror and claim Islam/Muslims promotes peace - its the same as saying half my body is cancerous so my health is great - just absurd - in fact insane.

The 'problem' with Islam as Tony Blair rightly points out is the same as Alberts view.

"Communities (cultures) tend to be guided less than individuals by conscience and a sense of responsibility. How much misery does this fact cause mankind! It is the source of wars and every kind of oppression, which fill the earth with pain, sighs and bitterness." (Albert Einstein, 1934)

No amount of so called moderate adherents of a codex which contains a genocide construct of Other will stop that genocide construct being reflected in the cultures behavioral variance. Yes some if not most Muslims may be nice personable people but as with the Nazi did this make a blind bit of difference to the outcome. Is just one life worth the price of allowing Islam access to the Public Square?

As Tony Blair rightly points out not accepting there is an inherent security threat from the Islamic construct of Other is a very dangerous thing to do.


"I consider anybody who oppresses or kills innocent people to be a terrorist; I don't care what religion you're from."

Khan(Muslims) your Islamic cultural foundation codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) templates) construct of Other informs a consistent, constant Muslim behavioral variance which "oppresses or(and) kills innocent people". Khan(Muslims) you by remaining an adherent of such a codex and existing in the Muslim moderate/radical/extremist/terrorist enable the Muslim terror and major schism to be manifest in each new generation - you are therefore culpable for the promulgation of Muslim terror and major schism.
"Hezbollah, he (Khan) says, are in favour of justice and peace, unlike many other groups that claim to be Islamic but contradict the faith."

"Where are your (Christian) churches? Where are your Patriarchs? Where are your nuns? Where are your crosses? ... Where are your sanctuaries? What has the world done for them - what did they do previously in Iraq? Aren't these groups causing all of this in all regions? They may tell you 'This is ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant) and this one isn't". They are all the same. It has so far shown they are all the same. They may differ in name but their mentality, essence and thought present on the ground, are almost all the same."

Source: Hezbollah's Leader to Christians: 'Where are your Churches, Cross...

"Joseph Hakim is a Lebanese native and President of the International Christian Union (ICU). In Hakim’s view, the jihadi forces within the Syrian opposition and Hezbollah on the other side, have used the conflict in Syria to ethnically cleanse the Christians. According to Hakim, the indigenous Christian minority in Syria is being “forced out of their native cities, towns, and villages.” Hakim bemoaned the passivity of the free world as it witnessed Christians being slaughtered, churches firebombed, priests being beheaded, and bishops kidnapped. “I feel that I am being accurate in calling what is happening genocide.”"Syria, Lebanon and Christian Genocide July 16, 2013 by Joseph Puder FRONTPAGE MAG

“A senior commander in Lebanon’s Shiite Hezbollah movement who was on the FBI’s most-wanted terrorist list has been killed in fighting in Syria, U.S. officials said Wednesday.”
Hezbollah operative wanted by FBI dies in fighting in Syria By Adam Goldman, The Washington Post, Thursday, May 29, 7:49 AM E-mail the writer

"In 2012, there was a clear resurgence of Iran’s state sponsorship of terrorism, through the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF), its Ministry of Intelligence and Security, and Tehran’s ally Hizballah (otherwise named Hezbollah), who remained a significant threat to the stability of Lebanon and the broader region. Attacks in Europe, Africa, the Middle East, South Asia, and the Far East were linked to the IRGC-QF or Hizballah. In fact, Hizballah’s terrorist activity has reached a tempo unseen since the 1990s with attacks plotted in Southeast Asia, Europe, and Africa." 
Source: Country Reports on Terrorism 2012 May 2013 United States Department of State Publication Bureau of Counterterrorism Released May 2013 

This is contributory (apart from the broken bodies and lives) proof of the notion a 'distinct ideology' of Islamic extremism which insinuates a completely unconnected 'distinct ideology' of Islamic 'moderation' exists is a lie. Kan claims as Hezbollah's Leader above to be the 'good' side of Islam really cannot be rationally supported as each Islamic/Muslim side supports their own version of justified terror and major schism against fellow adherents and Other.

‘Not Islam’. It is just not going to stand up to any reasonable evaluation as increasingly the broken bodies and lives keep rolling in.


So supporters of Hezbollah are Islamic 'moderates' who do not support the 'oppression or killing of innocent people to be a terrorist'?

Therefore Arif Khan is a Muslim 'moderate' personable person for whom determining them as an intrinsic threat and the Islamic organisations they support given they are indeed Muslim 'moderate' personable persons is Islamophobic - a mental illness?

The tragic irony of Hezbollah's leader and Arif Khan that the extremists and terrorists and their supporters are other Muslim adherents "their (other Islamic/Muslims sects) mentality, essence and thought present on the ground, are almost all the same." are not Hezbollah and Arif Khan whom not only Western security assessments but these other Islamic/Muslim sects determine as terrorists and supporters.

It begs the question those purporting an Islamic extremist 'distinct ideology' actually exists insinuating an Islamic 'moderate' 'distinct ideology' can therefore exist need to prove it.

Otherwise as the above logic clearly shows one Islamic 'moderate' is anothers extremist terrorist or their supporters. Therefore with Islam you can never, never have the Muslim so called 'moderate' without the Muslim terrorist or their all so erstwhile Muslim moderate supporters.

Proud to have such a dangerous construct within the Public Square downright dangerous pathological altruism I would propose.

Differing cultural meaning of a "better life" and as with "freedom" being shouted on the streets across the Arab world where Spring turned to Winter does inform in time and space completely differing political outcomes. In Turkey as the secular constraints on Islam are being loosened, notions of citizen independence are being promoted or diminished? How is it you can justify believing political cultural forces growing in Australia will not inform the same?


To Whom it May Concern - Education Department/The Hon Sussan Ley MP Assistant Minister for Education

I wish to make an official complaint of the awarding of a national Cultural Understanding Award to a person who has publicly stated support for a terrorist organisation Hezbollah as detailed in the attached Arif's story of love and hate in Wollongong By GEMMA KHAICY April 25, 2014,

Arif's story of love and hate in Wollongong By GEMMA KHAICY April 25, 2014


By Arif Khan openly supporting Hezbollah in the news article the following statement I view as I would presume Hezbollah's victims would as obscene "I consider anybody who oppresses or kills innocent people to be a terrorist; I don't care what religion you're from." 


Clearly such a statement determines those determined as innocent is severely qualified under Arif Khan's Islamic/Muslim cultural codex and the burning buildings, broken bodies and lives prove this to be true. Other even from the very first pages of the Quran determine Other as evil not innocent.

"I don't care" except clearly an Islamic terrorist organisation who does 'oppress and kill innocent people'.

I demand the national Cultural Understanding Award given to Arif Khan be immediately withdrawn, otherwise in not doing so it is my view an important Australian institution becomes complicit in the notion supporting terrorist organisations as normative.

To me it is the same as giving a supporter of a Nazi terrorist organization a Cultural Understanding Award award given the construct of Other are exactly the same, and the resultant terror on the ground.


Have I sinned? What is a Genocide Construct of Other and Why is it formed?

Change the Architect and Builder or Change Nothing

.How do you go about it. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child...

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Fair enough Islam contains a cultural genocide construct of Other and Pathological Altruists in Canberra and elsewhere are committing Western cultural suicide on our behalf but violence to remove Islam from the Public Square sets you on a path to continually inform the same.


Natalie O'Brien, The Sydney Morning Herald, Date April 6, 2014
The Leader Of Australian Anti-Islam Group The ADL Has A Bizarre Explanation For What Radicalised Him BEN COLLINS, Business Insider Australia,  22/4/2014

Cultural development of prejudice - i.e. definition of out-groups and relative prejudice strength driving behavior meta-analysis summarizing , 113 research reports worldwide (121 cross-sectional and 7 longitudinal studies) in 2011 on age differences in ethnic, racial, or national prejudice among children and adolescents. Overall, results indicated a peak in prejudice in middle childhood (5–7 years) followed by a slight decrease until late childhood (8–10 years). Another study in 2016  found "preschoolers as young as 2–5 hold and express stereotypes and prejudice. Additionally, 7–9 year olds manifest a reduction of stereotypes and prejudice and renew it again at preadolescence, 10–12 year olds."

Research
 has also found once these cultural derived schemas are set they are difficult to reset so each of us to a significant extent derive our reality testing from unconscious processes so although certain cultural development processes can and do inform greater relative harm even systemic terror-genocide when one realises our own ethic-belief-methodology social-political systems are to a significant degree foisted upon each of us, it is therefore the cultural development processes and the cultural definitions-categories, codex templates-ideologies allowed to inform these 'inequities and harm' not only against Other but even adherents themselves which must be removed from private/public space so as not to continue to inform the same, not persons.

Fair enough Islam which clearly contains a cultural genocide construct of Other and urgently needs to be removed from informing the 'spectrum' of cultural war and subjugation of women it consistently constantly actions against Other and women.

You must attempt this non-violently otherwise whats the point you simply try and suppress a genocide construct with another. You simply become what you have been fighting against - and as Gandhi rightly pointed out the nature of how you change society is inevitably reflected in the societal institutions you create.

You utilise violence in the endgame as Muslims as a culture always do this is the nature of the societal institutions you inform as in Iran today and Germany in the 1930's.

Yes you have every right to be angry and frustrated the pathological altruists in Canberra and elsewhere are committing Western cultural suicide on our behalf, even destroying the very Democratic institutions they claim to be protecting but violence sets you on a path to continually inform the same. It is a position which fails to recognise we all believe what we believe simply by chance of where we are born and raised aged 0-5.

Yes non-violent Cultural change takes centuries, yes it is a hard slog, but whats the alternative - you simply replace one genocide construct with another be it religious or secular. What does humanity face then, a world which enables a flourishing life or simply tyranny under another name?

It is very important to be on the streets to stand, not be silent, advocating change for a better society by removing genocide constructs from the Public Square - it is not that you are wrong in terms of the threat Islam poses - but it does not really solve anything to become a threat yourselves for the very same reasons as Islam.


The approach I propose will initially not stop Islamic violence on the streets, it is inevitable given the nature of the Islamic construct of Other and the evidence of broken bodies and lives trailing from the seventh century to this very day Muslim terror and derived major schism whatever you attempt to do will occur but the focus must be on the reason why, the Islamic cultural foundation codex (textual and exemplar) inherent construct of Other, force an examination via State institutions of the veracity of the pathological altruist position Islam is not an intrinsic threat to the security of Other and Western political institutions via a royal commission, scientific research projects etc.. Then leading from this the political processes utilising State institutions and power, based upon reason justifiably derived can be framed to remove Islam (and any other genocide construct) from the Public Square. 

How do you go about it without violence as your template yet in the end have a chance of informing enabling political institutions along the way?

First as Tony Blair is saying, whatever may think of Blair's past performance, is absolutely right when Tony Blair says murder of Lee Rigby PROVES 'there is a problem within Islam' and the Ex-PM says 'the ideology behind his murder is profound and dangerous' By GLEN OWEN, MAIL ON SUNDAY POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT PUBLISHED: 21:09 GMT, 1 June 2013.

"We have to put it on the table and be honest about it. Of course there are Christian extremists and Jewish, Buddhist and Hindu ones. But I am afraid this strain is not the province of a few extremists. It has at its heart a view about religion and about the interaction between religion and politics that is not compatible with pluralistic, liberal, open-minded societies." - Tony Blair

Although Blair is right the first critical error Blair makes is to fall into the fatal trap of determining Muslim 'extremists' as a 'strain' an inferred 'distinct' ideology that moderates even those considered as the Muslim doyens of the promotion of peace and harmony are not connected directly via any shared ethical constructs straight to extremists.

That it is even possible to stipulate a 'good' or 'evil' Islam is a lie for it means neither moderate not extremists move in the same cultural time and space - do not provide any social support whatsoever for the existence of the other. It simply is not the case therefore Muslims as a culture as a whole are a threat to notions of Western secular philosophical constructs of liberty and Democracy, despite the presence of any number of personable Muslims within the Muslim behavioral variance.


The worst aspect is such a notion of Muslim extremist 'distinct' ideology is purposefully created to justify a Muslim moderate/liberal  'distinct' ideology which is utilized to generate an even more grotesque myth Islam as represented by the extremists is not the 'true' Islam.

This can be immediately be shown to be a very dangerous construct for it enables 'moderate' Muslims who are in fact the underwriters of the 'extremist' Muslims to be regarded as a societal 'good' which in time and space enables the extremist element of the same culture to grow.

Bowing to a Genocide Construct does not enable peace and security for adherents or Other.- Arif's story of love and hate in Wollongong

‘Not Islam’. It is just not going to stand up to any reasonable evaluation as increasingly the broken bodies and lives keep rolling in.

"A house divided against itself cannot stand" Lincoln 1858 - A house whose resident cultural ethical constructs of Other (non-Islamic persons & women) are inextricably in conflict cannot stand 2014.


Blair though suggests 'education' is the key, what I view as an attempted Change in Architect and Builder but this 'education' is an external cultural codex competing with the core Islamic foundation codex in the same space and time within the Western Democracies, my view is such an approach will simply slow the journey to full breakdown of Western Democracies notions of liberty particularly regards Other and women.

Why?

Because the Islamic genocidal and misogynistic cultural codex has precedence in the learning process in the first critical years 0-5. It is too late research appears to be indicating attempts to change informed prejudice after this is pointless and anyway the Islamic codex remains intact within the Public Square to continue to inform the exact same Muslim cultural behavioral variance, both factors mean Tony Blair's solution will not stop the Final solution from whichever direction it comes from just at best slow its progress. It may even tend to speed up major schism as the Islamic cultural forces clearly recognise the external threat to its world view.

What is the alternative? As Tony Blair says it is not going to be easy.

How do you go about it. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child...