Friday, August 14, 2015

Evolutionary Psychology Explains Why, Who, What. New York Times - SIS Enshrines a Theology of Rape Claiming the Quran’s support: Claims which can be clearly shown as based upon constructs within the Quran which all Muslims determine as their sacred ethical source.

SIS Enshrines a Theology of Rape Claiming the Quran’s support, the Islamic State codifies sex slavery in conquered regions of Iraq and Syria and uses the practice as a recruiting tool.
NYT Written by RUKMINI CALLIMACHI; Photographs by MAURICIO LIMA AUG. 13, 2015
My view is psychology should be utilised to identify cultural evil and not hide evil behind a cultural sensitive paradigm which enables such evil to flourish. It would be my view there are particular cultures which inherently inform violent and oppressive psychotic behaviors driven by persecution type delusion disorders framed by the cultures codex and quantified currently as 'normal' thinking, belief, behavior under a grotesque APA evaluative paradigm which specifically excludes culture derived thought, beliefs, behaviors however vile from being determined as a mental disorder.

If Other reviews research based upon evolutionary psychology and then turns to look at the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex constructs regards 

1. Polygamy-(wherein a man has multiple simultaneous wives-given the human sex ratio 1:1 -with a possible small margin of more males than females),

2. Women categorization/rules/scripts determining women subject -forced to submit,

3. As well as the scripts for cultural altruistic enforcers priority access to women enabled to an extent by driving down the age at which culturally women/girls (Sura 65:1 – The Quran) are determined as sexually available. This possibly also an evolutionary necessity because as data shows women understandably prefer older men because of need to maximise resources to provide for their children and as women age men engaged in risky behavior become less desirable as partners so women of a younger age than the combatants will therefore be required so what did the seventh century Muslim codex creators and subsequent leaders continue to follow - Oh yes:

Official statistics released by the Islamic Republic between 2006 and 2011 involving girls below 10 year of age, 10-14 and 15-19 in a number of provinces in Iran indicates a staggering increase of 6448 marriages for the three above-mentioned age groups. Within the same period, the ratio of marriages involving girls compared to those among adults grew by 45%.2 Statistics indicate the number of girls under the age of 15 who were registered to marry increased from 33,383 in 2006 to 39,831 in 2011. Comparatively, this indicates a 40% increase in the percentage of girl children below 15 years of age who were forced to marry"
Early and Forced Marriages in the Islamic Republic of Iran A Brief Submitted to the Office of the High Commissioner for Women’s Rights and Gender Section (WRGS) For the 26th session of the Human Rights Council


"It’s very tough to know exactly how many girls are being married as children here in Australia, because the cases are under-reported and the research has not been conducted, but we know one Australian organisation alone has identified approximately 250 child marriages in Australia over the last two years (the National Children’s and Youth Law Centre)."
Child marriage in Australia: A hidden problem Jul 2014 | By Isabel Dunstan

4. How non-believing women can be and are utilised by Muslim man,

Proof for points 2, 3 and 4 above.

ISIS ‘Slave Market Day’
In a video posted in October 2014 on YouTube, a group of men believed to be Islamic State fighters are shown sitting in a room bantering about buying and selling Yazidi girls on “slave market day.”

SIS Enshrines a Theology of Rape Claiming the Quran’s support, the Islamic State codifies sex slavery in conquered regions of Iraq and Syria and uses the practice as a recruiting tool.
NYT Written by RUKMINI CALLIMACHI; Photographs by MAURICIO LIMA AUG. 13, 2015
Psychologists look Kayla in the eyes and tell her you by your support of the Islamic/Muslim culture are not enabling in time and space much more of the same you ignorant twats.
"The American hostage Kayla Mueller was repeatedly raped by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the self-proclaimed “caliph” and leader of the Isis terrorist group, in the months before her death, it has emerged.

Mueller, 26, from Prescott, Arizona, was abducted by the group in northern Syria in August 2013. She was held at a house in the town of al-Shadadiya, sharing a room with four captive teenage girls. They said Baghdadi treated her as a sex slave and she was regularly taken to his room when he visited.

The news that she was tortured and sexually abused was confirmed by her family. They had been briefed on the horrific details of her captivity by American officials who had interviewed two of the girls from the Yazidi religious minority who had been enslaved alongside her.

“We were told that Kayla had to ‘marry’ Baghdadi, but we all understand what that means,” her father, Carl, told The New York Times. “She was his property.”

American hostage Kayla Mueller repeatedly raped by ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, report confirms THE TIMES THE TIMES AUGUST 16, 2015
Combined with

5. The codex defined ramifications of not participating in jihad and the plaudits for doing so,

6. The rewards and punishment for altruism to advance Islamic ideology (be this in giving aid to poor Muslims, or political action)

Of course given these points above Other particularly males are going to be subject to murder/genocide, and of course Others women are to be abused and used as sex slaves, of course the Muslim males have an evolutionary cultural supercharged incentive maximising inclusive fitness (where organism's genetic success is believed to be derived from cooperation and altruistic behavior – in this case Islamic/Muslim cultural defined behavior), to participate in and create a political and resource environment which maximise Muslim mans chance of passing their genes on to the next generation, whilst gratifying their base sexual needs.

This is the Why the Muslim Man are willing, the question then as to Who is responsible,  and What is responsible for the Why then becomes obvious. Who in the main are to gain from involving themselves in such cultural derived behavior, able and willing to participate in realizing such a state, those already in secure polygamous relationships with the associated economic wealth to maintain such status, the old and infirm?


No of course not.

It is the youth - adolescent-young adult of any culture are involved in such acts at the sharp end of revolutionary-genocide - the frontal cortex brake is not fully engaged until approx 25 years of age also clearly it has been shown by testosterone research the more prior experience with aggression via social learning clearly influences the level of aggression. Given the research on cultural derived prejudice is imbedded infant-child as well as the social hierarchy which determines Other on the lowest level as testosterone kicks in adolescence to young adult where has research shown this aggression supercharged by rising levels of testosterone will be directed?


The double problem humanity face with the Islamic/Muslim codex constructs of Other is even as the frontal cortex comes into play disinhibition combined with inhibition inform aggression against Other. Who are more adept at swinging the sword, less prone to the nuances of ethical debate more imbued with the unbending automated script of cultural fear-hate of Other, the middle-aged the old, the infirm - cultures send such as these to fight their wars?

No of course not.

Do I have to remind you? Clearly I do.

There is increasing recognition in policy, research, and clinical practice communities that early and middle childhood provide the physical, cognitive, and social-emotional foundation for lifelong health, learning, and well-being. Early childhood, middle childhood, and adolescence represent the 3 stages of child development. Each stage is organized around the primary tasks of development for that period.

Early childhood (usually defined as birth to year 8) is a time of tremendous physical, cognitive, and socio-emotional development.

Middle childhood (usually defined as ages 6 to 12) is a time when children develop skills for building healthy social relationships and learn roles that will lay groundwork for a lifetime.

Healthy People 2010

So why is it determined as somehow unusual youth genetically programed as risk takers imbued with unquestioning culturalised 'rightness', prejudice based upon the cultures construct and methodology of inter-cultural border management of the 'enemy' now set, become the sharp blade as they always have been and how they are rewarded for doing so is culturally defined and cultural reward in the Islamic/Muslim codex for such behavior, the What driving the cultural process, includes increased opportunity for access to sex by driving down the age sex is imposed upon women both Muslim and Other, defining women as subject and Others women fair game.

Cognitive behavioral therapy, where in the process in an effort to change core beliefs and acceptance of the inserted new ethics and on what scale in terms of numbers and time - resources will be required to stop the cultural boulder whole rolling down the hill already set infant-child. Promising such a panacea when terror and misogynistic behavior escalates to inform more and more victims is in my view a grotesques self-indulgence of those psychologists putting forward such an approach as workable.

You know very well "It is easier to to extinguish a learned response immediately after original learning after original learning than it is later. After time has passed, learning becomes stronger (consolidated)."  Biological Psychology Kalat 2014. Although it may theoretically be possible accounting for "all of memories detailed procedures" for learning to become reconsolidated in a milder form or extinct research has found this is very difficult to do if actually possible at all regards strongly held cultural informed 'rational' models as opposed to recovering from phobias artificially generated via electric shocks associated with colored squares or common garden variety instinctual phobias regards snakes, or learned phobias regards height, etc .

Challenging strongly held cultural learned-beliefs can be made even stronger when the veracity of such learning of individuals comes up against a diametrically opposed 'rational' model. Promising positive outcomes regards whole of culture learning forming the structure of both benign and dangerous behavior forms along a cultures behavioral spectrum - dealing with symptoms rather than the whole of culture learning construct will in my view achieve - a political and profession delusion of positive change at subjectively determined singular points where none exists in the data at the level it counts the interface between and within cultures patrolled by the altruistic enforcers. The burning buildings broken bodies and lives continue and escalates as the price humanity pays for the view once set cultural 'rational' models can be made to change without removing the underlying cause the cultures clearly identifiable codex construct of Other and women.

When one sees the grotesque reaction of Muslims to the burning of mere pages or even the hint thereof to brutally murder a woman outside a Mosque surely there must be a sense there may be an inherent sensitivity of the autonomic nervous system developed culturally to influence such fight behavior. Does humanity really have to pay the price for such a diabolical codex, I say no we do not humanity have a choice to enable such infamy or remove this proven Man made self-serving codex from our presence.


This is a Theory not a Hypothesis: Nursery Rhymes on Cultures Knee - Western Version: Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me. Islamic Version: Words, images, body language will ‘provoke’ me to break your bones with swords and guns and I will certainly hurt you.

What is the  Islamic/Muslim cultures biopsychosocial model clearly in my view there is an inherent threat to humanity.

In terms of Other maximising their chance of survival these Islamic/Muslim codex constructs should be eliciting an immediate overwhelming defensive response in removing such a cultural construct as Plato told us so many years ago from being able to be taught on Mothers knee (Cultures indoctrination process). 

There must be a evolutionary reason fluid intelligence diminishes as the frontal cortex comes on line could it be the the crystallised automated constructs required to identify cultural threats inclusive of Other and nature and the methodology for dealing with them is set and as has been found neigh impossible to change. My view is trying to deal with the products of such diabolical constructs the Islamic/Muslim culture informs when a possible risk is identified in essence means it is too late - you get rid of the constructs which sets the infant child prejudice as these following or you have to deal with increasing infamy.


This is a Theory not a Hypothesis: “To make one exception means to make them all.” - Clothing such as the Muslim headscarf, hijab, burqa... is a political cultural statement and informs adherence and respect for the ideological constructs attached to it which hold tragic consequences for women.

Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why it is One Is and One Is-Not. Yet both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."

The dangerous circumstance Other finds itself in in the West is that we have been utilising the 'redemptive' paradigm for so long, which may appear to work to a degree within Others own cultural space (frankly we really suffer from a delusion in this area - as the crack epidemic in Australia clearly underlines)) based upon a shared cultural 'rational' model which simply does not work as an inter-group mechanism with the Islamic/Muslim culture. 

The Islamic/Muslim culture is not interested in 'redemption' -de-radicalization-rehabilitation its adherents have never been and never will be. It is a dangerous lie spread about by post-modernist humanist idiots singing

"Every cultural codex is sacred,
Every cultural codex is great.
If a cultural codex is wasted,
Postmodernists get quite irate."

The 'death-cult' notion is therefore an absurdity, the Prime Minister Abbott delusion the ‘death-cult’ being separated from the Islamic/Muslim culture itself where liberal-moderate Muslim families, groups and institutions supply and sustain the very persons who exhibit such behavior straight from the Islamic/Muslim codex of which ALL are devotees. The Islamic/Muslim cultural whole are the risk for any society not the altruistic 'few' the Muslim - liberal-moderates consistently constantly produce to deliver terror and misogyny since the seventh century.

You either get rid of these diabolical constructs of women, Other and the rewards to be gained by the Muslim Man for such behavior from the Public Square or Other continues to suffer the consequence as this issue increasingly gets to be resolved by matching terrible violence and in fact genocide in both directions.

Social psychologists already know the prosocial altruist enforcer 'few' are derived directly from cultural codex adhered to by the 'many' from whence they are derived and continue to be supported.

"Indonesia's PPTAK, the Financial Transactions Reports and Analysis Centre, and its Australian counterpart AUSTRAC have already detected money flowing from Australia to Indonesian groups supporting Islamic State, according to media reports from March."
Aust, Indonesia unite on terror threat The Australian AAP AUGUST 20, 2015

Therefore the terror threat is derived from whole of culture not just the 'few' the whole of culture inevitably in time and space create and sustain - remove the codex or remove nothing.

The view put forward to prevent reaction against Islam/Muslim culture that it is only a religion and has no interest in politic to change constructs in regards to Other and women is absurd for any ideological construct immediately informs a political force
.

"Islam Seen as Playing Big Role in Politics
An overwhelming majority (69%) say that Islam plays a large role in the political life of Turkey, with only 26% saying it plays a small role. Since 2005, six-in-ten or more have said Islam is a major force in Turkish politics. However, in 2002, prior to Erdogan’s election as prime minister, the public was split: 45% said Islam played a large role, while 43% said a small role."
Turks Divided on Erdogan and the Country’s Direction Pew Research 2014

It is rather ironic the exact same denial of growing influence and power against Other in Turkeys streets as a religious constructs enforces its codex against the existing political institutions and people whilst proclaiming seeking peace and harmony with all at the same time deriding the Gods and ethics of Other as evil and the reality a repeat of history in the exact same place between the Roman/Greek culture and Christianity.

It is not lost on those who can see clearly as in Egypt as in Turkey as in Iran 'Freedom!' is being utilised to gain power to destroy the relative independence gained by women - in fact turning the clock back.

Those shouting Freedom in the streets need to be challenged as to who is to pay for their version of freedom, and be very reticent to take notion of Other particularly women being protected particularly given what the Islamic/Muslim culture informed in Egypt, Turkey and Iran before handing over power.

What is the outcome Others societies can expect as the Islamic/Muslim culture as a percentage of any societies population increases? What in fact are we seeing in our own streets now a diminished threat as the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex takes increasing influence over social behaviors in our streets?

Religious Hostilities High in 57% of Muslim-Majority Countries


09/22/2014 Source data PEW Research Center - Commentary Weekly Number Brian J. Grim, Ph.D.

Religious hostilities are sweeping the globe, despite efforts by governments, religious groups and non-governmental organizations to hold them back.
Picture

According to the Pew Research Center, religious hostilities reached a six-year high in 2012, with a third (33%) of countries in the high category, up from 20% just six years earlier.

The Islamic world is disproportionately affected. More than one-in-two (57%) Muslim-majority countries have high religious hostilities, more than double that of other countries (25%), as shown in the chart to the left.

Although religious hostilities affect countries throughout the world experience, Muslim-majority countries consistently have higher levels of a range of religious hostilities than other countries and by wide margins. For instance, Muslim-majority countries are more than three times more likely than other countries to have religion-related war, terror or sectarian violence, as shown in the chart below.

These religious hostilities disrupt markets, trade and development in numerous parts of the Islamic World. This leads the talented young as well as risk-averse investors to look elsewhere for opportunity, compounding socio-economic conditions that contribute to the hostilities.

By contrast, research indicates that economic competitiveness is stronger in countries where religious freedom is respected by governments and societies.


Picture
What in time and space does the Islamic/Muslim codex inform in terns of social hostility? Is this really a cultural codex worth having in any Public Square - Maslows hierarchy of need is able to be fully realised by the individual, group and nation under such a codex surely social psychologists it is time to stand and to break away from the dangerous group think which determines hiding cultural derived evil is a good under a multiculturalism paradigm informing terror and misogyny in our streets.

Irving Janis identifies eight symptoms of group think:

  • an illusion of invulnerability
  • collective construction of rationalizations that permit group members to ignore warnings or other forms of negative feedback.
  • unquestioning belief in the morality of the in-group
  • strong, negative, stereotyped views about the leaders of enemy groups
  • rapid application of pressure against group members who express even momentary doubts about virtually any illusions the group shares
  • careful, conscious, personal avoidance of deviation from what appears to be a group consensus
  • shared illusions of unanimity of opinion
  • establishment of mindguards-people who "protect the leader and fellow members from adverse information that might break the complacency (apathy) they shared about the effectiveness and morality of past decisions."
source: Organization Theory, Human Resource Theory, or the Organizational Behavior Perspective - Shafritz Ott Jang 2014

Immediately the response "Et vous?", yes everything is relative therefore if you can prove to yourself relative to the Western Liberal-Equality construct the ethical constructs of the Islamic/Muslim codex in the same space will not politically shift societies to increasing social hostility and you can prove this is and will be the case given the evidence above and elsewhere since the seventh century then I would be very interested to review such an argument - otherwise if you are really a professional in your field and ethics count for something more than a piece of paper in a drawer?

Cultural evolution 'Improvise, Adapt and Overcome' to survive and replicate is the driver of political outcomes not how an individual inside or outside the behavioral variance views the veracity or otherwise of the 'rational' model. Culture can be and have been found to be a threat to the survival of Other cultures how many times do we have to see this process unfold despite the 'many' so called professed pro-Other in the attacking cultures midst claiming there culture is only seeking peace and harmony with everyone?
“the Germans (inclusive of the Nazi) that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Britain as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else”. Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

You assure yourselves 'moderates' are in charge for did they not tell us they were such, things could be worse?

“In fact, if the extremist’s elements had prevailed. I have not the least doubt that disruption would have been more drastic and that we should have real reason by now to fear German aggression from both a military as well as political point of view.” Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

Surely we have enough historical, statistical knowledge, data, cultural codex and the behavior derived to as well as the computing power be able to prove the relative veracity or otherwise of such a cultural claims. Other can now determine if it is worthwhile enabling a culture in their midst and how far such a culture deviates from Others core values inherent in Others 'rational' model particularly regards Other and women. Security agencies instead of wasting resources dealing with symptoms should be calculating the social hostilities forecast and informed social constructs and then providing this information to Other citizens so they can make an informed choice as to whether the costs and this is in terms of terror as well is worth the price.


"Communities (cultures) tend to be guided less than individuals by conscience and a sense of responsibility. How much misery does this fact cause mankind! It is the source of wars and every kind of oppression, which fill the earth with pain, sighs and bitterness." (Albert Einstein, 1934)
    "Against Soviets as Soviets one has nothing to say. Against the result of their rule in Russia and interference elsewhere one cannot protest to strongly. They are the world's terror to-day." Mrs. Alec-Tweedie, An Adventurous Journey. Russia-Siberia-China.1926

      As Albert Einstein and Mrs. Alec-Tweedie have by tragic circumstance observed individuals are not cultures, to claim an individual from a culture is 'good' from an Others perspective of beliefs, ethics, values and therefore determine that individual nor their culture should be held to account for the 'worlds terror' ignores a truth this individual is an integral part of support network for a cultural codex continuing existence.

        How 'few' are the 'few' in reality.

          "500-1,000 British Muslims don’t join ISIL in a vacuum. There’s an ideological current among Muslims globally generating sympathy for the same aims as ISIL: Enforcing a view of Sharia as law. I call this ideology Islamism." - Maajid Nawaz Chair of Quilliam, a counter-extremist think tank; former member of Hizb ut-Tahrir

            “Culture is not only what people think, it is also what they do. Ideally, cultural explanations would also strive to be mutually non-contradictory with relevant approaches from the social and natural sciences. This means taking into account both the nature of the individual mind as well as the dynamics of social interaction. Thus, ‘cultures’ should be understood as historically accumulated collections of beliefs and practices which are socially produced and aimed at meeting psychological needs. .....
              Culture, although it cannot ‘do’ anything on its own, provides a framework through which people are motivated to act. Subsequently, incidents of violence are individually and socially understood through narrative, that is, through the stories which are developed by participants, observers and the institutions which deal with them (such as the courts and media). These narratives, in turn, can express motivations or justifications for further violence or, alternatively, for its avoidance or suppression.”Wood, J. Carter (2007). Conceptualizing cultures of violence and cultural change. In: Carroll, Stuart ed. Cultures of Violence: Interpersonal Violence in Historical Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.

                "Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our "categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
                  ....
                    "every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"?SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglass Hofstadter, Emmanuel Sander, 2013

                    Tuesday, July 7, 2015

                    Revolution Psychology

                    Dear Psychologists

                    Response to "Op-Ed How the American Psychological Assn. lost its way" By ROY EIDELSON, JEAN MARIA ARRIGO Los Angeles Times

                    "..psychology should embrace every opportunity to expand its sphere of influence."

                    My view is it is not a matter of 'should' it is a matter of accepting psychology does pervade all human activity be it in war or peace and therefore inevitably will be called upon to inform the nature of outcomes across all types of human behavior. My view is the reverse of that which the article puts forward that the "American Psychological Association Lost Its Way"

                    I agree with the following view:

                    "Academic psychology once had considerable political diversity, but has lost nearly all of it in the last 50 years; 2) This lack of political diversity can undermine the validity of social psychological science via mechanisms such as the embedding of liberal values into research questions and methods, steering researchers away from important but politically unpalatable research topics, and producing conclusions that mischaracterize liberals and conservatives alike."
                    Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science, José L. Duarte, Arizona State University, Jarret T. Crawford, The College of New Jersey, Charlotta Stern, Stockholm University, Jonathan Haidt, New York University—Stern School of Business, Lee Jussim, Rutgers University, Philip E. Tetlock, University of Pennsylvania-2014

                    My concern is the psychologist elite are in denial cultures in particular contain inherent lethal codex constructs which will be not may be realized within public space given time and the ability to reach political and resource thresholds. Anyone raising this as a reality from my perception are determined as 'loosing their way' and research utilised to prove the point determined as 'cherry picking' and worse "steering researchers away from important but politically unpalatable research topics" which are necessary to address 'real' world not the 'humanist' world we all wish existed but does not.

                    One only has to reflect upon the US Armies 2025 future direction paper to understand particularly the reference to nano technology potentially not being 'ethically' utilized to inform violence and domination of Other, let alone intensifying culturally derived terror to which humanity are subject (not for the first time) that psychologists are going to be involved in life and death decision making processes where ticking ethical boxes applicable within the luxury applicable to a 'peace' space really is in my view a dangerous absurdity.

                    I also have been quite disheartened with the psychologists elites complicity in the redefining of feminism to include religious constructs of women which for me inform clearly misogynistic outcomes. The psychological elite for me has deserted it role to inform a better world and have created a 'humanist' rose colored glasses view of the world determining all 'rational' models are good except for a select few secular constructs which have exactly the same construct of Other inherent within the ideological codex informing terror which the same psychologist elite provide support. Respect for the status qou rather than 'ethics' the complaint of the article really is for me rather hypocritical as from my view genocide and misogynistic cultural constructs are being enabled to flourish in Public Squares by the very complainants that "the American Psychological Association Lost Its Way."

                    Frankly I am so disappointed as to Psychology's current political direction which for me 'respects' the cultures which will and do inform 'evil' and less than optimum outcomes for humanity particularly for women I believe a new branch of psychology Revolution Psychology needs to be created to actually challenge existing cultures in an overt manner in an attempt to achieve change.


                    Revolution Psychology

                    Utilizing the science of Psychology to inform better societies rather than support the harmful status quo which allows terror to be developed in our streets, subjugation of women to Mans 'leadership' and control of women's sexuality, non-optimal political decision based in the main upon Man made ideological frameworks and processes secular and religious created to serve the needs of political elites rather than the needs of the citizens they claim to serve, particularly women.

                    Does not accept cultures, secular or religious, must be respected simply because they exist.

                    Understands cultures form behavioral variances which inform differing levels of benefit and harm psychological and otherwise for adherent, Other and particularly women and seeks to remove the harm and increase the benefit.

                    Seeking to change or delete existing cultural codex which seeks to inhibit the maximised relative independence - autonomy of the individual.

                    Seeking to inform improved decision making processes individual, group, nation.

                    Understands review, change and deletion of cultural codex to maximise the relative independence of the individual is a never ending iterative process dependent upon the context existing at any point of time and seeks to provide the framework by which such processes of change may be able to be achieved without violence.

                    Understands it is only by seeking to maximise the relative independence of each other in sympathy with nature within which we exist can we hope to maximise the potential benefit and minimise the potential harm caused by our individual and group behavior.

                    Determines Moral Relativism a Crime Against Humanity, particularly as it invariably condemns Other and women to a less than optimal opportunity to live a flourishing life in fact to be subject to a miserable existence.

                    I could be wrong, and if I am the following observations I have made regards the lethality and misogyny inherent in the Islamic/Muslim culture codex constructs of Other and women within the Muslim behavioral variance are invalid. Are they? If not what in fact are the psychology elite allowing to be perpetrated in time and space against Other and women?


                    Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why it is One Is and One Is-Not. Yet both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."

                    This is a Theory not a Hypothesis: “To make one exception means to make them all.” - Clothing such as the Muslim headscarf, hijab, burqa... is a political cultural statement and informs adherence and respect for the ideological constructs attached to it which hold tragic consequences for women. 

                    Wednesday, June 10, 2015

                    A message for Socialists turned to the wrong side of the Liberty, Equality barricades. And an image of the new Socialist fascist flag 'Diametric'.

                    The 'Diametric' Socialism's new flag being flown on the wrong side of the Liberty, Equality barricades 
                    Socialists you are dangerous in time and space not only regards your own circumstance but the very beliefs, ethics values you claim to defend particularly for women.

                    For your next branch meeting after you have finished patting each other on the back for supporting revolutionary-genocide and a misogynistic construct.

                    Reflection upon:

                    “The far-right group responsible for organising anti-Muslim rallies across Australia in April has splintered under the pressure of anti-racist opposition.”
                    Anti-racists claim important victory over far-right Posted by sp By Mel Gregson, Socialist Party

                    “Religious distress is at the same time the expression of real distress and the protest against real distress. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, just as it is the spirit of a spiritless situation. It is the opium of the people. The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions.”
                    Karl Marx


                    This is a core determinant of Socialists action, or was, the drive to rid the human "condition which need illusions." to maintain belief, ethics, value-'rational' models. Marx was right in determining the 'demand' for action exists for illusionary states which determine outcomes, for invariably such illusionary states are created to cover 'evil', for the truth of the 'condition' would reveal 'oppression' not only applying to the individual adherent but invariably Other the non-adherent out-group.

                    But critically Marx failed to understand or failed to articulate the idea, 'creatures' individual and human groups whatever their 'rational' model suffer to relative degree, be they secular or religious 'illusion', hypocrisy as to the veracity and benefit to the individual and group of the 'rational' model to which they adhere - for no one is immune from 'illusion'-hypocrisy. It is a matter of relativity which our 'rational' models impose and enforce determines the degree of 'illusion', hypocrisy we suffer, the degree of relative independence within the 'rational' model  individuals (particularly women - and integrally linked to women's informed condition homosexuals) and groups are allowed, and as a direct consequence what the nature of Other - out-group are defined as and linked to the method and severity of the consequence of being so determined.


                    Marx by making such a statement immediately creates an 'oppressive' illusion, alas the possibility and as we see the actuality adherents of secular 'rational' models will determine themselves not subject to such a state. The degree of certainty we are 'right', an absence of 'illusion' for individual and group which secular adherents so delight in accusing adherents of religion of lacking, I fear has the potential to determine the degree of oppression informed.

                    Religion is not uniquely the "sigh of the oppressed" for all 'rational' models tend towards informing an oppressed class internal and external to itself. For 'rational' models are political ideological constructs never formed by the 'oppressed' but the the soon to be 'oppressors'. Those who shout 'Freedom!' in the streets or the back rooms invariably have an accompanying chant 'Death to ...". The question has to be asked of those shouting 'Freedom!' and of yourself "Freedom to do what to whom for whose benefit?". Are you really changing the world for the better what cost are you asking Other to pay for your bloody 'Freedom.'?

                    Invariably in a Religious construct Man seeking to control women's sexuality and maximises the cultures elites with access to resources, opportunity, distributed to maximise the survival of the elite internally within the culture and justification and authorisation of the same to be taken from Other. Secular constructs invariably Man seeking to move to redistribute resources, opportunity from one group to another, concentrated again under a political elites control so as to maintain control of the 'new' culture and enforce its notion of 'Freedom'. on Other for cultures cannot broach contradiction of their definitions.Someone and/or some group is going to pay for this 'Freedom.' and invariably as the certainty increases with their lives.

                    Religion is a political ideological construct nothing more or less, it tends to be based on relatively more illusion and hypocrisy, and certainty as the inequality of and subjugation of women cannot be justified by 'scientifically derived empirical facts/truth'. Illusion necessarily requires enforcement measures of oppression relative to the iniquitous condition so informed which apply to religious and nonreligious constructs.


                    The secular political constructs alas suffer to relative degrees of illusion, hypocrisy and certainty which outstrip some religions as history proves beyond doubt, and therefore can and do inform atrocity on a scale which create at times unimaginable misery and tragedy even though one is staring right at it. 

                    Marx's inferred view religion alone informs such a state really means he has failed to understand a critical fact about human nature individual and group which in my opinion from this one paragraph has led to genocide, destruction of cultural groups identified, internal or external to a culture on such a scale it beggars belief. Marx's paragraph, is an example for me of a cultural codex construct where words and sentences are strung together in inordinate hast without understanding where it might lead, to the gulags in Siberia, to the purposeful starvation on a massive scale of fellow citizens, Chinese teachers butchered by their own pupils in China, to ....

                    'Freedom!' - "Freedom to do what to whom for whose benefit?".

                    Each culture invariably claims to have 'Freed' someone or some group from the clutches of death and/or more mundane human conditions, despite clear evidence same being followed before by other cultures, in an attempt to take the moral high ground as some inform terror and oppression of Other. Yet these constructs even if an improvement upon a 7th century model are draconian relative to the present so the argument no longer hold moral substance of real worth. So you stopped kicking the dog but still held it hard on a leash never to run.


                    Instead of Marx writing "It (religion) is the opium of the people." Marx should have written 'Political ideologies (cultures religious and secular) are the "opium of the people." there are just degrees of addiction, the probability of breaking the habit once taken up almost nil and resultant informed threat against Other totally dependent upon the drug of choice construct of Other. The measure of potential 'oppression' any political ideology may inform in time and space are directly relative to the degree the cultural version of 'Freedom' sought results in the chains of one, individual, group being made tighter internal and external relative to others. One must always, always understand they have never been the holder of 'truth', nor certainty.


                    "Don't you think the Junkers have any faults at all, grandmother? I believe it's generally conceded that most individuals and most groups have the weakness correlative to their strength, and the vices correlative to their virtues." - (Hans Christian)

                    The response invariably is "...No-I have never discovered weakness among the Junkers, Hansel. They are a race of mighty warriors." - (Grandmother)
                    The Great Tradition, Francis Parkinson Keyes, 1939

                    There will always be illusion-hypocrisy-chains, this is not an excuse for exploitation, nor for the continuing existence of political elites, it is an acceptance this is necessarily a human condition imposed by the limitation of human nature, and the limited resources nature imposes. 

                    “The socialists and Democrats group (S&D) at the European Parliament (ep) has strongly condemned Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s recent threats directed at journalists and the life sentence demanded for Cumhuriyet´s editor-in-chief, Can Dündar.”
                    EP socialists strongly condemn Erdoğan’s threats against journalists, pressure on media

                    I am rather disturbed by Socialists forgetting which side of the barricade they should be on.

                    Fighting for a genocide misogynistic construct does not appear to me to be a ‘good’, nor do I believe fighting against those who determine such an ideology of hate and oppression of women diametrically opposed to liberty and equality as a victory of any sort.

                    Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why it is One Is and One Is-Not. Yet both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."

                    This is a Theory not a Hypothesis: “To make one exception means to make them all.” - Clothing such as the Muslim headscarf, hijab, burqa... is a political cultural statement and informs adherence and respect for the ideological constructs attached to it which hold tragic consequences for women.


                    Yes fighting against the inevitable genocide construct which will arise to negate it is a good – but you may not have noticed most of those you are fighting against do not have a Nazi tattoo on the back of their neck. 

                    Let’s put it so it is clear it is akin to having Stalin turning up at a Socialist rally bounding to the front causing violence and then all socialists are determined supporters of solving political disputes with a bullet in the head of Other going down the back stairs.

                    You are supporting a culture which utilizes revolutionary-genocide to force its political ideology into the Public Square and in your frenzy you interpret all opposite as the same because you have to otherwise your raison d'être - poof! gone!

                    Psychological research determines this a wasted effort but frankly I am sickened by the fact you have no sense of history and are happy to have cultural terror (not from those you are fighting) managed into Australian space so more Other can be shot in the back of the head if their lucky – Twats.

                    Norman first I will give you an insight into your stupidity and then who you actually are not who you think you are.

                    "For weeks two patriots (Nazi) had been lying in wait for me, considering the quickest way of sending me into a better world....they attacked me on a walk in the lonely Habichtswald Germany). One concealed behind a tree with an army revolver in his hand to help his mate with a bullet, in case the prussic acid that the latter was to squirt in my face should fail to take effect.... squirting prussic acid ... I lay unconscious on the ground...

                    The first telegram congratulating me on my escape was from Rathenau, who a few weeks later fell victim to a better planned attack.....

                    There was even a feeble law passed to Protect the Republic, that Imperial judges later on increasingly employed against the Left, .... In many ways the the Republic's policy was finicking and not understandable. I recollect the concessions already made with regard the Republican flag.

                    Many years later the two fellows were caught, ... At the trial I stated that I did not want a severe sentence as the two miscreants were only victims of the Nationalist (Nazi) Press outcry against me. As a matter of fact, both of them quoted in defence of their attempt the calumnies that appeared in the papers (Nazi) of the Right. ..

                    I repeatedly received official warnings of attacks .. intended attempts by private individuals , as, e.g. by a philosophical writer and a Professor of Medicine. In one case a women was deputed to quench my vital spark; in all other cases it was alleged that students and broken-down officers were concerned."

                    Memoirs of a Social Democrat by Philip Scheidemann 1929

                    Is there not a resemblance in the tools a culture whose codex contains a genocide construct of Other utilises revolutionary-genocide to impose its inherent cultural codex constructs within the streets, the 'few', are not the nature of the 'few' familiar, are the 'many' Nationalist (Nazi) standing behind the tree, does this excuse them in the culpability of the crime these 'few' commit and what Other is in the end to face? Given history you think it is unusual students form part of the sharp end of revolutionary-genocide in any interface with Other, just the gullible, the easily led - if this is really true what about students fighting for actual liberty and equality they were or are being misled by 'good' preachers?

                    For your next meeting, you can take these apart and prove the argument false only to pleased to be provided with the counter argument. I could be wrong. Please do not insult my intelligence by utilizing the 'many' argument.

                    "• Parents do not have the confidence to argue against the articulate and forceful activists who seek to impose their views, for fear of being branded as disloyal to their faith or their community."
                    Schools face new curbs on extremism after Birmingham Trojan horse affair Patrick Wintour, Political editor The Guardian, Wednesday 23 July 2014 06.42 AEST

                    "..the intelligence officer of Army Group South, Major Rudolf Langhauser, heard of plans to shoot 180 Polish civilians in a camp just turned over to the SS. He promptly returned the camp to military control. ... "The troops (German) are especially vexed over the fact that young men, instead of fighting at the front, test their courage on defenseless people."

                    'The German army's commander in chief, Walter von Braunchitsch confronted Himmler's deputy Reinhard Hydrich to be told "in no uncertain terms the role of the SS in Poland: "Fundamental cleansing [Flurbereinigung] (of Polish) Jews, intelligentsia, clergy, nobles." Wagner counted with the demand that this "cleansing" take place only "after the withdrawal of the army". '

                    Source: "The Origins of the Final Solution", Christopher R. Browning 2004

                    The individuals Major Rudolf Langhauser, German army's commander in chief, Walter von Braunchitsch and the German troops had already given their oath of allegiance to what Man, to what cultural codex construct of Other that Man had laid down clearly in the Nazi textual codex Mein Kampf, what justification and authorisation based on this codex construct of Other did they have for stopping the genocide?

                    "The analysts emphasized that most Sunnis do not support the Islamic State’s harsh interpretation of Islam, or its brutality, but that some were becoming more susceptible to its political talk about protecting oppressed Sunnis."
                    Using Violence and Persuasion, ISIS Makes Political Gains NYT By ANNE BARNARD and TIM ARANGO JUNE 3, 2015

                    Even if true "most Sunnis do not support the Islamic State’s harsh interpretation of Islam" the fact is the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex contains the construct of Other which enables such an interpretation and importantly it is historically consistent within the resultant Muslim behavioral variance. Therefore the Muslim terrorists hold the Islamic 'rational' model higher ground whose foundations are the Islamic/Muslim codex itself. This is the tragedy of the Is-Not Islamic paradigm which gives no such excuse to the other genocide construct of the Nazi where determining Is-Not Nazism would be rightly viewed as totally obscene.

                    Who I ask were the 'many' who were the 'few'? Does one, two or even the 'many' proclaiming being 'especially vexed', even when they hold overwhelming military power in their hands, make any difference to the derived outcomes of a culture whose codex informs 'evil' against Other, of which they the 'many' and the 'few' are self-proclaimed adherents?

                    "Communities (cultures) tend to be guided less than individuals by conscience and a sense of responsibility. How much misery does this fact cause mankind! It is the source of wars and every kind of oppression, which fill the earth with pain, sighs and bitterness." (Albert Einstein, 1934)

                    "Against Soviets as Soviets one has nothing to say. Against the result of their rule in Russia and interference elsewhere one cannot protest to strongly. They are the world's terror to-day." Mrs. Alec-Tweedie, An Adventurous Journey. Russia-Siberia-China.1926

                    As Albert Einstein and Mrs. Alec-Tweedie have by tragic circumstance observed individuals are not cultures, to claim an individual from a culture is 'good' from an Others perspective of beliefs, ethics, values and therefore determine that individual nor their culture should be held to account for the 'worlds terror' ignores a truth this individual is an integral part of support network for a cultural codex continuing existence.

                    How 'few' are the 'few' in reality.

                    "500-1,000 British Muslims don’t join ISIL in a vacuum. There’s an ideological current among Muslims globally generating sympathy for the same aims as ISIL: Enforcing a view of Sharia as law. I call this ideology Islamism." - Maajid Nawaz Chair of Quilliam, a counter-extremist think tank; former member of Hizb ut-Tahrir

                    “Culture is not only what people think, it is also what they do. Ideally, cultural explanations would also strive to be mutually non-contradictory with relevant approaches from the social and natural sciences. This means taking into account both the nature of the individual mind as well as the dynamics of social interaction. Thus, ‘cultures’ should be understood as historically accumulated collections of beliefs and practices which are socially produced and aimed at meeting psychological needs. .....
                    Culture, although it cannot ‘do’ anything on its own, provides a framework through which people are motivated to act. Subsequently, incidents of violence are individually and socially understood through narrative, that is, through the stories which are developed by participants, observers and the institutions which deal with them (such as the courts and media). These narratives, in turn, can express motivations or justifications for further violence or, alternatively, for its avoidance or suppression.”

                    Wood, J. Carter (2007). Conceptualizing cultures of violence and cultural change. In: Carroll, Stuart ed. Cultures of Violence: Interpersonal Violence in Historical Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.

                    "Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our "categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
                    ....
                    "every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"?

                    SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglass Hofstadter, Emmanuel Sander, 2013

                    "Culture uses artifacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members. It is the filter through which we see and understand our current reality (Edgar, 1980). These are the structures of identity that help people organise and make sense of everyday life (Wark, 1997). They also establish boundaries between groups (Oyserman & Lee, 2007)"
                    Psychology Burton, Western, Kowalski, 2012

                    "Culture, of course, is related to violence in general and not only to structural violence. For example, culture influences the determination of "thresholds" which pressure on a person must overcome in order to move that person from being controllable, or even positive, to being negative (that is, into violence)."
                    The Culture of Violence, Chp 3. On the relationship between violence and culture - Galtung's concept

                    “the Germans (inclusive of the Nazi) that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Britain as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else”. Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

                    You assure yourselves 'moderates' are in charge for did they not tell us they were such, things could be worse?

                    “In fact, if the extremist’s elements had prevailed. I have not the least doubt that disruption would have been more drastic and that we should have real reason by now to fear German aggression from both a military as well as political point of view.” Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

                    Norman actually noticed the missing as you are the burning cages, the shot in the back of the head, the 147 in Kenya, the Jews so long ago in Egypt when this all started, yet still “that great unified people (culture) are looking for peace and see friendship”. Does it matter even at a point of time as it was after Kristallnacht the ‘many’ opposed what happened in the streets what codex construct of Other had they signed up to? Which meant what is inevitable.

                    You are on the wrong side of the barricades as those Socialists in Turkey know only too well and those socialists running in the streets of Iran some time ago shouting ‘Freedom’ no longer even have the chance to reflect on those shouting the same beside them ‘Freedom to do what to whom for whose benefit?’ Certainly not for Liberty and Equality.

                    No doubt whatsoever you are on the right side of history the right side of the barricades? Two genocidal constructs with your support tearing each other apart informing as it has everywhere else burning buildings broken bodies and lives this is your answer to resolving this.

                    The Left in Indonesia they were simply clumsy?


                    "In his essay, The 'Ideograph:' A Link Between Rhetoric and Ideology, Michael Calvin McGee proposes that our system of beliefs is shaped through and expressed by words. We are consciously and unconsciously conditioned and controlled by the words we hear and use. Words carry ideology and convey and create meaning. Like Chinese characters, words are "ideographs" that "signify and 'contain' a unique ideological commitment," that is frequently unquestioned.' McGee also suggests that by understanding that a single word can carry ideology and that ideology can be expressed in a single word, we are better able to expose and evaluate ideology and choose to accept or reject such ideology. However, if we fail to recognize the ideographic nature of words, we risk creating and promoting a reality that is removed from our system of beliefs." - HOW WORDS CREATE REALITY ANN SINSHEIMER

                    Enough, is Enough! A CHARLIE HEBDO T-Shirt Design for every occasion.

                    Tuesday, May 19, 2015

                    YES EQUALITY FOR ALL - But understand why you have had to vote at all and the reason you have still remains in the Public Square


                    Facebook page: YesEquality!

                    "Conflict theory suggests that men, as the dominant gender, subordinate women in order to maintain power and privilege in society. Conflict theory asserts that social problems occur when dominant groups mistreat subordinate ones, and thus advocates for a balance of power between genders."
                    Source: Boundless. “The Conflict Perspective.” Boundless Sociology. Boundless, 28 May. 2015. Retrieved 30 May. 2015


                    A view: Why homosexuality is determined as ‘evil’ in religious codex and able despite the prevalence of a view held even possibly within culture as to the unjustifiable nature of such a cultural view informs iniquity and harm against homosexuals. 

                    Firstly the reason homosexuality is determined as ‘evil’ in religious texts is contradictions are not allowed in cultural codex (a). Secondly despite even a supposed majority claiming a 'good' view, culture set the boundaries and nature of our behavioral variance, despite a view to the contrary as individuals we can achieve self-actualization independent of cultural constructs.

                    "Tradition is an amazing chain of solid links well soldered. In theory it expands, but in practice seldom breaks. The liberating impulse is foiled before the rapier thrust. ....

                    One of the most highly educated and advanced men I met in many months' wanderings in India was bringing up his daughters hemmed in by all the old Hindu traditions. He didn't approve of them and honestly said so. In fact he talked wisely about expansion and wider vision. BUT he dared not break away from tradition. Thaldom of cast, fear of religion, kept him hide bound, and he married his daughters just as the Chinaman does his-as a chattel to be brought and sold. Oh, the thaldom of circumstance. The chain of tradition."

                    "An Adventurous Journey Russia-Siberia-China", Mrs Alec-Tweedie, 1926

                    “The prosecution say that her parents embarked upon a campaign of domestic violence and abuse designed to force her to conform so that she would behave in the way they expected.”

                    A Pakistani born couple living in England has gone on trial, accused of murdering their teenage daughter because she had become 'too westernised'. By Nigel Bunyan The Telegraph 22 May 2012

                    "A court in the north Italian city of Brescia has begun hearing the case against a Pakistani immigrant accused of having killed his own daughter. It is alleged he did so because she had become too Western in her dress and manners. It could be the first case of "honour killing" in modern Italy."
                    Pakistanis in Italy murder trial By Mark Duff 
                    BBC News, Milan 28 June 07 16:48 GMT

                    "MORTALLY wounded and bleeding profusely, Pela Atroshi covered her head with her hands, pleading "please don't shoot me, please don't shoot me"...

                    The bullet went through one of her fingers and into her brain.

                    The decision to kill her was made by a council of male relatives, led by Pela's grandfather, Abdulmajid Atroshi - a Kurd who lived in Australia.

                    "There is huge pressure on girls to take their own lives. They don't have the right to their own bodies, because their bodies are owned by the clan."

                    Australian links in honour killing of Pela Atroshi Nine News APRIL 26, 2008

                    Cultural codex the underwriter of 'Tradition'/culture, religious ideology in Pela Atroshi's case gives the clan Males the ownership of Pela Atroshi's body and the justification and authority to murder Pela Atroshi. This religious codex able to be analogised as such into reality allowed to flourish within the Western Public Squares of Liberty and Equality will not inform conflict?

                    "..the intelligence officer of Army Group South, Major Rudolf Langhauser, heard of plans to shoot 180 Polish civilians in a camp just turned over to the SS. He promptly returned the camp to military control. ... "The troops (German) are especially vexed over the fact that young men, instead of fighting at the front, test their courage on defenseless people."

                    'The German army's commander in chief, Walter von Braunchitsch confronted Himmler's deputy Reinhard Hydrich to be told "in no uncertain terms the role of the SS in Poland: "Fundamental cleansing [Flurbereinigung] (of Polish) Jews, intelligentsia, clergy, nobles." Wagner counted with the demand that this "cleansing" take place only "after the withdrawal of the army". '

                    Source: "The Origins of the Final Solution", Christopher R. Browning 2004

                    The individuals Major Rudolf Langhauser, German army's commander in chief, Walter von Braunchitsch and the German troops had already given their oath of allegiance to what Man, to what cultural codex construct of Other that Man had laid down clearly in the Nazi textual codex Mein Kampf, what justification and authorisation based on this codex construct of Other did they have for stopping the genocide?

                    "The analysts emphasized that most Sunnis do not support the Islamic State’s harsh interpretation of Islam, or its brutality, but that some were becoming more susceptible to its political talk about protecting oppressed Sunnis."
                    Using Violence and Persuasion, ISIS Makes Political Gains NYT By ANNE BARNARD and
                    TIM ARANGO JUNE 3, 2015

                    Even if true "most Sunnis do not support the Islamic State’s harsh interpretation of Islam" the fact is the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex contains the construct of Other which enables such an interpretation and importantly it is historically consistent within the resultant Muslim behavioral variance. Therefore the Muslim terrorists hold the Islamic 'rational' model higher ground whose foundations are the Islamic/Muslim codex itself. This is the tragedy of the Is-Not Islamic paradigm which gives no such excuse to the other genocide construct of the Nazi where determining Is-Not Nazism would be rightly viewed as totally obscene.

                    Who I ask were the 'many' who were the 'few'? Does one, two or even the 'many' proclaiming being 'especially vexed', even when they hold overwhelming military power in their hands, make any difference to the derived outcomes of a culture whose codex informs 'evil' against Other, of which they the 'many' and the 'few' are self-proclaimed adherents?

                    "Communities (cultures) tend to be guided less than individuals by conscience and a sense of responsibility. How much misery does this fact cause mankind! It is the source of wars and every kind of oppression, which fill the earth with pain, sighs and bitterness." (Albert Einstein, 1934)

                    "Against Soviets as Soviets one has nothing to say. Against the result of their rule in Russia and interference elsewhere one cannot protest to strongly. They are the world's terror to-day." Mrs. Alec-Tweedie
                    , An Adventurous Journey. Russia-Siberia-China.1926

                    As Albert Einstein and Mrs. Alec-Tweedie have by tragic circumstance observed individuals are not cultures, to claim an individual from a culture is 'good' from an Others perspective of beliefs, ethics, values and therefore determine that individual nor their culture should be held to account for the 'worlds terror' ignores a truth this individual is an integral part of support network for a cultural codex continuing existence.


                    How 'few' are the 'few' in reality.

                    "500-1,000 British Muslims don’t join ISIL in a vacuum. There’s an ideological current among Muslims globally generating sympathy for the same aims as ISIL: Enforcing a view of Sharia as law. I call this ideology Islamism." - Maajid Nawaz Chair of Quilliam, a counter-extremist think tank; former member of Hizb ut-Tahrir

                    This means a culture holding such a cultural codex derived view against homosexuality will enforce it in the Public Square no matter how enlightened or numerous individual adherents may be within the culture or be perceived to be by external Other. Because those adherents are subject to the relative independence of thought, behavior set by the cultural codex imperative and associated categorization which determine homosexuals a contradiction, an 'evil', diametrically opposed to the religious imperative of Mans subjugation of women to Mans 'Leadership' and complete control of women's sexuality.

                    “Culture is not only what people think, it is also what they do. Ideally, cultural explanations would also strive to be mutually non-contradictory with relevant approaches from the social and natural sciences. This means taking into account both the nature of the individual mind as well as the dynamics of social interaction. Thus, ‘cultures’ should be understood as historically accumulated collections of beliefs and practices which are socially produced and aimed at meeting psychological needs. .....

                    Culture, although it cannot ‘do’ anything on its own, provides a framework through which people are motivated to act. Subsequently, incidents of violence are individually and socially understood through narrative, that is, through the stories which are developed by participants, observers and the institutions which deal with them (such as the courts and media). These narratives, in turn, can express motivations or justifications for further violence or, alternatively, for its avoidance or suppression.”
                    Wood, J. Carter (2007). Conceptualizing cultures of violence and cultural change. In: Carroll, Stuart ed. Cultures of Violence: Interpersonal Violence in Historical Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan. 

                    "Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our "categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
                    ....
                    "every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"?

                    SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglass Hofstadter, Emmanuel Sander, 2013

                    "Culture uses artifacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members. It is the filter through which we see and understand our current reality (Edgar, 1980). These are the structures of identity that help people organise and make sense of everyday life (Wark, 1997). They also establish boundaries between groups (Oyserman & Lee, 2007)"
                    Psychology Burton, Western, Kowalski, 2012

                    "Culture, of course, is related to violence in general and not only to structural violence. For example, culture influences the determination of "thresholds" which pressure on a person must overcome in order to move that person from being controllable, or even positive, to being negative (that is, into violence)."
                    The Culture of Violence, Chp 3. On the relationship between violence and culture - Galtung's concept

                    A key indicator of the existence of an inherent cultural genocide codex construct justifying and authorizing revolutionary-genocide, as cultural political and resource thresholds are reached, to send into your streets the inevitable cultural altruistic enforcers to carry out the revolutionary-genocide necessarily required to violently enforce internal alignment and external acceptance of the cultures beliefs, ethics and values diametrically opposed to Other cultures is the degree to which the cultural codex constructs seek to control the most intimate of human relationships sex.

                    This is a function of the cultures (Mans) determination to maximise their genetic reflection into next generations but one suspects really this if it is an underlying subconscious imperative, the conscious drive is much more of a self-serving force in delivering to man the pleasure of sex with the least effort to do so.

                    As cultural codex cannot broach contradictions, as such contradictions bring the whole codex into question for if the logic is not valid in one part why should it for any of the other codex constructs.


                    The cultural categorisation engine therefore needs to identify, characterise precisely who are to benefit and lose. As it is religious Mans control over women’s sexuality, Man dominant-women subject partnership/marriage, the existence of a homosexual relations women equal-women equal partnership/marriage and man equal-man equal partnership/marriage determines an equality within the latter two and not in the first. A significant contradiction in the same space. For how long can the imposition of dominant-subject relationship be maintained diametrically opposed to the 'rational' of equal-equal relationship?

                    It therefore has nothing to do with homosexuality being intrinsically evil it is because to determine valid within a codex construct the two relationships of equality Benefit Women-Benefit-Woman and Benefit Man-Benefit Man means the religious inequality of the first, Benefit-Man, Lose-Women becomes manifest, a contradiction and therefore cannot exist within the codex.

                    This is what drives a real phobia against homosexuals for those who determine women, subject to Mans ‘Leadership’ which really means Mans control over women’s sexuality cannot have their own relationship construct contradicted in their presence. For it means Man will lose power and Women will gain power.

                    I would argue the degree any cultural codex attempts to subjugate women to Mans determination will indicate the degree one could expect this culture presents a threat to you as an out-group as such iniquitous constructs necessarily require an iniquitous means of enforcing the construct internally and acceptance externally relative to the iniquity of the construct.

                    So for me the measure of any culture or society is the relative degree they subjugate women to Mans will and with them inevitably homosexuals for my view dictates the construct of women and homosexuals are integrally linked. So if we can remove from the Public Square such codex determining women as less we will not only achieve equality in time for women, but at the same time have homosexuals determined rightly as the norm and gosh did you just notice terror has somewhat diminished?

                    I could be wrong.

                    Vote yes for equality by all means but my view is unless the acceptance of iniquity of women is completely swept aside, not only in law but in reality. the need of Man to have homosexuals deemed as an out-group will remain relative to the iniquity suffered by women.

                    YES EQUALITY FOR ALL. The fight alas never finishes as the cultural codex informing these iniquitous constructs are 'Free' to flourish in our Public Squares do not ever think what has been gained over centuries cannot be swept aside in a matter of months.


                    (a) Although this is idea of cultural opposition to contradiction may be challenged to a degree by Peng, Kaiping, U California, Dept of Psychology, Berkeley, CA, US research "Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction." - "Chinese ways of dealing with seeming contradictions result in a dialectical or compromise approach—retaining basic elements of opposing perspectives by seeking a "middle way." 

                    One would on reflection have to in my view seriously question the validity of these findings as an inherent Chinese cultural trait given the violent history of China and its current politic. It may be there is another explanation summed up in Mrs Alec-Tweedie's "An Adventurous Journey Russia-Siberia-China", 1926. "...They never dare say No. They positively funk it. They promise the moon rather than say No in a manly, upright fashion, and then will invent any fabrication to put off the final negative."

                    In other words however crudely put in 1926 the inherent Chinese quality may not be one of coming to a final determination as to their actual view but avoiding to make one for fear possibly of offending, an admirable quality, but as Mrs Alec-Tweedie determined 'evasive and elusive' would be more suitable terms than a "dialectical or compromise approach." for this determines an actual position held which clearly 'evasive and elusive' and "any fabrication to put off the final negative." (to reveal their true position.) which informs a significantly different reality on the ground does not support. Of course one would expect culturally such an interpretation of oneself would be quite nice but is it really true of an adherent of any culture when push comes to shove? 

                    Sunday, May 10, 2015

                    Women's Rights News: "I do not understand why they hate women over there (Afghanistan). - Plato did. It is the same reason they hate them 'here', everywhere the misogynistic cultural construct of women is allowed to flourish.

                    "(We) need feminism because I am stuck in a men dominated war zone in Afghanistan! I can't go outside I can't go to college.if I choose education for myself and try going outside they will call me a bitch and whore! They will hit me beat me and kill me! If I choose a man for myself to get married to they will kill us both because it will bring shame to my family choosing a life partner by myself! They will call me a bad girl if I pluck my eyebrows before marriage! I can't leave house without my parents permission and after marriage I can't leave my house without my husband's permission not even for my parent's house, if I do it without their permission they will kill me! I wish I never belonged to Afghanistan! Yes i understand I need to be strong and I am trying my best but sometimes I feel so helpless and weak!"
                    Women's Rights News  Post 10/5/2015

                    A response to the post: "
                    I do not understand why they hate women over there."

                    I do it is the same reason they hate them 'here', everywhere the misogynistic cultural construct of women is allowed to flourish even supported by so called Democratic States which espouse their core beliefs are Liberty and Equality.

                    Why is the same question asked regards cultural derived terrorism and the answer is the same as Plato pointed out so long ago regards the terrible abuse women had to suffer in his time.

                    "It is still not entirely clear what led the two men.." - It Has Been Completely Clear Since 348 BCE, Does Plato Really Have To Rise From The Dead To Shame Twenty-First Century Psychologists Particularly Social Psychologists Into Being Honest.

                    The attached following reveals the danger of accepting one analogised behaviour perceived to be benign or a 'free' choice for women and not understanding that same behaviour is based upon a cultural construct of women which enables much much worse to occur and each behaviour is non-contradictory of the other and supportive of it.

                    “To make one exception means to make them all.” - Clothing such as the Muslim headscarf, hijab, burqa... is a political cultural statement and informs adherence and respect for the ideological constructs attached to it which hold tragic consequences for women.

                    Wednesday, May 6, 2015

                    This is a Theory not a Hypothesis: "It is still not entirely clear what led the two men.." - It Has Been Completely Clear Since 348 BCE, Does Plato Really Have To Rise From The Dead To Shame Twenty-First Century Psychologists Particularly Social Psychologists Into Being Honest.

                    Plato Risen From the Dead 2015
                    "It is still not entirely clear what led the two men..."
                    Gunman in Texas Shooting Was F.B.I. Suspect in Jihad Inquiry NYT By MANNY FERNANDEZ, RICHARD PÉREZ-PEÑA and FERNANDA SANTOSMAY 4, 2015

                    “It is the cultural codex stupid, written in error by poets misrepresenting themselves as Gods scribes, change it or change nothing.” said Plato annoyed he had to rise from the dead after more than two thousand years simply to tell psychologists and particularly social psychologists what they already know yet still they watch from the footpath.

                    The fact I have to watch this statement be regurgitated each time an atrocity occurs be it in space US, Australia, Kenya. Nigeria, Syria, Pakistan, The Philippines. Malaysia, Thailand, ..... or be it across time up through middle Europe across Africa, in China .... is quite sickening when Plato told us thousands of years ago, a Chinese Emperor knew quite clearly and we have no qualms about determining it applies to a certain well known secular cultural codex.

                    If a cultural codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) template) has an iniquitous construct be it regards Other or in particular women it will be played out within the Public Square if the ideology which contain these iniquitous constructs are allowed to flourish within our Public Square.

                    As Plato said along with the Chinese Emperor unless these cultural codex iniquitous constructs are removed from the Public Square they will be reflected within the behavioral variance of the culture concerned.

                    The 'few' are created and sustained by the 'many' otherwise the 'few' would not exist and it would be my view the greater the relative degree of inequity the ideological codex informs regards Other and women the greater the need to have a violent enforcement mechanism to impose its acceptance internal and external. For who accepts such constructs willingly?

                    Is this clear enough.


                    Now from where and how does an individual arrive at such a point in time and space?

                    According to ASIO the psychological journey is three weeks as a teenager locked in your room with the internet, it appears for Muslims the development of personality and cultural codex imposed behavior traits simply do not occur 0-preadolescence. If this was really true all cultures who are fortunate to have the internet would have the same in the streets but they clearly do not.

                    Also it appears the internet was not around in the seventh century errr not until very recently so why the lie? Three weeks to create this, I am more than sickened by the dangerous denial inherent in the ASIO view as there must be clearly psychologists and social psychologists knowingly underwriting such a contradiction of research in this area.

                    Words and sentences are not strung together in a cultures codex for no purpose, they are reflections of cultural imperatives deemed as normative behavior and necessary to achieve specific outcomes otherwise these words and sentences would not exist in the codex.

                    Remove these codex constructs or change nothing as alternative narratives no matter how many you derive have to compete with the 'true' narrative which still remains hardwired into the codex. This means external and internal forces of a culture will lose any cultural construct dispute to those holding the cultural codex in their hands. Also contradictions which do exist are so obviously qualified it simply makes a nonsense to utilise them as proof a cultures codex informs peace particularly as on the ground it is a grotesque mockery of reality.

                    Culture defines out-groups and how the boundaries with out-groups will be managed not individual adherents. Cultures are therefore responsible for the terror they consistently, constantly deliver against Other the 'few' are the inevitable consequence of the cultural codex constructs of out-groups. Depending upon brain plasticity to resolve this after the prejudice and methodology is psychologically set is completely dishonest as you are proposing intensive therapy for more than a billion people along a behavioral variance which as with all cultures broaches no contradictions to its internal rational constructs.

                    Dealing with a 'few' extremes ignores the reality these extremes are defined as such only by Others cultural codex not by the 'fews' own cultural codex as they are carrying out the 'true' believer altruistic cultural enforcer role. Also releasing the 'few' back into the culture from whence they were created and given the justification and authorisation for their Other determined extreme view, under the auspices of an unprovable subjective view of 'cured' for me is akin to sending back a crack addict straight back into the environment which caused them to be a crack addict in the first place.

                    Claiming just one or two successes and thereby proclaiming this brain plasticity process works even though the terror matrices (err lists) are informing intensifying terror and major cultural schism, as is occurring right now, frankly is determining a policy failure not success. I repeat having to utilise intensive therapy means you have lost the game, the point is not having to get to a place such an ineffectual policy is even considered as appropriate. 


                    It is simply a political conscience assuaging device to say 'We are doing something.' - well frankly you are doing something and it is enabling terror and major inter-cultural schism to occur whilst certain psychologists play with their pet theoretical projects albeit helpful in certain 'contexts' at an individual level certainly is not within a context of cultural war.

                    And it is a cultural war for a culture does not have an inherent revolutionary-genocide construct being reflected into the Public Square so Other can flourish in peace and realise their full potential under their own rational model.

                    Culture is responsible for adherents informing revolutionary-genocide via specific cultural constructs of Other these have to be identified and removed so the inevitable 'few' no longer appear.