Tuesday, July 7, 2015

Revolution Psychology

"Academic psychology once had considerable political diversity, but has lost nearly all of it in the last 50 years; 2) This lack of political diversity can undermine the validity of social psychological science via mechanisms such as the embedding of liberal values into research questions and methods, steering researchers away from important but politically unpalatable research topics, and producing conclusions that mischaracterize liberals and conservatives alike."
Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science, José L. Duarte, Arizona State University, Jarret T. Crawford, The College of New Jersey, Charlotta Stern, Stockholm University, Jonathan Haidt, New York University—Stern School of Business, Lee Jussim, Rutgers University, Philip E. Tetlock, University of Pennsylvania-2014
Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science

Revolution Psychology

Utilizing the science of Psychology to inform better societies rather than support the harmful status quo which allows terror to be developed in our streets, subjugation of women to Mans 'leadership' and control of women's sexuality, non-optimal political decision based in the main upon Man made ideological frameworks and processes secular and religious created to serve the needs of political elites rather than the needs of the citizens they claim to serve, particularly women.

Does not accept cultures, secular or religious, must be respected simply because they exist.

Understands cultures form behavioral variances which inform differing levels of benefit and harm psychological and otherwise for adherent, Other and particularly women and seeks to remove the harm and increase the benefit.

Seeking to change or delete existing cultural codex which seeks to inhibit the maximised relative independence - autonomy of the individual.

Seeking to inform improved decision making processes individual, group, nation.

Understands review, change and deletion of cultural codex to maximise the relative independence of the individual is a never ending iterative process dependent upon the context existing at any point of time and seeks to provide the framework by which such processes of change may be able to be achieved without violence.

Understands it is only by seeking to maximise the relative independence of each other in sympathy with nature within which we exist can we hope to maximise the potential benefit and minimise the potential harm caused by our individual and group behavior.

Determines Moral Relativism a Crime Against Humanity, particularly as it invariably condemns Other and women to a less than optimal opportunity to live a flourishing life in fact to be subject to a miserable existence.

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

A message for Socialists turned to the wrong side of the Liberty, Equality barricades. And an image of the new Socialist fascist flag 'Diametric'.

The 'Diametric' Socialism's new flag being flown on the wrong side of the Liberty, Equality barricades 
Socialists you are dangerous in time and space not only regards your own circumstance but the very beliefs, ethics values you claim to defend particularly for women.

For your next branch meeting after you have finished patting each other on the back for supporting revolutionary-genocide and a misogynistic construct.

Reflection upon:

“The far-right group responsible for organising anti-Muslim rallies across Australia in April has splintered under the pressure of anti-racist opposition.”
Anti-racists claim important victory over far-right Posted by sp By Mel Gregson, Socialist Party

“Religious distress is at the same time the expression of real distress and the protest against real distress. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, just as it is the spirit of a spiritless situation. It is the opium of the people. The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions.”
Karl Marx


This is a core determinant of Socialists action, or was, the drive to rid the human "condition which need illusions." to maintain belief, ethics, value-'rational' models. Marx was right in determining the 'demand' for action exists for illusionary states which determine outcomes, for invariably such illusionary states are created to cover 'evil', for the truth of the 'condition' would reveal 'oppression' not only applying to the individual adherent but invariably Other the non-adherent out-group.

But critically Marx failed to understand or failed to articulate the idea, 'creatures' individual and human groups whatever their 'rational' model suffer to relative degree, be they secular or religious 'illusion', hypocrisy as to the veracity and benefit to the individual and group of the 'rational' model to which they adhere - for no one is immune from 'illusion'-hypocrisy. It is a matter of relativity which our 'rational' models impose and enforce determines the degree of 'illusion', hypocrisy we suffer, the degree of relative independence within the 'rational' model  individuals (particularly women - and integrally linked to women's informed condition homosexuals) and groups are allowed, and as a direct consequence what the nature of Other - out-group are defined as and linked to the method and severity of the consequence of being so determined.


Marx by making such a statement immediately creates an 'oppressive' illusion, alas the possibility and as we see the actuality adherents of secular 'rational' models will determine themselves not subject to such a state. The degree of certainty we are 'right', an absence of 'illusion' for individual and group which secular adherents so delight in accusing adherents of religion of lacking, I fear has the potential to determine the degree of oppression informed.

Religion is not uniquely the "sigh of the oppressed" for all 'rational' models tend towards informing an oppressed class internal and external to itself. For 'rational' models are political ideological constructs never formed by the 'oppressed' but the the soon to be 'oppressors'. Those who shout 'Freedom!' in the streets or the back rooms invariably have an accompanying chant 'Death to ...". The question has to be asked of those shouting 'Freedom!' and of yourself "Freedom to do what to whom for whose benefit?". Are you really changing the world for the better what cost are you asking Other to pay for your bloody 'Freedom.'?

Invariably in a Religious construct Man seeking to control women's sexuality and maximises the cultures elites with access to resources, opportunity, distributed to maximise the survival of the elite internally within the culture and justification and authorisation of the same to be taken from Other. Secular constructs invariably Man seeking to move to redistribute resources, opportunity from one group to another, concentrated again under a political elites control so as to maintain control of the 'new' culture and enforce its notion of 'Freedom'. on Other for cultures cannot broach contradiction of their definitions.Someone and/or some group is going to pay for this 'Freedom.' and invariably as the certainty increases with their lives.

Religion is a political ideological construct nothing more or less, it tends to be based on relatively more illusion and hypocrisy, and certainty as the inequality of and subjugation of women cannot be justified by 'scientifically derived empirical facts/truth'. Illusion necessarily requires enforcement measures of oppression relative to the iniquitous condition so informed which apply to religious and nonreligious constructs.


The secular political constructs alas suffer to relative degrees of illusion, hypocrisy and certainty which outstrip some religions as history proves beyond doubt, and therefore can and do inform atrocity on a scale which create at times unimaginable misery and tragedy even though one is staring right at it. 

Marx's inferred view religion alone informs such a state really means he has failed to understand a critical fact about human nature individual and group which in my opinion from this one paragraph has led to genocide, destruction of cultural groups identified, internal or external to a culture on such a scale it beggars belief. Marx's paragraph, is an example for me of a cultural codex construct where words and sentences are strung together in inordinate hast without understanding where it might lead, to the gulags in Siberia, to the purposeful starvation on a massive scale of fellow citizens, Chinese teachers butchered by their own pupils in China, to ....

'Freedom!' - "Freedom to do what to whom for whose benefit?".

Each culture invariably claims to have 'Freed' someone or some group from the clutches of death and/or more mundane human conditions, despite clear evidence same being followed before by other cultures, in an attempt to take the moral high ground as some inform terror and oppression of Other. Yet these constructs even if an improvement upon a 7th century model are draconian relative to the present so the argument no longer hold moral substance of real worth. So you stopped kicking the dog but still held it hard on a leash never to run.


Instead of Marx writing "It (religion) is the opium of the people." Marx should have written 'Political ideologies (cultures religious and secular) are the "opium of the people." there are just degrees of addiction, the probability of breaking the habit once taken up almost nil and resultant informed threat against Other totally dependent upon the drug of choice construct of Other. The measure of potential 'oppression' any political ideology may inform in time and space are directly relative to the degree the cultural version of 'Freedom' sought results in the chains of one, individual, group being made tighter internal and external relative to others. One must always, always understand they have never been the holder of 'truth', nor certainty.


"Don't you think the Junkers have any faults at all, grandmother? I believe it's generally conceded that most individuals and most groups have the weakness correlative to their strength, and the vices correlative to their virtues." - (Hans Christian)

The response invariably is "...No-I have never discovered weakness among the Junkers, Hansel. They are a race of mighty warriors." - (Grandmother)
The Great Tradition, Francis Parkinson Keyes, 1939

There will always be illusion-hypocrisy-chains, this is not an excuse for exploitation, nor for the continuing existence of political elites, it is an acceptance this is necessarily a human condition imposed by the limitation of human nature, and the limited resources nature imposes. 

“The socialists and Democrats group (S&D) at the European Parliament (ep) has strongly condemned Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s recent threats directed at journalists and the life sentence demanded for Cumhuriyet´s editor-in-chief, Can Dündar.”
EP socialists strongly condemn Erdoğan’s threats against journalists, pressure on media

I am rather disturbed by Socialists forgetting which side of the barricade they should be on.

Fighting for a genocide misogynistic construct does not appear to me to be a ‘good’, nor do I believe fighting against those who determine such an ideology of hate and oppression of women diametrically opposed to liberty and equality as a victory of any sort.

Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why it is One Is and One Is-Not. Yet both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."

This is a Theory not a Hypothesis: “To make one exception means to make them all.” - Clothing such as the Muslim headscarf, hijab, burqa... is a political cultural statement and informs adherence and respect for the ideological constructs attached to it which hold tragic consequences for women.


Yes fighting against the inevitable genocide construct which will arise to negate it is a good – but you may not have noticed most of those you are fighting against do not have a Nazi tattoo on the back of their neck. 

Let’s put it so it is clear it is akin to having Stalin turning up at a Socialist rally bounding to the front causing violence and then all socialists are determined supporters of solving political disputes with a bullet in the head of Other going down the back stairs.

You are supporting a culture which utilizes revolutionary-genocide to force its political ideology into the Public Square and in your frenzy you interpret all opposite as the same because you have to otherwise your raison d'être - poof! gone!

Psychological research determines this a wasted effort but frankly I am sickened by the fact you have no sense of history and are happy to have cultural terror (not from those you are fighting) managed into Australian space so more Other can be shot in the back of the head if their lucky – Twats.

Norman first I will give you an insight into your stupidity and then who you actually are not who you think you are.

"For weeks two patriots (Nazi) had been lying in wait for me, considering the quickest way of sending me into a better world....they attacked me on a walk in the lonely Habichtswald Germany). One concealed behind a tree with an army revolver in his hand to help his mate with a bullet, in case the prussic acid that the latter was to squirt in my face should fail to take effect.... squirting prussic acid ... I lay unconscious on the ground...

The first telegram congratulating me on my escape was from Rathenau, who a few weeks later fell victim to a better planned attack.....

There was even a feeble law passed to Protect the Republic, that Imperial judges later on increasingly employed against the Left, .... In many ways the the Republic's policy was finicking and not understandable. I recollect the concessions already made with regard the Republican flag.

Many years later the two fellows were caught, ... At the trial I stated that I did not want a severe sentence as the two miscreants were only victims of the Nationalist (Nazi) Press outcry against me. As a matter of fact, both of them quoted in defence of their attempt the calumnies that appeared in the papers (Nazi) of the Right. ..

I repeatedly received official warnings of attacks .. intended attempts by private individuals , as, e.g. by a philosophical writer and a Professor of Medicine. In one case a women was deputed to quench my vital spark; in all other cases it was alleged that students and broken-down officers were concerned."

Memoirs of a Social Democrat by Philip Scheidemann 1929

Is there not a resemblance in the tools a culture whose codex contains a genocide construct of Other utilises revolutionary-genocide to impose its inherent cultural codex constructs within the streets, the 'few', are not the nature of the 'few' familiar, are the 'many' Nationalist (Nazi) standing behind the tree, does this excuse them in the culpability of the crime these 'few' commit and what Other is in the end to face? Given history you think it is unusual students form part of the sharp end of revolutionary-genocide in any interface with Other, just the gullible, the easily led - if this is really true what about students fighting for actual liberty and equality they were or are being misled by 'good' preachers?

For your next meeting, you can take these apart and prove the argument false only to pleased to be provided with the counter argument. I could be wrong. Please do not insult my intelligence by utilizing the 'many' argument.

"• Parents do not have the confidence to argue against the articulate and forceful activists who seek to impose their views, for fear of being branded as disloyal to their faith or their community."
Schools face new curbs on extremism after Birmingham Trojan horse affair Patrick Wintour, Political editor The Guardian, Wednesday 23 July 2014 06.42 AEST

"..the intelligence officer of Army Group South, Major Rudolf Langhauser, heard of plans to shoot 180 Polish civilians in a camp just turned over to the SS. He promptly returned the camp to military control. ... "The troops (German) are especially vexed over the fact that young men, instead of fighting at the front, test their courage on defenseless people."

'The German army's commander in chief, Walter von Braunchitsch confronted Himmler's deputy Reinhard Hydrich to be told "in no uncertain terms the role of the SS in Poland: "Fundamental cleansing [Flurbereinigung] (of Polish) Jews, intelligentsia, clergy, nobles." Wagner counted with the demand that this "cleansing" take place only "after the withdrawal of the army". '

Source: "The Origins of the Final Solution", Christopher R. Browning 2004

The individuals Major Rudolf Langhauser, German army's commander in chief, Walter von Braunchitsch and the German troops had already given their oath of allegiance to what Man, to what cultural codex construct of Other that Man had laid down clearly in the Nazi textual codex Mein Kampf, what justification and authorisation based on this codex construct of Other did they have for stopping the genocide?

"The analysts emphasized that most Sunnis do not support the Islamic State’s harsh interpretation of Islam, or its brutality, but that some were becoming more susceptible to its political talk about protecting oppressed Sunnis."
Using Violence and Persuasion, ISIS Makes Political Gains NYT By ANNE BARNARD and TIM ARANGO JUNE 3, 2015

Even if true "most Sunnis do not support the Islamic State’s harsh interpretation of Islam" the fact is the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex contains the construct of Other which enables such an interpretation and importantly it is historically consistent within the resultant Muslim behavioral variance. Therefore the Muslim terrorists hold the Islamic 'rational' model higher ground whose foundations are the Islamic/Muslim codex itself. This is the tragedy of the Is-Not Islamic paradigm which gives no such excuse to the other genocide construct of the Nazi where determining Is-Not Nazism would be rightly viewed as totally obscene.

Who I ask were the 'many' who were the 'few'? Does one, two or even the 'many' proclaiming being 'especially vexed', even when they hold overwhelming military power in their hands, make any difference to the derived outcomes of a culture whose codex informs 'evil' against Other, of which they the 'many' and the 'few' are self-proclaimed adherents?

"Communities (cultures) tend to be guided less than individuals by conscience and a sense of responsibility. How much misery does this fact cause mankind! It is the source of wars and every kind of oppression, which fill the earth with pain, sighs and bitterness." (Albert Einstein, 1934)

"Against Soviets as Soviets one has nothing to say. Against the result of their rule in Russia and interference elsewhere one cannot protest to strongly. They are the world's terror to-day." Mrs. Alec-Tweedie, An Adventurous Journey. Russia-Siberia-China.1926

As Albert Einstein and Mrs. Alec-Tweedie have by tragic circumstance observed individuals are not cultures, to claim an individual from a culture is 'good' from an Others perspective of beliefs, ethics, values and therefore determine that individual nor their culture should be held to account for the 'worlds terror' ignores a truth this individual is an integral part of support network for a cultural codex continuing existence.

How 'few' are the 'few' in reality.

"500-1,000 British Muslims don’t join ISIL in a vacuum. There’s an ideological current among Muslims globally generating sympathy for the same aims as ISIL: Enforcing a view of Sharia as law. I call this ideology Islamism." - Maajid Nawaz Chair of Quilliam, a counter-extremist think tank; former member of Hizb ut-Tahrir

“Culture is not only what people think, it is also what they do. Ideally, cultural explanations would also strive to be mutually non-contradictory with relevant approaches from the social and natural sciences. This means taking into account both the nature of the individual mind as well as the dynamics of social interaction. Thus, ‘cultures’ should be understood as historically accumulated collections of beliefs and practices which are socially produced and aimed at meeting psychological needs. .....
Culture, although it cannot ‘do’ anything on its own, provides a framework through which people are motivated to act. Subsequently, incidents of violence are individually and socially understood through narrative, that is, through the stories which are developed by participants, observers and the institutions which deal with them (such as the courts and media). These narratives, in turn, can express motivations or justifications for further violence or, alternatively, for its avoidance or suppression.”

Wood, J. Carter (2007). Conceptualizing cultures of violence and cultural change. In: Carroll, Stuart ed. Cultures of Violence: Interpersonal Violence in Historical Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.

"Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our "categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
....
"every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"?

SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglass Hofstadter, Emmanuel Sander, 2013

"Culture uses artifacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members. It is the filter through which we see and understand our current reality (Edgar, 1980). These are the structures of identity that help people organise and make sense of everyday life (Wark, 1997). They also establish boundaries between groups (Oyserman & Lee, 2007)"
Psychology Burton, Western, Kowalski, 2012

"Culture, of course, is related to violence in general and not only to structural violence. For example, culture influences the determination of "thresholds" which pressure on a person must overcome in order to move that person from being controllable, or even positive, to being negative (that is, into violence)."
The Culture of Violence, Chp 3. On the relationship between violence and culture - Galtung's concept

“the Germans (inclusive of the Nazi) that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Britain as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else”. Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

You assure yourselves 'moderates' are in charge for did they not tell us they were such, things could be worse?

“In fact, if the extremist’s elements had prevailed. I have not the least doubt that disruption would have been more drastic and that we should have real reason by now to fear German aggression from both a military as well as political point of view.” Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

Norman actually noticed the missing as you are the burning cages, the shot in the back of the head, the 147 in Kenya, the Jews so long ago in Egypt when this all started, yet still “that great unified people (culture) are looking for peace and see friendship”. Does it matter even at a point of time as it was after Kristallnacht the ‘many’ opposed what happened in the streets what codex construct of Other had they signed up to? Which meant what is inevitable.

You are on the wrong side of the barricades as those Socialists in Turkey know only too well and those socialists running in the streets of Iran some time ago shouting ‘Freedom’ no longer even have the chance to reflect on those shouting the same beside them ‘Freedom to do what to whom for whose benefit?’ Certainly not for Liberty and Equality.

No doubt whatsoever you are on the right side of history the right side of the barricades? Two genocidal constructs with your support tearing each other apart informing as it has everywhere else burning buildings broken bodies and lives this is your answer to resolving this.

The Left in Indonesia they were simply clumsy?


"In his essay, The 'Ideograph:' A Link Between Rhetoric and Ideology, Michael Calvin McGee proposes that our system of beliefs is shaped through and expressed by words. We are consciously and unconsciously conditioned and controlled by the words we hear and use. Words carry ideology and convey and create meaning. Like Chinese characters, words are "ideographs" that "signify and 'contain' a unique ideological commitment," that is frequently unquestioned.' McGee also suggests that by understanding that a single word can carry ideology and that ideology can be expressed in a single word, we are better able to expose and evaluate ideology and choose to accept or reject such ideology. However, if we fail to recognize the ideographic nature of words, we risk creating and promoting a reality that is removed from our system of beliefs." - HOW WORDS CREATE REALITY ANN SINSHEIMER

Enough, is Enough! A CHARLIE HEBDO T-Shirt Design for every occasion.

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

YES EQUALITY FOR ALL - But understand why you have had to vote at all and the reason you have still remains in the Public Square


Facebook page: YesEquality!

"Conflict theory suggests that men, as the dominant gender, subordinate women in order to maintain power and privilege in society. Conflict theory asserts that social problems occur when dominant groups mistreat subordinate ones, and thus advocates for a balance of power between genders."
Source: Boundless. “The Conflict Perspective.” Boundless Sociology. Boundless, 28 May. 2015. Retrieved 30 May. 2015


A view: Why homosexuality is determined as ‘evil’ in religious codex and able despite the prevalence of a view held even possibly within culture as to the unjustifiable nature of such a cultural view informs iniquity and harm against homosexuals. 

Firstly the reason homosexuality is determined as ‘evil’ in religious texts is contradictions are not allowed in cultural codex (a). Secondly despite even a supposed majority claiming a 'good' view, culture set the boundaries and nature of our behavioral variance, despite a view to the contrary as individuals we can achieve self-actualization independent of cultural constructs.

"Tradition is an amazing chain of solid links well soldered. In theory it expands, but in practice seldom breaks. The liberating impulse is foiled before the rapier thrust. ....

One of the most highly educated and advanced men I met in many months' wanderings in India was bringing up his daughters hemmed in by all the old Hindu traditions. He didn't approve of them and honestly said so. In fact he talked wisely about expansion and wider vision. BUT he dared not break away from tradition. Thaldom of cast, fear of religion, kept him hide bound, and he married his daughters just as the Chinaman does his-as a chattel to be brought and sold. Oh, the thaldom of circumstance. The chain of tradition."

"An Adventurous Journey Russia-Siberia-China", Mrs Alec-Tweedie, 1926

“The prosecution say that her parents embarked upon a campaign of domestic violence and abuse designed to force her to conform so that she would behave in the way they expected.”

A Pakistani born couple living in England has gone on trial, accused of murdering their teenage daughter because she had become 'too westernised'. By Nigel Bunyan The Telegraph 22 May 2012

"A court in the north Italian city of Brescia has begun hearing the case against a Pakistani immigrant accused of having killed his own daughter. It is alleged he did so because she had become too Western in her dress and manners. It could be the first case of "honour killing" in modern Italy."
Pakistanis in Italy murder trial By Mark Duff 
BBC News, Milan 28 June 07 16:48 GMT

"MORTALLY wounded and bleeding profusely, Pela Atroshi covered her head with her hands, pleading "please don't shoot me, please don't shoot me"...

The bullet went through one of her fingers and into her brain.

The decision to kill her was made by a council of male relatives, led by Pela's grandfather, Abdulmajid Atroshi - a Kurd who lived in Australia.

"There is huge pressure on girls to take their own lives. They don't have the right to their own bodies, because their bodies are owned by the clan."

Australian links in honour killing of Pela Atroshi Nine News APRIL 26, 2008

Cultural codex the underwriter of 'Tradition'/culture, religious ideology in Pela Atroshi's case gives the clan Males the ownership of Pela Atroshi's body and the justification and authority to murder Pela Atroshi. This religious codex able to be analogised as such into reality allowed to flourish within the Western Public Squares of Liberty and Equality will not inform conflict?

"..the intelligence officer of Army Group South, Major Rudolf Langhauser, heard of plans to shoot 180 Polish civilians in a camp just turned over to the SS. He promptly returned the camp to military control. ... "The troops (German) are especially vexed over the fact that young men, instead of fighting at the front, test their courage on defenseless people."

'The German army's commander in chief, Walter von Braunchitsch confronted Himmler's deputy Reinhard Hydrich to be told "in no uncertain terms the role of the SS in Poland: "Fundamental cleansing [Flurbereinigung] (of Polish) Jews, intelligentsia, clergy, nobles." Wagner counted with the demand that this "cleansing" take place only "after the withdrawal of the army". '

Source: "The Origins of the Final Solution", Christopher R. Browning 2004

The individuals Major Rudolf Langhauser, German army's commander in chief, Walter von Braunchitsch and the German troops had already given their oath of allegiance to what Man, to what cultural codex construct of Other that Man had laid down clearly in the Nazi textual codex Mein Kampf, what justification and authorisation based on this codex construct of Other did they have for stopping the genocide?

"The analysts emphasized that most Sunnis do not support the Islamic State’s harsh interpretation of Islam, or its brutality, but that some were becoming more susceptible to its political talk about protecting oppressed Sunnis."
Using Violence and Persuasion, ISIS Makes Political Gains NYT By ANNE BARNARD and
TIM ARANGO JUNE 3, 2015

Even if true "most Sunnis do not support the Islamic State’s harsh interpretation of Islam" the fact is the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex contains the construct of Other which enables such an interpretation and importantly it is historically consistent within the resultant Muslim behavioral variance. Therefore the Muslim terrorists hold the Islamic 'rational' model higher ground whose foundations are the Islamic/Muslim codex itself. This is the tragedy of the Is-Not Islamic paradigm which gives no such excuse to the other genocide construct of the Nazi where determining Is-Not Nazism would be rightly viewed as totally obscene.

Who I ask were the 'many' who were the 'few'? Does one, two or even the 'many' proclaiming being 'especially vexed', even when they hold overwhelming military power in their hands, make any difference to the derived outcomes of a culture whose codex informs 'evil' against Other, of which they the 'many' and the 'few' are self-proclaimed adherents?

"Communities (cultures) tend to be guided less than individuals by conscience and a sense of responsibility. How much misery does this fact cause mankind! It is the source of wars and every kind of oppression, which fill the earth with pain, sighs and bitterness." (Albert Einstein, 1934)

"Against Soviets as Soviets one has nothing to say. Against the result of their rule in Russia and interference elsewhere one cannot protest to strongly. They are the world's terror to-day." Mrs. Alec-Tweedie
, An Adventurous Journey. Russia-Siberia-China.1926

As Albert Einstein and Mrs. Alec-Tweedie have by tragic circumstance observed individuals are not cultures, to claim an individual from a culture is 'good' from an Others perspective of beliefs, ethics, values and therefore determine that individual nor their culture should be held to account for the 'worlds terror' ignores a truth this individual is an integral part of support network for a cultural codex continuing existence.


How 'few' are the 'few' in reality.

"500-1,000 British Muslims don’t join ISIL in a vacuum. There’s an ideological current among Muslims globally generating sympathy for the same aims as ISIL: Enforcing a view of Sharia as law. I call this ideology Islamism." - Maajid Nawaz Chair of Quilliam, a counter-extremist think tank; former member of Hizb ut-Tahrir

This means a culture holding such a cultural codex derived view against homosexuality will enforce it in the Public Square no matter how enlightened or numerous individual adherents may be within the culture or be perceived to be by external Other. Because those adherents are subject to the relative independence of thought, behavior set by the cultural codex imperative and associated categorization which determine homosexuals a contradiction, an 'evil', diametrically opposed to the religious imperative of Mans subjugation of women to Mans 'Leadership' and complete control of women's sexuality.

“Culture is not only what people think, it is also what they do. Ideally, cultural explanations would also strive to be mutually non-contradictory with relevant approaches from the social and natural sciences. This means taking into account both the nature of the individual mind as well as the dynamics of social interaction. Thus, ‘cultures’ should be understood as historically accumulated collections of beliefs and practices which are socially produced and aimed at meeting psychological needs. .....

Culture, although it cannot ‘do’ anything on its own, provides a framework through which people are motivated to act. Subsequently, incidents of violence are individually and socially understood through narrative, that is, through the stories which are developed by participants, observers and the institutions which deal with them (such as the courts and media). These narratives, in turn, can express motivations or justifications for further violence or, alternatively, for its avoidance or suppression.”
Wood, J. Carter (2007). Conceptualizing cultures of violence and cultural change. In: Carroll, Stuart ed. Cultures of Violence: Interpersonal Violence in Historical Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan. 

"Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our "categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
....
"every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"?

SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglass Hofstadter, Emmanuel Sander, 2013

"Culture uses artifacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members. It is the filter through which we see and understand our current reality (Edgar, 1980). These are the structures of identity that help people organise and make sense of everyday life (Wark, 1997). They also establish boundaries between groups (Oyserman & Lee, 2007)"
Psychology Burton, Western, Kowalski, 2012

"Culture, of course, is related to violence in general and not only to structural violence. For example, culture influences the determination of "thresholds" which pressure on a person must overcome in order to move that person from being controllable, or even positive, to being negative (that is, into violence)."
The Culture of Violence, Chp 3. On the relationship between violence and culture - Galtung's concept

A key indicator of the existence of an inherent cultural genocide codex construct justifying and authorizing revolutionary-genocide, as cultural political and resource thresholds are reached, to send into your streets the inevitable cultural altruistic enforcers to carry out the revolutionary-genocide necessarily required to violently enforce internal alignment and external acceptance of the cultures beliefs, ethics and values diametrically opposed to Other cultures is the degree to which the cultural codex constructs seek to control the most intimate of human relationships sex.

This is a function of the cultures (Mans) determination to maximise their genetic reflection into next generations but one suspects really this if it is an underlying subconscious imperative, the conscious drive is much more of a self-serving force in delivering to man the pleasure of sex with the least effort to do so.

As cultural codex cannot broach contradictions, as such contradictions bring the whole codex into question for if the logic is not valid in one part why should it for any of the other codex constructs.


The cultural categorisation engine therefore needs to identify, characterise precisely who are to benefit and lose. As it is religious Mans control over women’s sexuality, Man dominant-women subject partnership/marriage, the existence of a homosexual relations women equal-women equal partnership/marriage and man equal-man equal partnership/marriage determines an equality within the latter two and not in the first. A significant contradiction in the same space. For how long can the imposition of dominant-subject relationship be maintained diametrically opposed to the 'rational' of equal-equal relationship?

It therefore has nothing to do with homosexuality being intrinsically evil it is because to determine valid within a codex construct the two relationships of equality Benefit Women-Benefit-Woman and Benefit Man-Benefit Man means the religious inequality of the first, Benefit-Man, Lose-Women becomes manifest, a contradiction and therefore cannot exist within the codex.

This is what drives a real phobia against homosexuals for those who determine women, subject to Mans ‘Leadership’ which really means Mans control over women’s sexuality cannot have their own relationship construct contradicted in their presence. For it means Man will lose power and Women will gain power.

I would argue the degree any cultural codex attempts to subjugate women to Mans determination will indicate the degree one could expect this culture presents a threat to you as an out-group as such iniquitous constructs necessarily require an iniquitous means of enforcing the construct internally and acceptance externally relative to the iniquity of the construct.

So for me the measure of any culture or society is the relative degree they subjugate women to Mans will and with them inevitably homosexuals for my view dictates the construct of women and homosexuals are integrally linked. So if we can remove from the Public Square such codex determining women as less we will not only achieve equality in time for women, but at the same time have homosexuals determined rightly as the norm and gosh did you just notice terror has somewhat diminished?

I could be wrong.

Vote yes for equality by all means but my view is unless the acceptance of iniquity of women is completely swept aside, not only in law but in reality. the need of Man to have homosexuals deemed as an out-group will remain relative to the iniquity suffered by women.

YES EQUALITY FOR ALL. The fight alas never finishes as the cultural codex informing these iniquitous constructs are 'Free' to flourish in our Public Squares do not ever think what has been gained over centuries cannot be swept aside in a matter of months.


(a) Although this is idea of cultural opposition to contradiction may be challenged to a degree by Peng, Kaiping, U California, Dept of Psychology, Berkeley, CA, US research "Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction." - "Chinese ways of dealing with seeming contradictions result in a dialectical or compromise approach—retaining basic elements of opposing perspectives by seeking a "middle way." 

One would on reflection have to in my view seriously question the validity of these findings as an inherent Chinese cultural trait given the violent history of China and its current politic. It may be there is another explanation summed up in Mrs Alec-Tweedie's "An Adventurous Journey Russia-Siberia-China", 1926. "...They never dare say No. They positively funk it. They promise the moon rather than say No in a manly, upright fashion, and then will invent any fabrication to put off the final negative."

In other words however crudely put in 1926 the inherent Chinese quality may not be one of coming to a final determination as to their actual view but avoiding to make one for fear possibly of offending, an admirable quality, but as Mrs Alec-Tweedie determined 'evasive and elusive' would be more suitable terms than a "dialectical or compromise approach." for this determines an actual position held which clearly 'evasive and elusive' and "any fabrication to put off the final negative." (to reveal their true position.) which informs a significantly different reality on the ground does not support. Of course one would expect culturally such an interpretation of oneself would be quite nice but is it really true of an adherent of any culture when push comes to shove? 

Sunday, May 10, 2015

Women's Rights News: "I do not understand why they hate women over there (Afghanistan). - Plato did. It is the same reason they hate them 'here', everywhere the misogynistic cultural construct of women is allowed to flourish.

"(We) need feminism because I am stuck in a men dominated war zone in Afghanistan! I can't go outside I can't go to college.if I choose education for myself and try going outside they will call me a bitch and whore! They will hit me beat me and kill me! If I choose a man for myself to get married to they will kill us both because it will bring shame to my family choosing a life partner by myself! They will call me a bad girl if I pluck my eyebrows before marriage! I can't leave house without my parents permission and after marriage I can't leave my house without my husband's permission not even for my parent's house, if I do it without their permission they will kill me! I wish I never belonged to Afghanistan! Yes i understand I need to be strong and I am trying my best but sometimes I feel so helpless and weak!"
Women's Rights News  Post 10/5/2015

A response to the post: "
I do not understand why they hate women over there."

I do it is the same reason they hate them 'here', everywhere the misogynistic cultural construct of women is allowed to flourish even supported by so called Democratic States which espouse their core beliefs are Liberty and Equality.

Why is the same question asked regards cultural derived terrorism and the answer is the same as Plato pointed out so long ago regards the terrible abuse women had to suffer in his time.

"It is still not entirely clear what led the two men.." - It Has Been Completely Clear Since 348 BCE, Does Plato Really Have To Rise From The Dead To Shame Twenty-First Century Psychologists Particularly Social Psychologists Into Being Honest.

The attached following reveals the danger of accepting one analogised behaviour perceived to be benign or a 'free' choice for women and not understanding that same behaviour is based upon a cultural construct of women which enables much much worse to occur and each behaviour is non-contradictory of the other and supportive of it.

“To make one exception means to make them all.” - Clothing such as the Muslim headscarf, hijab, burqa... is a political cultural statement and informs adherence and respect for the ideological constructs attached to it which hold tragic consequences for women.

Wednesday, May 6, 2015

This is a Theory not a Hypothesis: "It is still not entirely clear what led the two men.." - It Has Been Completely Clear Since 348 BCE, Does Plato Really Have To Rise From The Dead To Shame Twenty-First Century Psychologists Particularly Social Psychologists Into Being Honest.

Plato Risen From the Dead 2015
"It is still not entirely clear what led the two men..."
Gunman in Texas Shooting Was F.B.I. Suspect in Jihad Inquiry NYT By MANNY FERNANDEZ, RICHARD PÉREZ-PEÑA and FERNANDA SANTOSMAY 4, 2015

“It is the cultural codex stupid, written in error by poets misrepresenting themselves as Gods scribes, change it or change nothing.” said Plato annoyed he had to rise from the dead after more than two thousand years simply to tell psychologists and particularly social psychologists what they already know yet still they watch from the footpath.

The fact I have to watch this statement be regurgitated each time an atrocity occurs be it in space US, Australia, Kenya. Nigeria, Syria, Pakistan, The Philippines. Malaysia, Thailand, ..... or be it across time up through middle Europe across Africa, in China .... is quite sickening when Plato told us thousands of years ago, a Chinese Emperor knew quite clearly and we have no qualms about determining it applies to a certain well known secular cultural codex.

If a cultural codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) template) has an iniquitous construct be it regards Other or in particular women it will be played out within the Public Square if the ideology which contain these iniquitous constructs are allowed to flourish within our Public Square.

As Plato said along with the Chinese Emperor unless these cultural codex iniquitous constructs are removed from the Public Square they will be reflected within the behavioral variance of the culture concerned.

The 'few' are created and sustained by the 'many' otherwise the 'few' would not exist and it would be my view the greater the relative degree of inequity the ideological codex informs regards Other and women the greater the need to have a violent enforcement mechanism to impose its acceptance internal and external. For who accepts such constructs willingly?

Is this clear enough.


Now from where and how does an individual arrive at such a point in time and space?

According to ASIO the psychological journey is three weeks as a teenager locked in your room with the internet, it appears for Muslims the development of personality and cultural codex imposed behavior traits simply do not occur 0-preadolescence. If this was really true all cultures who are fortunate to have the internet would have the same in the streets but they clearly do not.

Also it appears the internet was not around in the seventh century errr not until very recently so why the lie? Three weeks to create this, I am more than sickened by the dangerous denial inherent in the ASIO view as there must be clearly psychologists and social psychologists knowingly underwriting such a contradiction of research in this area.

Words and sentences are not strung together in a cultures codex for no purpose, they are reflections of cultural imperatives deemed as normative behavior and necessary to achieve specific outcomes otherwise these words and sentences would not exist in the codex.

Remove these codex constructs or change nothing as alternative narratives no matter how many you derive have to compete with the 'true' narrative which still remains hardwired into the codex. This means external and internal forces of a culture will lose any cultural construct dispute to those holding the cultural codex in their hands. Also contradictions which do exist are so obviously qualified it simply makes a nonsense to utilise them as proof a cultures codex informs peace particularly as on the ground it is a grotesque mockery of reality.

Culture defines out-groups and how the boundaries with out-groups will be managed not individual adherents. Cultures are therefore responsible for the terror they consistently, constantly deliver against Other the 'few' are the inevitable consequence of the cultural codex constructs of out-groups. Depending upon brain plasticity to resolve this after the prejudice and methodology is psychologically set is completely dishonest as you are proposing intensive therapy for more than a billion people along a behavioral variance which as with all cultures broaches no contradictions to its internal rational constructs.

Dealing with a 'few' extremes ignores the reality these extremes are defined as such only by Others cultural codex not by the 'fews' own cultural codex as they are carrying out the 'true' believer altruistic cultural enforcer role. Also releasing the 'few' back into the culture from whence they were created and given the justification and authorisation for their Other determined extreme view, under the auspices of an unprovable subjective view of 'cured' for me is akin to sending back a crack addict straight back into the environment which caused them to be a crack addict in the first place.

Claiming just one or two successes and thereby proclaiming this brain plasticity process works even though the terror matrices (err lists) are informing intensifying terror and major cultural schism, as is occurring right now, frankly is determining a policy failure not success. I repeat having to utilise intensive therapy means you have lost the game, the point is not having to get to a place such an ineffectual policy is even considered as appropriate. 


It is simply a political conscience assuaging device to say 'We are doing something.' - well frankly you are doing something and it is enabling terror and major inter-cultural schism to occur whilst certain psychologists play with their pet theoretical projects albeit helpful in certain 'contexts' at an individual level certainly is not within a context of cultural war.

And it is a cultural war for a culture does not have an inherent revolutionary-genocide construct being reflected into the Public Square so Other can flourish in peace and realise their full potential under their own rational model.

Culture is responsible for adherents informing revolutionary-genocide via specific cultural constructs of Other these have to be identified and removed so the inevitable 'few' no longer appear.

Sunday, May 3, 2015

Australian Labor Parties Idea of Democracy - Better known as a Plibersek Choice


"Which raises the other huge dilemma in all of this is - in a representative democracy, whose interests does your elected representative actually represent?

Is it religious organisations that you may not belong to, parties that you may not belong to or a union you don't belong to?

Or is it yours?"

Same-sex debacle shows the deal ain't real Larry Graham WAtoday May 4, 2015


"Related to this is the sense that the nation is no longer working together: too many people and institutions seem to be working for themselves."
Democracy under threat as trust in system broken THE AUSTRALIAN MAY 04, 2015


Lest we particularly Labor forget what the ANZACs believed they were fighting for:

Tanya Plibersek is reflecting the extreme polarizations of those who believe they not only know the 'Truth' they therefore have a 'God/Secular given right to force Other to follow their 'rational' model or else.

I believe it is time, in this time, where everyone in turn can be and is determined a troll, not human, 'uneducated' a bigot to reflect upon the difference between 'the tyranny of the one view' Tanya Plibersek, albeit one may perceive an idea as a 'good', and a real ' Democracy as determined by Lincoln.

Yes you may not like, even be bigoted against the ideas of Other presented as well as the nature of the delivery but this is not a bad thing the fact it occurs, it can occur, if you take time to reflect may be an advantage to yourself as well as your society.

Of course everything is relative, there are genocide, misogynistic, and various real or imagined phobic constructs operating within the Public Square, given the nature of which will understandably require the State to enforce a singular view to protect citizens from each other and protect citizens from themselves that is a State’s role, but the nature of coming to these decisions of moral singularity in a Democracy, at least if it is to be one, requires each citizen to be given equal opportunity to speak their mind however unpalatable that may be at arriving at a Democratic decision.

Otherwise what are we really operating under, yes a Plibersek.

The State should be the sole owner of coercive power within a Democracy the participants in Democracy must not have that power for the Society ceases to be Democratic for each citizen if such as Tanya Plibersek can justifiably under a warped Democratic 'rational' model which determine Pliberseks as the holder of Truth can silence Other, determine Others view non-existent, superfluous to determining the very nature of Others own existence which is the 'sacred gift' the idea of Democracy enables.

‘It was one of Lincoln’s ways of working out his chief value to the country, and that value was his clear sense from the start it was our democratic scheme that was at stake, and that if it was to be saved, every citizen who could aid must help to give all that was in them.

Lincoln seems to have put it something like this to himself:

“Everybody in the country has had a part in bringing this thing about; everybody feels they have a right to say how things shall be handled; everybody that is worth their salt is going to exercise that right, and they are going to do it according to the kind of person they are – according to their temperament, their training, their self-control, their meanness, and their goodness. If we are going to put this thing through and prove that citizens can govern themselves, we must get from them what they can give, and we must let them give it in their own way.
” Source: The Life of Lincoln, Tachell

Well this is what a Democracy is from Lincolns view but Tanya Plibersek has shown by even being in a position to consider her actions as appropriate reveals what Australian citizens politic 'rational' model actually is.

True Democracy: The Right to misjudge and be misjudged, the Right to insult and be insulted, the Right to abuse and be abused....

Thursday, April 23, 2015

Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why it is One Is and One Is-Not. Yet both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."

Explain Why one Is and the other Is-Not.


"In his essay, The 'Ideograph:' A Link Between Rhetoric and Ideology, Michael Calvin McGee proposes that our system of beliefs is shaped through and expressed by words. We are consciously and unconsciously conditioned and controlled by the words we hear and use. Words carry ideology and convey and create meaning. Like Chinese characters, words are "ideographs" that "signify and 'contain' a unique ideological commitment," that is frequently unquestioned.' McGee also suggests that by understanding that a single word can carry ideology and that ideology can be expressed in a single word, we are better able to expose and evaluate ideology and choose to accept or reject such ideology. However, if we fail to recognize the ideographic nature of words, we risk creating and promoting a reality that is removed from our system of beliefs." - HOW WORDS CREATE REALITY, ANN SINSHEIMER

"Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our "categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
....
"every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"

SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglass Hofstadter, Emmanuel Sander, 2013

Who then provides the "basis on which to take any action." the individual adherent or the cultural whole? Who sets the nature the methodology of how out-group boundaries will be managed, the nature of the 'many' and the 'few', and why, how, for what reason the 'few' step forward whilst the 'many' wash their hands, the individual adherent or the cultural whole.

Who therefore is ultimately responsible for enabling the existence of the 'few' the cultural whole who create and sustain the 'few', provide the 'few' with the "categorization engine" which informs terror, the cultural whole the 'many' plus the 'few' who utilise the exact same "categorization engine" or just the 'few'?


"Cognitive-social approaches are limited, however in two respects. They tend to emphasise the rational side of life and under-emphasise the emotional, motivational, and irrational. If personality is really reducible to cognitive process (Cantor, 1990) one would have difficulty accounting for the psychological abnormalities of a man like Adolf Hitler. Because Hitler was tremendously adept at getting people to follow him and had extraordinary sense of self-efficacy, one would have to rate him high on several dimensions of social intelligence. Yet his social motives, his ways of dealing with his emotions are clearly disturbed.

A related problem is the tendency to assume that people consciously know what they think, feel and want and hence can report it. Would most of us accept Hitler's self-report of his life task of bettering the world by creating a master race? Or would we suspect that his dream of world domination and his program of genocide reflected, thoughts, feelings and motivations that he could not easily have described?"

Psychology 3rd Australia and New Zealand Edition Burton, Westen, Kowalski, 2012


Muhammad (model exemplar) articulates the exact same genocide construct of Other as Hitler (model exemplar) with the inevitable atrocities and yet we see, hear no statements emanating from the Psychology intelligentsia asking the question 'Would most of us accept Muhammad's self-report of his life task of bettering the world by creating a master religious culture?"' utilising the same cultural justified and authorised methodology of terror, categories, rules, and scripts as the Nazi. "Or would we suspect that his dream of world domination and his program of genocide reflected, thoughts, feelings and motivations that he could not easily have described?"

What do both codex constructs of Other continue to create as they inevitably must in the revolutionary-genocide behavioral variance of the 'mostly' good:


'He wouldn't hurt a mouse', says mother of Tunisia gunman The Telegraph By Nicola Harley 12:58AM BST 05 Jul 2015

"Rezgui's family insist he was brainwashed into carrying out the attack, but have not named any group or individual.

"They got to my son. They used him and they framed him for the crime," his mother said."
Tunisia Massacre: Killer's Parents Defend Son Sky News 10 July 2015


Time particularly for social psychologists to be honest about how an individual human is enabled by culture and its constituent families, communities and institutions to be 'brainwashed', to point out the truth of the 'Parents' culpability in their child's crime which enabled the child to cross the culturally defined ethical bridge to terror and that all cultures behavioral variances do not pose the same threat to Other and therefore must be treated differently relative to the threat they pose to societies within which they exist.

Psychologists you have a better than 'good' idea why 'He wouldn't hurt a mouse' is true in one context and not another due to a cultures beliefs, categorisations, scripts get off your couches and start to protect humanity rather than enabling its destruction you twats.

Cultural Genocide Codex Constructs of Other




Hitler MEIN KAMPF=Nazi
Mohammed QURAN=Muslims
Other unable to be convinced of the error and evil of their ways
"But a Jew can never be rescued from his fixed notions."


''How futile it was to try to win over such people with argument, seeing that their very mouths distorted the truth, disowning the very words they had just used and adopting them again a few moments afterwards to serve their own ends in the argument!”
002.006 As to those who reject Faith, it is the same to them whether thou warn them or do not warn them; they will not believe.

002.007 God hath set a seal on their hearts and on their hearing, and on their eyes is a veil; great is the penalty they (incur).

002:018  They are utterly deaf, dumb, and blind; they can no longer recover.

003.118 O ye who believe! Take not into your intimacy those outside your ranks: They will not fail to corrupt you. They only desire your ruin: Rank hatred has already appeared from their mouths: What their hearts conceal is far worse.

003.119 ... When they meet you, they say, "We believe": But when they are alone, they bite off the very tips of their fingers at you in their rage. Say: "Perish in your rage;..
Exemplar Nazi (Hitler) & Muslim (Mohammed) Cultural Authorisation for exclusion and murder of Other.
“In my opinion the most culpable .. those who did not think it worth while .. placing his seducer and corrupter against the wall.” etc
006.049 But those who reject our signs,- them shall punishment touch, for that they ceased not from transgressing.

008,012 Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them.

003.028 Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from God…

003.004 Then those who reject Faith in the Signs of God will suffer the severest penalty, and God is Exalted in Might, Lord of Retribution.

003.178 Let not the Unbelievers think that our respite to them is good for themselves: We grant them respite that they may grow in their iniquity: But they will have a shameful punishment.

003.147 All that they said was: "Our Lord! Forgive us our sins and anything We may have done that transgressed our duty: Establish our feet firmly, and help us against those that resist Faith."

Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."

Etc,
Nazi (Hitler) & Muslim (Mohammed) Justification for subjugation and murder of Other: The Nazi & Muslim categorisation of the nature of Other.
moral pestilence, poison, despoilers, germ- carriers in poisoning human souls, shameful, fabricators, falsehood, cunning and despicable, derogatory, evil, cold-blooded, thick-skinned and shameless, alien race, evil spirits, absurdity of their teaching, obstinacy, tricks of logic, falsehoods, evil counsellors, perfidy, etc.
“rejecters of Faith!”= unbelieving women (idolaters), Unbelievers do (but) beckon you to the Fire, Deaf, dumb, and blind, they are the fools, in utter darkness, deceive themselves, their hearts is a disease, hangout with their evil ones, wander like blind ones, bartered Guidance for error, lost true direction, in utter darkness, make mischief therein and shed blood, transgressors, Be ye apes, despised and rejected., ignorant (fool)!, illiterates, do nothing but conjecture, seek gain in evil, God's curse is on them for their blasphemy, sold their souls, in insolent envy, wrong-doers, most greedy of life, idolaters, perverse, blasphemers, buyers of (magic), they conceal, evil-doers, in schism, wrong, wickedness,.. etc
Genocide Outcomes Analogised from the Nazi (Hitler) & Muslim (Mohammed) Cultural Codex Construct of Other.
Please note the following are only a very small list of examples derived from each of the analogised genocide outcomes from Nazi and Muslim culture codex.

“Jewish homes were ransacked, as were shops, towns and villages, as SA stormtroopers and civilians destroyed buildings with sledgehammers, leaving the streets covered in pieces of smashed windows—the origin of the name "Night of Broken Glass." Ninety-one Jews were killed, and 30,000 Jewish men—a quarter of all Jewish men in Germany—were taken to concentration camps, where they were tortured for months, with over 1,000 of them dying. Around 1,668 synagogues were ransacked, and 267 set on fire. In Vienna alone 95 synagogues or houses of prayer were destroyed.” etc

The Holocaust (also called Ha-Shoah in Hebrew) refers to the period from January 30, 1933 - when Adolf Hitler became chancellor of Germany - to May 8, 1945, when the war in Europe officially ended. During this time, Jews in Europe were subjected to progressively harsher persecution that ultimately led to the murder of 6,000,000 Jews (1.5 million of these being children) and the destruction of 5,000 Jewish communities. These deaths represented two-thirds of European Jewry and one-third of all world Jewry.
The Jews who died were not casualties of the fighting that ravaged Europe during World War II. Rather, they were the victims of Germany's deliberate and systematic attempt to annihilate the entire Jewish population of Europe, a plan Hitlercalled the “Final Solution” (Endlosung).

Massacre of Kalavryta

The Massacre of Kalavryta (
Greek: Σφαγή των Καλαβρύτων), or the Holocaust of Kalavryta (Ολοκαύτωμα των Καλαβρύτων), refers to the extermination of the male population and the total destruction of the town of Kalavryta, in Greece, by German occupying forces during World War II, on 13 December 1943. Aside from the deportation and murder of over 80% of Greece's Jewish population, it is the most serious case of war crimes committed during the Axis occupation of Greece during World War II.

Ethiopian Christians beheaded and shot 2015

Kenya: 147 Killed in University Attack, Officials Say 2015

2014, two people were killed in a siege of a cafe in central Sydney

Pakistan bloody slaughter of more than 140 people — mostly children — in a school massacre. 2014

The 2002 Indonesian Island of Bali bombings killing 202 people etc

USCIRF Annual Report 2011 - The Commission's Watch List: Indonesia

“Indonesia's well-known tradition of religious tolerance and pluralism is being challenged by religious radicalism and extremist groups who have found converts in the country, leading to sectarian and societal violence, terrorism, and religious freedom violations. Indonesians rejected extremism at the polls, but it often goes unchallenged by many political, civic, and religious leaders. During the reporting period, nearly 40 places of worship belonging to religious minorities were closed, either forcibly by extremist groups or through the denial of building permits by government officials. Extremist groups also instigated violence against religious minorities, including an attack that led to the death of three Ahmadiyah adherents. New provincial bans on Ahmadiyah practice have been put in place in East and West Java and South Sumatra. Despite some strong public statements and arrests, the reactive approach taken by the Indonesian government has not been an effective deterrent to the violence perpetuated by non-state actors against religious minorities. Indonesian government officials also continue to employ the "blasphemy law" (Article 156(a)) to harass and detain individuals considered religiously "deviant" and continue to allow the enforcement of local laws restricting the rights of women and some non-Muslims, particularly in Aceh.” etc

Nazi (Hitler) & Muslim (Mohammed) Cultural Denial of Culpability for the individual adherent and culture as a whole.
Please note: All text within a cultural codex containing a genocide construct of Other which may in anyway infer Other is not targeted for destruction will be found to be qualified immediately after and/or swim in an ocean of textual and exemplar behaviour which clearly negates its authenticity. This is because the definition of ‘innocent’ and ‘neighbours’ do not include non-believers. Any dispute therefore within the culture as to the authenticity of a pro Other view will be quickly and definitively overwhelmed in an argument between what Other view as liberal-moderate adherents of a cultural codex containing a genocide construct of Other and the so called radical.
"The Jews are guilty! The Jews are guilty!" .. "We have nothing to contribute to it, it will come by itself, because it has to come." said Paul Joseph Goebbels Reich Minister of Propaganda in Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945

The next sentence:

actions will be carried out "without pity without mercy" and the rest.

Auschwitz and the rest

Quran, Surah 8 Al-Anfal The Spoils of War 17 It is not ye who slew them; it is Allah: when thou threwest (a handful of dust), it was not thy act, but Allah's: in order that He might test the Believers by a gracious trial from Himself: for Allah is He Who heareth and knoweth (all things). etc

002.256 Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error: whoever rejects evil and believes in God hath grasped the most trustworthy hand- hold, that never breaks. And God heareth and knowethall things.

The next sentence:

"Of those who reject faith the patrons are the evil ones .." and the rest.

Note Non-religious not included.

Armenian Genocide and the rest
Nazi (Hitler) & Muslim (Mohammed) Apologists of Foundation texts of terror, genocide and subjugation
"Experience has taught me that all argument is useless with fanatical young Nazi of this kind, and so I say nothing." Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

Despite the clear evidence in his own writings of the evidence of Other missing from the German streets Norman Hillson continues “the Germans (inclusive of the Nazi) that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Britain as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else”. Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

We assure ourselves 'moderates' are in charge for did they not tell us they were such, things could be worse?

“In fact, if the extremist’s elements had prevailed. I have not the least doubt that disruption would have been more drastic and that we should have real reason by now to fear German aggression from both a military as well as political point of view.” Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937
“It will be challenging to redirect those who identify with the IS ideology from violent extremism. Any program to redirect or divert young people must have realistic objectives, the most critical being to disengage IS supporters from violence rather than de-radicalise them.” Clarke Jones 2014

“The suggestion that faithful Muslims cannot thrive in a democracy is insulting, dangerous, and wrong,”
she (Clinton) said,

“Greens immigration spokeswoman Sarah Hanson-Young said both major parties had become "hysterical".

"These are a few dozen desperate people seeking our protection - they are hardly a national security risk," she said.”
Australian Greens immigration spokeswoman Sarah Hanson-Young – ‘a few dozen’?

Really? What of the threat apart from those clearly increasingly involved in delivering terror first second third generation what of the tyranny they bring via their cultural constructs of women? The following arising as a direct construct of women we are to determine as acceptable to have such a culture cross our borders and remain to flourish?

"A separate study by the Population Reference Bureau estimates that 507,000 women and girls in the United States are at risk or have already undergone FGM, where her genitalia are partially or totally removed to control sexuality and ensure virginity until marriage, more than twice the number estimated 15 years.

"When you consider that we have many, many immigrant communities in the United States who did not leave their culture behind, the scale is huge," said Amy Logan, co-president of the US National Committee for UN Women in San Francisco who was a consultant for the documentary."

Two girls murdered in taxi were 'honour killings'
Yahoo7 News June 19, 2015
Comment:
"Hitler's anti-semitism created an ideological imperative that required an escalating search for an ultimate or final solution."
The Origins of The Final Solution "The Evolution of the Nazi Jewish Policy, September 1939-March 1942 Christopher R. Browning / Jurgen Matthaus 2004

Quran (8: 38:39) Say to the Unbelievers, if (now) they desist (from Unbelief), their past would be forgiven them; but if they persist, the punishment of those before them is already (a matter of warning for them).
And fight with them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah altogether and everywhere,..." 

Muslim terror="the punishment of those before them is already (a matter of warning for them)."

Quran (31: 23:24) But if any reject the faith, let not his rejection grieve thee: to Us is their return, and We shall tell them the truth of their deeds: for Allah knows well that is in (men's) hearts.
We will grant them their pleasure for a little while in the end shall We drive them to a chastisement unrelenting. 

What has Muhammad created by his construct of Other as an ideological imperative for Muslims?


What happens are the apologists for cultures whose codex contain genocide constructs of Other correct in their view? Are there not just one but thousands of facts, evidence to determine at each turn they are not only wrong but such a view enables terror to escalate and proliferate not only internal within any Nation State but exported elsewhere as well?

The real cause of terror are not “fathers in work low-paid, unrewarding and unskilled jobs, often absent from home for long periods.” There are numerous examples of professional parent’s doctors and lawyers, teachers, parents of Muslim terrorists and even these doctors, lawyers and teachers becoming terrorists. It is not “mental illness” for the numbers dictate such terrorist behaviour would therefore be reflective in every other culture.

Neither is it simply “Other young people have been subject to stringent parenting, where 'foreign' culture and strict religious observance has been enforced. This kind of upbringing has conflicted with Australia's more secular outlook, often leaving them marginalised and in a bemused, helpless or frustrated state.” For other cultures have the same parenting style and seek to enforce cultural beliefs, ethics and values upon their children, and feel they are marginalized, whether factual or otherwise, yet these children do not involve themselves in genocide against Other.

Also it is important to reflect upon whether or not the aggressive nature of such parenting may be in essence inherent in cultures with iniquitous constructs of not only Other but women and therefore require such parenting behavior to instill the conditioning required for the individual adherents to accept, maintain and enforce such relatively draconian constructs which enables a mental schema more easily able to switch to terror against Other.

Nor is the cause of terror “For some, simply identifying as IS supporters has given them a feeling of elevation in their social standing among friends and community. It has, in their minds, made them strong and invincible.” For all cultures contain hierarchical and categorised legitimatised positions of power within peer groups and across peer groups within the same culture but these do not lead to genocide against Other.

Nor is the cause of terror “Many have been left to their own devices without guidance or direction from a positive role model.” For in cultural terms ‘Many have been left in their own families, educational and religious institutions with guidance or direction from an Islamic/Muslim cultural codex perspective a positive role model.’. The latter is the cause of terror.

There is a single pathway to radicalisation – is the Nazi (Hitler) and Muslim (Mohammed) cultural codex construct of Other everything else are excuses and correlations which have no connection to the actual root cause of terror. The cultural genocide constructs of Other are removed from the Public Square or the terror and genocide against Other will intensify with Other reacting in kind. Until as Lincoln informed us either tyranny takes the Public Square or Liberty and Equality.

There is a common thread in current public policy of a denial of cultural culpability for the terror emanating from a cultures adherents ‘Few’. The Australian and other Western Governments therefore must accept that the State have failed in their primary duty to protect their citizens by not only allowing a culture adhering to a codex of genocide within but also the financial and other resources required to advance its political power and with it potential to deliver terror against Other citizens and therefore the State have lost all political legitimacy and must be overthrown by democratic means as quickly as possible to restore peace and harmony to the Public Square rather than the ‘managed’ terror the State is currently enabling into citizens streets.

Explain to me again how is it one ideology informs the exact same cultural codex construct of Other with the same inevitable terror against Other but the 'Many' who create and sustain the 'Few' which deliver terror from one ideology are determined innocent and at the very same time the ,'Many' who create and sustain the 'Few' which deliver terror from the other ideology are determined as guilty?

Explain to me again how is it if you claim to be fearful of one ideology informing terror in your streets you are determined as having a mental illness a phobia (an irrational fear) as well as be determined a bigot, but at the same time you are praised as being rational when you claim to be fearful of what the other ideology with exactly the same construct of Other may and does inform in your streets if it is allowed to flourish?

Explain to me why one ideology is determined to be based upon an genocide construct of Other and the other ideology is not, even though the cultural codex constructs of Other are exactly the same? 


"German President Joachim Gauck for the first time Thursday called the World War I massacre of 1.5 million Armenians a genocide....

"Women, men, children, and the elderly were indiscriminately sent on death marches, banished without any protection or food to the steppe and the desert, burned alive, chased, beaten, and shot to death," he said. "This planned and calculated criminal act targeted Armenians for a sole reason: because they were Armenians."

The German parliament is due to vote on a genocide motion Friday, which Ankara has downplayed as a potential point of diplomatic confrontation with Berlin. Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu recently said the German government has already indicated it will not use the word."

German President: Armenian Deaths 'Genocide' by Dorian Jones, VOA, April 23, 2015

This is a Theory not a Hypotheses: The Supreme Council of Kenya Muslims (SUPKEM), Islamic Council of Victoria and Vehid Causevic Need to Accept Culpability For Muslim Terror and Stop Shifting Blame For Their Own Evil To Other

Explain to me again why it is two cultures which commit genocide justified and authorized as we see above by their respective cultural codex constructs of Other but only one of the cultures is able to have the 'word' genocide utilized to categorize their behavior?

Explain to me again why it is two cultures with exactly the same inherent construct of Other and one is encouraged and supported with Others resources within the Public Square so its cultures 'Many' families, educational, religious institutions can and do create and sustain the 'Few' to deliver terror against fellow citizens Other within and without the same space and the other culture is purposefully restricted because it is understood its cultural codex construct of Other, which is exactly the same as the other culture, if allowed unfettered access to the Public Square will in time and space inform terror and genocide as the other culture has and is?

Explain to me again why it is two cultures with exactly the same inherent construct of Other which clearly inform terror against Other yet it is accepted one is a culture of Peace and the other is a culture of Evil. And also why it is accepted that the 'Many' of one are liberal-moderates and the 'Many' of the other are evil radical fascists?

Yet the terror the unfathomable grief even at nation against nation level driven by one of these genocide constructs informs the missing the violence against Other and still the Norman Hillsons of 1937 exist once again in the form of Clarke Jones 2014 to sickeningly claim "that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Other as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else”.

The terror continues and intensifies as both Norman Hillsons of 1937 and Clarke Jones 2014 explicitly acknowledge the missing and the reflected unyielding nature of the underlying codex construct of Other in both cultures "argument is useless with fanatical young" and 'challenging to redirect those who identify with the IS ideology from violent extremism' and still both persist in enabling and even supporting the very culture which delivers such tragic outcomes for humanity and as they do determine themselves and their supporters as holding a moral high ground built upon burning buildings broken bodies and lives.


"Complicating the problem was the terror group’s messages - which are often underpinned by common Muslim ideas such as Sharia as an Islamic law, but with a more extremist element.

“Part of the challenge in countering the ISIS narrative is to counter ideas that Muslims generally subscribe to and accept,” Prof Rane said."
Returning Islamic State foreign fighters face jail, Abbott says THE AUSTRALIAN MAY 19,
2015


And I add with as much restraint as I can find the fool that is Prof Rane goes on to suggest "returned fighters would speak with credibility to those susceptible to ISIS propaganda" after detailing why it is not possible and the fact is these 'reformed' will be seen as Others stooges and traitors to their culture of commonly held ideas. The Quran determines these people if it is at all possible from the first pages as even worse than Other - how do you expect their views will be treated as well as themselves.

Worse still the suggestion to reward insidious behavior against humanity of those who purposefully participated in genocide I find such as Prof Rane suggesting such as these can be utilised for 'good' extremely offensive. What of the victims, burned alive in cages, beheaded on beaches, sex slaves,.... all for a 'narrative' which cannot stand against just the normative sacred beliefs held by Muslims as detailed above which drives this Muslim terror. I am sickened by this world were the victims are forgotten in this postmodernist version of multiculturalism where we are forcefully told and have to accept on pain of being called a bigot diametrically opposed values in the same space will inform peace and security - well where is it? We had peace and security we have not got it now because......


This is what can and is analogised from the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex construct of Other and women Prof Rane and happened also where these so so helpful 'reformed' terrorists have been - Boko Haram Militants Raped Hundreds of Female Captives in Nigeria NYT By ADAM NOSSITER MAY 18, 2015

"Carmen Ortiz, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, said after the decision that Tsarnaev's crime was not motivated by religion; it was motivated by politics. She said the gravity of the crime, the murder of a child, a police officer and two young women merited the death penalty.

"This was an act of terror," she said. ...

Tsarnaev (Muslim terrorist-Boston April 15, 2013
) wrote in the boat: "I don't like killing innocent people, but in this case it is allowed" and "I can't stand to see such evil go unpunished."

Boston Marathon bomber sentenced to death G. Jeffrey MacDonald, Special to USA TODAY 5:48 p.m. EDT May 15, 2015

Definitions:
Ideology: is a set of opinions or beliefs of a group or an individual, refers to a set of political beliefs or a set of ideas that characterize a particular culture.

Religion: is an organized collection of beliefs, cultural systems, and world views that relate humanity to an order of existence.

Politics: is the practice and theory of influencing other people.

Influence: the capacity to have an effect on the character, development, or behaviour of someone or something, or the effect itself.

Terrorism: is violence that is consciously carried out by the perpetrator(s) primarily in order to influence the attitudes and behavior of a wider target audience (or multiple target audiences)


Culture: The totality of socially transmitted behavior patterns, arts, beliefs, institutions, and all other products of human work and thought. Culture is learned and shared within social groups and is transmitted by nongenetic means.


Culture informs:
Culture is not only what people think, it is also what they do. Ideally, cultural explanations would also strive to be mutually non-contradictory ...

Culture, although it cannot ‘do’ anything on its own, provides a framework through which people are motivated to act. Subsequently, incidents of violence are individually and socially understood through narrative, that is, through the stories which are developed by participants, observers and the institutions which deal with them (such as the courts and media). These narratives, in turn, can express motivations or justifications for further violence or, alternatively, for its avoidance or suppression.”
Wood, J. Carter (2007). Conceptualizing cultures of violence and cultural change. In: Carroll, Stuart ed. Cultures of Violence: Interpersonal Violence in Historical Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.

"Culture uses artifacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members. It is the filter through which we see and understand our current reality (Edgar, 1980). .... They also establish boundaries between groups (Oyserman & Lee, 2007)"
Psychology Burton, Western, Kowalski, 2012

"Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our "categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
....
"every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"
SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglass Hofstadter, Emmanuel Sander, 2013

Politics is the practice (action) of influencing people, terror is the political method utilised to influence attitude and behavior. The political action-behavior of a person is determined by "culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforcing ... labels", categorisation, "that belong intrinsically to things and entities"
 without which the person "would have no basis on which to take any action." Culture not only "provides a framework through which people are motivated to act." culture "establishes boundaries between groups" and how they will be managed and cultural narratives to justify violence.

Religion is an ideology if it contains set of opinions or beliefs refers to a set of political beliefs or a set of ideas that characterize a particular culture
, Islam is in essence a political ideology as it has two dimensions: 1. Goals: how society should work, 2. Methods: the most appropriate ways to achieve the ideal arrangement. The Islamic religion contains set of ,beliefs, ethics, values and a set of ideas characterizing the Muslim culture.

Carmen Ortiz, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, claim that "Tsarnaev's crime was not motivated by religion; it was motivated by politics" cannot be true because politics cannot motivate a person to action, politics is method which informs the action terror not motivation. Motivation the "basis on which to take any action." is defined by culture in this case the Islamic/Muslim culture.

Culture -religion- provides Tsarnaev's justification "but in this case it is allowed" (The fact is the Islamic/Muslim codex enables it is always "allowed" against Other even Muslims determined as such  - culture "establish boundaries between groups" and the justification for violence at those boundaries) and for his action (cultural determined punishment method -
"deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them" ) terror a political method of achieving influence and Tsarnaev's motivation "I can't stand to see such evil go unpunished.". Culture defines 'evil' which is the motivation to apply the culturally appropriate punishment. In the act of killing the 'innocent' they are no longer innocent they never were nor can be as the Muslim text above clearly determines. The clear characterization of evil Other, numerous codex text exhortations as to the efficacy of 'fighting', the attacks on those who do not do so  and the assurance Tsarnaev is not doing the killing by his hand it is Allah's own hand I perceive is culturally constructed to ameliorate the cognitive dissonance and make easier psychologically the killing of Other by Muslims.

Evil intrinsically encapsulates perpetrator, action and victim, punishment the perpetrator, action, victim and punishment have to be culturally categorized for the notion of evil the motivating force justification and authority for culturally defined punishment to be applied. Individuals do not invent these complex interlinked category constructs themselves which are supported by a network of cultural interconnected non-contradictory beliefs, ethics and values which enabled the Muslim culturalised 
Tsarnaev to kill Other.

It is hard not to despair when the Quran in particular enables so easily the killing of Other apart from Muhammad's exemplar behavior supercharging such atrocities. You look at people still admiring Muhammad, Stalin, and Hitler and you have to seriously consider if there is something seriously askew with the capacity of humans to take on such exemplars as a good. For me it just reinforces how powerful culture is in determining our behavioral variances, and beliefs even against 'truth' right in front of us.


Why the lie 'not religion', 'not culture' when it has to be?

This is not a conspiracy theory it is simply how the world as it stands works