Thursday, April 9, 2015

The Supreme Council of Kenya Muslims (SUPKEM) Needs to Accept Culpability For Muslim Terror and Stop Shifting Blame For Their Own Evil To Other


Is the loss of just a single child and the unfathomable grief it tragically brings to a mother, to a father, to a sister, to a brother, to a nation, worth 'managing' a cultures terror in our Public Square to enable terror to escalate?
What the 'Many' of a culture deliver via the 'Few' they create by their own 'Many' hands.

Kenya: State Needs to Change Counter-Terror Tactics
AllAfrica The Star, Nairobi, The writer Hassan Ole Naado is the deputy secretary general of the Supreme Council of Kenya Muslims.

The Supreme Council of Kenya Muslims (SUPKEM) Needs to Accept Culpability For Muslim Terror and Stop Shifting Blame For Their Own Evil To Other.

Being hateful of, being bigoted against, being fearful of a cultural codex which can and does inform such atrocities time after time against Other (inclusive of their own being determined the same) across generations, across the world is a wise and rational thing to do if one wants real peace and harmony in their streets, homes, communities, education and religious institutions.

Islam is not captured. The 'Few' consistently, constantly come from the 'many' as they must.

If the Islamic/Muslim codex was actually peaceful there would be no terror as the mental schema to be analogized into the murder of Kenyan university students would simply not exist. How can you hijack something to cause terror if terror did not inherently exist in the entity in the first place? It is psychologically impossible yet here you are claiming it is so. Despite the protestation of the 'many' of their innocence evil still emanates in such a manner that determines them culturally culpable for which families, communities, education and religious institutions does this evil emanate from?

Tell us where is this divide of this so called Is-Islam Not-Islam from exactly the same codex source utilised by all with in the Islamic/Muslim behavioral variance which determines them innocent you have to assume exists for your argument to be valid?

Tell us how in no way the beliefs, ethics, and values held by the 'innocent' Muslims frame the mental schema support for the terror against Other emanating from their very ranks?

"The time has come for us to be honest with ourselves and indeed each other. The radicalisation that breeds terrorism is not conducted in the bush at night. It occurs in the full glare of day in homes, in madrasas and in mosques with rogue imams. We must ask the question — where are the parents and families (communities, education and religious institutions) of those who are being radicalized?" said Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president "Our task of countering terrorism has been made all the more difficult by the fact that the planners and financiers of this brutality are deeply embedded in our communities."

"A Garissa-based official said the government was aware Abdullahi, a former University of Nairobi law student, had joined the militant group al Shabaab after graduating in 2013."
Kenya says son of a government official was among gunmen in Garissa attack
by EDITH HONAN GARISSA, Kenya — Reuters Published Sunday, Apr. 05 2015

"addressing the socio-economic .. that breed violent extremism" This is a complete lie because if it was true every culture which suffers the same if not worse would be informing the same behavioral variance as they do not it simply cannot be the cause. The fact is we have even in Kenya itself educated persons who had work actually pulling the trigger. Though you are correct in determining 'ideological factors breed violent extremism' yet you claim the Islamic/Muslim culture is not to blame even though it is their ideology which determines them to be an Islamic/Muslim culture which informs terror where other cultures do not in the same space.

So what Most Muslims do not involve themselves directly in terror this is not at all unusual culturally. Terror as a political weapon on such a scale has to be justified and authorized from a cultural codex a 'rational' model and have been utilised in such a manner by exemplars previously otherwise how does an individual know how to go from being non-violent to violent against Other. Individuals do no invent their own beliefs, ethics and values.

Your argument can be applied to a secular ideology and it was in the exactly the same way in the 1930s as you are doing now to excuse the so called liberal-moderates of an ideology with a genocide construct of Other where the terrorists consistently come from their ranks. Why should any culture have to put up with a another culture in their midst which has a cultural codex which can and does produce the 'few' to cause such tragedy?

Is the loss of just a single child and the unfathomable grief it tragically brings to a mother, to a father, to a sister, to a brother, to a nation, worth 'managing' a cultures terror in our Public Square to enable terror to escalate rather than confronting it and holding to account the cultures 'many' responsible for the 'few' continually being derived from their families, communities, educational and religious institutions?

If such families, communities, educational and religious institutions were really adherents of a cultural codex of peace there would be no terror, no codex construct of Other able to form mental schema of hate, bigotry to be analogized into reality to chase down our children in school yards, to chase down our children in university dormitories to be mercilessly murdered.

"The time has come for us to be honest with ourselves and indeed each other." - Change the Architect and Builder or Change Nothing.

Have I sinned? What is a Genocide Construct of Other and Why it is formed?


It is impossible under any 'rational' model, other than under the postmodernist 'rational' model which claims cultural derived evil no longer exists, for statement (1) to be true if statement (2) made by Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president in the following quote is true.

Kenyatta (Kenya's president) stressed his belief that (1) “Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance.” He said (2) “the radicalization that breeds terrorism” is conducted “in the full glare of day.”
Setbacks Press Somalia’s Shabab Fighters to Kill Inexpensively in Kenya (NY Times)
Published by Tadias Magazine April 6th, 2015


It is impossible under any 'rational' model, other than under the postmodernist 'rational' model which claims cultural derived evil no longer exists, for statement (1) made by Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president above to be true if the statement below in the following quote is true. 

"A Garissa-based official said the government was aware Abdullahi, a former University of Nairobi law student, had joined the militant group al Shabaab after graduating in 2013."
Kenya says son of a government official was among gunmen in Garissa attack 
by EDITH HONAN GARISSA, Kenya — Reuters Published Sunday, Apr. 05 2015

It is impossible under any 'rational' model, other than under the postmodernist 'rational' model which claims cultural derived evil no longer exists, for statement (1) made by Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president above to be true if the image at the beginning showing so many children murdered by Muslims above actually exists as truth rather than a pretence.


You cannot inform peace and terror at the same time as an individual or culture and be determined rationally as an individual or culture of peace. As you cannot be half slave and half free and consider yourself free no matter how much you attempt and succeed in convincing yourself otherwise. For Other can see the burning buildings, broken bodies and lives and the chains before us.

"The time has come for us to be honest with ourselves and indeed each other."

Own it you are responsible yes you.


This is not a conspiracy theory it is simply how the world as it stands works

Thursday, February 26, 2015

This is not a conspiracy theory it is simply how the world as it stands works


Sam Harris: Atheists have no ‘blood on their hands’ for Chapel Hill murders Richard Dawkins Foundation Feb 24, 2015

Arabs: Why is Obama Siding with Supporters of Terrorism? by Khaled Abu Toameh February 26, 2015 at 5:00 am

"In the first place, ideologies provide a perspective, or 'lens', through which the world is understood and explained. People do not see the world as it is, but only as they expect it to be: in other words, they see it through a veil of ingrained beliefs, opinions and assumptions. Whether consciously or subconsciously everyone subscribes to a set of political beliefs and values that guide their behaviour and influence their conduct. Political ideas and ideologies thus set goals that inspire political activism. .... a, unifying set of political ideas and values can develop naturally within society, or it can be enforced from above in an attempt to manufacture obedience and exercise control. The clearest examples of such 'official' ideas have been found in fascist, communist and religious fundamentalist regimes."

Source: Political Ideologies Andrew Heywood 2012

States based upon a multiculturalism paradigm having values diametrically opposed to liberty and equality being "enforced from above in an attempt to manufacture obedience and exercise control" can now be added to those ideological entities of oppression yet the perpetrators of such a value construct as multiculturalism as the World Health Organisation (WHO) and those following the WHO script of cultural derived terror and ideological political schism being a 'health' issue see themselves as anything other than 'evil' which is not surprising given neither did or do their colleagues "in fascist, communist and religious fundamentalist regimes." .

"Political ideas and ideologies thus set goals that inspire political activism." - the nature of the "political activism" is defined by the cultural codex and such cultural codex can and clearly does in some cultures justify and authorise terror, the culture is therefore responsible for the 'few' they will always in time and space produce and the methods utilised to realise their own cultural "goals" which is a political space which reflects their "political beliefs and values" not Others. 


ISIS, Boko Haram, Iran, Islamic political party Hizb ut-Tahrir ... are reflecting the actual Islamic codex desired cultural political space which are able to be analogised into reality, each have exactly the same core beliefs and values which they must for they are variants made possible only because such political constructs exist within the Islamic/Muslim codex and in fact have to exist there for these political variant constructs to exist.

"About a month after Sisi said "We must revolutionize our religion," Ibrahim Eissa, an Egyptian journalist and another hero of the Middle East backed him up, saying, "when the people of ISIS perpetrate slaughter, murder, rape, immolation, and all those barbaric crimes, they say that they are relying on the sharia. They say that this is based on a certain hadith, on a certain Quranic chapter, on a certain saying of Ibn Taymiyyah, or on some historical event. To tell the truth, everything that ISIS says is correct.""
Heroes in Egypt Confront Islamist Ideology by Michael Armanious March 7, 2015 at 5:00 am

To then label those opposed to such Islamic/Muslim beliefs and values 
to be analogised, even partially, being allowed into a space of Liberty and Equality as having a mental illness, unreasonable bigots against a culture of peace and harmony when it is clear "political activism" terror in fact 'fear' is the only way Other could in anyway be forced to accept such an Islamic/Muslim construct is from a Liberty and Equality rational model simply madness. Unless the definition of Liberty and Equality along with Feminism are altered which in fact they have been under multiculturalism to allow those who impose such a construct to determine they have not changed their belief system at all to include tyranny.

Why is Obama Siding with Supporters of Terrorism? Why are atheist and non-atheists being accused of 'provoking' not only Muslim terror but counter-terror rising to meet it? This is Why.

It is irrational under a cultural 'rational' model which you would expect to contain codex to protect your own culture but the Western Democracies are not operating under such a model the political elite have decided (note there is no master plan there is only ever belief, ethics values and these become analogised within the world.) to for political pragmatic reasons as they perceive them to operate under a belief system which they call Multiculturalism. In fact they are hiding behind the label of what appears on the surface to be a noble aim for all cultures to be able to be in the same space. The trouble is the 
Multiculturalism definition as defined by the elite enables diametrically opposed beliefs, ethics, values into the same space.

Lincoln was clear why this could not work as is history as well as mere human psychology yet the elite persist in enabling terror and major inter-cultural schism and blame everyone else for their failure as they must.


This is not a conspiracy theory it is simply how the world as it stands works – you are being sacrificed to political pragmatism so the political elite can wash their hands and be ‘seen’ to be doing something and can blame anyone for their failure to stem the major schism with the Islamic/Muslim culture. 

What does such hand washing enabling the elite to publicly deny culpability of terrorists being increasingly derived from their own political space and the terror they inform within and without that space require under a Western Construct – it requires ‘experts’ to provide the bowl and the appropriate amount of water.

Anyone who has worked in a Western Government Public Service or simply observed behavior thereof within whatever nation will understand the political imperative of the ‘expert’-‘expert body’ to provide the necessary justification, authority and blame shifting methodology inherent in any public policy decision.

I want you to understand why you are being regarded and determined as racists, bigots, suffering from a mental illness/ irrational fear Islamophobia and worse are being accused of actually ‘provoking’ not only Islam/Muslim terror but the counter-terror rising to match it.

Why you are not and never have been as described above for coming out and determining Islam is a genocide and misogynistic construct and for humanities sake the Islamic cultural codex must be removed from the Public Square.

Why it is important for the elite to have you not them defined as having a mental illness so they can reduce the severe cognitive dissonance they must necessarily suffer derived from continuing to follow a clearly failing policy paradigm.

And importantly what you have to do to at least to start to force the elite to change their current policy paradigm driven by their pathological altruism (yes it is the elite not you suffering from a mental illness).

Let us begin by reflecting:

It could have been the killer of the three Muslims crossed the line by justifying, in part a reaction against Muslims as a culture because of the terror and challenge to Western values the Muslim culture informs, it may not have been the main reason but given the potential complexity of human ‘reason’ for human behavior and the statements at the time by the murderer of the Muslims it clearly cannot be ruled out as a contributory factor altogether.

It is from my perspective an action which based upon the value schism between the West and Muslim culture and the failure of current Western policy paradigm to confront the real cause of terror the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) template) which from generation to generation creates the ‘Few’ from the ranks of the ‘Many’ will increasingly inform counter-terror against Muslims and the State. The State will be subject to counter-terror because the State is the reason the terror exists, the State has not only clearly failed in its duty to protect its citizenry it is actually enabling terror and major schism to intensify.

Twiddling with matrices of data, weighting with the numerous variables from across different correlations, investing in increased institutions physical security systems, diminishing relative independence in a vain attempt to avoid 'provoking', changing food types preparation, increasing secret service and terror tactical units in the military and police 2 ,3 10, 100 fold will not stop what is going to happen only possibly slow it possibly because in fact it will more than likely have the reverse effect as it fits directly into the Islamic victim paradigm - it does not therefore matter what you do unless the Islamic codex which is the cause not a correlation, a cause is removed from the Public Square.
As we ‘possibly’ saw in this murder of three Muslims as action against the Muslim culture, the actions of arson against Mosques, abuse of Muslims in the streets and importantly action as in Norway against the political constructs within the West supporting Muslims access to the Public Square, which are enabling terror and pressure on the Western politic to align to Islamic norms so as to avoid ‘provoking’ Islamic/Muslim cultural violence. 

‘Fear works’ as social psychological studies have found and a Danish newspaper stated as a reason for refusing to publish Charlie Hebdo after the Muslim terrorist attack in Paris, although they had previously done so.

The blaming of Other be they atheists, or anyone along the counter-Islamic/Muslim culture codex behavioral variance is if you have not noticed a part of the ‘Official program’ ‘they’ have even determined you have a mental illness – a phobia irrational fear – Islamophobia – along with being determined ‘Hate preachers’ and vile bigots. You are determined the actual cause of not only ‘provoking’ the Muslim terror itself but the counter-terror as well.

How could such an insane paradigm exist which determines the very persons opposed to genocide misogynistic constructs and what they inform as well as opposed to the counter-terror rising in an attempt to fill the void of State inaction against such constructs, are now to be regarded as the ‘cause’ of all of it?


Simple but insane yes even Kafka may have difficulty with this one.

An ‘expert body’ had to be found and a policy paradigm able to shift political blame for continuing failed outcomes. Such a political construct was required because confronting the actual cause of major schism between the West and the Islamic/Muslim culture diametrically opposed values personal, family, gender, construct of Other, differing desired political constructs was/is seen as simply not a politically wise thing to do, something to do with energy, Muslims states with possible nuclear capability or the means to quickly develop it, in situ large populations of Muslims within Western nations if justifiably held to account would, initially at least, cause a destructive uprising.

All worthy issues to considered the trouble is avoiding the ‘truth’ of diametrically opposed values existing in the same space as Lincoln rightly observed one or the other would in time take the space you would either have slaves in every State of the Union or there would be none.

So humanity in this case Western political elite needed to have firstly an ideological basis for justifying and authorizing diametrically opposed values in the same space and be able to define it as a ‘good’.


One of the excuses needed to be realised in a supporting 'truth'-'not religion'-'not Islam' this is what they hobbled together the doctrine upon which the whole response to Islamic religious cultural war sits, prove it false to enough policy keys in the Western security network, totally false as the doctrine is, the real work to stop terror and insurgency begins. Of course it had to be an excuse underwritten by 'experts' in the field of terrorism/insurgency so the powers that be could wash their hands of the inevitable bloody failure that was to follow.

"I use the term "takfiri terrorist" to describe those who use terrorism to further that ideology. The doctrine of takfiri disobeys the Qur'anic injunction against compulsion in religion (Surah al-Baqarah:256) and instead holds that Muslims whose beliefs differ from the takfiri's are infidels who must be killed. Takfirism is a heresy within Islam: it was outlawed in the 2005 Amman Message, an initiative of King Abdullah II of Jordan, which brought together more than 500 'ulema (Islamic scholars)  and Muslim political leaders from the Organisation of the Islamic Conference and the Arab League in an unprecedented consensus agreement, a "unanimous agreement by all Muslims everywhere as represented by their acknowledged most senior religious authorities and political leaders." The Accidental Guerrilla David Kilcullen Oxford Press 2009

This the 'distinct' Islamic ideology devoid of a genocide construct of Other was created by "unanimous agreement by all Muslims everywhere". Unanimous? If this were true there would be no Islamic State but this does not matter as long as you have an 'expert' saying it the washing bowl has been created. Given the nature of the Islamic codex and the clear text contained within that ALL text in essence however contradictory remains valid.

All text is to remain valid not just bits any number of religious leaders decide at a point of time will be in or out for in the Islamic context anyone in essence can become a religious leader just a matter of developing enough political power. There is no authority to rule any part of the Islamic codex out it is only open to interpretation not deletion. As well simply saying something is true does not mean it will or can be. What had not changed was the codex itself, enforceable across the globe.

David Kilcullen is a liar and by his act has done humanity no favors there was no "unanimous agreement by all Muslims everywhere". There can be no Is-Islam-Not-Islam which enables humanity to excuse the liberal-moderate end of the Muslim behavioral variance of their culpability in informing terror particularly as invariably these exact same terrorists are derived from families claiming to be Liberal-Moderates. There has to be shared categories across derived mental schemas regards Other common to the whole Muslim behavioral variance otherwise it would be impossible.for terrorists to be derived from the so called liberal-moderate end.


"The young Melbourne man at the centre of the latest case of Islamic State recruitment, was not on the radar of authorities before he turned up in the Middle East.


Rather he was what authorities call a "cleanskin",...

"Too many Australians, it seems, are being brainwashed online by this death cult," Mr Abbott said."
Islamic State recruit 'wasn't on radar of authorities' smh David Wroe Date March 9, 2015


"Too many" is the operative phrase. The so called "death cult" along with the "Hate Preachers" require a cultural codex foundation if the participants within the "death cult" and those taking on the roll of "Hate Preachers" can be proven to come from the liberal-moderate end of the Muslim behavioural variance and the following is true:

1. An individual's behavior is derived from the individuals genetic propensity, psychological experience and culture with culture in the main the determinant of cultural experience

2. Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our "categorization engine", we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action."
SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglass Hofstadter, Emmanuel Sander, 2013

3. "every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities" which provides the "basis on which to take any action.".

4. "Culture uses artifacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members. It is the filter through which we see and understand our current reality (Edgar, 1980). These are the structures of identity that help people organise and make sense of everyday life (Wark, 1997). They also establish boundaries between groups (Oyserman & Lee, 2007)"
Psychology Burton, Western, Kowalski, 2012

5. Cultural codex - a cultures "artifacts, rituals and text" form the basis for a cultures a categorization which seeks to form "precise and sharp boundaries" for adherent action.

6. Clearly something must exist in the so called Is-Islam liberal-moderate Islamic Muslim cultural codex which enables these "precise and sharp boundaries" enabling adherent "action" for good or evil. Otherwise the Muslim terrorist 'would understand nothing around them, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.'.

The Liberal-moderate far from being capable of being excused culpability are the actual generators of terror, "death cults" and the "hate preachers" and unless they are held to account nothing will change terror will simply increase as the Muslim culture adapts to each method of control rather than the elimination of the cause the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex construct of Other common as it must be to the whole Muslim behavioral variance. Otherwise liberal-moderate family members could not be 'brainwashed' as there would be no categories of Other to link into the "Hate Preachers" terrorist construct but there is.


Why is it critical to the multiculturalist paradigm of enabling two diametrically opposed beliefs, ethics values to exist in the same space, the acceptance of much more than the 'pluralisation of life worlds'-differentiated cultural sub-systems exist within society, the working, middle and upper class, the proletariat and the bourgeoisie, ethnic, religious, secular sub-systems in essence differentiated ideological constructs? 

It is critical because postmodernist theory determines modernism's reliance on facts and figures (scientific method of cause and affect) is not the whole story. Facts and figures according to postmodernists have to be examined and interpreted in relation to the sub-system context from which the facts and figures are derived and the context of the sub-system albeit the same sub-system which initiated-managed the collection.

No facts and figures can therefore be relied upon to give a 'true' representation of 'reality' because in the end the collection of any facts and figures are based upon subjectivity particularly in sociological/psychological fields of the provider, collector and reviewer dependent from within each sub-system each exist and the possible reflective variance enabled within these sub-systems.

There can no longer be a 'truth' and therefore all that I have written above to prove Muslims inclusive of the so called liberal-moderate are indeed culpable is my 'truth' only under a postmodernist paradigm a personal subjective view under a multiculturalist paradigm, which is postmodernism on steroids, a prejudiced, bigoted, even irrational view a phobia against other cultures 'truth' however dangerous they may be.

Postmodernism has enabled a rewriting of the Western cultural codex which abandons the ideal utopian vision of achieving a better society by confronting the cause of division and instead seeks to 'manage' the differentiation (particularly diametrically opposed beliefs, ethics, values differences) of cultural sub-systems of society by 'Harm minimisation programs' across all aspects of society.

"Historically, the survival imperative was based on power conflict and politics. Now it
is down to the management of complexity."
Identity as a Cybernetic Process, Construct and Project, by Paul A.Stokes, 2004


No longer are there societal problems to be resolved they are issues to be managed. Muslim diametrically opposed beliefs, ethics and values and inevitable derived terror therefore becomes a 'manageable' issue, not a problem at all to be resolved by confronting cause, for cause is simply another sub-systems 'truth' which has just as much validity as any other sub-systems codex.

Surely in utilising such a postmodernist construct multiculturalists believe in the end this will all be resolved somehow, yes it appears some may do via sociocultural evolution. It appears the Western elite are so enamoured with their own 'truth' they believe a secularization process will in time, before it completely eradicates liberty and equality transform religious 'magic' societal tyranny sub-systems or at least integrate them in a non-lethal form by sacrificing the current definitions of liberty and equality to an interculturally agreed equilibrium.

Multiculturalists clearly appear to have forgotten in fact deny evolution is about survival of the entity concerned via any means possible which will result in the survival of the entity into the next generation and the next,... Some entities are capable of establishing mutually beneficial arrangements of living some clearly have not and cannot by the mere nature of their being.

Western intellectual elite have arrived at a dangerous false conclusion, the mere recognition of a fact differing 'rational' models exist means that they can rationally in time be 'made' to fit together. Such a view ignores the existence of terror as a derivative of cultural derived codex blockers justifying and authorising the existence of 'gatekeepers-hate preachers' and their cultural altruistic enforcers terrorists the prime indicator the cultures cannot ever be joined without significant lose of one or the others beliefs, ethics and values in the sociocultural evolution multiculturalists believe will be managed into peace and harmony.

The trouble is what will be the resultant definition of peace and harmony - at the moment it is one where the Head of the Australian Intelligence Service Organisation (ASIO) can without a pause tell us the killing of two Australians in a cafe as a result of a Muslim terrorist attack was not a failure, where 'clean skins' (which given the nature of psychology 'clean' of the necessary cultural derived mental schema to transition to terror is a complete lie) are brainwashed by 'gatekeepers-hate preachers' derived from the exact same cultural codex of which the whole culture are adherent to.

It is a societal mental schema space where an undefined sub-system is-culture is determined to exist without proof so as to enable the 'issue' to be managed by determining those of an undefined sub-system not-culture are found to be not abiding by the is-culture rational therefore are irrational and even insane. It is now a health issue to be managed not a inter-cultural problem to be resolved by targeting the cause the actual cultural codex constructs.


Let us view the political process of development of the logic utilizing two diametrically opposed values in the US in the past of Slave and Free - of arriving at Half-Slave-Half-Free being a ‘good’ in the Public Square and by necessity having to create a cultural concept IS-Slave-Not-Slave to explain the terrible iniquitous outcomes derived from allowing the whole of the culture of ‘Slave’ within the Public Square. 

The culture of Slave therefore no longer informs terrible outcomes these outcomes are slavery adherents taking the codex of slavery out of context informing Not-Slave behaviors, and as we saw in the US as well at the time opponents of slavery Abolitionists were ‘provocateur extremists’ in fact terrorists with a mental illness. Is-Slave was simply unfairly targeted by vile bigots. And any way those exhibiting Not-Slave behavior were the ‘Few’ – the ‘Few’ utilizing terrorism to promote slavery in new and existing US States. And what happened counter-terror arose to match it.

What was the ideology the Western political elite sought to utilize – it was Multiculturalism. Who can argue against such a decent construct a space where all cultures are accepted for who and what they are, each according to their codex. It is the same from the Western perspective of going against Liberty and Equality (in some areas) the sting is in the definition.

The definition of what Multiculturalism means in reality for those who support such a construct and their view of those who do not is as follows, a definition kindly donated by DrPhil.

"It is possible to have values diametrically and philosophically against yours and still not be your enemy. The point about multiculturalism is the concept of acceptance and tolerance. Most people from all cultural backgrounds want a happy and prosperous society. That is a fundamental that unites us. The difference is how to get there. We don't need a society of people who think just like you to be a happy society." DrPhil

The above is the multicultural construct we must accept or be regarded as out-group ‘not needed’ to achieve the ‘happy society’ such a construct promises.

This Multiculturalism definition statement above was stated after the two Australians died in a café Sydney Australia, after Charlie Hebdo, after Denmark, after setting persons alight (not the first time since the seventh century, crucifixions, beheading, increasing calls for an Islamic politic to replace democracies from Muslim adherents residing in Democratic space, after we are told all matrix's on the Muslim terror situation are informing a worsening situation.

In fact all data is pointing to the failure of the current Western policy paradigm to deal with Islamic diametrically opposed values to those of the West within the same space. Yet those opposing such a policy which is clearly failing are determined as getting in the way of ‘Societal happiness’ are bigots 'not needed.

The only way for multiculturalism as defined above to work (to prevent the physical being and physical property from being subject to violence) is for tyranny greater than the tyranny informed by any culture within to pervade the space. 'work' in a multicultural sense only enables survival not a flourishing life.

Multiculturalism is where liberty is redefined to the align to the highest restrictive cultural definition, as not to do so informs terror as the 'restrictive' culture seeks to survive in a space were its relatively iniquitous constructs of women in particular and of Other come face to face with a diametrically opposed 'rational' model which offers relatively greater liberty and opportunity for a flourishing life.

The point about multiculturalism is not the concept of "acceptance and tolerance" it is an acceptance of cultural intolerance the complete opposite. The rules of such a society accepting multiculturalism as a value will as we see become more restrictive to align in time with the 'restrictive' culture so as not to 'provoke' cultural violence to force acceptance of iniquity as a norm.

The fundamental which unites a society having multiculturalism as a value is not the pursuit of 'happiness' for each culture has a different 'rational' 'happiness' model which inform differing constructs political, family, community, institutions which if Other cultures were subject to would make them extremely unhappy.

The fundamental which unites a society having multiculturalism as a value is a delusion 'happiness' is possible when diametrically opposed values, behaviors, political desired constructs exist in the same space. Humans are united by what they have in common - not by diametrically opposed ethics and politic.

Multiculturalism therefore leads to the enabling or diminishing of liberty relative to the level of cultural inequity allowed into its space. You have not noticed the cultural terror and laws diminishing liberty which rise to ameliorate the terror as well as behavioral change to diminish ‘criticism’ as a method of holding each other to account in democracies? Is multiculturalism informing liberty or tyranny?

Please note:

My view is it really adds to a society when cultures meld together and clearly this is possible because most cultures have ethics, values beliefs that are compatible and more importantly do not contain a genocide construct of Other and misogyny as the Islamic codex does.

My view is any culture be it secular or religious have the propensity if gaining sufficient power to do quite nasty things so I believe we have to actually re-look at our constitution to make sure to the best we can, we set definitions of Liberty and Equality which become the benchmark by which we determine if a culture can enter the Public Square or can remain in it. Because currently we have a constitutions which has allowed a culture in which enables our fellow citizens to be shot in the back of the head something needs to be changed, in my view.


Well the political elite now have the ideology and the creation of the Is-Islam Not-Islam to deflect criticism but now they needed one last political ingredient an ‘expert body’ which could attempt to justify the Not-Islam and the logic of adherents to Not-Islam being inextricably delinked from Is-Islam even though these adherents determined as radical-extremists have been and continue to be consistently since the seventh century derived from the Is-Islam space (which is really a subjective individual undefined segment of the Muslim behavioral variance reflecting back diminishingly Others own ethics and beliefs). This ‘expert body’ is the World Health Organistation WHO.

WHO are responsible for enabling terror to remain and worsen in Western streets as a direct result of their ill-conceived ‘’Harm Minimisation Violence Program.” The very citizen body claiming to be the protector of our physical and mental health.

It is another ‘Gold Standard’ WHO product that never solves a problem simply perpetuates it and has the State become the sponsor to provide the ‘necessary’ funding, drugs and programs which are never enough as the situation worsens. It is run on correlation being falsely represented as cause and the perpetrator of violence simply took too much alcohol, drug addicts and their pushers marginalized victims not responsible really for their own actions, terrorists or the radicalize extremists of cultures simply have too much time on their hands isolated individuals due to Others prejudice and understandably lash out after having been subject to ‘Hate Preacher derived from the exact same cultural codex they have whispering in their ear ‘Society/Other is to blame’ go off and justifiably murder them.

WHO along with supplying the bowls and sufficient water for the political elite - justifies and authorizes 'management' of the terror allowing even those identified by 'authority' to present a high risk of perpetrating terror to roam the streets because they are 'victims' of radicalisation process by 'hate preachers' and just need a range of tailored services such as mentoring, counselling, education and employment services to counter the Other prejudice –Isamophobia which has caused them to feel ‘isolated’ and therefore ‘understandably’ lash out against Other by murdering them in cafes, burning them in cages, committing atrocities upon women, ….

The trouble is the WHO definitions of the ‘risky’ individuals has been utilized by security services for their matrix's (not lists so they tell us) of terror risk of individuals ignoring the fact any Muslim becomes a risk once they pick up the Quran as the mental schema for carrying out atrocities against Other is in the Quran apart from the exemplar behavior of previous Muslims inclusive of Mohammed. This is why none of the Muslims involved in Sydney, Boston, Denmark, France made it to the not very nice end of the matrix or were not there at all.

AS each political entity in the hierarchy are required to justify and authorize its behavior in all political constructs. What did WHO base its policy approach upon and utilize as an excuse for its behavior – it is the following.

"There Are Two Causes of Terrorism

All terrorist acts are motivated by two things:

Social and political injustice: People choose terrorism when they are trying to right what they perceive to be a social or political or historical wrong—when they have been stripped of their land or rights, or denied these.

The belief that violence or its threat will be effective, and usher in change. Another way of saying this is: the belief that violent means justify the ends. Many terrorists in history said sincerely that they chose violence after long deliberation, because they felt they had no choice."

Source: The Causes of Terrorism Two Causes of Terrorism By Amy Zalman, Ph.D. Global Terrorism Expert

Let us analogize this WHO/Western political elite policy paradigm as at times situated within a social context you do not fully, even at all, realise how totally dangerous and insane such a policy paradigm in fact is.

John Brown and Lincoln need to be subject to therapy and given a job in high finance to ameliorate the cognitive dissonance they were experiencing with the culture of Is-Slavery and even accept its existence as a ‘good’.

US State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf and the World Health Organisation (WHO) determine university educated and member of a billionaire family Bin Laden simply needed education, employment opportunities and therapy to lead him away from Islamic/Muslim cultural derived terror against Other.

'To fight extremism, Franklin D. Roosevelt calls on US to embrace its Nazis.'

The Nazi SS returning to Britain, Australia, the US, ... through WWII back from throwing gas canisters into concrete bunkers, or fully intending to participate in such atrocities at home and abroad, and doing so being regarded as only needing 'understanding' and a good therapy session.

“In fact, if the extremist’s elements had prevailed. I have not the least doubt that disruption would have been more drastic and that we should have real reason by now to fear German aggression from both a military as well as political point of view.” Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

“This programme identifies radicalised and at risk people and delivers a range of tailored services such as mentoring, counselling, education and employment services, that will help them turn away from ideologies of violence and hate,” King Louis XVI said”. France 1785

Nazi returning to Britain, Australia, the US, ... before WWII and the throwing of canisters into concrete bunkers and only took part in Kristallnacht were really not as much of a problem as those other terrorists.

Father of Sydney terror suspect Omar Al-Kutobi says he was lonely in Australia February 12, 2015 - by SMH Rachel Olding and Paul Bibby

Now WHO/Western Political elite will have loneliness, boredom as a prerequisite correlated cause for terror given clearly education, employment are no longer supportable assumptions and never were.

Correlation does not mean cause. Maybe a game of Monopoly a true Western construct will change their Islamic/Muslim cultural ways and show what a ‘happy life’ they can lead in a Multiculturalist society if only they would agree to abide by Others ethics errr Is-Islam ethics.

WHO IS RESPONSIBLE? The World Health Organisation thats WHO.

All cultures have a cultural codex of denial, it is matter of relativity of their construct of Other and women as to how dangerous they are to Other:

1. Our ideology is being misinterpreted.

2. The actions of these radicals are simply a power trip.

3. You need many years to study our ideological codex before you can translate it accurately the radicals have not studied the ideological codex for the appropriate number of years and are therefore not interpreting it properly.

4. Other have always attacked us first.

5. This terror against Other only appeared in the last 2 to 3 hundred years it therefore has nothing to do with our ideology, our exemplar and his followers where as pristine as the driven snow.

6. We are all the same under our skin - our physical being determines our innocence/guilt and equality, cultural beliefs, ethics and values are of no import.

7. Religions are not to blame religion is not culture, and therefore does not inform the nature of our behavior nor the terrorists they are therefore not of our religion.

8. Tribal thinking drives most of the terrible behavior which has nothing to do with Religion nor with us the 'modern'.

9 Our text stipulates killing innocents even one person is a heinous act and not condoned by our religion.

10. By saying there is a genocide construct in our ideology means you are saying all adherents to our codex are terrorists - look I am peaceful therefore it cannot be true.

11. All ideologies are the same look at that so called peaceful ideology yet it informs evil why are you attacking us only? They have been or are worse than our culture.

12. You are being selective in choosing pieces of our codex not considering what comes before or after. Here is a selective piece of my codex to prove you wrong.

13. We respect all these other ideologies as well of the very people attacking us albeit they are in error in their beliefs.

14. The radical are insane and therefore not of our ideology.

15. We do not believe in that bit of our codex anymore it is barbaric, although the same codex does stipulate nothing in the codex is ever to be regarded as no longer applicable even if it is contradictory and the codex will remain as is because it is sacrosanct.

16. The radicals simply need counselling, a white picket fence and a grey flannel suit.;

17. We did it for their own good; they were asking for it.

18. "..the problems that we have with terrorism, fundamentalism and extremism all find their roots back to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Coordination Council (GCC)." Or Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, or ..... our own citizens are not responsible for the terror they deliver against each other or Other.


19. Our text stipulates forcing Other to convert is not condoned.

20. “The extremists (imams) often start by teaching people about the parts of the Qu’ran — Islam’s holy book — that have never been mentioned by their imams and then inject violent thoughts in people by misinterpreting doctrines,” he (Adudulkrep, head of the state-run Xinjiang Islamic Institute) said.
CHINA LOSING BATTLE AGAINST EXTREMIST ISLAMIC TEACHINGS, SAYS MUSLIM OFFICIAL MARCH 30, 2015


21. Islamic extremism due to a lack of “respected” religious leaders

22. "“If the religious leaders compete with the extremists on Islamic knowledge, I cannot guarantee that they would win. That’s what worries me,” said Adudulkrep, who is also head of the (China) state-run Xinjiang Islamic Institute." Which means?

23. Lets be honest if that co-pilot was muslim everyone would be calling it 'terrorism'

Statement 23 seeks to deny the Islamic 'rational' model informs actions which are considered sane behavior under the Islamic cultural codex "Pilots flying planes into buildings and causing mass killings." - "Burning people alive in cages or outside cages" - "Crucifying Other", "Making girls sexual slaves", "Chopping off peoples heads" , Blowing people to bits at transport hubs". "Murdering Other in Museums, cafes, streets corners...". "Political tyranny when Muslims have control of the politic.:"- etc carried out by Muslim sane adherents as opposed to the Western democratic 'rational' model under the liberty and equality codex which determines "Pilots flying planes into mountains and causing mass killings.", etc as insane and carried out by insane adherent outliers.

Yes lets be honest.

24. What I mean't was that every person who commits mass-murder should be deemed mentally ill, no matter what the reason for their actions. If we can stop categorizing such acts, maybe the world, as a whole, can become a much more understanding and peaceful place. It's our own prejudices that fuels mistrust and mistrust creates hatred and fear.

Statement 24 seeks to deny 'culture' is responsible for the atrocities its adherents inform.

Statement 24 is simply an indefensible position, as it ignore the fact cultural 'rational' models are not the same and therefore the behavioral variances cultures inform regards Other and relatively I would claim the nature of womens status are clearly not the same.

Our individual behavioral variance are determined by three factors genetic propensity (where even prejudice has been found via twin studies to be able to be transmitted from one generation to the next), psychological experience, and cultural dictates via cultural codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) templates) which sets the nature of our knowing and what we know to be truth. As psychological experience is dictated in the main by what cultural context informs what is the determinant of your behavioral variance? Individuals do not come up with their own beliefs, ethics, and values there is no common ethical template no matter how much we, you would like to believe there is so as to make your argument valid.

As social psychological research shows if you care to check our prejudice is set infant-child and thereafter is hardwired and very difficult to change as it requires resetting and remapping new neuron connections which are connected in a web of non- contradictory analogical networks - humans do not like cognitive dissonance.

So cultures are culpable for the sane acts they exhibit under their 'rational' models inclusive of mass murder and burning humans in cages. Muslims as a culture are responsible for the 'few; who are always derived and sustained by the many otherwise they would not exist. Now given your prejudice is hardwired are you really despite the evidence I have supplied you going to change? Be aware high intelligence is no protection as it has been found it makes you even more efficient at denying truth. Unless the culture as a whole is held to account for the terror IT informs nothing will change.

25. "He was a very brilliant student (University of Nairobi (Kenyan) law student who had employment involved in killing 147 university students) . But then he got these crazy ideas," the official said."

Ideas come from where? Clearly the numbers having and acting on these 'crazy' ideas -beliefs, ethics, values would indicate they are not 'crazy' from a certain cultural 'rational' model otherwise such actions would never be carried out. And this cultural 'rational' model has a name? You leave this cultural 'rational' model in the Public Square what continues to happen in fact as we see intensifies?

26. Typing error that gave rise to militancy

27. “If he didn’t say by himself, I wouldn’t believe.’’

28. “That’s not my belief. He comfort the people. He’s a very nice man.’’


The trouble is the cultural definition of innocents. neighbor sets the definition of Other juxtaposed to both invariably from the very first pages and exemplar actions.

Also as 12, 20, 21, 22 above clearly prove by a Muslim/Islamic religious leader Adudulkrep (head of the (China) state-run Xinjiang Islamic Institute) own admittance the 'selected' utilisation of text from the Muslim/Islamic Qu’ran text/Islamic knowledge  by 'respected' imams when utilised to argue against the 'selected' utilisation of  text from the Muslim/Islamic Qu’ran text/Islamic knowledge by 'extremist' imams does not guarantee that the 'respected' imams would win the the Muslim/Islamic Qu’ran text/Islamic knowledge argument.

In other words the so called 'extremist' imam Islamic knowledge has as much if not more justification and authority derived from the Muslim/Islamic Qu’ran text/Islamic knowledge to enable 'extremist' imams to win the argument as to what the 'true' beliefs, ethics, values of the Muslim/Islamic culture are.  Adudulkrep would not have been able to make the the comment in 22. above if this was not the case.

So called 'extremist' imam because logic and system analysis regards cultural 'rational' models tells us the once 'respected' imams can now be rationally accused themselves of misinterpreting the Qu’ran text and be determined 'extremists' with the so called 'extremist' imam now determined as 'respected' imams as the 'true' believers.


We apply the same framework above to what occurred with the Tasmanian Aborigines, let alone the rest of Australia as it was happening, has it stopped - how many liberal-moderates? Surely the proof is what occurs in front of us. No systemic cultural codex informed belief, ethic, value failure?

Each one of the above we know can be taken apart with ease yet it is the web of cultural denial which if it remains unchallenged the cultural codex stays in place the genocide continues.

You do not have to have an explicit cultural codex script of genocide where there is a sentence which exists "Our culture has a right to murder Other, innocents and neighbors, and displace them, disappear them from their space politically and geographically.".

You just have to have ambiguity as to what constitutes an innocent and a neighbor and as that ambiguity in some codex becomes less so as to delineate the innocent from the not-innocent the neighbor from the not-neighbor it becomes analogized into space.

Why?

Some individuals may have relatively the same physiology but their culture, ideology (religious or secular) determines our likeness is only 'skin-deep' as some cultures are more self-interested in advancing their own survival than in cooperating for mutual benefit with other cultures.

Also as recent oxford research points out it may be a mistake to develop a view another person or culture is seeking cooperation they may simply be operating under the old maximum adapt discover improvise overcome. They were just learning the game. It has happened so many times through history it beggars belief we have returned once again to the same place.

Simply determining we would like it to be different and therefore it is and/or coming up with a notion as everything is subjective therefore we have to deal with messiness the world throws at us, manage the 'complexity', accept terror as a part of a cultures 'messiness' which you can only ever attempt to minimise not be rid of results in other forces to rise to get rid of an imbalance and not necessarily to obtain justice but perceived right.

Making up Kafkaesque constructs to blame anyone or group other than the cause of the terror, the culture for which it emanates and yourselves for enabling such madness and death within the Public Square really is poor form.

"fascist imams who are not necessarily qualified"
Former chief of Islamic body warns of rise of Islamic fascism THE AUSTRALIAN SEPTEMBER 25, 2014

"fascist imams who are not necessarily qualified". - How long is a piece of string?

Firstly let us understand there is no master plan there are only ever cultural codex constructs of Other and women driving analogised cultural behaviour within the constraints or freedom context allows in time and space, so form changes to adapt to circumstance. A sword becomes a word and/or a word becomes a sword.

How often are we to take such claims “not necessarily qualified” seriously when it is a well know part of almost every cultures web of denial of culpability for the ‘Few’ cultural altruistic enforcers a culture always produces to enforce internal adherence and external acceptance.

It is determined by some it takes 12 years of intense study utilising the original language Arabic to be appropriately 'qualified' to interpret the Quran so as to represent its true meaning. Yet it is an undeniable fact there exist Muslim imams who have dedicated more than 12 years of such rigor still express 'fascist' political constructs regards Other and women as the 'true' representation of the Islamic codex.

The same claim of lack of knowing the truth of a 'text' have been applied, and continue to be applied by adherents to other texts such as the Christian bible, works of Marx, Mien Kampf, etc. There comes a point when such claims of ineptitude come face to face with the continual, consistent nature of the analogised reality such ideological codex secular or religious are clearly capable of informing.

These continual, consistent behavioral traits are connected to a cultural codex because as social psychology proves individuals do not on their own determine the nature of their behavioral variance.

Decision analysts inform us it is this continual, consistent nature of analogised reality which proves the connection to a cultural 'rational' model as there has to be a cultural 'rational' model to which these adherent actions are inextricably connected.

"fascist imams who are not necessarily qualified" would not exist if the cultural codex(text and exemplar (messianic) template did not enable them to exist. In fact these described "fascist imams" can, because the same codex enabled Haset Sali to exist, in turn claim "radical Westernized liberal imams are not qualified and are a toxic sub-culture".

Manifestations of the 'true' nature of a cultural codex are context dependent, political power and resource threshold dependent, and such cultural codex can, and does detail how the culture is to operate under varying degrees of Others political power in the same space.

The appearance of “fascist imams” are therefore a natural progression in the cultures cultural development. Haset Sali appears no “fascist imams” exist, Haset Sali and “fascist imams” exist in the same space (which cannot last as Lincoln informs us), either Haset Sali exists or “fascist imams” – the cycle is repeated – until?

There is I repeat no explicit master plan just constructs of Other and women analogised onto reality dependent upon the context, all members of a culture are culpable for the ‘Few’ are derived from the ‘many’ as they must.

We need a frank intercultural discussion on the basis diametrically opposed values cannot in reality, as proposed by multiculturalism, exist within the same space, a society based on lies will come to grief, a flourishing life simply cannot be realized under a construct of ‘managed’ cultural terror where the murder of Other is not considered a failure, and there is such a thing as evil, cultural derived evil - that no amount of counseling, white picket fences and grey flannel suits are going to resolve.

I could be wrong.

"DHAKA, Bangladesh — A man targeted for his comments about Islam on social media was killed in a machete attack by a group of men on Monday, in the second such killing here in Bangladesh’s capital in five weeks, the police said."
Bangladeshi Killed in Machete Attack Over Online Comments About Islam NTY By ELLEN BARRY and JULFIKAR ALI MANIK MARCH 30, 2015


Everyday the lie not-Islam creates even more Islamic codex victims how much more blood and grief will it take.

"The gunmen were saying sisi ni al-Shabab (Swaihi for we are al-Shabaab).
If you were a Christian you were shot on the spot."

Al Shabaab attack on Kenya university: live By Harriet Alexander 02 Apr 2015 The Telegraph

Everyday the lie not-Islam creates even more Islamic codex victims how much more blood and grief will it take.

Egypt Jihadists Kill 15 Soldiers, 2 Civilians in Sinai World | Agence France-Presse | Updated: April 02, 2015

Everyday the lie not-Islam creates even more Islamic codex victims how much more blood and grief will it take.


"Manila (AFP) - The FBI confirmed Thursday that a senior Malaysian militant believed to have been involved in the 2002 Bali bombings was killed in a January raid in the Philippines that also left 44 police commandos dead."
FBI confirms death of top militant in bloody Philippines raid AFP April 2, 2015

Everyday the lie not-Islam creates even more Islamic codex victims how much more blood and grief will it take.

"Recently, Indonesia’s top Muslim clerical body, the Council of Indonesian Ulema (MUI) issued a fatwa (an Islamic legal edict) condemning homosexuality."
Does the fatwa on homosexuals in Indonesia matter? 2 April 2015, 

Everyday the lie not-Islam creates even more Islamic codex victims how much more blood and grief will it take.

"Funds from Australia are helping recruit and send Indonesian fighters to join Islamic State (IS) in Iraq and Syria, authorities in Jakarta say."
Australian funds 'help recruit and send Indonesian fighters to join IS' SBS 24 MAR 2015

Everyday the lie not-Islam creates even more Islamic codex victims how much more blood and grief will it take.

"Thousands of Indonesian troops backed up by missile launchers, fighter jets and attack helicopters have hit targets in the hills near Poso - the known hideout of an Islamic State-linked terrorist cell."
Indonesian military mount major show of force in terror leader's mountain stronghold"
By Indonesia correspondent George Roberts ABC 1-4-2015


Everyday the lie not-Islam creates even more Islamic codex victims how much more blood and grief will it take.

"POLICY chiefs struggling to contain the flow of Europeans joining jihadist group Islamic State (IS) have been warned that Central Asia is the new front line in the war against terror."
Spread of terror: As UK struggles to contain jihadis, new militant wave joins IS from Asia
By TOM BATCHELOR PUBLISHED Apr 2, 2015 The Express

Everyday the lie not-Islam creates even more Islamic codex victims how much more blood and grief will it take.
"The government late last year said new measures were needed after arresting some 100 Malaysians suspected of supporting the Islamic State militant group. More than 60 Malaysians were believed to have joined the war in Syria and Iraq, as well as another 10 who have been killed."
Malaysia Proposes Anti-Terror Laws to Curb Islamic Militants By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS MARCH 30, 2015,

Everyday the lie not-Islam creates even more Islamic codex victims how much more blood and grief will it take.

"Aurora cousins Hasan and Jonas Edmonds had been aspiring terrorists for months when they arrived at the Joliet Armory on Tuesday to scout out a brazen attack, federal authorities say."
Aurora cousins charged in terror plot: 'If we can break their spirits we will win' By Jason Meisner, Erika Wurst and Geoff Ziezulewicz Chicago Tribune

Everyday the lie not-Islam creates even more Islamic codex victims how much more blood and grief will it take.

Home Secretary Theresa May launches Islamic extremism crackdown with new anti-terror measures By Ian Silvera , Video produced by Adam Justice March 23, 2015 International Business Times


Everyday the lie not-Islam creates even more Islamic codex victims how much more blood and grief will it take.

"Their report states the flow of foreign fighters is 'higher than it has ever been historically.'  The number of fighters leaving home to join Al-Qaida and the Islamic State group in Iraq, Syria and other countries has spiked to more than 25,000 from over 100 nations, according to a new UN report."
More than 25,000 recruits joined jihadi groups like ISIS since 2014 By Edith M. Lederer Apr. 2, 2015

Everyday the lie not-Islam-the 'Few' creates even more Islamic codex victims how much more blood and grief will it take.

Suicide bomber hits group of protesters in Afghanistan, killing 17 by Masoud Popalzai and Jethro Mullen, CNN April 2, 2015

Everyday the lie not-Islam-the 'Few' creates even more Islamic codex victims how much more blood and grief will it take.

"At least 147 people have been killed and 79 injured by Somalia’s Al-Shabab Islamist group gunmen in a day-long siege at the Garissa University College, in eastern Kenya."
Gunmen attack Kenya university AFP APRIL 03, 2015

Everyday the lie not-Islam-the 'Few' creates even more Islamic codex victims how much more blood and grief will it take.
Change the Architect and Builder or Change Nothing or the 'Few' will continue to be radicalized, recruited and sustained by the 'many' to become terrorists against Other cultures as they always have been from the seventh century.

Thursday, February 5, 2015

I am confused (not really)? To be crucified, or not to be burned alive, that is the question— Whether 'tis Nobler in the mind of Islamic religion to have Other suffer nail and sword of outrageous crucifixion, Or


'To be crucified, or not to be burned alive, that is the question—
Whether 'tis Nobler in the mind of Islamic religion to have Other suffer nail and sword of outrageous crucifixion,
Or have Other to take up the cage against a Sea of burning petrol,
And by opposing Islam, end. To die,
A wretched death whatever choice the 'noble' Islamic religion determines as your fate.'


- William Shakespeare (2015) after seeing what is writ by the Sunni High Priest and a Sunni High King and observing a human being burned alive in a cage by fellow Sunni adherents.

Here we are again "contradicts the tolerance of our noble religion" and "Sunni call to crucify Islamic State killers for burning pilot alive". When is Humanity going to realise cultures 'rational' models are not the same. Some cultures simply cannot exist in the same space as Other if Other requires peace and security.


"Sunni call to crucify ISIS killers"
"The highest authority in Sunni Islam last night called for the execution and crucifixion of Islamic State militants after their burning alive of a Jordanian pilot."

"The highest authority in Sunni Islam you say. I am confused (not really)?

"Saudi King (a Sunni) calls pilot's killing 'heinous' violation of 'noble' Islam"
"Saudi King Salman bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud (a Muslim from the Sunni sect) on Wednesday condemned the killing of a Jordanian pilot by Islamic State militants, calling it a "heinous crime which contradicts the tolerance of our 'noble' religion"

So the 'heinous" Islamic/Muslim cultural action of crucifying a person alive on a cross is not or is as noble as burning them alive in a cage?


Boko Haram Shoot, Burn To Death Dozens Of Civilians In Cameroon by EDWIN KINDZEKA MOKI and MICHELLE FAUL Posted: 02/05/2015

Boko Haram was founded as a Sunni Islamic fundamentalist sect advocating a strict form of Sharia Law and developed into a Salafist-jihadi group in 2009, influenced by the Wahhabi movement.

The majority of the world's Wahhabis are from Qatar, UAE and Saudi Arabia. 46.87% of Qataris and 44.8% of Emiratis are Wahhabis.5.7% of Bahrainis are Wahhabis and 2.17% of Kuwaitis are Wahhabis.

Wahhabis are the "dominant minority" in Saudi Arabia. There are 4 million Saudi Wahhabis (concentrated in Najd) representing 22.9% of the population.


And this is noble?

Saudi blogger sentenced to 1,000 lashes for insulting Islam has second flogging postponed for another week after doctors rule he has still not sufficiently recovered By COREY CHARLTON and MAIL FOREIGN SERVICE PUBLISHED: 22 January 2015

This is noble?

Qatar (46.87% of Qataris Sunni Wahhabis) Published Fatwa In 2006 Permitting Burning People — Removes It After IS Burns Pilot by Raymond Ibrahim on February 7, 2015

This is noble?

Saudi historian: Women drive because they don't mind being raped By Harriet Alexander The Telegraph 11 Feb 2015


This is noble?

"Mr Erdogan, (President of Turkey) a devout Sunni in the patriarchal Muslim majority nation, has in the past been criticised by women's groups for failing to speak out more domestic violence, and for saying he does not believe in equality of the sexes. Human rights monitor Bianet says 281 women were murdered in Turkey in 2014, a 31 per cent increase on the previous year."
Death of Ozgecan Aslan stokes anger over violence against women in Turkey SMH February 17, 2015

“It is the result of the radical Islamic atmosphere created by the government. The men say that women should be conservative. They think if they are not conservative, they deserve this kind of violence,” she said."
Women Defy Imam to Carry Murdered Woman’s Coffin Front Page Mag February 16, 2015


This is noble?


“We’ve put flowers here because we must remember him,” said a young Arab man, who gave his name as Mohamed. “He was a good guy. We don’t believe he did anything wrong. It wasn’t like the police say.” A placard placed with the flowers read: “May Allah be merciful, rest in peace” in both Arabic and Danish."
Copenhagen shootings: Friends pay tribute at shrine for the gunman By David Chazan, Copenhagen 16 Feb 2015

This is noble?

"RAIDA, Yemen — About all that remain of Yemen’s ancient and once vibrant Jewish community are untended cemeteries, dramatic hillside ghetto villages of thousand-year-old stone houses and a few people like Abraham Jacob and his extended family."
Persecution Defines Life for Yemen’s Remaining Jews NYT By ROD NORDLAND FEB. 18, 2015

Not the 'few'.
The Muslim exemplars did what to inform what behavior as justified and authorised by the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex?

Given Islam (from the same Sunni sect) in all cases is being utilised to justify and authorize crucifixion and burning alive what is the Islamic definition of noble?

Is the Islamic noble the same definition as the Western definition 2015 or are we moving in the direction of the of the seventh century version supported by the World Health Organisation? They all just need an 'intervention' you know what 'young' and yes 'old' people are like.


There is clear evidence burning of Other by Muslims has occurred from the very beginning of Islam yet we are to accept without a murmur from our cultural inept dangerous gatekeepers the Saudi Kings view it is unIslamic.


Christians Burned Alive for Refusing Islam: The Story of Sidhom Bishay by Raymond Ibrahim on February 11, 2015

Is this clear enough to you enablers of terror in WHO and your bureaucrat supporters. I pour the blood of those two murdered in the Australian Sydney cafe into your hands and the many to come around the world in both directions. This is not a health issue this is a cultural codex issue.

WHO IS RESPONSIBLE? The World Health Organisation thats WHO.


We have a problem’ by Zaid Nabulsi  The Jordon Times Feb 10, 2015

The writer  Zaid Nabulsi Jordanian attorney and partner in the law firm of Nabulsi & Associates has a further problem from where was the Wahhabi cultural codex analogy derived from for it is only an analogy from the very 'text' he claims by inference informs good rather than evil - this is impossible for if one informs evil so does the other.

WHO IS RESPONSIBLE? The World Health Organisation thats WHO.



I was wondering where this policy paradigm was being driven from: The Burning Buildings, broken bodies and lives intensifies with terror in both directions and you (World Health Organisation - WHO) persist with this drivel.

WHO | Global status report on violence prevention 2014

Margaret Chan, WHO Director-General, Helen Clark, Administrator of the United Nations Development Programme, Yury Fedotov, Executive Director of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

Lets us be clear what this policy means in reality:

It is the same as the Nazi SS returning to Britain, Australia, the US, ... through WWII back from throwing gas canisters into concrete bunkers, or fully intending to participate in such atrocities at home and abroad, and doing so being regarded as only needing 'understanding' and a good therapy session. This is the policy madness which is determined as rational by Western Governments at this very moment and being driven by WHO - which now can only be regraded as a benefactor of genocide and misogyny.

It is a paradigm where the USA Northerners against USA Southern Planters slavery construct like John Brown simply needed a job, therapy and feel included in the others value system?

It is a paradigm where the British and French opposed to the notion of the Divine Right of Kings and Clerics to determine their fate simply needed a job, therapy and feel included in the others value system?

It is a paradigm where women suffragettes, members of women's organizations (right to vote) movements in the late 19th and early 20th century, were bigots against Mans right to determine womens destiny and women simply needed take a Bex go home and look after the husband and kids, have therapy and feel satisfied with 'Mans 'leadership' and control of women's sexuality as a good.


The psychologists and the medical establishment giving their imprimatur of 'expert', required to wash the hands of Western politicians instituting such policy and allocating resources, justifying this tragedy along with their bureaucratic supporters inclusive of WHO must be held in the end to account for what they are perpetrating against humanity. It is no exaggeration that they by their actions are enabling current and future triggers to be pulled, bombs exploded and matches to be lit. 

And worse these psychologists if not the contributory political source by their inaction to deny it, the notion it is the 'provocation' of Other be it by cartoons, lack of 'opportunity' or rightful prejudice against a genocide and misogynistic construct is the 'real' reason for terror rather than the actual cause the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex which determines any challenge of Islamic doctrine and resultant behavior, of clearly iniquitous constructs of women and Other, incites the Islamic codified method of extreme violence not the 'real' reason the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex justification and authorisation for such a violent method.


Because this policy cannot work as we see there is a charge that Other is to blame, Others provocation is to blame, Others prejudice against iniquity and a policy of delivering rather than stopping terror is bigotry, a mental illness, so the demand from this same source are for laws and regulations which diminish the freedom of citizens to challenge the very existence of the persistent terror in their streets by calling to account the actual culture responsible for it the Islamic/Muslim culture.


Has such policy stopped the development and realisation of the political space reflective of the core Islamic codex which ISIS represents which the Iranian political space represents, which the Saudi Arabian political space represents which ......?

Did the 'apology' writ in the Sydney sky for the "Lakemba Mosque imam issues 'fatwa against Christmas': 2012, the very ethics underlying such a fatwa of determining Other as unworthy and evil which resulted in a man being burnt alive in a cage in Syria, provide adequate assurance such ethics, values and behavior where not in existence and developing as they have done elsewhere in time and space as they had with the Nazi in Germany? Boy, 6, calls for caliphate in 'sickening' footage filmed in Lakemba 2014 is this proof all is well the antithesis of values and behaviors which are the bedrock of Democracies being reflected in political organizations such as Hizb ut-Tahrir holding public meeting in Lakemba over Charlie Hebdo 2015 further proof your policy is working informing Other "slaying of the magazine staff by (Muslim) Parisian terrorists as a "cure" - note I had to actually provide the ideological descriptive label (Muslim) myself - we cannot even in the Australian media now identify the actual cause Islamic codex adherents - this is sanity, this will resolve the terror? The ultimate proof of policy success "Sydney siege: Man Monis forced Tori Johnson to kneel before executing him" the excuse as scripted by WHO "obviously insane" to excuse the terror WHO has had a direct hand orchestrating by allowing such into the streets.The cause WHO defined insanity but in fact sanity utilising a Islamic/Muslim 'rational;' model which from an Other 'rational; model perspective just appears to be insane behavior.


It so sickens me that such human beings, WHO bureaucrats exist who have such history behind them would perpetrate such a dangerous lie upon fellow humans.

"Communities (cultures) tend to be guided less than individuals by conscience and a sense of responsibility. How much misery does this fact cause mankind! It is the source of wars and every kind of oppression, which fill the earth with pain, sighs and bitterness." (Albert Einstein, 1934)

We observe once again: "Experience has taught me that all argument is useless with fanatical young Nazi of this kind, and so I say nothing." Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

We know that not only does Other say nothing in fear of attack, from the young and inevitably the not-so-young fanatic/fundamentalist 'few', as in Birmingham, nor do adherents claiming to be 'moderates', adherents open supporters of exactly the same ideology.

And yet we determine forcefully despite increasing violence against Other and the missing: “the Germans (inclusive of the Nazi) that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Britain as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else”. Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

We assure ourselves 'moderates' are in charge for did they not tell us they were such, things could be worse?

“In fact, if the extremist’s elements had prevailed. I have not the least doubt that disruption would have been more drastic and that we should have real reason by now to fear German aggression from both a military as well as political point of view.” Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

Just more programs, not enough resources? WHO your delusional state is grotesque in its reflected terror and enabling of a misogynistic construct in our Western streets.
So WHO your determination is cultural derived violence is not due to the fact there are two diametrically opposed values 'rational' models in the same space, inclusive with the cultural methodology of dealing with enforcement and compliance hard coded in cultural codex. It is a mental health issue. It is the same as determining lung cancer is the cause of death not smoking six packs a day. 

It is the same as determining the violence generated by having slavery in the same space as liberty and equality in the US simply needed 'anti violence intervention program' - do you realise what you are doing.

Under such a paradigm of insanity, as a Muslim leader just did in Australia, there is never going to be enough money, never enough programs Other gets blamed for violence derived from a inherent cultural genocide construct of Other. What does such a policy inform - You will blame those who raise any objections to such stupidity as having a mental illness which is what is happening with Islamophobia and determine any perpetrator of violence as suffering from a mental illness not driven by a cultures inherent construct of Other.

You leave the cause intact cultural codex and create a pretend cause mental instability on both sides. What happens the cognitive dissonance generated by the complete mismatch of reality to policy is not only enabling the Islamic violence to continue and intensify the counter violence rises in opposition because you have left Other with no alternative as the root cause of the violence the diametrically opposed ethics in the same space remain unresolved. Violence rises to match violence because violence is being seen as working for the other side. No sign of this occurring?

Oslo Suspect Wrote of Fear of Islam and Plan for War By STEVEN ERLANGER and SCOTT SHANE Published: July 23, 2011

Toowoomba mosque fire suspicious: police Brisbane times January 24, 2015

Chapel Hill Shooting Leaves 3 Muslim Students Dead; Neighbor Is Charged By JONATHAN M. KATZ and RICHARD PÉREZ-PEÑAFEB. 11, 2015


You have never reflected whatever the mental state it is not the weapon be it nuclear, sword, or a match an individual/culture have in their left hand it is the ideology and its construct of Other they hold in the right hand which will determine your fate.


You do not change delete the cultural codex which enables the violence to occur in the first place, you do not force open discussion of resolving value difference and why one should remain and the other leave the Public Square, values which have been set before your ridiculous programs can even come in to play - you are dealing with the fringe not the core and interpret any apparent 'change' in a small square as a victory as the counter-insurgency fraternity did in Iraq - what happens? You ask for more programs more money. Meanwhile.

The Only the ;Few'/'moderate'/'Not Islam' policy paradigm has failed there are two dead Australians in a cafe in Sydney as proof and thousands else where and more to come if this dangerous stupidity of not facing the real cause - the cultural codex construct of women being subject to Mans leadership and sexual control and of Other being determined as less evil and rightfully destine for grievous harm derived from differing cultural codex which cannot, which cannot remain in the same space.

You do not see how diametrically opposed to a Western feminist construct the Islamic cultural construct of women is which informs because of its categorization of women the analogous reflection into reality of female genital mutilation as an inherent part of its cultural behavioral variance to realise the Islamic construct of womens 'purity' and responsibility for Mans behavior and you believe apart from what else this Islamic misogynistic construct informs this is not one of the values, reasons why Islamic terror occurs to force alignment internal and external and in time will inform in time and space a violent reaction from Other as your policy paradigm just deals with symptoms not cause. Well educated or not women who determine such a construct as an anathema and publicly are saying so you set up a paradigm under which they are determined as suffering a mental illness a phobia, are bigots. What an achievement.

And then there is the Islamic construct of Other clearly supporting the notion you can burn people in cages, the inherent codex justification of utilisation of 'provocation.' to commit murder and call it 'good'. Not Islam well where is this other culture which causes this behavior there has to be one?

World Health Organisation bah! World enabler of terror and blaming the victim organisation. Be certain, Be compliant, Be silent.

So under your scheme John Brown should just have therapy realise his circle of influence only goes as far as his front door and shut up, Lincoln was an extremist right winger and also should join John Brown in containing their opposition to slavery. After all cultures will be cultures.

So under your scheme the 'young' and 'old' SS back from throwing gas canisters into concrete bunkers need to have a nice chat and live next door. Mouth acceptance of 'good' values utilised to sign off people who Iraq and elsewhere has proved have not jettisoned their belief systems at all simply taking advantage of the system as it exists - back in you go you simply have not thrown enough money and programs at it. What have you left unchanged?

Change this dangerous deluded policy paradigm. Under your watch what I ask would have happened with slavery in the US.

May I advise you to release a statement "Violence, non-generic criminal violence against women and Other is a cultural construct derived directly from inherent cultural codex and unless this genocide and misogynistic codex is identified and changed or deleted nothing will change.

The major schism clearly in the field since the seventh century and forecast to intensify due to globalization between the diametrically opposed Islamic and Western value /'rational' models has nothing to do with 'violence' the symptom which can only ever be slowed by adherents already imbued to degree with Others values of liberty and equality and/or simply mouthing adherence - statistics utilised to support the continuance of terror not its elimination. Meanwhile the political landscape changes where we accept such values to redefine Liberty and Equality, Feminism and you will call it a success and those opposed suffering a mental illness - Kafka was born too early he was yet to experience the full true twisted nature of what humanity was capable of framing in the Public Square.

Nursery Rhymes on Cultures Knee - Western Version: Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me. Islamic Version: Words, images, body language will ‘provoke’ me to break your bones with swords and guns and I will certainly hurt you.

Have I sinned? What is a Genocide Construct of Other and Why it is formed?

'Complete Proof' within the Islamic behavioral variance 'spectrum' women being 'free' to choose their own clothing style is a lie and why.

Feminist Discourse Analysis in Islamic Feminism - The Islamic/Religious ‘Duty to Certainty’ rather than ‘Duty to Doubt’ is manifest.


Change your assumptions their dangerously invalid.


The fact is from my reading of psychology you cannot change what a citizen believes is truth but you can change how they get to believe what is truth. In other words what this policy is proposing is you can change a person’s belief system after it has been set in concrete. Also the Islamic codex already imbues the adherent with the mental schema Other will try this on and what happens then – peace and harmony?

Charlie Hebdo did not even slightly inform this WHO policy was completely flawed let alone the two dead in the Sydney café what do you want victims falling on your front door step?

"the paltry funding for this latest initiative and lack of ongoing financial commitment from Canberra were key factors."
Strengthening Australian policy to counter violent extremism | The Strategist

The response there was just not enough money and programs – there never will be.

Providing increasing resources to the exact same culture whose codex contains a genocide construct of Other, which as we see with such constructs can even include their own determined as not measuring up, as in Iraq and elsewhere makes what difference in the end game?

"Under interrogation, Mullah Mujahid began describing how police officers helped Taliban fighters, sometimes selling them ammunition, other times tipping them off to impending police operations, a member of Parliament from Kunduz, Abdul Wadud Paiman, said in a telephone interview."
Police Force in Afghanistan Is Studied for Ties to Taliban NYT By JOSEPH GOLDSTEIN FEB. 8, 2015


Australia police arrest two 'terror 'suspects  BBC 11 February 2015

"In his essay, The 'Ideograph:' A Link Between Rhetoric and Ideology, Michael Calvin McGee proposes that our system of beliefs is shaped through and expressed by words. We are consciously and unconsciously conditioned and controlled by the words we hear and use. Words carry ideology and convey and create meaning. Like Chinese characters, words are "ideographs" that "signify and 'contain' a unique ideological commitment," that is frequently unquestioned.' McGee also suggests that by understanding that a single word can carry ideology and that ideology can be expressed in a single word, we are better able to expose and evaluate ideology and choose to accept or reject such ideology. However, if we fail to recognize the ideographic nature of words, we risk creating and promoting a reality that is removed from our system of beliefs." - HOW WORDS CREATE REALITY ANN SINSHEIMER

The question then has to be asked as we utilise analogies enabled and limited by our immediate context to create our reality from the boundaries created by culture codex (textual (words) and exemplar (messianic) template) within which we exist which necessarily informs a cultural behavioral variance, anyone within that cultural behavioral variance can rightfully claim they represent the 'True' ideology unless someone or some group can come up with a definitive set of definitions (words) which have the commonly recognised imprimatur of the exemplar originator either by non-contradictory deed, i.e. constancy of behavior, and unqualified textual support across the whole cultural codex.

This is the test of any cultures claim to 'Not our ideology'. The World Health Organisation WHO had better check if 'Not Islam' passes this simple test before it continues on it path of violence is unconnected to culture and is simply a generic ''health issue', and in doing so allow a culture containing a genocide construct of Other to continue to do their worst in our streets and cafes.

Shiite Militia Drives Back Islamic State, but Divides Much of Iraq By KAREEM FAHIMFEB. 7, 2015


So the Shiite underwritten by an Iranian vision will inform what outcome in sunni space -what causes this divide given both sides utilise the exact same construct of Other. Peace and harmony restored or as we see throughout history simply a lull before the genocide resumes in both directions.

The World Health Orgainsation Spiel:


“This programme identifies radicalised and at risk people and delivers a range of tailored services such as mentoring, counselling, education and employment services, that will help them turn away from ideologies of violence and hate,” the Attorney Generals’ office said.” Australia 2015
Brandis launches online terror tip-off service by Julian Bajkowski on February 10, 2015

The absurdity of such a statement reveals itself in the following analogies: 

“This programme identifies radicalised and at risk people and delivers a range of tailored services such as mentoring, counselling, education and employment services, that will help them turn away from ideologies of violence and hate,” Abraham Lincoln said”. USA 1861


“This programme identifies radicalised and at risk people and delivers a range of tailored services such as mentoring, counselling, education and employment services, that will help them turn away from ideologies of violence and hate,” King Louis XVI said”. France 1785

Father of Sydney terror suspect Omar Al-Kutobi says he was lonely in Australia February 12, 2015 - by SMH Rachel Olding and Paul Bibby

Now we will have loneliness, boredom as a prerequisite correlated cause for terror given clearly employment is no longer a supportable assumption issue and never was. Correlation does not mean cause.

What happens again, and again,...?


No values which are diametrically opposed to cause major schism? Cultural 'rational' models are able to be reconciled in the same space? What happens to Other when the Islamic rational model increasingly takes political control of space?

Saudi historian: Women drive because they don't mind being raped By Harriet Alexander The Telegraph 11 Feb 2015


This is not a protective comment it is a clear threat to women if you are alone and not clearly shown as 'owned' no master present you are fair game, expect to be raped. We hear do we not there is not pressure on women to conform even from the women victims of such a construct yet we are to accept such a construct in our midst without raising objection becuase 'everything is relative'. I for one will never go quietly into the night allowing such a construct within my own space.

"..this is our worst concern and the ability for people to move very quickly from an idea to an intention through to action" Tony Abbott Australian Prime Minister
Sydney ‘terror plot’: Suspect ‘used false documents to enter country’ by Jared Owens & Dan Box, THE AUSTRALIAN FEBRUARY 12, 2015 

'idea-intention-action'

Given "every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities" who provides the "basis on which to take any action." the culture or the individual. The reason utilized by an individuals actions are sourced from where?
Source: SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglass Hofstadter, Emmanuel Sander, 2013

"Culture uses artifacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members. It is the filter through which we see and understand our current reality (Edgar, 1980). These are the structures of identity that help people organise and make sense of everyday life (Wark, 1997). They also establish boundaries between groups (Oyserman & Lee, 2007)"
Psychology Burton, Western, Kowalski, 2012



Cultural codex - a cultures "artifacts, rituals and text (words)" form the basis for a cultures a categorization which seeks to  form "precise and sharp boundaries"  for adherent action. 

Clearly something must exist in the Islamic Muslim cultural codex which enables these "precise and sharp boundaries" enabling adherent "action" for good or evil. Otherwise the Muslim terrorist  '
would understand nothing around them, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.'.

How long WHO are you going to enable the lie 'Not Islam' a 'health issue' to drive terrorists into our streets and increasing pressure for the acceptance of ethical constructs of Other, women and a method of 'provoked' violence for enforcing that view to be accepted as a 'norm' within a society where the majority determines such seventh century values an anathema as Lincoln did Slavery, women suffragettes did misogyny, ...


Its values stupid. The degree of mental decrepitude or of poverty, or .. have never had anything to do with it.

How do you go about it. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child...


‘We have a problem’ by Zaid Nabulsi  The Jordon Times Feb 10, 2015

The writer  Zaid Nabulsi Jordanian attorney and partner in the law firm of Nabulsi & Associates has a further problem from where was the Wahhabi cultural codex analogy derived from for it is only an analogy from the very 'text' he claims by inference informs good rather than evil - this is impossible for if one informs evil so does the other.