Thursday, September 18, 2014

Australia 2014: Premier Campbell Newman = Britain 1937: Norman Hillson “ I speak of Germany” Both Dangerous twits.

Germany 1931: "Hans Achim Litten cross-examined Hitler 1931 in a court case involving two workers stabbed by four “a very small number - few” Brownshirts (paramilitary wing of the Nazi Party) –
....
“The presiding judge read a question formulated by Litten: Did Hitler, as he named Goebbels Reich Minister of Propaganda, know of the passage from his book, where Goebbels declares that fear of the coup d'état cannot be permitted, that parliament should be blown up and the government hunted to hell and where the call to revolution was made again, letter-spaced?
.....
Hitler: I can no longer testify under oath, if I knew Goebbels' book at the time. The theme (...) is absolutely of no account to the Party, as the booklet doesn't bear the Party emblem and is also not officially sanctioned by the Party. (...)

Here we have in 1931 not just a leader but the leader Hitler of an ideology denying that Nazi text which aligns directly to his own Mein Kampf construct of Other informed the murder of two men by a ‘few’ Nazi adherents. Please note the exact same construct of Other exists in the Quran.

Have I sinned? What is a Genocide Construct of Other and Why is it formed?

" February 28, 1933, the night of the Reichstag fire, he (Litten) was rousted from his bed, arrested and taken into protective custody. Litten spent the rest of his life in one Nazi concentration camp or another, enduring torture and many interrogations. After five years and a move to Dachau, where his treatment worsened and he was cut off from all outside communication, he committed suicide."

We face exactly the same obscenity of denial in 2014 in Australia by Gatekeepers who are either inept or liars or both.

2014: Premier Campbell Newman: “There are some people a very small number ‘few’ of ‘radicals’ who are talking about doing their fellow Australians or Queenslanders harm.

 …….

…If people lash out against a particular group then we immediately start to break our community apart. Lets not allow this to happen. Let us recognise we are dealing with some criminals who are using a particular religion, Muslims as a badge trying to convince other people to get on board. They are rejected by the leaders of that religion and all freedom loving members, the majority of people of that religious group they reject these things unequivocally.”


This can justifiably be rephrased utilizing the exact same logic for Germany 1931.

Germany 1931: President of Germany Paul von Hindenburg: “There are some people a very small number ‘few’ of ‘radicals’ who are talking about doing their fellow Germans harm. …….
…If people lash out against a particular group then we immediately start to break our community apart. Lets not allow this to happen. Let us recognise we are dealing with some criminals who are using a particular ideology, Nazism as a badge trying to convince other people to get on board. They are rejected by the leaders of that ideology and all freedom loving members, the majority of people of that ideological group they reject these things unequivocally.”


Australians should be also reminded of the following, Premier Campbell Newman is not alone in his dangerous stupidity.

London 1937: "Experience has taught me that all argument is useless with fanatical young Nazi of this kind, and so I say nothing." Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”,

Norman Hillson despite seeing the results of terror by the very small number - few on the German streets the exact same script, logic and pure ignorance of Premier Campbell Newman:

London 1937 “ the Germans (inclusive of the Nazi) . that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Britain as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else”. Norman Hillson “ I speak of Germany”,

This is where the Australian Political mindset is now 'It could have been worse." Well get this do not change your security strategy it will be.

We (Australia 2014, Britain 1937) assure ourselves 'moderates' are in charge for did they not tell us they were such, things could be worse?

London 1937 “In fact, if the extremist’s elements had prevailed. I have not the least doubt that disruption would have been more drastic and that we should have real reason by now to fear German aggression from both a military as well as political point of view.” Norman Hillson “ I speak of Germany”

Australia 2014: Premier Campbell Newman says people should visit mosques on open days as a "gesture of good faith" at a time of "great peril for our country".

Germany 1931: Premier Campbell Newman’s request is exactly the same as asking the Socialists in Germany 1931 to attend a Nazi Party Rally. This is totally insane and it’s called in Australia 2014 being good.

Culture uses artifacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members. It is the filter through which we see and understand our current reality(Edgar, 1980). 
Psychology Burton,Western,Kowalski, 2012

Counter-terrorist forces are arresting these persons therefore they are not generic criminals they are Muslim cultural terrorists/insurgents deriving their belief and actions from Islamic artifacts, rituals and text as the Nazi cultural terrorists/insurgents derived their belief and actions from Nazi artifacts, rituals and text, to claim this is not the case is pathological.

Not all Nazi members joined the SS nor the Brownshirts they were the small numbered few but they represented the true nature of the text in Mein Kampf they were the 'True Believers'.

Yet the true insanity is these dangerous gatekeepers are accusing those who can actually see and show the direct connection between Islamic text and exemplar (messianic) behavior, just as well as these Muslim 'radicals' can, are accusing these people of suffering a mental illness Islamophobia, racism, bigotry (a non-existent condition because rational fear is not a phobia) for detailing the truth - 'radicals' are coming from so called 'good'-'moderate' families, groups, institutions. this would be impossible if there was not an ethical bridge which all recognised as valid within the Islamic codex otherwise there would be no major schism.

How do you go about it. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child...

Did it make any difference the 'majority' of such a codex are "looking for peace" in Germany 1930s/1940s and you expect with an exact same Muslim genocide construct with growing not diminishing terror as in Germany 1931 Australia will somehow be different. Picking up simply newspaper articles over the last twenty years no movement in the Muslim ethical mean which enabled terror in Australian streets?

Should it not be ALL not majority, of what use is a culture in the Public Square which causes massive diversion of resources just to protect ourselves from adherents formed from the exact same cultural codex of the whole Muslim cultures so called 'good'-'moderate'-'radical'.

Change the Architect and Builder or Change Nothing.

Surely there exists within the security apparatus persons and even muslims who recognise this as a truth, cultures inform behavioral variances, and this variance defines the relative threat of any culture to another not the ever present 'good' which will always exist relative to the radical. It is what the radical of a culture informs consistently constantly which is the true measure of risk/threat a culture poses. To solve the problem derived from any cultures radicals therefore demands a cultural solution not an individual solution - the individual is never the issue because they are a product of the culture itself. It is the same as determining Pavlovs dog is responsible for his behavior when the bell rings and punishing him for being so. You have really done what? Changed what? 


Muslim culture has formed these cultural terrorists/insurgents unless the Muslim "artifacts, rituals and text" are removed which causes this condition nothing will change. Being 'friends' with the enablers the Muslim Culture be it that they and their erstwhile supporters are in complete denial of their complicity is absurd.

Monday, September 15, 2014

Is it True to Determine Allowing a Particular Cultural Group to Immigrate to Your Country Poses a Security Threat is Wrong" - "..most of them are children of immigrants"

Most immigrants, and from certain cultures none (which in itself should inform a truth), are not directly involved in radical actions, in cultures this is not at all unusual, but clearly family, groups, institutions must provide the sustenance and culturalization infant-child-adolescent-adult to create 'radicals' from so called 'good'/'moderate' families, groups, institutions to provide the necessary ethical bridge to cross so easily from so called 'good'/'moderate' to violent 'radical'. How can any person within such a culture claim rationally to be 'good'/'moderate' when enabling such a cultural construct of Other to remain from generation to generation within the Public Square enabling such tragic results?

Clearly the so called 'good'/'moderate' must know very well what the ethical basis for the 'radical' component of their own cultural behavioral variance is - it happens often enough, and from generation to generation upon common interpretation and purpose so cannot be be behavioral outliers.

So for anyone to claim a person is suffering from islamophobia (a non existent condition because rational fear is not a phobia) for stating immigrants from a certain culture pose security risks not only now but into the future and will with subsequent generations, given the evidence these cultures do inform such violent outcomes, is delusional and worse outright dangerous to fellow citizens for such an approach currently underlying public policy allows terror and major schism to intensify under a 'criminal' rather than cultural response.

It is public policy which deals with intensifying symptoms of a specific culture not the cause the culture itself. So what happens - Terror Threat Levels are raised as the threat of attacks increases and occur tag teaming with cultural pressure to accept ethics abhorrent to Other in the same space.


"The girl, Rahaf Yousef, is 13.


Speaking wistfully of her days at school, she declared herself throughout the day to be “indifferent” to the marriage she says will keep her from finishing her education. But no one seemed to be listening."
In Jordan, Ever Younger Syrian Brides NYT By RANA F. SWEIS SEPT. 13, 2014

"The report, written in conjunction with Anti-Slavery Australia, tells the story of 14-year-old Ms Elia, whose parents married her off in Australia to an older man. When she tried to continue with her education after the marriage her husband burnt her homework and forced her out of school."
Girls as young as ten being forced into marriage; 14 million child brides married every year
news.com.au JULY 14, 2014

"So appalling was the woman's life of abuse, which included claims that her father told her she could only leave her marriage “in a coffin”, that Judge Joseph Harman made an unprecedented public appeal in his judgment for authorities to act.

The story came to light after the Daily Telegraph reported the arrest of a man who had been living with a 12-year-old as his wife in Sydney.


The imam who married the pair, Riaz Tasawar, was yesterday arrested by police."
Shame of our child brides: Court hears how woman was raped and beaten as it’s revealed hundreds are forced into arranged and unregistered marriages across NSW
EXCLUSIVE BY PADRAIC MURPHY THE DAILY TELEGRAPH FEBRUARY 12, 2014 

“I would say nearly every Afghan Hazara family in ­Melbourne is involved in this practice.” ­Sultana, who fled the Taliban two years ago with her family, added: “I only know about these girls because I am also a ­Hazara, and the other women tell me about them. They are kept prisoners, locked in their husbands’ homes and only allowed out if their mothers-in-law go with them, so they can never seek help.”
....
“My brother used me to get his friend an Australian visa,” says Badria. “But I didn’t know that at the time. I was so young I didn’t know what was happening to me. All I knew was that I didn’t want to get married yet.

“I wanted to make something of my life,” she says. “But in our culture you obey your father. I would not have thought of saying no to the marriage. On the day of the wedding, standing there marrying this guy, I felt helpless, trapped and scared. But I remember thinking, ‘If I say anything against this, I will shame the family’s name.’ ”

‘It is the young flesh they want’
ANNE BARROWCLOUGH THE AUSTRALIAN JUNE 14, 2014 12:00AM


Do the many victims, (inclusive of us who have to pay increasing amounts of protection money better spent funding education, infrastructure, etc) of invariably 'only the few' cultural enforcers really care about relative numbers of a culture directly involved when they see for themselves the intensifying threat and the burning buildings, broken bodies and lives as well as the inexorable movement to impose abhorant ethical constructs as the 'norm' particularly as they relate to women within the Public Square? The later being the whole point of why the tool of cultural violence appears in the cultural codex in the first place. Cultural ethics/beliefs unable to be imposed peacefully through reason and equity require what type of cultural tools?

I believe this policy approach that religions, cultures whose ethics are derived from a religious rather than secular construct do not inform terror and major schism is so insane and devoid of truth that of course the policy instruments deployed will fail and citizens will be killed, maimed and live in increasing fear. 

So many determining themselves to be 'good'/'moderates' claiming to be of a religion of peace yet the religion continually informs such terror and major schism wherever it is allowed to set foot, not only in one space but thousands across time, as well as oppressive political constructs - this is pure madness.

It is important that persons are not attacked as this simply falls into the same genocide construct but the codex which enables this to occur rightly needs to be challenged which forms the infant-child-adolescent-adult radical and removed from the Public Square.

". most of them are children of immigrants"
Portugal's Jihadists by Soeren Kern Gatestone Institute, International Policy Council, September 14, 2014 at 5:00 am

"In Dec 2011 Justice Betty King sentenced three of the men to 18 years in prison, saying that they should be ashamed for their ingratitude to Australia. She added that Fattal, Aweys and El Sayed were all unrepentant radical Muslims and would remain a threat to the public while they held extremist views. Fattal can be deported on his release from jail, but his co-conspirators are Australian citizens.

16,000 Somali immigrants live in Australia, and Australian authorities have been worried for some time about the close links some of their number maintain with Islamist and jihadi organizations and ideologies."
Holsworthy Barracks terror plot


Teen terror threat: ‘Dangerous sons’ of Muslim immigrants involved in Australia stabbing
BEN MCCLELLAN AND LEIGH VAN DEN BROEKE THE DAILY TELEGRAPH AUGUST 26, 2014 12:00AM


"That is a cohort, so far, of 80,000 low-skilled Muslims with poor English predominantly from countries that have the most radical and extreme jihadist traditions in the world.


Of course, most Muslims in any country are not extremists. But after the latest terrorist atrocity in London, former British prime minister Tony Blair, while acknowledging that most Muslims were moderates, commented: "There is a problem with Islam - from the adherents of an ideology which is a strain within Islam. We have to put it on the table and be honest about it. Of course there are Christian extremists and Jewish, Buddhist and Hindu ones. But I am afraid the strain is not the province of a few extremists. It has at its heart a view about religion and about the interaction between religion and politics that is not compatible with pluralistic, liberal, open-minded societies ... At the extreme end of the spectrum are terrorists, but the world view goes deeper and wider than it is comfortable for us to admit. So by and large we don't admit it."
Policy failure creating a monstrous problem THE AUSTRALIAN Greg Sheridan JUNE 08, 2013

"not about religion"?

"This is a wonderful multicultural society we have."  Queensland Premier Campbell Newman said it was not about religion but about people involved in criminal acts.
Logan mosque targeted with anti-Muslim pamphlets, sparking fears of violence..
ABC By Leonie Mellor SEPTEMBER 13, 2014 

"Tony Abbott raises Australia’s terror threat to high"
Tony Abbott raises Australia’s terror threat to high 
SEPTEMBER 12, 2014 news.com.au

"..a wonderful multicultural society we have" - Had once not anymore.

"not about religion"? Terrorists/insurgents require to be defined as such need to have a political cause,, and ideological cause, religious or non-religious. 

Are the 'societies criminal police gang squads arresting these supposed generic criminals? No those involved in arresting and hunting down these terrorists/insurgent are counter-terrorism security units.

This means these persons of interest are political, ideological advocates and have to, have to derive the justification and authorisation from a specific cultural, political, ideological codex  otherwise they would not be able to exist.

These are Muslim terrorists/insurgents therefore the justification and authorisation for their actions comes from a cultural codex of which each of them has a common understanding of meaning and purpose,  as anyone who has taken the time to read the Quran and reflect on Mohammad as the Muslim exemplar model would realize immediately is the source - Islam.

Religion is therefore responsible for the terror/insurgency undertaken by Muslims  the fact most do not go out and participate is not unusual, in fact not everyone can or does turn up at the front in any cultural war how would the cultural combatants survive? 

Nor is it unusual for members of such a community to claim innocence blaming 'radicals' - but radicals would not exist if the belief system they based their actions did not exist and more importantly such claims of innocence and moderation on the part of some of the adherents never stops the terror/insurgency increasing in intensity.

Also it can be clearly proved these 'radicals' are derived from the very families, groups, and institutions claiming to be peace loving - this is simply not a sustainable argument - peace loving - if it was really the case there would be no violent radicals - such ideas, motivation which enable violence simply would not exist.

As these infant-child-adolescent-adult 'radicals' have learnt their ethical and behavioral constructs within and from a cultural codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) templates) and as there are statistically many adherents, therefore they cannot be determined generic criminal outliers, not only holding 'radical' beliefs but also utilising these cultural imbued beliefs as motivation for violence there has to be a commonly held view of the whole of culture 'good'-'moderate'-'radical' of not only the existence of an ethical bridge to cross from 'good' to 'radical' but a common whole of culture knowledge of the justification and authorisation for doing so inherent within the cultural codex. 


We are told continually invariably for each terrorist "They came from a 'good' Muslim family that does not believe in violence." Those Muslims and others supporting them claiming such a state believe it to be a true representation, either the Wests actions caused their 'good' children to stray or Muslim 'Hate' clerics from the exact same culture Islam did so. From where I ask do the 'Hate' clerics obtain the ethical constructs to even get to the point of justifying violence against Other? Islam.

The Islamic State are therefore Muslim 'radicals' not 'Death Cultists' nor generic criminals.

The Islamic State is, and has to be, basing its beliefs and behavior upon Islamic "artefacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members." To claim this is not the case and the Islamic State does not represent Islam the proposers of such a notion given the Islamic States name alone need to justify 'why not' as all of us depend on our cultural learning to frame and justify our actions to ourselves and more importantly with others we are relating to. The Islamic state would not exist otherwise.


"Culture uses artefacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members. It is the filter through which we see and understand our current reality(Edgar, 1980)." Psychology Burton,Western,Kowalski, 2012 

Islam is a religion, religion is responsible, therefore Muslims as a culture are responsible as long as the codex construct of Other enabling such cultural violence remains within Islamic/Muslim codex.

How did supposedly 'rational' highly educated Western security policy makers and enforcers come to believe or acquiesce to "not religion" as a fundamental deductive starting point for terror/insurgency which will lead irrevocably in time and space to their own cultures destruction as Islam adapts to having symptoms attacked not cause? The Islamic State is only one result of this policy in action. Adapt, Improvise, Overcome. It is not a new theme.


Firstly the 'holocaust' by the Germans against the Jews, raised the spectre of the real risk of informing horror once one starts determining 'rightly' or 'wrongly' a culture is informing terror and/or major schism. 

Secondly the development of the International Diplomacy, Business advantage based upon cultural relativism, the 'turning of the blind eye', diametrically opposed ethical constructs no longer posed Blocks to diplomatic dialogue, business - peace and wealth was more important than ethical differences so long as you-individual, family, institutions were not themselves directly subject to them - National/cultural sovereignty became the accepted basis for relationships. 

Thirdly vanity, the West thought and still do its philosophical constructs of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity, economic prosperity, political democratically based institutions and processes are so so superior at delivering what a human needs to survive and flourish that time will convince even the most hardened 'radical' of other cultures the error of their ways. Trouble is every other culture thinks the same thing regards their culture relative to others.

Fourthly the size of the problem, given the only way to resolve what Tony Blair calls the Islam Problem is to remove the very 'artefacts, rituals and text which develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among Muslim members.' which Muslims determine as sacred God given direction as to belief and behavior. The reality of what had to be actually done was clearly too much for those in political power and given the acceptance of one to three above as excuses -dealing with symptoms not cause appeared to be a much safer option. Let the future generations suffer the consequences we now will simply try and keep our heads above water.

One to four excuses needed to be realised in a supporting 'truth'-'not religion'-'not Islam' this is what they hobbled together the doctrine upon which the whole response to Islamic religious cultural war sits, prove it false to enough policy keys in the Western security network, totally false as the doctrine is, the real work to stop terror and insurgency begins. Of course it had to be an excuse underwritten by 'experts' in the field of terrorism/insurgency so the powers that be could wash their hands of the inevitable bloody failure that was to follow.

"I use the term "takfiri terrorist" to describe those who use terrorism to further that ideology. The doctrine of takfiri disobeys the Qur'anic injunction against compulsion in religion (Surah al-Baqarah:256) and instead holds that Muslims whose beliefs differ from the takfiri's are infidels who must be killed. Takfirism is a heresy within Islam: it was outlawed in the 2005 Amman Message, an initiative of King Abdullah II of Jordan, which brought together more than 500 'ulema (Islamic scholars)  and Muslim political leaders from the Organisation of the Islamic Conference and the Arab League in an unprecedented consensus agreement, a "unanimous agreement by all Muslims everywhere as represented by their acknowledged most senior religious authorities and political leaders." The Accidental Guerrilla David Kilcullen Oxford Press 2009

This the 'distinct' Islamic ideology devoid of a genocide construct of Other was created by "unanimous agreement by all Muslims everywhere". unanimous? There would be no Islamic State.

Let us consider two statements"

Mohammed Quran: "There is no compulsion in Faith."

Goebbels (Nazi propaganda Minister) "The Jews are guilty! The Jews are guilty!" .. "We (Nazi) have nothing to contribute to it, it will come by itself, because it has to come." ...

What was is the reality - something does not add up.

Clearly Goebbels and Mohammed are clear their ideology will not cause the subject of their constructs of evil Other the 'guilty' to be subject to harm, pressure in these one statements. 

What is completely ignored is where both statements sit within both codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) templates) of both ideologies what goes before and after. 

Mohammed Quran: "There is no compulsion in Faith." for instance when reviewing just the Qur'anic text which goes before is simply a recognition of the impossibility to impose faith at a human level as psychology and experience would clearly dictate and the fact in the very first lines of the Quran it stipulates God decides who believes or not who is led astray or not not mere Muslim humans - for a Muslim to attempt to force a person to believe is to assume you have the power of God, to determine who believes. 

Such a justification to form the basis of a distinct Islamic ideology collapses - and clearly the true meaning is not lost on the Muslim radicals - yet it still justifies an obscenity 'not religion'. An obscenity for it blames the victims not the perpetrator, generic criminality replaces the true culprit culture-Islam-Muslims as adherents of that culture which enable it 'good'-'moderate'-'radical' to frame the next generations behavior.

How do you go about it. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child...

"..these efforts focused on the far-right; anti-Semitism in Muslim communities was left unchecked, according to community activists and government officials.


"The protests got a lot of attention, but 'Jew' has been used as an insult by young Muslims in schoolyards, on sports grounds, for years," said Ahmad Mansour, an Israeli Arab who has led initiatives against prejudice and radicalization among Muslims in Germany since 2007. "There is a group of people that Germany's fight against anti-Semitism passed by."
Germany Sees Rising Anti-Semitism Among Muslims

Merkel to Address Weekend Rally, German Jews Worry About Lack of Plan

Another example of growing incidences of Cultural Gatekeeper paralyses enforced not of fear of more Muslim terror but enforcement from within of the false notion of islamophobia, racism (even though Muslims are not a race) and bigotry (even though being bigoted against a genocide construct you would think would be a good).

I ask again no movement in Muslim ethical mean to enable attacks upon Other?


"not about religion"?

"With only a few exceptions, moderate Muslim leaders have not spoken out publicly to condemn the Islamic State and those who want to leave Australia to fight with them."
Preparing for next wave of terror in the post-9/11 world THE AUSTRALIAN Cameron Stewart SEPTEMBER 13, 2014 


The problem is 'only a few exceptions', firstly altruist enforcers in any culture invariably are 'a few' also the 'few' Muslim leaders who do not condemn the Islamic State and "those (Muslims) who want to leave Australia to fight with them." exist as 'religious' Muslims leaders and recognized as such therefore their reasons for not 'condemning' must derive from Islamic cultural justification and authorisation.

"Wissam Haddad, head of the extremist al-Risalah Islamic Centre in Sydney, this week called on the government to let Australians go and fight in the Middle East.."

Clearly Wissam Haddad is one of those Muslim leaders not condemning IS he is the head, Imam, religious leader advocating the support of cultural terror he as a religious leader clearly determines as a legitimate religious derived position. Otherwise it would be impossible for him to do so there has to be a cultural basis for approving of such actions. The fact Wissam Haddad exists at all and has not been run out of town by the so called moderate Muslims is because there must be Islamic legitimacy attached to him and his ethics. Otherwise he simply would not exist with the title and the organisation he currently heads.


As important as the direct connection of Muslim Leaders such as Wissam Haddads approval connecting decisions for doing so directly to religious based constructs is the complete juxtaposition between condemning IS by so called 'moderate' religious Muslim clerics and demanding by the same 'moderate' Muslim leaders at the highest level of the hierarchy in Australia nothing be done to stop IS carrying out despicable acts against Other inclusive of Muslims who do not align to their Sunni sect view of the world. 

You condemn the acts then refuse to do anything about it and even blame Other for a derivative of your own cultural codex - this is not duplicity. 

The duplicity is sickening claiming it has nothing to do with you then trying to obviate any action to resolve the situation. No religious cultural connection this is impossible for such a stance has to be justified on religious cultural grounds.

The 'few' could not do what they do so well unless there was cultural backing sufficient enough to do so. The Myth of 'only a few exceptions' Muslim Opinion Polls: A "Tiny Minority of Extremists"?"Immigration Minister Scott Morrison has rejected comments from Australia's Grand Mufti that the Abbott government will be to blame for creating more Muslim radicals at home if it sends troops to the Middle East."
Immigration Minister Scott Morrison rejects comments from Australia’s Grand Mufti
Date smh Gareth Hutchens and Rory Callinan September 14, 2014

The Grand Mufti (Arabic: مفتي عام‎ muftī ʿām , "general expounder" or كبير المفتين kabīr al-muftīn , "the great of expounders") is the highest official of religious law in a Sunni or Ibadi Muslim country. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

"The Australian National Imams Council and Professor Mohammed issued a statement on September 3 saying "one of the main causative factor [sic] for local radicalisation in the West has been the Western governments' military involvement in the Middle East".

They called on the Abbott government to "re-examine its decision" to provide weapons to Kurdish forces in Iraq to help in the fight against the Islamic State."


"An imam (Arabic: إمام‎ imām, plural: أئمة aʼimmah; Persian: امام‎) is an Islamic leadership position. It is most commonly in the context of a worship leader of a mosque and Muslim community by Sunni Muslims. In this context, Imams may lead Islamic worship services, serve as community leaders, and provide religious guidance."

Islamic State another, not the worst brutal manifestation of Islam as Boko Harem and other groups clearly inform the same behavior. It is just that the Islamic State is an embarrassment to Obama and put a lie to a US strategy of disengagement based upon a fallacious self-serving Muslim view supported by grossly inept Western policy makers, expressed so eloquently by the religious Muslim Australian Grand Mufti and his fellow religious Muslim Imams "one of the main causative factor [sic] for local radicalisation in the West has been the Western governments' military involvement in the Middle East".

The fact is Obama withdrew from Iraq in large part on the basis of this belief, US involvement in Iraq caused the Islamist genocide conflict in both directions Sunni against Shia and both against the US. It is a belief founded on a lie. Islam is a religion of peace.

It is a lie because the US was not in Iraq when IS started to take control of large swaths of territory committing atrocities as they went. This was a sectoral-religious war within Islam itself - a war it has been waging for centuries even before the US came into existence.

This newspaper article segment above is proof the IS terror and major schism are derived directly from religion if it was not so the religious leadership, the religious Muslim Australian Grand Mufti and his fellow religious Muslim Imams would not be involved at all, do we see the catholic clergy involved, the buddhist, the hindu, etc, the terror and major schism, we have been told has nothing to do with Muslims, simply generic crime, nothing to do with Muslim sectoral enmity and inherent hatred of Other even trying to prevent terror even amongst Muslims themselves.


Other gets blamed for trying to prevent the worst that human nature can inform. 

"He said the young men who reportedly verbally attacked a uniformed ADF officer in Sydney's CBD were "idiots" who needed to be "dealt with" by authorities.

An internal ADF memo, circulated just 48 hours before Australia's terrorist threat level was raised to high last week, had apparently detailed an incident in which a group of men threatened to blow the "head off" an ADF member in Sydney if he went to Iraq to fight the Islamic State. 

According to The Sunday Telegraph, the officer was approached by the group of men and told to "go to the Middle East so we can blow your f----ing head off you c--t."

I ask again no movement in Muslim ethical mean to enable attacks upon Other not only in this country but elsewhere?

"Worse, there is no shortage of Arabs and Muslims who are convinced that Islamic State is actually an invention of Americans and "Zionists" to destroy the Arab world and tarnish the image of Islam.


The head of Egypt's Al-Azhar University, Sunni Islam's highest seat of learning, was recently quoted as saying that Islamic State terrorists were "colonial creations" serving a "Zionist" scheme to "destroy the Arab world."
Why Many Arabs and Muslims Do Not Trust Obama by Khaled Abu Toameh Gladstone Institute September 15, 2014 at 5:00 am

Saudi Arabia's top clerics speak out against militancy Reuters RIYADH Wed Sep 17, 2014

"On April 23, Saad al-Durihim, a Saudi Wahhabi sheikh, posted a tweet on Twitter in which he said that jihadist fighters in Iraq should adopt a "heavy-handed" approach and kill any Shiites they can get their hands own, including children and women.
....
There is no sect or group that maintains a monopoly on extremism and takfir, all sects are apostatizing others. Even members of the same sect or political group are now apostatizing members of their own group because of political disputes or a struggle for power and leadership."
Saudi Wahhabi Sheikh (D. Saad Darém Faculty member (Associate Professor). Imam of a mosque) Calls on Iraq's Jihadists to Kill Shiites On April 23 2013 Almonitor

Clearly there is Islamic text which exists which supports terror 'apostatizing others' unless it is deleted not simply determined as misinterpreted or simply ignored with selective interpretation of other text the terror will not stop.


"Saudi Arabia's top cleric, Sheik Abdulaziz bin Al Sheikh, on Thursday issued the strongest condemnation yet of Hezbollah's role in Syria, urging politicians and Muslim scholars to take "effective steps to deter its aggression" on Syria."
After Hezbollah's foray into Syria's civil war, sectarian flames blaze stronger in Mideast

Published June 07, 2013 Associated Press

John Stuart Mill & Edmund Burke Putting the Cart Before the Horse. Are the 'Good' Responsible for Stopping Evil Or Are the 'Good'-'Moderate'-'Radical' Responsible for Creating Evil?

Wednesday, September 10, 2014

AFP National Manager Counter Terrorism Assistant Commissioner Neil Gaughan Invents Motiveless Terror Paradigm

Neil Gaughan Invents Motiveless, Ideological Free Terror Paradigm "This has got nothing to do with Islam."

You have a genocide construct, even if you do not personally ascribe to it, anywhere in your cultural codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) templates) it will in time and space be reflected in your cultures behavioral variance.

Why ‘will be reflected’ not ‘may be’ not ‘will not be’ – because the construct of Other would not have been placed into your cultural codex for no cultural purpose as genetically our genetic codex informs two arms instead of just one. Given Islam’s construct of women in particular let alone Other why do you think inherent cultural violence may be needed for the Muslim culture to survive?

Terror/Insurgency has to be informed by a political construct derived from culture. 

If Not Islam What Culture Counter Terrorism Assistant Commissioner Neil Gaughan?




Man charged after raid on Islamic centre south of Brisbane

"A (non-member of any culture) Agim Kruezi, 21, from Boronia Heights, is expected to appear in the Brisbane Magistrates Court following a 12-month joint operation that included the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and Queensland Police.

(non-member of any culture) Omar Succerieh, 31, from Kuraby, has also been arrested and is expected to be charged later today."

Man charged after raid on Islamic centre south of Brisbane ABC

(non-member of any culture)= humans who derive their ethics to commit or participate in terror from nowhere. Very rare creatures which only exist in ...... ?????


I am rather sickened by what Mr. Gaughan says for it proves to me our Western Cultural Gatekeepers are completely inept and putting Western Democratic citizens in increasing not diminishing danger. 

"AFP National Manager Counter Terrorism Assistant Commissioner Neil Gaughan said there was nothing to connect the men to the jihadist Islamic State movement.
"This has got nothing to do with Islam. This is criminal behaviour by Australians involved in terrorist activity," Mr. Gaughan said.
BY TRACEY FERRIER AND STEPHEN JOHNSON AAP SEPTEMBER 10, 2014 7:16PM

One simply has to look at three things even without considering other facts which inform us what Mr. Gaughan said "This has got nothing to do with Islam." is a dangerous lie.

Firstly it is Mr. Gaughan's title "Counter Terrorism Assistant Commissioner" if it said "Gangs Squad Commander" then I may have reflected upon the notion a generic crime has been committed rather than cultural derived action. Action follows function, Mr. Gaughan's job is not to apprehend generic 'criminals' it is to apprehend and/or discombobulate cultural derived terrorists/insurgents.

Given Mr. Gaughan has taken on this role clearly by the statement made the system of which Mr. Gaughan is integral has no idea what terrorism/insurgency means and it must have been only by pure luck they tripped over these two non-political/non-ideological/non-cultural terrorist/insurgents. Such rare creatures so recently brought to my attention as an absurdity have found solid form in Western Democratic policy frameworks. These two should not be in prison they should be in Oddities Hall of Fame.

Secondly Mr. Gaughan describes the two men’s behavior - involvement in “terrorist activity”.

It is so awful how Australian counter terrorism policy makers are dealing with Islamic terror/insurgency that I even stoop to obtaining definitions firstly from Wikipedia.

"Common definitions of terrorism refer only to those violent acts that are intended to create fear (terror); are perpetrated for a religious, political, or ideological goal; and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants (e.g., neutral military personnel or civilians)." From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"terrorism" can be defined as "politically motivated violence against civilians, conducted to coerce through fear" and is a tactical repertoire of virtually of every insurgency (i.e. change of status quo through subversion and violence) 'Counterinsurgency', David Kilcullen

Just from these two definitions the lie Mr. Gaughan as well as the system he represents is trying to have us believe is that these two persons arrested by a ‘counter terrorism’ team have no political/cultural underpinning justification authorization for being members of terrorist/insurgency groups.

Thirdly what is the cultural name on the Shop front “Disney Centre”? No it is “Islamic Centre”. There is no negative construct of Other in the Islamic cultural codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) templates) which can and are utilized for justifying and authorizing terror/insurgency since the seventh century? What was left of the Byzantine Empire simply bowed down to a superior culture without a mummer?  No genocidal construct exactly the same as Mein Kampf to inform terror?

  
The hypocrisy and sheer stupidity of trying on such a trick is revealed in the following details of generic criminal arrests of ‘Bikie gang’ 'culture' members.

Under the absurdity of Counter Terrorism Assistant Commissioner Neil Gaughan Motiveless Terror/Crime Paradigm Gangs Squad Commander Deb Wallace would have to say the following:

".,there was nothing to connect the men to the Hells Angels. This has got nothing to do with bikie gangs. This is criminal behaviour by Australians involved in gang activity," 



Rebels bikie gang's Liverpool clubhouse shutdown, three arrested in Sydney police raids

“A Rebels member from Cecil Hills was arrested, as well as a Lone Wolf member from Monterey.”

Gangs Squad Commander Deb Wallace said people who behaved as if they were above the law could expect a swift response from police."
ABC 9 May 2014, 10:46pm

One can see when those from a 'bikie gang' culture are arrested there is absolutely no reticence to label then with the 'group' to which they are directly associated with as members be they arrested where there groups meeting place is or not.. "A Rebels member from Cecil Hills was arrested," and even if they are associated with a different 'bikie group' they still use the 'group' label.

Members of 'bikie gang' cultures are determined as being associated to a cultural group behavioral variance, yet the ABC places no label of association to align with the dangerous delusion the two arrested for 'terrorist activity' have derived motivation for their actions from no cultural behavioral variance - it is totally false and tragically so because the actual cause of Islamic terror and major schism goes unchallenged.

‘Not Islam’. It is just not going to stand up to any reasonable evaluation as increasingly the broken bodies and lives keep rolling in.

Dr Adrian Cherney & Associate Professor Tina Murphy: Humanity are not dealing with generic criminal acts we are dealing with Muslim cultural derived acts.


For Inept Gatekeepers:

For Chris Gares consideration: I think Chris you have missed the absolute importance of what is said in this article. It contains within the reason for cultural terror, its actual purpose.


You can tell the difference between the 'good'/'moderate'

" When Saudi Arabia's Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdulaziz Al al-Sheikh described Islamic State and al Qaeda as "kharijites" last month, he was casting them as the ultimate heretics of Muslim history, a sect that caused the faith's first and most traumatic schism."

And the 'radical'? Really?

"But while Saudi Arabia's official Wahhabi school of Sunni Islam attacks Islamists as heretical and "deviant", many of its most senior and popular clergy preach a doctrine that encourages intolerance against the very groups targeted by IS in Iraq."

Saudi Arabia's clerics condemn IS but preach intolerance Reuters September 10, 2014, 4:07 pm

As in Germany the Nazi 1930's 1940's the less virulent version becomes acceptable despite the cultural codex remaining exactly the same. Even though prior to this acceptance the same fear and rightly so applied to the now 'good'/'moderate' Nazi.

This is not happening again with Islam which has exactly the same inherent cultural construct of Other as the Nazi, as is clearly reflected in the statements of the Saudi Arabia's clerics

Our strategy becomes as it did in the 1930's 1940's at each escalation of oppression, terror and major schism - accept within what we previously considered abhorrent ethics and outcomes - it could be worse?

This in time and space actually works?

"This has got nothing to do with Islam." Really? If this is truly the case how is the following possible given it is happening in the actual space Mohammed himself provided the very text from "which these most senior and popular clergy preach a doctrine that encourages intolerance against the very groups targeted by IS in Iraq."

Someone is deliberately lying and/or completely inept - I wonder who it could be.

"It was one flag that could evoke horror. Yet it was put up for auction at a Sydney mosque, which was thronged with people, even children. And it went for over $2000. Even a drawing of the flag was bought.

The flag belonged to Islamic State members, who had allegedly murdered thousands in Iraq and Syria, and beheaded two western journalists, James Foley and David Sotloff."

IS Jihadi Flag Auctioned For Sydney Mosque 
By Revathi Siva Kumar | September 10, 2014 11:06 AM

I ask again if the statement today (9-12-2014) by the Prime Minister in raising the Terror alert level to high that Terror has nothing to do with religion - is the truth - "Sydney mosque, which was thronged with people, even children."  Has the whole Muslim cultures threat level to fellow Australians remained the same as twenty years ago?

These 
 "people, even children" are of a religion, Islam, selling an Islamic religious symbol directly connected to a religious based terrorist organisation IS, within a Islamic religious meeting place -Sydney Mosque. 

Muslim terror is not derived from Islamic codex it is derived from criminals who simply turn up without motive to kill people? You want to know how infant-child are turned in to terrorists this is part of the 'enculturation process' as Abbott would tell us, an integral part of the process which is, Abbott informs us, not connected in any way to any religion constructs of Other. Muslim terror and derived major schism has nothing to do with religion?

"not about religion"?

"This is a wonderful multicultural society we have."  Queensland Premier Campbell Newman said it was not about religion but about people involved in criminal acts.
Logan mosque targeted with anti-Muslim pamphlets, sparking fears of violence..
ABC By Leonie Mellor SEPTEMBER 13, 2014 

"Tony Abbott raises Australia’s terror threat to high"
Tony Abbott raises Australia’s terror threat to high 
SEPTEMBER 12, 2014 news.com.au

"..a wonderful multicultural society we have" - Had once not anymore.

"not about religion"? Terrorists/insurgents require to be defined as such need to have a political cause,, and ideological cause, religious or non-religious. 

Are the 'societies criminal police gang squads arresting these supposed generic criminals? No those involved in arresting and hunting down these terrorists/insurgent are counter-terrorism security units.

This means these persons of interest are political, ideological advocates and have to, have to derive the justification and authorisation from a specific cultural, political, ideological codex  otherwise they would not be able to exist.

These are Muslim terrorists/insurgents therefore the justification and authorisation for their actions comes from a cultural codex of which each of them has a common understanding of meaning and purpose,  as anyone who has taken the time to read the Quran and reflect on Mohammad as the Muslim exemplar model would realize immediately is the source - Islam.

Religion is therefore responsible for the terror/insurgency undertaken by Muslims  the fact most do not go out and participate is not unusual, in fact not everyone can or does turn up at the front in any cultural war how would the cultural combatants survive? 

Nor is it unusual for members of such a community to claim innocence blaming 'radicals' - but radicals would not exist if the belief system they based their actions did not exist and more importantly such claims of innocence and moderation on the part of some of the adherents never stops the terror/insurgency increasing in intensity.

Also it can be clearly proved these 'radicals' are derived from the very families, groups, and institutions claiming to be peace loving - this is simply not a sustainable argument - peace loving - if it was really the case there would be no violent radicals - such ideas, motivation which enable violence simply would not exist. 

"His uncle, Ehsan Azari, is a lecturer who has worked at Macquarie University and the University of Western Sydney, and who has written about Afghanistan in the international media.

He told the Daily Mail Australia that his nephew was "very pious".

"But if he is truly involved in this, it is someone else who has convinced him, turned his mind," he said.

According to the University of Western Sydney's website, Dr Azari has an MA in English literature and linguistics and a PhD in Critical and Cultural Studies.

Dr Azari said his nephew's parents, who flew out of Australia to attend the Haj festival in Saudi Arabia the day before the raids, had not been told of their son's arrest.

He said he regretted what had happened to Afghanistan since he emigrated to Australia 22 years ago.

"We came from war and now there is all this talk of war," he said.

Omarjan's cousin, Rami Azari, told the Daily Mail Australia that he simply didn't believe that Omarjan, a keen and talented soccer player, would have made a phone call in which threats were made to behead a random member of the public.

"He was always interested in justice and fighting against injustice," he said.

"Maybe [that's what got him into trouble].

"I don't believe that he made the phone call [making the beheading threat].

Yet already which even Dr Azari was aware of:

"He'd stopped using his phone because he was being followed by police and ASIO [The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation].

This would indicate "interested in justice and fighting against injustice" the question is does Dr Azari really understand what these concepts mean in a Western context as Dr Azari connects 
"very pious" (religion) and "justice and fighting against injustice" clearly the Islamic culture informs outcomes derived from the combination of these two aspects that are very detrimental to fellow Australians.

Omarjan Azari, charged over Sydney terrorism plot, 'is a gentle, loving person' SMH Megan Levy, September 19, 2014 - 10:06 AM

After reading the above article and reflecting upon "very pious" which is viewed as inherently imbued with religious constructs and then determine 'Not Religion' in regards to subsequent acts is a terrible mistake. In fact it is a lie.
Religion is responsible, therefore Muslims as a culture are responsible as long as the codex construct of Other enabling such cultural violence remains within Islamic/Muslim codex.

Wednesday, September 3, 2014

For Chris Gares consideration: I think Chris you have missed the absolute importance of what is said in this article. It contains within the reason for cultural terror, its actual purpose.

Child abuse revelations divide "most shameful town in Britain" Reuters Tue, Sep 02 14:25 PM
Years of Rape and ‘Utter Contempt’ in Britain Life in an English Town Where Abuse of Young Girls Flourished By KATRIN BENNHOLD, NYT, SEPT. 1, 2014

Chris Gare
"To be honest with have a bigger problem with Catholics here than Muslims. But the very worst has to be the BBC and Westminster." 

I think Chris Gare misses the absolute importance of what is said in this article. It contains within the reason for cultural terror, its actual purpose.

Terror is to the Muslim/Nazi culture what Rohypnol is to Date Rapists. Both achieve by utilising such methods what would be otherwise impossible - getting past outright rejection to tolerance to acceptance to the ultimate goal in time and space imposition of their will over a powerless Other.

As an astute British journalist observed, regards the failure of the British Cultural Gate Keepers when fears of Islamophobia (a non-existent condition) gave Muslim activists free rein in Birmingham schools, it is what happens 'afterwards', after cultural derived terror, its effect.

Cultural derived terror is a conditioning mechanism inherent as a process justified and authorized by cultures whose underlying ethical constructs, beliefs are abhorrent to Other.

Invariably this abhorrence relates to the cultural construct of women (women’s relative independence compared to man – informs man’s relative control over access to sex) and the very construct of Other (Others relative independence (even possible existence) compared to adherents – Informs Adherents relative control over access to resources via political power over who and under what conditions Other and adherents will be allowed into the Public Square – or hanged/beheaded/crucified/taxed/whipped/stoned/blown to bits/shot/raped/molested/sold into sexual slavery/etc. there.

Cultures in essence can be seen as individual persons, with behavioral variances. As with persons cultures behavioral variance can be modified by conditioning.

As with Pavlov’s dogs, you only have to ring the bell, and the dog expects food, and physiologically and psychologically prepares for it = conditioned behavior.

Pavlov’s other experiments also engendered quite horrific outcomes psychologically and psychologically upon animals just with the expectation a certain action may possibly occur.

Not too fond of Pavlov but his work proves a very important point.

It's effect not of engendering 'fear' of personal injury because although this justifiably rises intrinsically we know the chances of being an actual victim is relatively small, it is the 'fear' engendered within the attacked Culture (Western Culture) as a whole, its institutions, its mind-set of ‘fear’ to attack real evil derived from another culture given what that culture has shown by its previous actions to be capable of.

You invariably hear from such cultures who are involved in delivering terror – ‘We only attack if attacked.”

The question then becomes for the “attacked” Cultures institutions the definition of “attacked” it is so open to interpretation and the codex such as Islam only required you to be an unbeliever/ to dispute the validity of Islam by your continued belief in another ideology to be attacked in the first place.

Therefore as has happened and is happening around the Western political world any challenge even for heinous crimes of the attacking culture in this case Muslims raises a possible terrorist reaction or accusations of heinous labeling of Islamophobe, bigot, racist whatever you do.

The later labeling even enforced by the Gate Keepers of the attacked culture to the detriment of their very own culture. The Gate Keepers become the altruist enforcers for the attacking culture – terror has achieved its purpose.

Cultural terror conditioning is utilized to ease the way of a cultures ‘abhorrent’ ethical constructs being firstly ‘tolerated’ to ‘accepted’ all along the way to the ability to ‘impose’ in time within another dominate cultures space.

Given the existing dominate constructs of women, for example Western feminist developed notion of equality, and Western notions of Other inherently equal not less, evil, condemned by God HIMSELF and therefore justifiably subject at least to supervision and tax, or ‘grievous harm’ or ‘severest penalty’.


Quran, Surah 8 Al-Anfal The Spoils of War 12 " Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their fingertips off them.'

One can imagine, if simply reading the Muslim cultural text which is utilized as the core codex to frame Muslim behavioral variance, even in the absence of historical or current records of Muslim behavior against Other, the degree of cultural terror required by a culture to impose upon another, to have that attacked culture accept such a construct within their space. Let alone the ‘abhorrent’ Muslim construct of women having to be subject to “mans’ leadership and have determined as at the least ‘acceptable’ women paraded before them wearing the very marks of the shame of such subservience in the form of veils, burkas and the like.

It simply has to, has to be a cultural war of attrition until as Lincoln points out when two diametrically opposed ethical constructs appear within the same Public Square in time one or the other will take the space.

How has it come to this. Two important proofs of the intended cultural impact of a cultural terror attack upon another culture working to undermine the very foundations of the attacked culture utilising their very own Gate Keepers - Muslim activists free rein in Birmingham schools & Child abuse revelations divide most shameful town in Britain. 

Why is it such an abhorrent ethical construct was allowed within the Public Space in the first place? How is this achieved?

Why:
At its core is wishful thinking developed from Western constructs of ‘Freedom of Religion’ and Multiculturalism which were derived in essence from the same rational model Christianity variants ‘getting along’, at its core is ignorance of the fact your Western derived ‘rational’ life model in no way predicates what you may view as inevitable ‘rational’ outcomes in time derived from a different culture whose behavioral variance derives from a different ‘rational;’ model (ideology).

Freedom of Religion’ and Multiculturalism engendered the dangerous notion we are all in the end the same, human beings who all suffer and rejoice in commonality, health, loss of loved ones, joy of birth, good food, sunsets, etc.

The trouble is psychically (genetically) humans are relatively the same but the imposition of culture codex upon individual adherent behavioral variance ensures above Maslow’s level one of ‘the same’ we can be and are as cultures very different. We are not the same. We do not have the same beliefs regards women and Other the concurrence of which are so critical to harmony within society.

How:
Terror – conditioning of culture – it is not about engendering individual fear – it is all about engendering cultural fear of the attacked cultures institutions will to act against the attacking cultures intrusion of ethical constructs within its space and this cultures grab for political power over in situ resources to consolidate its cultural position relative to other cultures and in time destroy them.

‘destroy them’ yes because otherwise there would be no need for terror to have been culturally utilized in the first place.

As with everything else I am relatively sure a mathematical relationship will be found between the degree of utilisation of terror by any culture, to the relative cultural construct of Other held by that culture, the degree of vilification of Other relative to the veracity of the belief system being able to be sustained internally and sustained against outside ethical constructs, the ability in population/political power to attain maximum altruistic enforcement of core cultural constructs.

Cultural terrorism must have an inherent whole of cultural function otherwise it would not be able to be enabled in the first place - it simply would not exist.



"Police have been accused of “covering up” a campaign of abuse, threats and violence aimed at “Islamicising” an area of London. ...

Victims say that officers in the borough of Tower Hamlets have ignored or downplayed outbreaks of hate crime, and suppressed evidence implicating Muslims in them, because they fear being accused of racism."
Police 'covered up' violent campaign to turn London area 'Islamic' The Telegraph By Andrew Gilligan 8:10AM BST 12 Jun 2011

Notice the year 2011.

'A Labour minister says his party has been infiltrated by a fundamentalist Muslim group that wants to create an “Islamic social and political order” in Britain.'
Islamic radicals 'infiltrate' the Labour Party The Telegraph By Andrew Gilligan 10:00 PM GMT 27 Feb 2010

Notice the year 2010.

"‘I would say she was a moderate Muslim. I find it really bizarre, knowing her from school and then her suddenly being part of Islamic State.’" A schoolfriend

"Its motto is ‘realising your daughter’s potential’, and it is here, in these gentle, middle class surroundings, that a terrorist was raised."
The private school jihadist: As PM unveils new terror crackdown, a Scots girl incites bloody massacre on British streets By KHALEDA RAHMAN and VICTORIA ALLEN FOR THE DAILY MAIL PUBLISHED: 09:54 AEST, 2 September 2014



"Home Office’s 'deradicalisation' scheme, Channel, has used at least three staff who are closely connected to hard-line Salafi groups"
Hardliners being paid thousands to advise young, at-risk Muslims The Telegraph By Andrew Gilligan 6:30 AM BST 24 Aug 2014

Lutfur Rahman adviser: there will be street violence unless people stop complaining about Tower Hamlets election By Andrew Gilligan Politics Last updated: May 28th, 2014

Notice the year 2014.

No change in the movement of the ethical mean of the British Muslim reflective of other Western Democracies for exactly the same reason - increasing control of the political by the 'good' whose ethics are exactly the same as the 'radicals' except for publicly stated method yet they adhere to exactly the same Islamic codex which supplies the justification and authorisation to the radicals - no longer able to discern the difference - yet taken by inept Western Gate Keepers as the 'good' - under the cover of Islamophobia, racism, bigotry?

Islamic cultural terrorism