Facebook page: YesEquality!
A view: Why homosexuality is determined as ‘evil’ in religious texts. Contradictions are not allowed in cultural codex that’s why.
A key indicator that a cultural genocide codex construct exists as a method of resolving diametrically opposed values in the same political space is the degree to which its cultural codex constructs seek to control the most intimate of human relationships sex. This is a function of the cultures (Mans) determination to maximise their genetic reflection into next generations but one suspects really this if it is an underlying subconscious imperative, the conscious drive is much more of a self-serving force in delivering to man the pleasure of sex with the least effort to do so
As cultural codex cannot broach contradictions, as such contradictions bring the whole codex into question for if the logic is not valid in one part why should it for any of the other codex construct, the cultural categorisation engine therefore needs to identify, characterise precisely who are to benefit and lose. As it is Mans control over women’s sexuality which is the dominant precept the existence of a women-women partnership/marriage and man-man partnership/marriage determines an equality within the latter two and not in the first.
It therefore has nothing to do with homosexuality being intrinsically evil it is because to determine valid within a codex construct the two relationships of equality Benefit Women-Benefit-Woman and Benefit Man-Benefit Man means the inequality of the first, Benefit-Man, Lose-Women becomes manifest, a contradiction and therefore cannot exist within the codex.
This is what drives a real phobia against homosexuals for those who determine women, subject to Mans ‘Leadership’ which really means Mans control over women’s sexuality cannot have their own relationship construct contradicted in their presence. For it means Man will lose power and Women will gain power.
I would argue the degree any cultural codex attempts to subjugate women to Mans determination will indicate the degree one could expect this culture presents a threat to you as an out-group as such iniquitous constructs necessarily require an iniquitous means of enforcing the construct internally and acceptance externally relative to the iniquity of the construct.
So for me the measure of any culture or society is the relative degree they subjugate women to Mans will and with them inevitably homosexuals for my view dictates the construct of women and homosexuals are integrally linked. So if we can remove from the Public Square such codex determining women as less we will not only achieve equality in time for women, but at the same time have homosexuals determined rightly as the norm and gosh did you just notice terror has somewhat diminished?
I could be wrong.
Vote yes for equality by all means but my view is unless the acceptance of iniquity of women is completely swept aside, not only in law but in reality. the need of Man to have homosexuals deemed as an out-group will remain relative to the iniquity suffered by women.
YES EQUALITY FOR ALL. The fight alas never finishes as the cultural codex informing these iniquitous constructs are 'Free' to flourish in our Public Squares do not ever think what has been gained over centuries cannot be swept aside in a matter of months.