Monday, January 25, 2016

Julia Kloeckner and Angela Merkel Pathological Altruistic Plan A2 & Plan A are tearing Europe apart as it is a logic which determines a cat of any type represents the same inherent risk, it is a dangerous stupid view.

Enabling a Culture Within Your Societal Walls With Significantly Different Value Systems Will Split the Walls Asunder
Before proceeding it is of importance framed by Liberty and Equality for 'you to put together  a picture first of what a secure, flourishing, healthy, wholesome human life looks like' and the required political and social system to promote such a state then as you proceed reflect if such a life can be, has been in the past, enabled by having the Islamic/Muslim political and social attractors/constructs increasingly reflected into a societies public and private spheres.

Reflect as the argument proceeds if Freedom of Religion is any longer affordable in terms of the brutalised lives it informs with significant redirection of scarce resources simply to protect ourselves from the symptoms of a cultural religious codex/ideology rather than enabling a secure, flourishing, healthy, wholesome human life for all citizens.


"
the plan of Chancellor and CDU leader Angela Merkel to solve the refugee crisis at European level, is correct remains"  Julia Kloeckner
Klöckner-Vorstoß zur Flüchtlingspolitik: Wer A2 sagt, muss nicht B sagen Von Björn Hen gst SPIEGEL ONLINE

It is a logic which determines a cat of any type represents the same inherent risk it is a dangerous stupid view. It is the fact that a cultural codex construct of Other can inform terror-genocide in the first place not all cultures inform the same relative risk therefore must if one has any commonsense be treated differently. 


"
The use of force and violence is more commonplace and prevalent in some families, communities, religions, cultural/ethnic groups and societies based on the views and values about adult prerogatives with children espoused. They may also be based upon the sociopathy of the perpetrators." Treatment of Complex Trauma Courtois/Ford 2016

Sociopathy: groups of people who adopt belief systems which cause them to behave in a similar fashion.

"..children raised in religious households, who are perceived to be more empathetic and sensitive to justice, are in fact less altruistic to their own class mates .... children from religious households also differ in their ratings of deserved punishment for interpersonal harm (F(2, 847) = 5.80, p < 0.01, h2 = 0.014); this was qualified by significantly harsher ratings of punishment by children from Muslim households than children from non-religious households (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between children from Christian households and non-religious households.".
The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World, November 05, 2015

“I came to the absolute conviction that it is impossible…impossible…for any human being to read the biography of Mohammed and believe in it, and then emerge a psychologically and mentally healthy person.”
- Syrian Psychiatrist Dr. Wafa Sultan

"
Muhammad Anwar, 15, was attending a sermon when the cleric asked if anyone present was not a true lover of the prophet. The boy misheard the question, and enthusiastically raised his hand, causing the others to accuse him of heresy, police chief Mehr Nausher Ahmad Kathia told dpa. He was told that he had joined enemies of the prophet by raising his hand, so he vowed to remove the hand, Kathia said."
Pakistan teen chops off own hand for blasphemy smh, January 16, 2016

"A survivor hidden in a tree says he watched Boko Haram extremists firebomb huts and heard the screams of children burning to death, among 86 people officials say died in the latest attack by Nigeria's homegrown Islamic extremists."

Boko Haram Burns Kids Alive in Nigeria, 86 Dead: Officials By ISMAIL ALFA AND HARUNA UMAR, ASSOCIATED PRESS DALORI, Nigeria — Jan 31, 2016

This is a Theory not a Hypothesis: The Supreme Council of Kenya Muslims (SUPKEM), Islamic Council of Victoria and Vehid Causevic Need to Accept Culpability For Muslim Terror and Stop Shifting Blame For Their Own Evil To Other

"The time has come for us to be honest with ourselves and indeed each other. The radicalisation that breeds terrorism is not conducted in the bush at night. It occurs in the full glare of day in homes, in madrasas and in mosques with rogue imams. We must ask the question — where are the parents and families (communities, education and religious institutions) of those who are being radicalized?" said Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president "Our task of countering terrorism has been made all the more difficult by the fact that the planners and financiers of this brutality are deeply embedded in our communities."

"A Garissa-based official said the government was aware Abdullahi, a former University of Nairobi law student, had joined the militant group al Shabaab after graduating in 2013."
Kenya says son of a government official was among gunmen in Garissa attack
by EDITH HONAN GARISSA, Kenya — Reuters Published Sunday, Apr. 05 2015

If the religious leaders compete with the extremists on Islamic knowledge, I cannot guarantee that they would win. That’s what worries me,” said Adudulkrep, who is also head of the state-run Xinjiang Islamic Institute...."

CHINA LOSING BATTLE AGAINST EXTREMIST ISLAMIC TEACHINGS, SAYS MUSLIM OFFICIAL MARCH 30, 2015

rogue = "a dishonest or unprincipled person",
dishonest = "deceitful, fraudulent, knowingly intending to mislead",
unprincipled = "not acting in accordance with moral principles",
principles = "(of a system or method) based on a given set of rules - in accordance with morality and showing recognition of right and wrong",
extreme ="furthest from the centre",
extremist = "a person who holds extreme political or religious views, especially one who advocates illegal, violent, or other extreme action."

Do the statements by Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president, does the evidence even the logic of Adudulkrep's (head of the China Xinjiang Islamic Institute) statement determine as extreme, furthest from the centre/mean of Islamic/Muslim ethics-methodology-set of rules in accordance with Islamic/Muslim morality, existing outside the non radicalised, 'moderate' law abiding families (parents-homes), communities, institutions (mosques) development process infant-child-adolescent-adult, the Islamic/Muslim imams or other Muslims determination terror-genocide against Other is justified and authorised?

Can the 'extremist' view be regarded in all honesty as extreme, furthest from the centre/mean of Islamic/Muslim ethics-methodology, given Adudulkrep's (head of the China Xinjiang Islamic Institute) statement 'I (Adudulkrep) cannot guarantee that they (so called 'non-extremist' religious leaders-imams with Islamic knowledge) would win (against so called 'extremist' 'rogue' religious leaders-imams with Islamic knowledge).'?

Surely reflection therefore determines the cultural knowledge creating the conduct-principles forming the Islamic governance political and social system of the so called Islamic/Muslim extremist is if not at, close enough to the Islamic/Muslim cultural ethical-belief centre/mean to enable their winning the argument for their world-view of what it means to be a true Muslim? There are therefore no 'rogue', 'extremist' 'hate-preacher' imams determining violence against Other are justified and authorised by Islamic/Muslim knowledge they are simply Muslim imams reflecting real-true Islamic/Muslim ethics-beliefs.

Even given so called 'Islamic/Muslim extremists who are anything but given Adudulkrep's statement are furthest from the Islamic/Muslim cultural knowledge-ethical methodology mean ,does it in fact matter a wit, is it a sufficient enough excuse for the Islamic/Muslim culture systemically informed burning buildings, broken bodies and lives to utilise such an argument 'Look how far from the centre/mean of Islamic/Muslim ethics-methodology-set of rules in accordance with Islamic/Muslim morality the Islamic/Muslim extremist knowledge and informed behavior are.". How 'far' in reality is 'far' if this Islamic/Muslim terror-genocide behavior can be proven as it can to be endemic from generation to generation within Islamic/Muslim culture?

Fo
r the Islamic/Muslim knowledge to inform so called 'extremists' at such a level of cultural justification and authorisation as we can prove by simple observation of the daily piles of tragedy comprised of men, women and children before us, 'far' clearly in cultural behavioral variance terms is not 'far' enough if Other cultures determine security and harmony as a desired facet of life.

Vast resources need to be diverted simply not only to protect Other cultures from the Islamic/Muslim culture but given the Islamic/Muslim terror-genocide construct of Other simply to even protect Muslims from each other - this is an ideological construct worthy of inclusion within a liberal democratic space? What are the Islamic/Muslim political and social attractors/constructs, desired worldview which enables the Islamic/Muslim culture to support twenty-first century developed liberal democratic definitions of liberty, equality, fraternity without informing bloody bodies in humanities streets as the Islamic/Muslim culture has since the seventh century? What are they?

Logically, rationally the existence of such systemic Islamic/Muslim terror-genocide behavior across centuries and the empirical evidence of preaching by imams, leaders of Islamic/Muslim culture who are not merely generic 'rouge' extremist without Islamic/Muslim hierarchy status, determines 'Islamic knowledge' exists to inform conduct, to the inform the Islamic/Muslim governing principles which are integral to the Islamic/Muslim culture whole.

Muslim parents who would wish to oppose extremist knowledge therefore have 'no confidence to argue against' the so called Islamic/Muslim extremists because the extremists are 'articulate and forceful', not because of their innate rhetoric skills nor their propensity for violence or the threat thereof but because of the simple fact the so called extremists hold the Islamic/Muslim ethic-belief center/mean ground are not extremists in a Islamic/Muslim rational system sense and therefore have the appropriate and sufficient Islamic/Muslim knowledge justification and authorisation to support their conduct and world-view as to the 'true' Islamic/Muslim governing principles and methodology and enough Muslim parents have 'confidence' the so called Islamic/Muslim extremists are the 'true believers' as they are that humanity continually to this very day ends up with infamy blamed on the 'few' who continually are derived from the ranks of the blameless 'many'.

"•
Parents do not have the confidence to argue against the articulate and forceful activists who seek to impose their views, for fear of being branded as disloyal to their faith or their community."
Schools face new curbs on extremism after Birmingham Trojan horse affair Patrick Wintour, Political editor The Guardian, Wednesday 23 July 2014

To determine one is not culpable for the evil ones culture informs even though in participating as a member of the culture one enables the existence of the 'few' to inform evil, and claim that bit of the codex I do not follow but in following it at all you enable that part which you do not follow to be followed by others to inform evil is to determine a human person modularised and the leg completely disconnected in function from the torso. It determines a humans evil, behavior is not their responsibility only the good they do.

It is rather astonishing from the same lips determining 'no responsibility' as a culture is the determination Western cultures actions, the US etc are sole cause of Islamic/Muslim cultures violence. Though some have realised very quickly the logic trap and are now saying it is not the people of a culture causing infamy it is the leadership of the culture who have been put there by who - yes the people of the culture for the culture.

As a psychological phenomenon, narcissism acquires political significance to the extent that it is recapitulated within political systems characterized by the concentration of authority within a very limited number of individuals. This approach can explain much about the nature of authority with regard to the deeply rooted human needs it satisfies. In this context narcissism is a defining feature of all concentrated and consecrated forms of political authority (Schwartz 1989, 266-267).”
Prosocial Dr. Jekyll, meet Deviant Mr. Hyde: Exploring the Confluence of Other-oriented Public Values and Self-centered Narcissism, RK Christensen, J Stritch, 2016, cord.asu.edu

"Pathological altruism is found in any pattern of altruistic behavior that results in severe harm to oneself or others. However, the pathological altruists thinking is also irrational and distorted. That is to say, his or her thinking appears to be characterised by a suspension of logic and reason and respect to the outcomes of their actions.

Pathological altruism victimizes the altruists themselves, as well as those in their path."

Pathological Altruism, Oxford University Press, 2012

Angela Merkel 'is showing signs narcissism' over her 'stubborn' refusal to reverse her migrant policy, warns celebrated German psychiatrist Dr Hans-Joachim Maaz
By SARA MALM FOR MAILONLINE, 29 January 2016

"Wi
thout the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
....
every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"

SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglass Hofstadter (American professor of cognitive science), Emmanuel Sander (French Psychologist-Developmental Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Educational Psychology), 2013

"Every set of beliefs introduces its own logic and its own constraints.

..to a decision scientist, “rational” means “consistency with some model.” Rational decisions are not necessarily dispassionate, nor well-reasoned, nor selfish. They are not even necessarily good decisions, from others’ perspectives. They simply are consistent."

Distinguishing Spiritual from Temporal Power, Inventing the Individual, The origins of Western Liberalism, Larry Siedentop, 2014

"Culture, of course, is related to violence in general and not only to structural violence. For example, culture influences the determination of "thresholds" which pressure on a person must overcome in order to move that person from being controllable, or even positive, to being negative (that is, into violence)."
The Culture of Violence, Chp 3. On the relationship between violence and culture - Galtung's 
concept

Migrant rape fears spread across Europe: Women told not to go out at night alone after assaults carried out in Sweden, Finland, Germany, Austria and Switzerland amid warnings gangs are co-ordinating attacks By TOM WYKE and JAY AKBAR FOR MAILONLINE and ULF ANDERSSON IN SWEDEN FOR MAILONLINE and NICK FAGGE AND SARA MALM IN COLOGNE FOR MAILONLINE, 9 January
 2016

"A 15-year-old boy, described as Somalian, is being held on suspicion of murder, and prosecutor Linda Wiking is expected to announce the official arrest on Wednesday. 
Officers in Molndal say they have had to ignore lesser offences such as drug-dealing because they are so overrun by migrant crime, with gang fights and violent assaults.
And in capital Stockholm police this week warned that the capital's main train station was 'overrun' by gangs of Moroccan street children 'stealing and groping girls'.
Swedish police revealed they have sent plain-clothes officers to monitor swimming baths in Stockholm after increased reports of sexual harassment of girls and women.
Last night it was also claimed police had been forced to flee after being attacked by a mob of asylum seekers as they tried to relocate a ten-year-old boy amid allegations he had been 'raped repeatedly' at a refugee centre."
Swedish police quiz Somali boy, 15, over knife murder of refugee worker as her heartbroken mother says: 'This country is no longer safe' By SAM GREENHILL IN GOTHENBURG, SWEDEN, FOR THE DAILY MAIL and ULF ANDERSSON and NICK FAGGE IN GOTHENBURG, SWEDEN FOR MAINONLINE, 27 January 2016

This is a Theory not a Hypothesis: “To make one exception means to make them all.” - Clothing such as the Muslim headscarf, hijab, burqa... is a political cultural statement and informs adherence and respect for the ideological constructs attached to it which hold tragic consequences for women.

"According to the Pew Research Center, religious hostilities reached a six-year high in 2012, with a third (33%) of countries in the high category, up from 20% just six years earlier.

The Islamic world is disproportionately affected. More than one-in-two (57%) Muslim-majority countries have high religious hostilities, more than double that of other countries (25%), as shown in the chart to the left.

Although religious hostilities affect countries throughout the world experience, Muslim-majority countries consistently have higher levels of a range of religious hostilities than other countries and by wide margins. For instance, Muslim-majority countries are more than three times more likely than other countries to have religion-related war, terror or sectarian violence"

09/22/2014 Source data PEW Research Center - Commentary Weekly Number Brian J. Grim, Ph.D.

You are asking fellow citizens to 'grow confidently' with another cultures terror-genocide I for one believe such a request is sickening and dangerous.

Have you checked how the Islamic inclusion under UN human rights actually aligns with Liberal Democratic principles - why do you think social hostility rises with bloody bodies in our streets?

“Plainly the sheep and the wolf are not agreed upon a definition of the word liberty.” ― Abraham Lincoln

"A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved — I do not expect the house to fall — but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other.” ― Abraham Lincoln

“The Declaration (Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam 1996 – adopted by The Organisation of the Islamic Conference (56 Member States)) is inconsistent with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) in that all rights and freedoms it stipulates are ‘subject to the Islamic Shari’ah’, which is to be the ‘only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles (Article 24 and 25). Shari’ah is based on the holy books of the Islamic religion, as well as interpretation by imams, or ministers of religion. This makes the Cairo Declaration a religious document, despite some liberal language. It is based on inequality between men and women (Article 6), denies belief rights (Article 22) and limits free speech (Article 22).
……
By recognizing the Cairo Declaration, the UN appeared to give credence to contradictory statements of rights, thus undermining the integrity of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR). The Cairo Declaration is considered to be a valid statement of human rights by its signatories, presumably supplanting contrary principles of the UDHR and ICCPR.”

Freedom From Religion – Rethinking Article 18, Meg Wallace, 
2015

"As part of the plans, ministers will pledge to outlaw gender segregation in public buildings amid concerns that some Muslim organisations are forcing women to sit separately."

UK PM David Cameron will back Muslim veil ban The Age, Peter Dominiczak and Steve Swinford, January 19, 2016,

"The tormented final hours of Farkhunda Malikzada, a 27-year-old aspiring student of Islam who was accused of burning a Quran in a Muslim shrine, shocked Afghans across the country. That is because many of her killers filmed one another beating her and posted clips of her broken body on social media. Hundreds of other men watched, holding their phones aloft to try to get a glimpse of the violence, but never making a move to intervene. Those standing by included several police officers."
Flawed Justice After a Mob Killed an Afghan Woman NYT, By ALISSA J. RUBINDEC. Dec 26, 2015

"The head imam at Lakemba, Sheikh Yahya Safi, had told the congregation during prayers that they should not take part in anything to do with Christmas.

The fatwa, which has sparked widespread community debate and condemnation, warns that the "disbelievers are trying to draw Muslims away from the straight path"

It also says that Christmas Day and associated celebrations are among the "falsehoods that a Muslim should avoid ... and therefore, a Muslim is neither allowed to celebrate the Christmas Day nor is he allowed to congratulate them.

"The fatwa quotes the teacher Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim as saying that congratulating disbelievers for their rituals is forbidden, and if a "Muslim who says this does not become a disbeliever himself, he at least commits a sin as this is the same as congratulating him for his belief in the trinity, which is a greater sin and much more disliked by Almighty Allaah than congratulating him for drinking alcohol or killing a soul or committing fornication or adultery”.

No merriness here: mosque puts fatwa on Christmas Sydney Morning Herald, Natalie O'Brien, December 23, 2012

“The Islamic Party of Australia Hizb-ut Tahrir posted their draft Islamic Constitution of Australia

1 – The articles of this constitution are characterised by the fact that they are exclusively and purely Islamic opinions and thoughts. They contain nothing whatsoever that is non Islamic, nor are they influenced by anything that is non-Islamic. They are rather Islamic in every sense and nothing else, and they are based upon nothing but the foundations and texts of Islam."

Draft Islamic Constitution of Australia

..it is not aggression which moves armies it is devotion, moreover what brings about such conflicts at its most fundamental level are irreconcilable values, perceptions of a radical different nature, what brings these things about actually is a form of discourse, sometimes we call it propaganda but whatever it is legions are moved by words and symbols… more than the devil made me do it, or instinctually I am like that, people do not go to war because of their evolutionary history they go to war for statable discoverable reasons bound up with politics and culture, civilisation, religious and moral values.. great variety of factors that incline whole peoples to warfare he establishes that these factors are deeply embedded in culture and cultural differences create other differences… 
The lamp of history illuminates what is beyond the readers desk, the readers village the ocean which surround the readers nation. When properly constructed the lamp of history, the study of history, illuminates the very commonalities that constitute human nature itself, what is taught is this wherever you find human beings these lessons are lessons worth learning and no matter how different the language or the culture or the customs or the diet there is a root humanity that is reached by such events that will allow us to predict how we are likely to behave under certain conditions and how those conditions therefore should either be promoted or shunned depending upon whether our behaviour is to be laudable or reprehensible.. .. the cause of war, the casus belli, is a complex of conflicting aspirations, someone is trying to achieve something, some group of people are trying to achieve something, and prepared to risk life and limb to do it and to have others die for it.” Professor Daniel N. Robinson, Oxford University, Author of An Intellectual History of Psychology.Under Islamic/Muslim cultural conditions what 'historic illuminated' systemic behavior are to be found in time and space within the Islamic/Muslim behavioral variance which determines whatever the derived Islamic/Muslim sect the resultant behavior is 'reprehensible', and
therefore such a human-derived condition should be 'shunned'.
"The findings of the study indicate that citizens (Hofstede and Hofstede (2005)) of Islamic countries share similar cultural values that vary significantly with those of the Western countries."
Conceptualizing the Islamic Personality Model, Abdul Kadir Othman, Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah, Nurhazirah Hashim, Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

"The
 Prime Minister, David Cameron, is to announce the moves today in a blistering attack on the “passive tolerance” of discriminatory practices inflicted on female members of the country’s Muslim communities.
.....
In a move to confront men who exert “damaging control over their wives, sisters and daughters”, he will announce a review of the role of Britain’s religious councils, including Sharia courts."

British PM David Cameron lashes Muslim practices acting against women FRANCIS ELLIOTT, THE TIMES, JANUARY 18, 
2016

"“We said before the extraordinarily harsh criminal charges, pretrial arrest, and now the prosecution's call for life sentences raise serious concerns about Turkey's commitment to fundamental principles of freedom of expression, of democracy, of due process, and judicial independence,” Toner said in a forceful statement."
US: Serious concerns over Turkey’s commitment to democracy Today's Zaman January 28, 2016, MAHIR ZEYNALOV | WASHINGTON

Is
it worth just one child's life to have the Islamic/Muslim cultures methodology of achieving Islamic/Muslim cultural 'aspirations', political and social constructs determined by human experience to be pure infamy particularly for women, noted for informing increasing social hostility which crushes a human capacity to achieve a flourishing life, within humanities public and private spheres? Are we prepared to have our children forever to be run down in our school yards to be shot in the head or murdered in university commons as a worthy price for including the Islamic/Muslim culture in our midst?

"
No, I don’t see a coming together of the United States and Iran. Iran remains the world’s chief sponsor of terrorism,” Saudi Foreign Minister Adel Al-Jubeir said at a joint news conference with US Secretary of State John Kerry."
US aware of Iran mischief Saudi Gazette Jan 24, 2016

Why Does the U.S. Support Saudi Arabia, A Country Which Hosts and Finances Islamic Terrorism? On Behalf of Washington? By Washington's Blog Global Research, January 25, 2015

How Saudi Wahhabism Is the Fountainhead of Islamist Terrorism 01/20/2015 06:01 pm ET | 
Updated Mar 22, 2015

"Fatah claimed that the social media campaign that praises Hamas fighters who died in the incident as "tunnel fighters" is lead by a group of "war merchants who know nothing but burying their young people in ashes.""
Fatah lashes out at Hamas 'war merchants' after 7 killed in tunnel collapse The Jerusalem Post, 28/1/2016

"Fatah Central Committee member Amal Hamad sang the praises of Dalal Mughrabi, the deputy commander of the 1978 Coastal Road attack on an Israeli bus, in which 38 Israelis were killed.

She also praised other female Fatah suicide bombers, such as Wafa Idris and Ayat Al-Akhras."

Fatah Member Praises Palestinian Terrorists Who Killed Dozens of Israelis Algemeiner 22 Jan, 
2016

"We 
have to grow with the threat, and we have to do it in a confident manner,” Professor Siracusa said.
Two Sydney schools in lockdown as police unions call for support against extremists SBS 20 OCT 2015

"Banda Aceh: Indonesia's conservative Aceh province has enacted a strict Islamic criminal code, officials said late on Friday, criminalising adultery, homosexuality, and public displays of affection outside of a legally recognised relationship, with penalties that include public whippings with a thin rattan cane....

The sharia law comes after Aceh's government said several Christian churches would be shut down, just days after a mob burned down a church earlier this month, killing one person and injuring several others."

Indonesia's Aceh province enacts Islamic criminal code smh October 24, 2015

"All signs point to these being north Africans and people from the Arab world.

"Based on what we know now from the investigation, asylum seekers who arrived in the past year are among the suspects."

Although no formal charges have been laid, Mr Jaeger said the attackers emerged from a group of more than 1,000 "Arab and North African" men who gathered between the main railway station and the city's iconic Gothic cathedral during the year-end festivities"

Cologne attacks: Minister says people 'of foreign origin' behind nearly all New Year's Eve criminal acts ABC Updated 11 Jan 2016

The
argument has never been about an attack upon multiculturalism, upon diversity nor upon race this would be ridiculous, for in this globalized world of course many cultures need to exist in the same space and most cultures do but tragically some not only do not live harmoniously with Other they cannot due to their cultural codex construct of Other.

Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why it is One Is and One Is-Not. Yet both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."

It can no longer be a matter of 'educating' citizens as to their responsibilities and behaviours regards each other as individuals in Democracies which necessarily contain many cultures due to our globalized world, as cultures set the behavioral variance within which their adherents exist it is a matter of reviewing what a cultures responsibilities and behaviours regards each other culture in their same space have to be and abide by for any culture to be accepted to and remain in a Democratic multicultural space.


"Now that Germany is actively taking part in the war, it is of course being seen in the same light as the USA, France and so on. But we do not see the danger, which was already big anyway, increasing due to this," he (Hans-Georg Maassen the head of Germany's BfV domestic security agency) added."
GERMAN SPY CHIEF: WAR AGAINST ISIS DOESN'T INCREASE DOMESTIC TERROR RISK BY REUTERS ON 12/10/
15

Clearly
 the continuing acceptance of Freedom of Religion under Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (‘UDHR') as a good protecting a culture informing terror-genocide and misogyny within humanities midst with the incumbent political elites "habit of sloth" regards any of its sacred totems "immunized against critical thought and its challenges" killing any gadfly which dares challenge the political elite and cultural perpetrators 'rational' system and legitimacy of the ethics-beliefs justifying the rationale is a sickening indictment of the accommodation of cultural infamy rather than striving for improvement of the human condition which has seen the golden thread discarded in a vain hope hand in hand with the Minotaur a way out of the labyrinth may be found despite the evidence such an approach leads inexorably to the brutal death of many more of Others sons and daughters.

My view is there is a fatal assumption inherent in Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (‘UDHR”) and it is this.

After each inevitable atrocity delivered by such a political paradigm which protects the real culprits the Islamic/Muslim culture and dangerous inept cultural gatekeepers and their 'experts', the 'good', stand upon each inevitable new pile of broken bodies and lives and the ocean of unfathomable grief into which they sink screeching across at those who demand it stop "Bigots, racists, xenophobes, hateful ignorance, hysteria, trolls, islamophobes, blasphemy, LOVE!". The Islamic/Muslim cultural derived terror-genocide and misogyny continues to march across their victims unimpeded even enabled by State resources and political protection. This is civilisation.


Is one just one child's life worth the price, just one - you think many, many more must be sacrificed to a fallacious vision of cultural harmony which includes within its definition burning buildings broken bodies and lives.

Of course countries, Other cultures object to any culture inclusive of the Nazi crossing their borders without permission to deliver terror-genocide, subjugation of women and with it rising social hostility to their streets - Denmark and other nations response to do whatever they can to halt a diabolical culture which has a proven inherent terror-genocide construct of Other and misogyny is rational and ethically-morally right in that it determines no one can simply knock down the door of your house and demand they not only move in but you supply them with your own resources to do so and at the same time they kill and rape members of your family as well demand to have their cultural anti-liberal-democratic judicial and political constructs imposed upon your society.


"“We have to understand: An attack on one faith is an attack on all our faiths,” Obama said. He said it fell on all Americans to speak up."

Is this what civilisation has come to?

We have a knowledge, conduct and governance ideological recipe which  informs infamy, has informed infamy since its conception derived directly from its messianic political and social codex constructs of Other and women and we can no longer determine such a ideological construct should not, due to the systemic infamy it informs and can be proven to do so by simple observation, demand it be removed from public and private spheres so as not to have such a culture continue to inform the same. 

It is a logic which determines the Nazi non radicalised 'moderate' law abiding 'many' creating the 'few' to become the managers and perpetrators of infamy must not be held culpable for the human misery they inform by their very own cultural creations. Pure insanity.
The law abiding 'good' helping the law abiding 'kind-hearted' 'good' just asserting the right to 'Freedom of Religion' doing 'humanitarian work' - "He just cleaned the toilets, dealt with the clothing, changed the bandages he did not participate in the terror-genocide practiced by the organization he joined." :

"Jack Letts labeled by some newspapers as “Jihadi Jack” left the UK to join the terrorist group when was 18. His parents were arrested after he reportedly sent money for Jack for his expenses including buying new glasses.

Letts' parents have acknowledged that their son had converted to Islam. They, however, dismissed the claims that he had joined terrorists and insist he traveled to the region for "humanitarian purposes".

"He has the freedom to practice whatever he wants, that’s British values. It’s so unfair, but if there is any evidence that he’s done anything violent, if you can show me any of that I’ll be the first to believe it and I’ll be the first to report it,” Jack’s mother Sally said

Speaking to British media last week, Sheikh Ramzy, director of the Oxford Islamic Information Centre also described Jack as kind-hearted but said he had lost contact with him in 2014."

Brit parents arrested for sending money to ‘Jihadi Jack’ Press TV

Joining a Islamic/Muslim culture with a terror-genocide-humanitarian construct what do you expect to happen peace and security?

Saturday, January 23, 2016

My view is there is a fatal assumption inherent in Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (‘UDHR”) and it is this.

Reflection on Meg Wallace's Freedom OF or Freedom FROM Religion? THURSDAY, 17 SEPTEMBER 2015 and very informative book FREEDOM FROM RELIGION - RETHINKING ARTICLE 18 Meg Wallace, 2015

"NEW DELHI: Jamiat-Ulama-i-Hind, the powerful body of Muslim clerics, has said that Muslim personal law flows from the Holy Quran and cannot be subjected to any scrutiny by the Supreme Court based on principles of the Constitution."
Muslim personal law founded on Quran, SC can't question it: Jamiat TNN | Feb 6, 2016

My view is there is a fatal assumption inherent in Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (‘UDHR”) and it is this.
"Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance."

The European union ruling on the woman seeking to take her own life was as plain as day that the inherent view is an individual does not make up their own ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology cultures do and their altruistic enforcers of which the European court is a prime example make damned sure adherents stick to the cultural script within the cultural autonomy limits within which the individual adherent exists.

It was noted in one research paper I came across prejudice against Other peaks around 5 years of age (thanks to physical limitations not able to completely control a Kalashnikov) dips a little but from then on underwrites what is to come - in fact supposedly nigh impossible to change. Which means what about autonomy in reality?

Also there appears to be an assumption we humans after the cultural development process infant-child-adolescent-adult particularly a culture with strong network control end up having the same capacity to discern what belief-system is better for us than another and even if at the cultural behavioral variance edges there may be a wish to change the belief-system makes it rather difficult to move. Frankly to this point I am in no way convinced this is possible given the evidence these development processes can lead to cultural significantly different outcomes regards other and the capacity to cross cultural borders apart from the individual autonomy only ever existing within cultural autonomy limits.

Also in the book regards the Islamic inclusion under UN human rights there are significant value differences with Western Liberalism which are cultural and not at all to be taken as applying to separate nations as we can see with the dead bodies in our streets - in other words as we see around the world social hostility rises when significantly different values end up in the same space - cultural codex tend to be non-contradictory and drive political social outcomes regards State policy and will not be divorced I believe so easily without force or the acceptance of the tranquility of silence so favored by the Iranian elite and the ASIO head Duncan Lewis - democracy as we know it would then be dead –personal belief systems cannot in my view be divorced from the culturally contrived individual belief system version of what the political and social world should be.

If cultures decide our individual relative autonomy and belief systems-knowledge which enable or not our capacity to even discern 'good' from 'evil' then the wording should be changed to hold cultures to account for the infamy they inform systemically from their non-radicalised, moderate, law abiding ranks not the 'few' altruistic aligners/enforcers/punishers they create and sustain to become the managers and perpetrators of cultural infamy.

My view is it can no longer be a matter of 'educating' citizens as to their responsibilities and behaviours regards each other as individuals in Democracies which necessarily contain many cultures due to our globalized world, as cultures set the behavioral variance within which their adherents exist it is a matter of reviewing what a cultures responsibilities and behaviours regards each other culture in their same space have to be and abide by for any culture to be accepted to and remain in a Democratic multicultural 
space.

Terrorism Will Not Provoke Us To Abandon Our Values – John Kerry Channels Television. Updated January 23, 2016

The value placed upon Freedom of Religion must change to reflect the actual value it holds for humanity rather than what we would hope it would hold, for the rising cost of burning buildings, broken bodies and lives determines Freedom of Religion a worthless political and social construct.

Research determines more religion is clearly not the answer for the evil religion informs daily in our midst, any belief system be it secular or religious must be held to account for the infamy the non-radicalised, 'moderate' law abiding systemically inform from their ranks, social constructs such as Freedom of Religion must no longer be able to be utilised to shield, privilege one ideology-belief system over another so as to protect a culture from earned censure and calls for removal from public and private spheres so as to enhance humanities security and maximised possibility for a flourishing life.

"The use of force and violence is more commonplace and prevalent in some families, communities, religions, cultural/ethnic groups and societies based on the views and values about adult prerogatives with children espoused. They may also be based upon the sociopathy of the perpetrators." Treatment of Complex Trauma Courtois/Ford 2016

Sociopathy: groups of people who adopt belief systems which cause them to behave in a similar fashion.

"..children raised in religious households, who are perceived to be more empathetic and sensitive to justice, are in fact less altruistic to their own class mates .... children from religious households also differ in their ratings of deserved punishment for interpersonal harm (F(2, 847) = 5.80, p < 0.01, h2 = 0.014); this was qualified by significantly harsher ratings of punishment by children from Muslim households than children from non-religious households (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between children from Christian households and non-religious households.".
The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World, November 05, 2015

“I came to the absolute conviction that it is impossible…impossible…for any human being to read the biography of Mohammed and believe in it, and then emerge a psychologically and mentally healthy person.”
- Syrian Psychiatrist Dr. Wafa Sultan

"“No, I don’t see a coming together of the United States and Iran. Iran remains the world’s chief sponsor of terrorism,” Saudi Foreign Minister Adel Al-Jubeir said at a joint news conference with US Secretary of State John Kerry."
US aware of Iran mischief Saudi Gazette Jan 24, 2016

Why Does the U.S. Support Saudi Arabia, A Country Which Hosts and Finances Islamic Terrorism? On Behalf of Washington? By Washington's Blog Global Research, January 25, 2015

How Saudi Wahhabism Is the Fountainhead of Islamist Terrorism 01/20/2015 06:01 pm ET | Updated Mar 22, 2015


I have most likely misunderstood Meg Wallace's argument and despite the above very much appreciate what Meg Wallace has achieved and is trying to do against the tide.

Friday, January 22, 2016

'deadly attack on Pakistani college' - Why does this continue to occur simple.

PAST-NEW-OLD-FUTURE THE ISLAMIC/MUSLIM CULTURE HAS-CAN-WILL DELIVER TO YOUR STREET
In deadly attack on Pakistani college, extremists take new aim at students, The Washington Post, By Tim Craig January 20

Another 'new' manifestation of what the Islamic/Muslim culture has, can and will continue to deliver to humanity.

Why does this continue to occur simple.

"The use of force and violence is more commonplace and prevalent in some families, communities, religions, cultural/ethnic groups and societies based on the views and values about adult prerogatives with children espoused. They may also be based upon the sociopathy of the perpetrators." Treatment of Complex Trauma Courtois/Ford 2016

Sociopathy: groups of people who adopt belief systems which cause them to behave in a similar fashion.

"..children raised in religious households, who are perceived to be more empathetic and sensitive to justice, are in fact less altruistic to their own class mates .... children from religious households also differ in their ratings of deserved punishment for interpersonal harm (F(2, 847) = 5.80, p < 0.01, h2 = 0.014); this was qualified by significantly harsher ratings of punishment by children from Muslim households than children from non-religious households (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between children from Christian households and non-religious households.".
The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World, November 05, 2015

“I came to the absolute conviction that it is impossible…impossible…for any human being to read the biography of Mohammed and believe in it, and then emerge a psychologically and mentally healthy person.”
- Syrian Psychiatrist Dr. Wafa Sultan

“Wahabism has entirely replaced, and become, Sunni Islam; the two cannot be told apart anymore.

Some Wahabist teachings, which have permeated the air we breathe in the Muslim world, are simply irreconcilable with decent human values, especially the ones that declare that every non-Wahabist is a disposable body whose bloodletting is unproblematic"

‘We (Muslims) have a problem’ by Zaid Nabulsi The Jordon Times Feb 10, 2015

“If the religious leaders compete with the extremists on Islamic knowledge, I cannot guarantee that they would win. That’s what worries me,” said Adudulkrep, who is also head of the state-run Xinjiang Islamic Institute....
CHINA LOSING BATTLE AGAINST EXTREMIST ISLAMIC TEACHINGS, SAYS MUSLIM OFFICIAL ucanews.com reporter, Beijing China March 30, 2015

"• Parents do not have the confidence to argue against the articulate and forceful activists who seek to impose their views, for fear of being branded as disloyal to their faith or their community."
Schools face new curbs on extremism after Birmingham Trojan horse affair Patrick Wintour, Political editor The Guardian, Wednesday 23 July 2014

“Plainly the sheep and the wolf are not agreed upon a definition of the word liberty.” ― Abraham Lincoln

"A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved — I do not expect the house to fall — but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other.” ― Abraham Lincoln

“The Declaration (Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam 1996 – adopted by The Organisation of the Islamic Conference (56 Member States)) is inconsistent with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) in that all rights and freedoms it stipulates are ‘subject to the Islamic Shari’ah’, which is to be the ‘only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles (Article 24 and 25). Shari’ah is based on the holy books of the Islamic religion, as well as interpretation by imams, or ministers of religion. This makes the Cairo Declaration a religious document, despite some liberal language. It is based on inequality between men and women (Article 6), denies belief rights (Article 22) and limits free speech (Article 22).
……
By recognizing the Cairo Declaration, the UN appeared to give credence to contradictory statements of rights, thus undermining the integrity of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UDHR). The Cairo Declaration is considered to be a valid statement of human rights by its signatories, presumably supplanting contrary principles of the UDHR and ICCPR.”

Freedom From Religion – Rethinking Article 18, Meg Wallace, 2015

Cultures as social psychologists have known for years and Plato knew centuries ago for goodness sake are responsible for the ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology not the altruistic 'few' aligners/enforcers/punishers the non-radicalized, 'moderate' law abiding 'many' families, communities and institutions create and sustain from their very ranks to become the managers and perpetrators of internal and external terror.

"Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our "categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
....
"every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"

SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglass Hofstadter (American professor of cognitive science), Emmanuel Sander (French Psychologist-Developmental Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Educational Psychology), 2013

Lincoln
understood and told citizens why social hostility arises ‘the sheep and the wolf are not agreed upon a definition of the word liberty.’ and that either one (good) or the other (evil) would in time take the political and social space and realize their definition as the ‘true moral’ state.

The Islamic/Muslim culture are culpable for the altruistic ‘few’ they create and sustain and therefore must be held to account for the systemic terror-genocide they inform from their very own ‘good’ ranks.

Even Malcolm Turnbull the avid supporter of the ASIO head Duncan Lewis who wants blasphemy and the divine vengeance which goes with it into a Liberal Democratic space now admits Islam's link to Muslim terror-genocide. And therefore.....?

The argument has never been about an attack upon multiculturalism, upon diversity nor upon race this would be ridiculous, for in this globalized world of course many cultures need to exist in the same space and most cultures do but tragically some not only do not live harmoniously with Other they cannot due to their cultural codex construct of Other.

It can no longer be a matter of 'educating' citizens as to their responsibilities and behaviours regards each other as individuals in Democracies which necessarily contain many cultures due to our globalized world, as cultures set the behavioral variance within which their adherents exist it is a matter of reviewing what a cultures responsibilities and behaviours regards each other culture in their same space have to be and abide by for any culture to be accepted to and remain in a Democratic multicultural space.

'New'? Really? Simply another Muslim codex outcome and more to come because of our dangerous cultural gatekeepers and their 'experts'.

Monday, January 18, 2016

The notion of universal morality=Human Rights - If 'universal morality' cannot exist neither can Human Rights - Reflection on Moral Function and Moral Perfection Matthew J Rossano Ph.D.

Moral Function and Moral Perfection Matthew J Rossano Ph.D.

Human rights, such as freedom of religion, are predicated upon the existence of 'universal morality' and human autonomy, if cultures development process determines 'morality' for the cultures adherent and autonomy is only existent within enforced cultural boundaries via inculcation and punishment, an individual's moral determination "exquisitely sensitive to prevailing local sentiments (culture) especially those of influential authority figures (altruistic exemplar/enforcer/punisher) despite the wise words from Socrates means significant different moral imperatives regards in and out groups will remain.

It would appear from recent research perceived morality of one's own culture may be rather significantly different than what it actually informs. Increased commitment to a religion appears to lead to less good altruistic outcomes for out-groups yet the adherents believe they and their children have increased good altruistic behavior despite the reverse.


So trying harder in some 'rational' systems to be 'good' , 'perfecting of our souls' will I would argue possibly have the reverse effect upon out-groups than your argument would suggest.

I am with Plato change what mother (culture) teachers her child on her knee regards morality or change nothing - at the edges possibly of a cultural behavioral variance enabled marginally by the existence of an other 'rational' systems protection which is fallaciously being currently used to excuse cultures 'good' of their culpability for the individual 'few' they systematically create and sustain to inform terror-genocide from their own 'good' ranks.

If 'universal morality' only exists as an unrealisable form (abstract) in reality neither can human rights no matter how much we would as individuals determine such a state as desirable because individuals do not determine their own ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology cultures 'rational' system does anything significantly in another 'cultures' rational system contradictory to the other simply cannot I repeat cannot be accepted to the degree it prevents social hostility from occurring or escalating. Why is this? Simple.

"Communities (cultures) tend to be guided less than individuals by conscience and a sense of responsibility. How much misery does this fact cause mankind! It is the source of wars and every kind of oppression, which fill the earth with pain, sighs and bitterness."  (Albert Einstein, 1934)

Why is Albert Einstein right even when there is a pretend
'overwhelming' majority of 'individuals of conscience and a sense of responsibility'? It is because cultures who find it necessary to have terror-genocide construct of Other have social networks which make it nigh impossible to object without incurring severe cultural penalty, being determined as a traitor to the cause and significantly have no sufficient cultural 'knowledge' , codex support to override the altruistic enforcers and punishers cultural ethics-beliefs nor methodology.


"• Parents do not have the confidence to argue against the articulate and forceful activists who seek to impose their views, for fear of being branded as disloyal to their faith or their community."
Schools face new curbs on extremism after Birmingham Trojan horse affair Patrick Wintour,
Political editor The Guardian, Wednesday 23 July 2014


“If the religious leaders compete with the extremists on Islamic knowledge, I cannot guarantee that they would win. That’s what worries me,” said Adudulkrep, who is also head of the state-run Xinjiang Islamic Institute"
CHINA LOSING BATTLE AGAINST EXTREMIST ISLAMIC TEACHINGS, SAYS MUSLIM OFFICIAL ucanews.com reporter, Beijing China March 30, 2015

Change the Architect and Builder or Change Nothing.

Monday, January 4, 2016

'Not Religion' is a grotesque lie. As Religions Divine Grace, Love Informs Human Behavioral Outcomes Religions Divine Vengeance Must Therefore Inform Human Behavioral Outcomes.

'Not  Religion'. The underwriting ethical-moral-belief force for Islamic terror-genocide 'divine vengeance' against Other-out-groups (even fellow Muslims) determines 'Not  Religion' is a grotesque lie.

 “Tehran had heavily criticised the Sunni-ruled kingdom, with Iran's supreme leader saying Saudi politicians will face 'divine vengeance' (Retribution) over the killing of Nimr al Nimr.”
Saudi Arabia cuts ties with Iran  Monday, 4 January 2016

Vengeance: "The action or an act of avenging oneself or another; infliction of injury or punishment in retribution for wrong to oneself or another. With great force or violence; in an extreme degree."

"003.004 Then those who reject (nonbelievers Other-out-groups) Faith in the Signs of God will suffer the severest penalty, and God is Exalted in Might, Lord of Retribution." Quran


"Divine grace is a theological term present in many religions. It has been defined as the divine influence which operates in humans to regenerate and sanctify, to inspire virtuous impulses, and to impart strength to endure trial and resist temptation;[1] and as an individual virtue or excellence of divine origin.[2] From Wikipedia

'Divine vengeance' logically; rational critical thinking informs humanity, is therefore a theological term present in many religions. It has been defined as the divine influence which operates in humans to regenerate and sanctify, to inspire violent impulses, and to impart strength to inform destruction and murder against Other-out-groups (inclusive of fellow Muslims) and resistance to Other-out-groups pleas for mercy and cessation of such evil; and as an individual virtue or excellence of divine origin.


As religions divine grace, love informs human behavioral outcomes religions divine vengeance must therefore inform human behavioral outcomes.

Yet one is determined a religion of the divine as qualified and the other is illogically determined by some as 'not religion' of the divine as qualified even though all determine human behavioral motivation to act. Divine Grace, Love and Vengeance all determined as being of the other for to be '
good, just and pious'  a Muslim adherent has to, has to align to the Islamic/Muslim categorisation engine (definitions) of what it means to be 'good, just and pious'  'through the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex scriptures and the prophets.'.

"Divine Love” God’s love is manifest in beings brought into existence, whether believer or disbeliever (the Quran itself determines from its very first pages the Islamic God's view of Other-outgroups is not one of Divine love but of violent Divine Retribution.  Why do you think terror-genocide emanates systemically from the Islamic/Muslim culture?), to enjoy life, if only for a brief moment. It is also realized in the creation of paradise for those who choose righteousness over evil.  God states in the final revelation that He loves those who do good (Quran 5:13), those who are just (Quran 5:42), those who are pious (Quran 9:4), those who are patient (Quran 3:146), those who put their trust in Him (Quran 3:159), those who frequently turn to Him in repentance and those who purify themselves (Quran 2:222). However, it is He (the Islamic/Muslim God) who has defined for human beings through the scriptures (codex text -Quran) and the prophets (exemplar (messianic) template behavior - Mohammed) what is good, just and pious.  Consequently, those who follow the prophets are most beloved to God.
Why Did God Create? (part 3 of 3): Divine Love and Grace

"Consequently, those who follow the prophets are most beloved to God." The paragraph above commences with equality and finishes with inequality this has real life repercussions for Other-out-groups, the former claim being false and the later true, particularly as you will find out below how in 'Love' with nonbeliever Other the Islamic/Muslim God really is. The Islamic/Muslim God is as indicated in Islamic scripture above a God of Divine Retribution not of Divine Love regards nonbeliever Other-out-groups. By definition therefore a Muslim is 'good, just and pious' by following a God's scripture to wreak Divine Retribution against Other-out-groups simply for being a 'rejector' of the Islamic/Muslim 'faith'/religion.

Gods/Muslim adherents Divine Vengeance, as reality proves, does not even need fellow Muslims from their own in-group to have violence visited upon them to initiate Divine Retribution even silence is of no protection for Other-out-groups which is the usual theme in terror-genocide codex such as the Muslim and Nazi cultural codex.

''How futile it was to try to win over such people with argument, seeing that their very mouths distorted the truth, disowning the very words they had just used and adopting them again a few moments afterwards to serve their own ends in the argument!” Hitler's (Nazi exemplar (messianic) template) Mein Kampf



"002.006 As to those who reject Faith, it is the same to them whether thou warn them or do not warn them; they will not believe. 002.007 God hath set a seal on their hearts and on their hearing, and on their eyes is a veil; great is the penalty they (incur). 002:018 They are utterly deaf, dumb, and blind; they can no longer recover." Muhammad's (Muslim  exemplar (messianic) template) Quran

'Whatever promotes the cause': Swedish step-grandfather says he is pleased Jihadi Junior appeared in latest sick ISIS video

I am confused (not really)? To be crucified, or not to be burned alive, that is the question— Whether 'tis Nobler in the mind of Islamic religion to have Other suffer nail and sword of outrageous crucifixion, Or

Tuesday, December 29, 2015

Proof by Reductio ad absurdum: There is no such thing as a 'good' Muslim as there is not such thing as a 'good' Nazi. The reason is because the 'few' perpetrator Muslims of terror-genocide as with the Nazi are created and sustained by the 'good'.


There is no such thing as a 'good' Muslim as there is not such thing as a 'good' Nazi. The reason is because the 'few' perpetrator Muslims of terror-genocide as with the Nazi are created and sustained by the 'good'.

The following claim is made “People link us (Muslims) to terrorism, but we (Muslims) are not terrorists. They (Muslims) have hijacked our (Muslim) religion and used it (Muslim religion) against us (Muslims)."

As you can see there is invalid logic in fact absurd which determines Muslims are all part of a terror-genocide culture.


"Enough is enough. It is time to speak out.

“Islam is innocent” is an incomplete sentence. Introspection is needed, for, if we shy away from reality, the alternative will be more images like those we witnessed last Tuesday night, when brave Lt. Muath Al Kasasbeh was burnt to death in a cage.

The inconvenient truth that is overlooked or willfully ignored by apologists for the indefensible is the fact that Wahabism, the cult of mediaeval austerity founded by Ibn Abdul Wahab (1703-1792), has over the last half century been exported to every mosque and school throughout the Muslim world until it completely enveloped mainstream Sunni Islamic teachings.

Wahabism has entirely replaced, and become, Sunni Islam; the two cannot be told apart anymore.

Some Wahabist teachings, which have permeated the air we breathe in the Muslim world, are simply irreconcilable with decent human values, especially the ones that declare that every non-Wahabist is a disposable body whose bloodletting is unproblematic"

‘We have a problem’ by Zaid Nabulsi The Jordon Times Feb 10, 2015

“If the religious leaders compete with the extremists on Islamic knowledge, I cannot guarantee that they would win. That’s what worries me,” said Adudulkrep, who is also head of the state-run Xinjiang Islamic Institute....
CHINA LOSING BATTLE AGAINST EXTREMIST ISLAMIC TEACHINGS, SAYS MUSLIM OFFICIAL ucanews.com reporter, Beijing China March 30, 2015

No Muslims have not 'hijacked' Islam for to claim such a thing would mean Muslims make up their own ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology social psychological and sociology research determines this view invalid.

The Muslims perpetrating terror have not 'hijacked' the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex (text and exemplar (messianic) templates) they exist in the exact same cultural behavioral variance and have done so with the so called non radicalized moderate law-abiding 'many' from which they are derived via the Islamic/Muslim cultures infant-child-adolescent-adult development process since the seventh century.

You cannot claim to be not culpable for the terror-genocide your culture systemically creates against Other across time and space when the whole cultural behavioral variance within which you exist utilizes the exact same codex to analogize into reality the behavior of terror-genocide against Other.

You are culpable you are a member of a terror-genocide ‘rational’ system otherwise there would be no terror-genocide so consistently being derived from your culture. One or two outlier criminal actions of violence one could claim to be culturally unconnected but terror is a cultural derived act not a generic criminal action therefore the ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology have to be justified and authorized by a cultural codex.

To claim ‘hijacked’ you are going to have to prove the Islamic/Muslim codex can in no way be analogized into terror-genocide behavior, a sufficient proportion of Muslims do not exist who empathise, who overlap in Muslim derived ethics-beliefs etc to provide moral and resource support for the methodology utilised to enable the Islamic/Muslim culture to inform terror-genocide against Other despite claims of an 'overwhelming' majority exist who are against Islamic Muslim culture derived terror-genocide - as if there was indeed overwhelming Muslim opposition to terror-genocide being derived from Islamic/Muslim culture there would be no terror-genocide.


"A recent BBC survey of 1,000 British Muslims revealed that while 95% said they felt a loyalty to Britain and the vast majority had no sympathy for the perpetrators of the Paris attacks, 27% did have some sympathy for the motivations behind the Paris attacks and 45% said clerics preaching violence against the west could be justified as being in touch with mainstream Muslim opinion."
"Can we drop the term ‘moderate Muslim’? It’s meaningless" Sarfraz Manzoor, theguardian, Tuesday 17 March 2015 02.47 AEDT

Furthermore prove there are no current nor historical records of the same occurring without the usual culprits charged with its cause Western Imperialism. colonialism, marginalism, economic paucity - which is impossible because Muslim terror-genocide has existed consistently from its creation in the seventh century to this very day, in time and space none of these apply and Other can show you the actual codex construct which underwrites such behavior.

Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why it is One Is and One Is-Not. Yet both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."

So what you claim you as a Muslim wish peace for all what as with the Nazi behavioral variance happens systematically consistently wherever in time and space the Islamic/Muslim culture is allowed to flourish and enforce it diabolical version of the world upon Other? What happens even in the streets where the Islamic/Muslim culture is not dominant peace. security, no fear of what the Islamic/Muslim culture can and does inform?

"Banda 
Aceh: Indonesia's conservative Aceh province has enacted a strict Islamic criminal code, officials said late on Friday, criminalising adultery, homosexuality, and public displays of affection outside of a legally recognised relationship, with penalties that include public whippings with a thin rattan cane....

The sharia law comes after Aceh's government said several Christian churches would be shut down, just days after a mob burned down a church earlier this month, killing one person and injuring several others."

Indonesia's Aceh province enacts Islamic criminal code smh October 24, 2015

How are you any different as a Muslim than those Nazi in the 1930's convincing some deluded Other:

“the Germans (inclusive of the Nazi) that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Britain as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else”. Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

"Communities (cultures) tend to be guided less than individuals by conscience and a sense of responsibility. How much misery does this fact cause mankind! It is the source of wars and every kind of oppression, which fill the earth with pain, sighs and bitterness." (Albert Einstein, 1934)

Why is Albert Einstein right even when there is a pretend 'overwhelming' majority of 'individuals of conscience and a sense of responsibility'? It is because cultures who find it necessary to have terror-genocide construct of Other have social networks which make it nigh impossible to object without incurring severe cultural penalty, being determined as a traitor to the cause and significantly have no sufficient cultural 'knowledge' , codex support to override the altruistic enforcers and punishers cultural ethics-beliefs nor methodology.

"• Parents do not have the confidence to argue against the articulate and forceful activists who seek to impose their views, for fear of being branded as disloyal to their faith or their community."
Schools face new curbs on extremism after Birmingham Trojan horse affair Patrick Wintour, Political editor The Guardian, Wednesday 23 July 2014

Not one child’s life is worth retaining such a cultures capacity to systemically inform terror-genocide across the ages not one – you are culpable for every child lost whilst you cling to the fallacious view the Islamic/Muslim culture of which you are a member does not inform terror-genocide as clearly it does and can be proved to do so.

Saturday, December 26, 2015

Indonesia's ambassador, Nadjib Riphat Kesoema "Violent extremism is the common challenges of all religions"=Ebola is simply a medical condition as is the Common Cold so Go Home Take Plenty of Water and Rest


"Violent extremism is the common challenges of all religions: Buddha, Christianity, Hindu, Islam and all faiths." 
Indonesia labels former prime minister Tony Abbott's critique of Islam 'unhelpful' and 'divisive' By political reporter Anna Henderson ABC 10 Dec 2015

It is the same logic as determining ebola is simply a medical condition as is the common cold and therefore 'is a common challenge' to all humanity so go home take plenty of water and rest. Anyone accepting both rational are suffering a severe mental condition  of denial and delusion and in both cases placing humanity at extreme risk.


"We have to grow with the threat, and we have to do it in a confident manner,” Professor Siracusa said.
Two Sydney schools in lockdown as police unions call for support against extremists SBS 20 OCT 2015


"We (Other cultures) have to grow with the threat (Muslim cultural derived terror)"

Are humanity being forced by their political elites and their advisers to 'grow confidently' with any Other cultures systemic terror-genocide, is any Other culture demanding the redirection of the same relative level of scarce resources to set up security systems to protect themselves, is any Other culture informing such devastation in property, lives and informing such draconian political constructs resulting in the persecution and elimination of Other cultures as the Islamic/Muslim culture informs?

Common definition: usual, ordinary, customary, habitual, familiar, regular, frequent, repeated, recurrent, routine, everyday, daily, day-to-day, quotidian, standard, typical;

You seriously are suggesting all other faiths and ideologies at this point in time are informing the same relative level of terror-genocide and eliciting the enormous cost of combating such Muslim derived violence? It is commonplace for all religions-I would love to see for just the last year for each space a Muslim atrocity occurred and the severity the list of Other religions doing the same in the exact same space. What does the data tell you - nothing to fear from Muslim culture relative to Other cultures - the data has to be exactly the same for what you say to be true - is it? If not Abbott is right.

Even if it were true which it is not is that an acceptable excuse to allow piles of Muslim derived bloody bodies to continue as we know in your own streets as well as in the rest of humanities?

Not all cultures inform a flourishing life as clearly the Islamic/Muslim culture does not for humanity as simple observation and research proves.

"The use of force and violence is more commonplace and prevalent in some families, communities, religions, cultural/ethnic groups and societies based on the views and values about adult prerogatives with children. They may also be based upon the sociopathy of the perpetrators." Treatment of Complex Trauma Courtois/Ford @2016


Note: 'The use of force and violence is more commonplace and prevalent in some not all....religions, cultural/ethnic groups.'

"Banda Aceh: Indonesia's conservative Aceh province has enacted a strict Islamic criminal code, officials said late on Friday, criminalising adultery, homosexuality, and public displays of affection outside of a legally recognised relationship, with penalties that include public whippings with a thin rattan cane....

The sharia law comes after Aceh's government said several Christian churches would be shut down, just days after a mob burned down a church earlier this month, killing one person and injuring several others."

Indonesia's Aceh province enacts Islamic criminal code smh October 24, 2015

"..children raised in religious households, who are perceived to be more empathetic and sensitive to justice, are in fact less altruistic to their own class mates .... children from religious households also differ in their ratings of deserved punishment for interpersonal harm (F(2, 847) = 5.80, p < 0.01, h2 = 0.014); this was qualified by significantly harsher ratings of punishment by children from Muslim households than children from non-religious households (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between children from Christian households and non-religious households.".
The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World,
November 05, 2015

"The mother of one of the Paris attackers has told a local Belgian television station that she had missed the warning signs, and not spotted that her son had been radicalised.

Fatima Hadfi, who said she was the mother of Bilal Hadfi who blew himself up outside the Stade de France in Paris...

"You could not see anything (different) with him. He was like everybody else," Fatima Hadfi said, speaking mostly in French.

"He was a good boy, friendly and helpful ...."

Mother of Paris attacker says she missed warning signs: report AFP 28/12/2015

Why is it adherents within cultures cannot see the heinous creations developing or existent in their own behavoral variances of their own cultural making yet Other may be able to discern them?

In-culture norm-sharing and shared body representation derived from common understood meaning of cultural justified and authorised ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology "form the fundamental basis of empathy and our understanding of others’ emotions and actions.". rather than ringing alarm bells with adherent family members when the non radicalised, moderate law-abiding family have once again as they must produce an
altruistic enforcer-punisher.

Also even if helped in an Other dominated space to be able to possibly discern cultural derived 'signs' of aberrant behavior as defined by Others cultures codex raising such a view with authorities may not be even possible given the repercussions from the culture itself. Some cultures have dense social networks which stifle critical reflection.


"The perception of bodily states in others can activate similar bodily states in the self, and this is taken as evidence that our representations of our own bodies and those of others can partially overlap. These shared body representations are thought to form the fundamental basis of empathy and our understanding of others’ emotions and actions."
Changing bodies changes minds: owning another body affects social cognition, L Maister, M Slater, MV Sanchez-Vives, 2015

“Norms-shared
ideas about proper way to behave-are clearer, more firmly held and easier to enforce the more dense a social network. (If a social network consists of n “nodes”. People, firms or other social units, “density” is the proposition of the possible n(n-1)/2 connections among these nodes that are actually present.). This argument is one of the oldest in social psychology; for instance, see the classical account of Festinger, Schachter and Back (1948). It rests on the fact that the denser the network, the more unique paths along which information, ideas about proper behaviour are more likely to be encountered repeatedly, discussed and fixed; it also renders deviance from resulting norms harder and harder to hide and thus, more likely to be punished.” (Granovetter, 2005)

"The tormented final hours of Farkhunda Malikzada, a 27-year-old aspiring student of Islam who was accused of burning a Quran in a Muslim shrine, shocked Afghans across the country. That is because many of her killers filmed one another beating her and posted clips of her broken body on social media. Hundreds of other men watched, holding their phones aloft to try to get a glimpse of the violence, but never making a move to intervene. Those standing by included several police officers."
Flawed Justice After a Mob Killed an Afghan Woman NYT, By ALISSA J. RUBINDEC. Dec 26, 2015


"• Parents do not have the confidence to argue against the articulate and forceful activists who seek to impose their views, for fear of being branded as disloyal to their faith or their community."
Schools face new curbs on extremism after Birmingham Trojan horse affair Patrick Wintour, Political editor The Guardian, Wednesday 23 July 2014

“If the religious leaders compete with the extremists on Islamic knowledge, I cannot guarantee that they would win. That’s what worries me,” said Adudulkrep, who is also head of the state-run Xinjiang Islamic Institute...."

"
The findings of the study indicate that citizens (Hofstede and Hofstede (2005)) of Islamic countries share similar cultural values that vary significantly with those of the Western countries."
Conceptualizing the Islamic Personality Model, Abdul Kadir Othman, Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah, Nurhazirah Hashim, Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

"All events related to Christmas and New Year celebrations are contrary to Islamic culture, which could damage the faith of the Muslim community," the director general of the religious affairs ministry told reporters Tuesday.



Sheikh Mohamed Khayrow said security forces had been ordered to break up any such celebrations. "There should be no activity at all," he said.



Sheikh Nur Barud Gurhan, of the Supreme Religious Council of Somalia, said that non-Muslim festivities might provoke the ire of Al-Shebab, East Africa's Al-Qaeda branch, which is headquartered in Somalia.



"We are warning against the celebration of such events which are not relevant to the principles of our religion," Gurhan added, saying it could provoke Al-Shebab "to carry out attacks".

Somalia bans Christmas and New Year festivities The Daily Star Lebanon Dec. 23, 2015


"“Today I place my faith in and am grateful to Allah the almighty to announce that tomorrow, Thursday, May 1 2014, will see the enforcement of Sharia law phase one, to be followed by the other phases,” the 68-year-old sultan said at the time.

Brunei’s Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah has declared a ban on public celebration of Christmas in the tiny oil-rich state, saying that residents face jail if caught celebrating the Christian festival. The punishment for celebrating Christmas publicly in Brunei is now a fine of $20,000, or up to five years in prison, or both." 

INQUISITR December 22, 2015

"The head imam at Lakemba, Sheikh Yahya Safi, had told the congregation during prayers that they should not take part in anything to do with Christmas.

The fatwa, which has sparked widespread community debate and condemnation, warns that the "disbelievers are trying to draw Muslims away from the straight path"

It also says that Christmas Day and associated celebrations are among the "falsehoods that a Muslim should avoid ... and therefore, a Muslim is neither allowed to celebrate the Christmas Day nor is he allowed to congratulate them.

"The fatwa quotes the teacher Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim as saying that congratulating disbelievers for their rituals is forbidden, and if a "Muslim who says this does not become a disbeliever himself, he at least commits a sin as this is the same as congratulating him for his belief in the trinity, which is a greater sin and much more disliked by Almighty Allaah than congratulating him for drinking alcohol or killing a soul or committing fornication or adultery”.
No merriness here: mosque puts fatwa on Christmas Sydney Morning Herald, Natalie O'Brien, December 23, 2012


"According to the Pew Research Center, religious hostilities reached a six-year high in 2012, with a third (33%) of countries in the high category, up from 20% just six years earlier.

The Islamic world is disproportionately affected. More than one-in-two (57%) Muslim-majority countries have high religious hostilities, more than double that of other countries (25%), as shown in the chart to the left.

Although religious hostilities affect countries throughout the world experience, Muslim-majority countries consistently have higher levels of a range of religious hostilities than other countries and by wide margins. For instance, Muslim-majority countries are more than three times more likely than other countries to have religion-related war, terror or sectarian violence"

09/22/2014 Source data PEW Research Center - Commentary Weekly Number Brian J. Grim, Ph.D.



"When you look at Iran and Saudi Arabia, these are the two leading nations of Islam. And I’m saying the messages that we get are not messages that inspire people. So we’ve got to change that. We’ve got to stop the support for radicalism that comes from the weird ideologies that come from Saudi Arabia.

At the same time, I’ve been to Iran. It really bothers me that after each prayer, they say: “Death to America. Death to Israel. Death to Britain.
Seattle-area imam takes on religious radicalism, prayers of ‘Death to America’ By Nina Shapiro, Seattle Times staff reporter December 14, 2015

The Islamic Party of Australia Hizb-ut Tahrir posted their draft Islamic Constitution of Australia 

1 – The articles of this constitution are characterised by the fact that they are exclusively and purely Islamic opinions and thoughts. They contain nothing whatsoever that is non Islamic, nor are they influenced by anything that is non-Islamic. They are rather Islamic in every sense and nothing else, and they are based upon nothing but the foundations and texts of Islam.
Draft Islamic Constitution of Australia

"The group (Islamic Party of Australia Hizb-ut Tahrir), which reportedly described last week the slaying of the magazine staff by Parisian terrorists as a "cure".."

Hizb ut-Tahrir holding public meeting in Lakemba over Charlie Hebdo by Natalie O'Brien smh, January 18, 2015



"The sharia law comes after Aceh's government said several Christian churches would be shut down, just days after a mob burned down a church earlier this month, killing one person and injuring several others."

Indonesia's Aceh province enacts Islamic criminal code smh October 24, 2015


"Indonesia's laws and policies have produced many instances where members of one religion have persecuted the members of other religions or of other sects. The authorities have not brought to justice many perpetrators of crimes. Crimes are commonly justified by the perpetrators as actions against hatred, heresy, blasphemy, or deviance.

In October 2009, a group of petitioners, including some human rights groups, requested that Indonesia's Constitutional Court review the 1965 Law on Blasphemy. On 19 April 2010, the Court announced its refusal to make the review. “If the Blasphemy Law was scrapped before a new law was enacted . . . it was feared that misuses and contempt of religion would occur and trigger conflicts in society,” Justice Akil Mochtar said. The Court offered an interpretation of the Law. The interpretation says the state recognizes six religions, and "leaves alone" the followers of other religions."
Blasphemy law in Indonesia From Wikipedia


These laws (Pakistan Blasphemy Laws) seem to protect the embodiments of faith of only one community in a multifaith society, whereas that community is already in majority and ruling class of the country. On the contrary these laws provide no protection to members of other religions and hence they are discriminatory. They are used against the members of other religious communities including Christians, Ahmadis, and Hindus and even against Muslims who have some differences with main sects. It is even being interpreted by extremists as ‘blasphemous’ to claim that it is not necessary for a man to grow his facial hair long in Islam!

Christians are the main targets by the fundamentalist and religious political parties. The law is being used for forced conversion, forcibly taking over the lands and business of Christians, hindering the preaching of Christian faith and for settling personal scores, rivalries and vengeance. Nevertheless, these laws have proved to be the most injurious weapon of active religious persecution by the extremists with encouragement from the government.

Muslims on the other hand also face these problems but only those who are being declared as non-Muslims by the majority known as Sunni. The other sects of Muslims who are declared as non-Muslims are Ahmedis, Shias, Bahais, Zakris, etc. and they also face problem from the majority. They are also accused and charged with blasphemy to settle personal disputes.

Many innocent persons have been falsely accused under these laws and the number is still on the rise. Victims are severely manhandled and even murdered by mobs and individuals; their families go in hiding. They have to leave their home or even their homeland and their dear ones accept exile to save their lives. Their worship places, houses and localities are attacked, burned and destroyed. Those accused have to undergo fierce media trial. Throughout the process of arrest, investigation and trial anyone showing sympathy with the accused is liable to harassment and allegations being made against them of acting in a non-Islamic way. Police are pressurised and blackmailed. Judges are threatened, harassed and have even been killed. Even if the accused is acquitted, they are still hunted and killed by extremists. There are still many in the jails waiting for fair trial."

Muslim terrorist 'few' derive their ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation methodology from the Muslim cultures categorisation engine construct of Other - the 'few' do not make them up themselves therefore the Muslim culture as a whole is responsible.

"Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our "categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
....
"every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"

SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglass Hofstadter (American professor of cognitive science), Emmanuel Sander (French Psychologist-Developmental Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Educational Psychology), 2013

It can no longer be a matter of 'educating' citizens as to their responsibilities and behaviours regards each other as individuals in Democracies which necessarily contain many cultures due to our globalized world, as cultures set the behavioral variance within which their adherents exist it is a matter of reviewing what a cultures responsibilities and behaviours regards each other culture in their same space have to be and abide by for any culture to be accepted to and remain in a Democratic multicultural space.

I repeat for the hard of hearing supporters and actual adherents of the diabolical proven blight upon humanity the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex 'The use of force and violence is 
more commonplace and prevalent in some not all....religions, cultural/ethnic groups.'

"The use of force and violence is more commonplace and prevalent in some families, communities, religions, cultural/ethnic groups and societies based on the views and values about adult prerogatives with children espoused. They may also be based upon the sociopathy of the perpetrators."
Treatment of Complex Trauma Courtois/Ford @2016

Sociopathy groups of people who adopt belief systems which cause them to behave in a similar fashion.

The Islamic/Muslim codex can analogisis the quotes in this text into any space I repeat into any space the proof behavior of the 'many' exists it is a matter of record not imagined for a political purpose to malign a particular culture the Islamic/Muslim culture is relatively to other cultures behavoral variances a diabolical and dangerous entity and must be removed from humanities public and private spheres as quickly as possible for not to do so has this cultural codex inform infamy on a scale which leave no one untouched.and a diminished human condition..

Farkhunda ‘didn’t burn Koran’: Afghanistan mob killed innocent woman news.com.au MARCH 25, 2015

My view is simply this, there is not one victim, not one worth the price of enabling such a cultural variance no matter the number of so called relative good compared to the 'few' they produce to inform systemic terror and genocide against Other.

"The West can no longer afford to play the compassionate democrat when it faces an enemy which respects no ethical rulebook whatsoever."
Comment: Western kindness is killing democracy JP, By ARI HAROW, RICHARD KEMP 11/23/2015

Not one child, not one is worth the price, not one..