Tuesday, June 28, 2016

Iain Dale: "A friend of mine has just told me he and his wife had been disinvited to a BBQ this evening because they have voted LEAVE"

“It (Damascus-Syria) has seen empires and tyrants come and go; it offers a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony. It is a wonderful city in which to be. …. a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony"
British Historian Dan Cruickshank BBC series "Cruickshank's Adventures in Architecture, Episode 5 - Connections, Syria, Damascus 2008, First aired on BBC Two in April 2008

When the petition for the 2nd EU Vote Hits 16,775,993 wake me up until then better off accepting Democracy decided. There is an alternative it is called civil war-it appears many have forgotten why humans invented Democracy. 

Do we call another election because we are not satisfied with the result - the Democratic act will become meaningless, in fact inform breaking down of society as citizens go into the streets to fight for a recount and opposing citizens go into the streets to protect the result of the vote - further polarising the politic - a refusal to compromise and accept the majority view so necessary for the survival of Democracy. The result will end in violence being an inherent part of the new 'Democratic' politic. Being 'disinvited to a BBQ' is a clear indication the political elite are leading us inexorably to more than hurt feelings, it is a sign of dangerous political enclaving.

If
 by some perfidy Britain-you do manage to have a new referendum why not be honest this time, clearly we all know it was not about staying or not staying in the EU because of the EU consensus politics the English sausage was not up to scratch it was fundamentally driven by inter-cultural social hostility and particularly the terror-genocide now coming from both directions.

“Extremist groups, whatever their orientation, are gaining ground in Germany,” Thomas de Maiziere, the interior minister, said.
“Security forces observed not just a rise in membership but also an increase in violence and brutality.”

Extremist violence increasing in Germany, warns report,  The Telegraph, Justin Huggler, berlin, 28 JUNE 2016

The
questions therefore should be:
  1. Do you believe Multiculturalism needs reviewing?
  2. Do you believe Freedom of Religion needs reviewing?
  3. Do you believe cultures should be held accountable and excluded from public and private spheres if their cultural codex constructs and development processes systemically inform increasing terror-genocide in your streets and tragic misogynistic consequences for women?
Let’s be honest these are the 'unasked questions' our current Sociology Departments in our Western universities for decades have trained you not to ask. It is amazing how the Tranquility of Silence informing infamy can be achieved so effectively by the so called 'good'. 

The consequence of this Tranquility of Silence enforced by postmodern sociology ethical nihilist altruist enforcers utilising brand new definitions of:
  • 'freedom' (as 'freedom' is a subjective state one cultures 'freedom' is simply another cultures fascism and vice versa ),
  • 'race' (which has been hijacked so as any challenge to cultural constructs is bigotry, linked inherently to symbols of the holocaust,  'racism' no matter how vile in modernity human rights terms the cultural behavior informs regards Other and women), 
  • 'feminism' (now inclusive of oppressive religious constructs-symbols-behaviors)
is rising social hostility, endemic terror-genocide now developing in both directions - Damascustisation where the Left and even some conservatives determine despite increasing social hostility, fracturing of citizenry and even bloody bodies in our streets Western Democracies are "a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony" is this really the world you want for you and yours a dangerous lie which will get worse - maybe we all should be checking our sacred assumptions before any next vote.

Ever wondered why the Right has found it necessary to rise? Review Newton physics. Something just as ugly must be in the same space looking like roses to some yet informing...




For those who clearly have no idea what a Democracy means in practice:

‘It was one of Lincoln’s ways of working out his chief value to the country, and that value was his clear sense from the start it was our democratic scheme that was at stake, and that if it was to be saved, every citizen who could aid must help to give all that was in them.

Lincoln seems to have put it something like this to himself:

“Everybody in the country has had a part in bringing this thing about; everybody feels they have a right to say how things shall be handled; everybody that is worth their salt is going to exercise that right, and they are going to do it according to the kind of person they are – according to their temperament, their training, their self-control, their meanness, and their goodness. If we are going to put this thing through and prove that citizens can govern themselves, we must get from them what they can give, and we must let them give it in their own way.”
Source: The Life of Lincoln, Tachell

To whom it may concern: Time for a Royal Commission to determine if it is possible for the Islamic/Muslim culture to ‘reconcile itself with modernity' so as to prevent terror-genocide against Other cultures


Thursday, June 23, 2016

How Do You Stop a Future Terrorist When the Only Evidence Is a Thought? Wrong Question. First realise the 'Thought' is not their own it is their cultures.



How Do You Stop a Future Terrorist When the Only Evidence Is a Thought? New York Times, by RUKMINI CALLIMACHI, JUNE 21,
2016

"How Do You Stop a Future Terrorist When the Only Evidence Is a Thought?" Wrong Question as the 'Thought' is not their own it is their cultures. The right question:

'How Do You Stop a Culture creating Terrorists (cultural altruistic enforcers/punishers) When the Only Evidence Is a Thought?'

First realise the 'Thought' is not the terrorists own 'Thought', it is their cultures 'Thought'. You have to face the fact the 'few' terrorists are altruistic enforcers/punishers created for a cultural 'rational' system purpose otherwise the 'few' would never come into existence utilising the ethics-values-beliefs-motivation nor methodology the 'few' do, as social psychology research tells us the 'few' are few in number relative to the whole because of the intrinsic cost of being one of the true-perfect believer ‘few’, and importantly fear & the cultural codex knowledge⇆justification and authority works to achieve the required Tranquility of Silence-relative degrees of cultural acquiescence along the cultural behavioral variance to achieve cultural goals.

The whole of culture, the ‘many’, are therefore not required at the cultural front nor would it be culturally advisable to do so for how is the culture to sustain itself all out on the front line? Given the extreme cultural methodology of certain cultural derived altruistic enforcers/punishers some cultures necessarily require a relatively sophisticated developed mantel of deniability – otherwise how long would Other cultures put up with their presence before Other cultures moved decisively to remove this attacking culture from their space? So claiming you’re the ‘many’ innocent and not culpable is really unacceptable in an inter-cultural conflict where these cultural derived terrorists, as they have to be, utilizing terror-genocide come into Other cultures space and even attack their own as such cultures with an inherent codex construct of terror-genocide tend to do –everyone, everyone in turn may be determined as Other.


Secondly you have to face the fact these 'few' are created via the cultures 'many' non radicalised. 'moderate', law abiding families, communities and institutions development process infant-child-adolescent-adult imbued with cultural ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology individuals do not make up their own the culture is therefore culpable - the few will be replaced.

Thirdly even with cultures with an inherent cultural terror-genocide construct of Other in their codex there will always be the 'good' in any cultural bounded behavioral variance telling you they want peace and harmony, possibly even believing it to be true, diminishingly reflecting back your own ethics-beliefs within their behavioral variance particularly in an Other dominated political/social space - it is what is systemically occurring in the other part of the same behavioral variance which is the truth of the matter regards the culture.

∴ 'How Do You Stop a Future Terrorist When the Only Evidence Is a Thought?'

Remove the cultures codex constructs of Other + development process from societal public and private spheres or change nothing.


If you disagree with the argument and conclusion, to be right you need to prove the following is false:

Biology Determines Our Human Hands Have the Same Constituent Parts as Other.
Culture Determines Our Human Hands Will Inform Differing Outcomes for Other.


Belgium.......

"Every set of beliefs introduces its own logic and its own constraints.

..to a decision scientist, “rational” means “consistency with some model.” Rational decisions are not necessarily dispassionate, nor well-reasoned, nor selfish. They are not even necessarily good decisions, from others’ perspectives. They simply are consistent."

Distinguishing Spiritual from Temporal Power, Inventing the Individual, The origins of Western Liberalism, Larry Siedentop, 2014

"Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.

…..every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"

SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglas Hofstadter (American professor of cognitive science), Emmanuel Sander (French Psychologist-Developmental Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Educational Psychology), 2013

"Culture, of course, is related to violence in general and not only to structural violence. For example, culture influences the determination of "thresholds" which pressure on a person must overcome in order to move that person from being controllable, or even positive, to being negative (that is, into violence)." The Culture of Violence, Chp 3. On the relationship between violence and culture - Galtung's concept

Cultural codex constructs (categorisation engines) and development process not to blame? As the research determines otherwise you are going have to provide yourself with actual proof your view is correct simply saying it even believing it is not sufficient as evidence to prove the conclusion above invalid. In aggregate political/social terms given the victims and rising you can understand making the effort to question assumptions is required of all of us.

Whatever are viewed regards the Islamic/Muslim culture or any culture with a terror-genocide construct of Other inherent in their codex for a temporal period of "a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony" it is only ever a temporal space for building to cultural political/social thresholds to enable the renewal of the holocaust against Other, it may not come the next day, the next twenty years, 100 years but it will 
come.

And
 you will see/hear the building of Islamic/Muslim rationale for attacks against Other prior, and to ignore them as aberrations of radicals and not as the inherent ethical-belief system of the Islamic/Muslim culture given the bloody bodies informed by the exact same culture elsewhere in time and space is a dangerous delusion for the pronouncements will be made from the highest levels in the Islamic/Muslim cultural hierarchy by the Islamic/Muslim ideological leadership and they will not stop until the cultures codex constructs of Other + development process are removed from societal public and private spheres.

No merriness here: mosque puts fatwa on Christmas, SMH. by Natalie O'Brien, December 23, 2012

Sydney siege: Two hostages and gunman dead after heavily armed police storm Lindt cafe in Martin Place, ABC, 16 Dec 2014


Terror shooting: Teen killer ‘turned’ at Parramatta mosqueTHE AUSTRALIAN, by Dan Box, OCTOBER 5, 2015

"The existence of the Jewish colony in China was discovered by the Jesuit Fathers in the seventeenth century, if not earlier; Kaifung, some four hundred and fifty-miles south-west of Peking, being the headquarters of the colony. When Martin visited the place in 1866, he found the synagogue, supposed to be built in 1164, in ruins; the Jews had dispersed, some having become Mohammedans, and not one being able to speak a word of Hebrew. In 1850 certain Hebraic rolls were recovered from the few remaining descendants of former Jews, .."
China in Transformation, A. R. Colquhoun, 1898


"Experience has taught me that all argument is useless with fanatical young Nazi of this kind, and so I say nothing….
..the Germans (inclusive of the Nazi) that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Britain as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else..
In fact, if the extremist’s elements had prevailed. I have not the least doubt that disruption would have been more drastic and that we should have real reason by now to fear German aggression from both a military as well as political point of view.”
Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

“It (Damascus-Syria) has seen empires and tyrants come and go; it offers a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony. It is a wonderful city in which to be. …. a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony"

British Historian Dan Cruickshank BBC series "Cruickshank's Adventures in Architecture, Episode 5 - Connections, Syria, Damascus 2008, First aired on BBC Two in April 2008

Afghanistan's dwindling Sikh, Hindu communities flee new abuses, Reuters, KABUL | BY HAMID SHALIZI, Jun 22, 2016 

"Obama described how he has watched Indonesia gradually move from a relaxed, syncretistic Islam to a more fundamentalist, unforgiving interpretation; large numbers of Indonesian women, he observed, have now adopted the hijab, the Muslim head covering...... 
"Early on, Obama saw Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the president of Turkey, as the sort of moderate Muslim leader who would bridge the divide between East and West—but Obama now considers him a failure and an authoritarian, one who refuses to use his enormous army to bring stability to Syria." 

The Obama Doctrine: The U.S. president talks through his hardest decisions about America’s role in the world. By JEFFREY GOLDBERG, The Atlantic, APRIL 2016

What we in the Western Democracies are confronting is in essence an internal crises of significant difference in ethics-values-beliefs as sociology-anthropology developed notions of differing worldviews having equal status-access to societal space despite certain cultures having inherent sociopathy regards Other and women. Where the ideology and development process which informs systemic violence against Other and women cannot be challenged in fact those doing so are either criminalised or at the very least labeled as evil  suffering from mental illness with efforts to have such objectors socially shamed and shunned takes place, even blamed for inciting the very terror-genocide to which their culture is subject. 


"The use of force and violence is more commonplace and prevalent in some families, communities, religions, cultural/ethnic groups and societies based on the views and values about adult prerogatives with children espoused. They may also be based upon the sociopathy of the perpetrators." Treatment of Complex Trauma Courtois/Ford @2016

Sociopathy groups of people who adopt belief systems which cause them to behave in a similar fashion.

..it is not aggression which moves armies it is devotion, moreover what brings about such conflicts at its most fundamental level are irreconcilable values, perceptions of a radical different nature, what brings these things about actually is a form of discourse, sometimes we call it propaganda but whatever it is legions are moved by words and symbols… more than the devil made me do it, or instinctually I am like that, people do not go to war because of their evolutionary history they go to war for statable discoverable reasons bound up with politics and culture, civilisation, religious and moral values.. great variety of factors that incline whole peoples to warfare he establishes that these factors are deeply embedded in culture and cultural differences create other differences… 
The lamp of history illuminates what is beyond the readers desk, the readers village the ocean which surround the readers nation. When properly constructed the lamp of history, the study of history, illuminates the very commonalities that constitute human nature itself, what is taught is this wherever you find human beings these lessons are lessons worth learning and no matter how different the language or the culture or the customs or the diet there is a root humanity that is reached by such events that will allow us to predict how we are likely to behave under certain conditions and how those conditions therefore should either be promoted or shunned depending upon whether our behaviour is to be laudable or reprehensible.. .. the cause of war, the casus belli, is a complex of conflicting aspirations, someone is trying to achieve something, some group of people are trying to achieve something, and prepared to risk life and limb to do it and to have others die for it.” 
Professor Daniel N. Robinson, Oxford University, Author of An Intellectual History of Psychology.

The objectors to the nature of women's condition are told they are bigots and need to 'understand' why the culture acts the way it does, and western ethical-beliefs will in time change their ways - be 'reformed' - being the same logic as being told a Nazi throwing a gas canisters into concrete showers needs 'understanding' and one must wait until the full glory of Western Modernity ethics-beliefs seeps through and all will be well - its a load of BS for there is absolutely no constructed argument to determine how this 'reform' will be attained given there have been calls from individuals both from the culture itself and Other for it to do so for centuries, also there is not argument at all defending why meantime we should even accept victims of such a culture to continue to be thrown in front of us nor how long this 'reform' even if it is possible would take.

The whole approach is based upon false assumptions firstly we are all human therefore we should all get along, culture determines this an impossibility as clearly history has shown and research into the nature of interactions between various groups imbued with significantly differing values - sacred values, it is simply not going to happen has never happened. Either one will remain in societal space or the other as Lincoln rightly determined.

Culture, of course, is related to violence in general and not only to structural violence. For example, culture influences the determination of "thresholds" which pressure on a person must overcome in order to move that person from being controllable, or even positive, to being negative (that is, into violence)." The Culture of Violence, Chp 3. On the relationship between violence and culture - Galtung's concept


"Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
…..
every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"
SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglas Hofstadter (American professor of cognitive science), Emmanuel Sander (French Psychologist-Developmental Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Educational Psychology), 2013

".a cluster of friends or fellow travellers may come to hold sacred values, perhaps initially  influenced by one or a few of them, and then fuse into an imagined family-like group  defined and driven by these values. Furthermore, when sacred values are at the core of motivations to make extreme sacrifices, it becomes clear how people can sustain commitment and continue to fight. This result is so even when most of the group they were fused with has perished,."
Devoted actors sacrifice for close comrades and sacred cause
Scott Atrana,1, Hammad Sheikhb, and Angel Gomezc aCNRS-Institut Jean Nicod, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 75005 Paris, France; bDepartment of Psychology, New School for Social Research, New York, NY 10011; and cFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Also there is an assumption religious ideologies in particular operate under the 'Golden Rule', 'Do unto Others as you would do unto yourself' & Love they Neighbor as thyself & Do not harm innocents, despite clear significant differences to other ideologies be they religious or secular of sacred values which would predict, as mere empirical observation provides evidence for, Other, neighbor, innocent in certain cultural categorisation engines within cultural codex are so circumscibed as to be not like me at all, non-human -ape, evil, not a neighbor nor innocent. Clearly religions as any secular ideology can and do inform infamy against humanity to claim this is not the case has to be a regarded as a severe psychological delusional state for the evidence across history to this very day informs us otherwise. The following quote is an example of such delusion underwriting a policy which refuses to hold the Islamic/Muslim culture culpable for its systemic crimes crimes against Other and women. 

"In all the monotheism faiths we taught to love one another. That is what God wants. Not bashing one another" said one facebooker 2015

Yet the reality of what certain 'monotheism faiths' categorisation engines inform, as for goodness sake we see examples of each and every day, is quite different and the 'sacred word' determines Other is not deserving of the same treatment as I, neighbor-innocent not being of the 'faith' are neither.

Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why it is One Is and One Is-Not. Yet both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."


"Additional research suggests that negative information may more easily generalize to the outgroup (Paolini, Harwood, & Rubin, 2010). Our studies suggest that negative expectations prevent positive contact from leading to more favorable outgroup attitudes."
Positive Expectations Encourage Generalization From a Positive Intergroup Interaction to Outgroup Attitudes, September 24, 2014, Matthew P. Deegan, Eric Hehman, Samuel L. Gaertner, and John F. Dovidio 


"'Religion and Violence. Paradoxes of Religious Communication' argues that violence in religious systems is present in at least three forms: It is inherent to communication with the ‘‘sacred,’’ it is generated by processes of inclusion and exclusion, shaping religiously interpreted lifeworlds, and it is motivated or moderated by the respective semantics of religious narratives. The paper concludes that violence as a moment of hierophany (manifestation of the sacred ) is constitutive for the living experience in religious systems and cannot be eliminated entirely by moderating semantics."
'Religion and Violence. Paradoxes of Religious Communication', Ilja Srubar, 2016

"Baron and Spranca 1997; Fiske and Tetlock 2002; Tetlock 2003) suggests that people resist attempts to compromise sacred values no matter the cost to themselves or others. In the last decade or so, experimental work that goes beyond the morality of fairness and harm suggests that religious and transcendental beliefs consolidate “community” (Rozin et al. 1999), lead to “binding” (Graham et al. 2011), provide “unity motivation” (Ray and Fiske 2011), and mobilize parochial altruists, such as suicide bombers, to give their lives for the group (Ginges, Hansen, and Norenzayan 2009; cf. Atran 2003). .......
Sacred values are nonnegotiable preferences whose defense compels actions beyond evident reason, that is, regardless of calculable costs and consequences (Ginges et al. 2007). Identity fusion occurs when personal and group identities collapse into a unique identity to generate a collective sense of invincibility and special destiny (Swann et al. 2012). These two programs account for different aspects of intractable intergroup conflicts; however, here and in a companion article (Sheikh, Gómez, and Atran 2016), we argue that sacred values and identity fusion interact to produce willingness to make costly sacrifices for a primary reference groups even unto death, that is, sacrificing the totality of self-interests. "
The Devoted Actor, Unconditional Commitment and Intractable Conflict across Cultures, by Scott Atran Current Anthropology Volume 57, Supplement 13, June 2016

Also from our own rational systems of development we believe we will be able to 'rationally' come to an understanding with other cultures about the error of their 'sacred values' and the benefit of our own yet the very sociology-anthropology paradigm determines these worldviews can be significantly different and in essence it is about managing significant difference not seeking resolution to lead to a peaceful harmonious societal space which significant values difference preclude from occurring. Instead we are to 'grow confidently' with another's cultures terror-genocide and oppression of women. We are to accept as a part of the multiculturalism paradigm underwritten be generation of insane sociologists we must accept endemic social hostility for a 'drink of mint tea and Turkish pita' , and to underline the kafkaesque nature of our circumstance its Western Other cultures fault as they are not integrating the Muslim culture into Western culture were by mere observation of not only the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex, it is forbidden unless for necessity reasons to have anything to do with Other, Islamic/Muslim leaders are proclaiming fatwas, directive, ruling on a point of Islamic law given by a recognized authority, such as the fatwa in Sydney Australian which stipulated Muslims must follow the Islamic/Muslim cultures codex sacred value direction Muslims should have little or nothing to do with Other.

Is it any wonder  the "Outplayed: Regaining Strategic Initiative in the Gray Zone" report sponsored by the Army Capabilities Integration Center in Coordination with Joint Staff J-39/Strategic Multi-Layer Assessment Branch 
reveals the reality which has led inexorably to WWI. WWII, "profound and paralyzing risk-confusion" regards enemy cultures utilising "combinations of influence, intimidation, coercion, and aggression. At the same time,.. exploiting, free-riding on, or are propelled by the generalized erosion or outright failure of traditional political authority." the same elite philosophy driven policy of appeasement of enemy cultures, determining well constructed argument under a Western rationale model will surely convince internal cultures tearing societies apart and external cultures battering Western democratic walls to accept the obvious benefits of the Western Worldview.

"We have to grow with the threat, and we have to do it in a confident manner,” Professor Siracusa said. (Human Security and International Diplomacy)
Two Sydney schools in lockdown as police unions call for support against extremists 
SBS 20 OCT 2015

"We have to stop with this debate of neutrality and secularity in Belgium and recognise and accept our multicultural society in all its manifestations. Not just when we want to drink mint tea or eat Turkish pita." sociologist Corinne Torrekens, a specialist in Muslim communities at the Free University of Brussels."
Terror sparks integration debate in France, Belgium, DW, Elizabeth Bryant, Molenbeek/Sevran, 05.04.2016

"It's not a question of Muslims being integrated, it's that society isn't integrating Muslims," says Alexandre Piettre, a sociologist at the Societies, Religions and Secularism Group, a Paris-based think-tank.

Terror sparks integration debate in France, Belgium, DW, Elizabeth Bryant, Molenbeek/Sevran, 05.04.2016

Such
approach of a perception of common human rationality ignores a truth cultures imbue us with differing reactive tendencies regards perceived transgression against 'sacred values' correlated positively I would argue with the relative draconian nature of our codex and an inherent inability to even have a 'rational' discussion regards 'irrational' constructs-unable to be justified by empirical evidence i.e the subjugation of women to man's 'leadership' and sexual control.

"..children raised in religious households, who are perceived to be more empathetic and sensitive to justice, are in fact less altruistic to their own class mates .... children from religious households also differ in their ratings of deserved punishment for interpersonal harm (F(2, 847) = 5.80, p < 0.01, h2 = 0.014); this was qualified by significantly harsher ratings of punishment by children from Muslim households than children from non-religious households (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between children from Christian households and non-religious households.".
The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World, November 05, 2015

"great emphasis placed on Muslims to see themselves as members of a community of true believers .., Muslims to see each other as part of a cohesive social whole .. deliberate individualism is seen as a threat to the order and coherence of society...parents devalue creativity as an important child quality.. intellectual autonomy and imagination ..a stumbling block toward the unconditional surrender required of pious Muslims." (Acevedo, Ellison, & Yilmaz, 2013)


Further we have the insidious how long is a piece of string marginalisation excuse for terror Other are to blame for their own demise clearly evidence exists each claim of marginalisation is contradicted by the reverse occurring. The reality comes back to the codex-development-status anxiety in a dense network where holding to the true-perfect believer status and the justified-authorised methodology framing behavior leads to heightened aggression. The fact is this as we all exist in what are hierarchical status based societies marginalisation is a fact of life for all of us, it will be found. That is not to argue marginalisation does not occur in an oppressive form but the point is relatively do Other cultures inform the same terror-genocide behavior if not marginalisation cannot be the core contributing factor.


"We find that aggression is generally not a maladjusted reaction typical of the socially marginal; instead, aggression is intrinsic to status and escalates with increases in peer status until the pinnacle of the social hierarchy is attained."
R Faris, D Felmlee - American Sociological Review, 2011

"The time has come for us to be honest with ourselves and indeed each other. The radicalisation that breeds terrorism is not conducted in the bush at night. It occurs in the full glare of day in homes, in madrasas and in mosques with rogue imams. We must ask the question — where are the parents and families (communities, education and religious institutions) of those who are being radicalized?" said Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president "Our task of countering terrorism has been made all the more difficult by the fact that the planners and financiers of this brutality are deeply embedded in our communities."

"A Garissa-based official said the government was aware Abdullahi, a former University of Nairobi law student, had joined the militant group al Shabaab after graduating in 2013."
Kenya says son of a government official was among gunmen in Garissa attack 
by EDITH HONAN GARISSA, Kenya — Reuters Published Sunday, Apr. 05 2015

The following is what we are being asked to accept by our political/social elite and they are surprised-shocked large segments of their citizenry are searching for a way to bring peace and security back to their streets and hold these inept dangerous cultural gatekeepers to account for enabling the unleashing of a culture's terror-genocide into their societal space.

‘We cannot eliminate entirely the risk of terrorism any more than we can eliminate the risk of any serious crime.’ said Neville Chamberlain British Prime Minister in 1938 ‘Humanity simply have to make political concessions to cultures delivering terror-genocide against Other cultures, seek to understand and respect their ideology and ignore the bloody bodies and those missing in the streets and ‘grow confidently' with Nazi terror.’.

"According to the Pew Research Center, religious hostilities reached a six-year high in 2012, with a third (33%) of countries in the high category, up from 20% just six years earlier.

The Islamic world is disproportionately affected. More than one-in-two (57%) Muslim-majority countries have high religious hostilities, more than double that of other countries (25%), as shown in the chart to the left.

Although religious hostilities affect countries throughout the world experience, Muslim-majority countries consistently have higher levels of a range of religious hostilities than other countries and by wide margins. For instance, Muslim-majority countries are more than three times more likely than other countries to have religion-related war, terror or sectarian violence"

09/22/2014 Source data PEW Research Center - Commentary Weekly Number Brian J. Grim, Ph.D.

You are asking fellow citizens to 'grow confidently' with such a cultures terror-genocide with political/social codex constructs clearly visible before us informing increased social hostility as it always has, 'accept our multicultural society as, designed by our university 'only ask the questions we allow you to' sociology departments, in all its manifestations inclusive of terror genocide and tragic outcomes for women because surely a 'drink of mint tea or Turkish pita is worth it' I for one believe such a request is sickening and dangerous. In fact I believe the contributors to the "Outplayed: Regaining Strategic Initiative in the Gray Zone" report determining the political/social elite as suffering from "profound and paralyzing risk-confusion"  is rather too generous.

Clearly the policy is leading inexorably to the past terror-genocide in both directions as cultural gatekeepers imprisoned by an abstract utopian view of society attempts to destroy their own cultures heritage values-beliefs and methodology and accept endemic terror-genocide in both directions as the price their citizens pay for the privilege, seeking to blame anyone except themselves for the broken bodies and lives in their streets. How the 'good' enforce so effectively the 'Tranquillity of Silence' and lead humanity in the appeasement of cultures of infamy into hell once again. 

“Extremist groups, whatever their orientation, are gaining ground in Germany,” Thomas de Maiziere, the interior minister, said.
“Security forces observed not just a rise in membership but also an increase in violence and brutality.”

Extremist violence increasing in Germany, warns report,  The Telegraph, Justin Huggler, berlin, 28 JUNE 2016

Sunday, June 19, 2016

Quintan Wiktorowicz: 'marginalised'? research says otherwise Muslim development=↑reactionary behaviour-'Its Culture.' Quintan Wiktorowicz and his colleagues need to recheck their assumptions.

I do not apologise for any cognitive dissonance which may be experienced by some readers as there are too many cultural derived victims past, present and future for me to care one iota.

It was heard often in the past a complaint “There is a Military 'complex/establishment' enabling war for their own benefit."

"Focusing on extremist ideology as the driver of radicalization, rather than as the end result, is often misleading and even dangerous, according to experts who’ve studied the backgrounds of violent jihadists.

“It can make us less safe. It means that we’re missing a really important conversation about all the other drivers, and all the other complexities that we might be able to address,” said Quintan Wiktorowicz, a former White House senior adviser on countering violent extremism who’s now a managing partner of Affinis Labs, a Virginia-based startup incubator whose projects include apps to combat radical messaging."

Quintan Wiktorowicz and his colleagues need to recheck their assumptions.

"Focusing on extremist ideology as the driver of radicalization, rather than as the end result, is often misleading and even dangerous, according to experts who’ve studied the backgrounds of violent jihadists."

Is the same logic as:

"Focusing on the ingredients of a cake as the driver of taste, rather than as the end result, is often misleading and dangerous', according to experts who’ve studied the backgrounds of avid cakeists who have died from food poisoning."

Radicalisation (constituting ethics-values-beliefs-motivation & methodology inclusive of whether or not the culture utilises strong or weak networks) as with taste are culturally derived-set within cultural derived variances and dependent upon the cultural development process (smell (which in essence encompasses taste) sounds you appreciate also). The assumption appears to be 'Extremist Ideology' sits all alone in a lone wolf cubical and can even be objectively determined as such I am suggesting cultural codex 'ingredients' (inclusive of individual definitions of 'Extremist Ideology') matter, not all will be affected in the same way but they will be affected some more than others - otherwise there would be no way adherents would understand each other. The result is culturally informed terror not individual informed terror. What you see as irrational (i.e. Islamic extremism view by some from within as true-perfect believer status) may very well not be under another cultural rational model particularly if it is endemic. See systems theory.

"The religious police in Kano State have been cracking down on Muslims who fail to fast during the holy month of Ramadan. As DW’s Nasir Zango reports, the suspects could be caned in public if found guilty."
Non-fasting Muslims arrested in northern Nigeria, DW, 22/6/2016

Example above of an inherent strong network system in action utilising inherent violence to align internal adherence = what level of aggression therefore would one expect to be informed against non-adherents from such a system, such a cultural codex? Is this the only example from this culture in time and space, are we not now in the twenty-first century does this mean of course such methodology will be diminished despite even the observation by Obama regards Islamic/Muslim dominated Turkey and Indonesia a more stringent version of the Islamic/Muslim codex developing than existed previously at a point in time is occurring? The claims of possible 'reform' held out as a carrot to prevent Other cultures actually holding the Islamic/Muslim culture rightly culpable for the infamy it informs really possible? Who clearly has the codex knowledge, justification and authority for determining ethic-beliefs and methodology the 'moderates' determining 'reform' is possible without stipulating how and under what authority, or the 'extremists' as Western eyes perceive them?

Religious roots of hatred resurface in Orlando-If there was one message in the massacre cultures need to be held responsible for their development process.

Quintan Wiktorowicz: 'marginalised', research says otherwise Muslim development=↑reactionary behaviour-'Its Culture.'

‘Always Agitated. Always Mad’ (mental Health), assimilation (marginalization), ..... So what?

Such an approach of ignoring cultural ideology immediately seeks to deal with strong or weak correlations unrelated to actual cause-cultural codex constructs and development process, immediately opening up a world of infinite 'nuanced' 'complexity', persons feverously working away developing their many ‘complexities’ to impress each other and convince their sponsors dealing out our tax dollars, utilising deduction from false assumptions spirals out of control from the temperature on the day of the massacre, marginalisation (aren’t we all to some degree varying over time-it will be found), deprived childhood, bullied, bullying, homophobia, low IQ, ..low job prospects, health issues, etc.


The result is a whole new industry emerges, based upon lies, self-perpetuating determined as all cultures to grow and prosper, which with all irrational paradigms will develop oppressive political/social methods to shut down any opposition to such baloney 'nuanced' 'complexity'. And it can be expected violence in both directions as the bloody bodies make plain such 'nuanced' 'complexity', are a cover for doing nothing but divert scarce resources for even worse 'less safe' outcomes for humanity.

"Complexity"?

The fact is cultural ideology determines the ethics-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology of the 'few' altruistic enforcers be they terrorists or otherwise the 'few' do not make up their own. It has been established even with the Orlando killing this Muslim was well educated and had employment. It is absurd this 'marginalised' paradigm for each of us to degrees is 'marginalised' by some aspects of our cultural circumstance - social hierarchies inform such a state upon all of us up and down the chain and across it. You search for ‘marginalisation’ as cause based upon sociology bleeding heart theory groupthink texts what will you inevitably find….?

May I suggest the 'wolf' is never alone, for how did the wolf come to be a wolf all on his lonesome?

The point is we are not imbued with the same Muslim reactionary behaviour ethics-beliefs methodology created by the Islamic/Muslim cultural development process to inform terror-genocide having been subject to the same 'relative' 'marginalisation', therefore it cannot be 'marginalisation' statistically, rationally it has to be something else.

How many of these persons feverously working away developing their many ‘complexities’ to impress each other and their sponsors dealing out our tax dollars better spent on enabling a flourishing life rather than protecting citizens from a culture which systemically delivers bloody bodies to our door steps, would lose their considerable income if they actually held the culture to account delivering the terror as humanity rightly did with the Nazi ideology and its adherents.

May I suggest words (ingredients) development process even with the physical nature and arrangement of cultural space does matter. Is the cause. Its Culture make it accountable or change nothing.


Western Political/Social Elites → any enemy can be your friend → "profound and paralyzing risk-confusion." ∴ WWI, WWII, Belgium, Orlando, Kenya, ..... 

Clearly Obama’s questioning of Israel's qualitative military edge as the following quote from the "Outplayed: Regaining Strategic Initiative in the Gray Zone" report reveals the continuing dangerous Western appeasement paradigm and unwillingness to recognize a cultural enemy by its actions nor its professed ideology which has led inexorably to WWI. WWII, Orlando, Belgium, London, Paris, Sydney, Bali,.... a "profound and paralyzing risk-confusion" regards enemy cultures internal and external utilizing "combinations of influence, intimidation, coercion, and aggression” whilst ’exploiting, free-riding on, or are propelled by the generalized erosion or outright failure of traditional political authority.’


Outplayed: Regaining Strategic Initiative in the Gray Zone, A Report Sponsored by the Army Capabilities Integration Center in Coordination with Joint Staff J-39/Strategic Multi-Layer Assessment Branch

I have a complaint "There is a growing Terror 'complex/establishment' enabling terror for their own benefit."

"In his essay, The 'Ideograph:' A Link Between Rhetoric and Ideology, Michael Calvin McGee proposes that our system of beliefs is shaped through and expressed by words. We are consciously and unconsciously conditioned and controlled by the words we hear and use. Words carry ideology and convey and create meaning. Like Chinese characters, words are "ideographs" that "signify and 'contain' a unique ideological commitment," that is frequently unquestioned.' McGee also suggests that by understanding that a single word can carry ideology and that ideology can be expressed in a single word, we are better able to expose and evaluate ideology and choose to accept or reject such ideology. However, if we fail to recognize the ideographic nature of words, we risk creating and promoting a reality that is removed from our system of beliefs." - HOW WORDS CREATE REALITY ANN SINSHEIMER


For reflection by the 'good' as I have over time come to believe "they do not know what they are doing." - 'Words are dangerous weapons': New South Wales (Aust) Attorney-General Gabrielle Upton.

The same flawed elite philosophy driven policy of appeasement of enemy cultures, determining well-constructed argument under a Western rational model will surely convince internal cultures tearing society’s apart and external cultures battering Western democratic walls to accept the obvious benefits of the Western Worldview.

Wake up to yourselves you twats you take the few 'good' words of a specially selected group of so called liberals/moderates of attacking cultures from just one part of the cultures behavioral variance, even paying them significant sums to hear their comforting reflection back of your own cultural values-beliefs that this attacking culture can 'reform', without any indication at all of how this can be achieved in reality, and/or inform Other cultures they want to live in peace and harmony when elsewhere in their behavioral variance the increasing 'few' coming possibly from their very own families, communities and institutions continue to commit terror-genocide and/or cross Other's borders or disputed territory without immediate overwhelming response which history warns will be required inclusive of the massive military might of the US and its allies which was actually intended to be utilised for such belligerence. Humanity have had so many lessons on what a culture containing a terror-genocide construct of Other looks like and what it will inform yet we ask this same cultures 'good' around for dinner at our table and castigate those objecting to such an obscenity as promoters of hate and division. It is beyond kafkaesque.

A political/social elite inclusive of Obama suffering "profound and paralyzing risk-confusion" regards the enemy, is it any wonder we are heading for the abyss within and outside our walls.

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

"To blame an entire religion for the acts of a single individual in Orlando is bigotry, pure and simple."="To blame an entire secular ideology(Nazism) for the acts of a single individual in Berlin is bigotry, pure and simple."


"To blame an entire religion for the acts of a single individual in Orlando is bigotry, pure and simple." Bernie Sanders (Facebook) 15-6-2016

A logic which = "To blame an entire secular ideology(Nazism) for the acts of a single individual in Berlin is bigotry, pure and simple."

Lets test the truth of Bernie Sanders' statement when examining the statements just made by Hillary Clinton a fellow Democrat and the exact same views Clinton previously held yet did not publically espouse even when challenged recently regards Saudi complicity in 9/11.


The Orlando massacre another of thousands by a Muslim and Donald Trump's public view, and a correct one if research on social psychology is to mean anything at all, the Islamic/Muslim culture is responsible for terror-genocide coming directly from their non radicalised, 'moderate', law abiding families, communities, institutions and should be held accountable clearly forced Hillary Clinton to state the obvious which the major part of perceptive US citizenry already knew as a truth Islamic/Religious indoctrination of Muslims in Islamic religious 'schools and mosques around the world' based upon Islamic/Muslim cultural codex (text and exemplar (messianic) templates) created and sustained the Muslim extremists delivering terror-genocide:

""It is long pas
t time for the Saudis, Qataris and Kuwaitis and others to stop their citizens 
from funding extremist organisations," she declared in the aftermath of the Orlando attack.
"And they should stop supporting radical schools and mosques around the world that have set too many young people on a path towards extremism."
Hillary Clinton links Saudi Arabia to terrorism and the world suddenly changes by Daniel Flitton, SMH, June 14, 2016

This is the kafkaesque paradigm Not Religion-Not Culture in which Western citizens are forced by their political/social elites to exist, where Hillary Clinton can simultaneously determine a religion-culture does not finance systemically informed extremism-terror, counter to a view this same person as the US Secretary of State (2009-2013) held in 2010 according to Wikileaks, and refused to admit publically, and yet this same person Hillary Clinton in 2016 determines religion-culture not responsible for extremism and its financing and at the very same time in the statement above states religion-culture has "set too many young people on a path towards extremism."

.
"The scale of this commitment was made clear in March 2002, when the Saudi government's English weekly Ain Al-Yaqeen published an article on the "Billions Spent by Saudi Royal Family to Spread Islam to Every Corner of the Earth". It described the 210 Islamic centres, 1500 mosques, 200 colleges and 2000 schools wholly or partly financed by Saudi Arabia in Europe, North and South America, Asia, and Australia.

Overall, the Saudis have spent approximately $95 billion since the mid-1970s to export Wahhabism ("reliance on Quran (central religious text of Islam) and hadith (record of the traditions or sayings of the Prophet Muhammad, revered and received as a major source of religious law and moral guidance, second only to the authority of the Qurʾān)), rejecting medieval interpretations of Islam and jurisprudence") on a global scale, and there is no evidence of decreased activity in its missionary effort."
How to be a useful idiot: Saudi funding in Australia, ABC, By Mervyn Bendle, 29 Sep 2010

For what are the Saudis financing what are they exporting? They are financing religious schools and institutions such as Mosques where the 'export' the Islamic/Muslim religion in the form Wahhabism determined as being truly reflective of Islamic ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology tenets contained within the prime sacred source the Quran and the secondary source the hadith.

"German Vice-Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel (Angela Merkel’s deputy) had good reason to lash out at Saudi Arabia over King Salman’s intention to fund 200 hardline Sunni Wahhabist mosques and madrassas for hundreds of thousands of refugees streaming into Germany. Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states have not resettled a single refugee. But the rulers in Riyadh, it appears, want to ensure that those who find new homes in Europe have access to radical Wahhabist teaching. In a rare public attack on a country regarded as a key Western ally, Mr Gabriel said: “Wahhabi mosques all over the world are financed by Saudi Arabia. Many Islamists who are a threat to public safety come from these communities.”

Wahhabism, or Salafism, is the dominant Islamic stream in the kingdom of the House of Saud. It is the religion of al-Qa’ida and inspired Osama bin Laden. Its uncompromising, medieval practices — floggings, stonings and beheadings — are the bedrock of Islamic State fanaticism."

Hardline mosques pose a riskTHE AUSTRALIAN, DECEMBER 11, 2015

The Islamic/Muslim
 religion Wahhabism sourced directly and/or authoritively inferred /analogised from the key sacred sources of the Islamic/Muslim culture and is claimed such interpretation/reflection can be linked justifiably to these sacred texts which are the source of all Muslims religious ethics-beliefs methodology we are told according to Hillary Clinton are creating extremists around the world to inform terror-genocide. But paradoxically Hillary Clinton claims at the same time along with Bernie Saunders and Obama to accuse the Islamic/Muslim cultures families, communities, institutions of creating extremists-terrorists utilising the religion of ethics-beliefs methodology Clinton claims are creating extremists is bigotry and a mental disorder an irrational fear phobia. 

"Enough is enough. It is time to speak out.

“Islam is innocent” is an incomplete sentence. Introspection is needed, for, if we shy away from reality, the alternative will be more images like those we witnessed last Tuesday night, when brave Lt. Muath Al Kasasbeh was burnt to death in a cage.

The inconvenient truth that is overlooked or willfully ignored by apologists for the indefensible is the fact that Wahhabism, the cult of mediaeval austerity founded by Ibn Abdul Wahab (1703-1792), has over the last half century been exported to every mosque and school throughout the Muslim world until it completely enveloped mainstream Sunni Islamic teachings.

Wahhabism has entirely replaced, and become, Sunni Islam; the two cannot be told apart anymore.

Some Wahabist teachings, which have permeated the air we breathe in the Muslim world, are simply irreconcilable with decent human values, especially the ones that declare that every non-Wahhabist is a disposable body whose bloodletting is unproblematic"

‘We have a problem’ by Zaid Nabulsi The Jordon Times Feb 10, 2015


The Saudis are accused of exporting religion which Clinton determines as Not Religion for to do so means the extremism immediately becomes as it is in reality sourced directly from Islamic/Muslim religious tenets taken or existing in the source of all Muslim ethics-beliefs and methodology the Quran and the hadith. Zaid Nabulsi from Jordan knows very well the source of Wahhabism are sacred Islamic/Muslim religious texts he is aware the ethics-beliefs and methodology exists in those texts the problem for Zaid Nabulsi as it is for all of us the Islamic/Muslim codex is being taken literally to argue this is not right in a Modern age misses the point these are 'sacred' dictates from God via Mohammad and even the Quran itself determines such tenets as set down will apply for all time - the justification and authority for these ethics and beliefs to exist now simply cannot be swept away therefore by saying look I want to pick and choose what is sacred or not and then say its not your fault other Muslims inform terror-genocide when by your very continued adherence enables these acts to occur because in your very families, communities and institutions the 'true word of God is being adhered to and you are passing the exact same codex onto the next generation to inform the same - you are culpable.

The fact is Wahhabism as a religious reflection of the Quran and Hadith has justification and authorisation to not only align to those beliefs but demand via the Islamic/Muslim cultural developed methodology of violence - terror-genocide against not only Other cultures but Muslims as well that such ethics- beliefs be aligned to and they can due to this justification and authority achieved the required tranquility of silence from the acquiescent and not so acquiescent because they not 'extremists' at all under such a Quran-hadith rational model are standing on the true-perfect believer high ground.


“If the religious leaders compete with the extremists (religious leaders) on Islamic knowledge, I cannot guarantee that they would win. That’s what worries me,” said Adudulkrep, who is also head of the state-run Xinjiang Islamic Institute...."
CHINA LOSING BATTLE AGAINST EXTREMIST ISLAMIC TEACHINGS, SAYS MUSLIM OFFICIAL MARCH 30, 2015

I
slamic/Muslim Religious tenants are being utilised by Islamic/Muslims families, communities, institutions to create extremists terrorists and therefore rightly the cultural whole needs to be held accountable for the altruistic enforcers/punishers/aligners the so call non radicalised, 'moderate' law abiding systemically create and sustain. Do the Islamic/Muslim faithful even in Western streets raise their voices in unison in such a way to thwart the so called 'extremists' when they start enforcing what Zaid Nabulsi terms medieval reality a realty these very same 'moderates' determined themselves a medieval or is it we are taking just a 'few' or even one Muslim voice and suffering from wishful thinking and believing such views are representative of the whole where clearly the outcomes determine such a view delusion?

"• Parents do not have the confidence to argue against the articulate and forceful activists who seek to impose their views, for fear of being branded as disloyal to their faith or their community."
Schools face new curbs on extremism after Birmingham Trojan horse affair Patrick Wintour, Political editor The Guardian, Wednesday 23 July 2014

Yet the Quran and the hadith enable what elsewhere where Wahhabism is not followed as a script, yet cannot help given the source have similar codex constructs and therefore outcomes as logic would dictate. The writer Zaid Nabulsi Jordanian attorney and partner in the law firm of Nabulsi & Associates has a further problem, as does humanity as a result, from where was the Wahhabi cultural codex transcribed, inferred/analogised from for it is only either true transcription or an inference/analogy capable of being validly formed from the very 'text' Zaid Nabulsi claims by true transcription or an inference/analogy capable of informing good rather than evil - this is impossible for if one informs evil so do the others.

"
“No, I don’t see a coming together of the United States and Iran. Iran remains the world’s chief sponsor of terrorism,” Saudi Foreign Minister Adel Al-Jubeir said at a joint news conference with US Secretary of State John Kerry."
US aware of Iran mischief, Saudi Gazette Jan 24, 2016

It c
annot simply be only one interpretation or direct usage of the Quran and the hadith which are causing terror these religious texts clearly inform terror-genocide if based upon these two islamic/Muslim cultural sacred sources. 

"The head imam at Lakemba, Sheikh Yahya Safi, had told the congregation during prayers that they should not take part in anything to do with Christmas.

"The fatwa quotes the teacher Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim as saying that congratulating disbelievers for their rituals is forbidden, and if a "Muslim who says this does not become a disbeliever himself, he at least commits a sin as this is the same as congratulating him for his belief in the trinity, which is a greater sin and much more disliked by Almighty Allah than congratulating him for drinking alcohol or killing a soul or committing fornication or adultery”
.
No merriness here: mosque puts fatwa on Christmas Sydney Morning Herald, Natalie O'Brien, December 23, 2012

Glasgow mosque leader praises extremist killer By Calum McKay BBC Scotland 25 March 2016

The logic of
 Bernie Sanders claim "To blame an entire religion for the acts of a single individual in Orlando is bigotry, pure and simple."  denies exactly the same behavior in Orlando are being derived from exactly the same culture Muslims Sunni or Shia or .. in such numbers as to be statistically significant in places other than Orlando. The logic determines the Nazi are not responsible for any single action carried out by an adherent be it in auschwitz or a french town because look there was only one who pulled the trigger. Who created sustained indoctrinated him/her? It has to be a culture-ideology.

The fact is this is not an isolated action thousands upon thousands of similar acts have occurred in Belgium, London, Boston, Paris, Sydney, Indonesia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Turkey, Syria ....... If it was just one individual action which has never occurred before or extremely rarely one may be able to claim a culture is not responsible for its aberrant adherents behavior but clearly this is not the case.

To blame an entire culture-religion for the acts of a single individual particularly as the same acts are frequently occurring elsewhere is rational for individuals do not invent their own ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation nor their methodology in this case terror-genocide a cultural action, cultures do and the question then is only 'Which culture is responsible which has such a rationale to enable such terror-genocide to occur?"

And the culture is the Islamic/Muslim culture. Therefore if the culture is not held accountable for the Islamic/Muslim cultural development process infant-child-adolescent-adult what happen
s?

"'The good news is that there's 50 less pedophiles in this world': Fundamentalist Christian pastor films hate-filled rant in wake of Orlando gay club massacre "
By CHRIS KITCHING FOR DAILYMAIL.COM PUBLISHED: 01:18 EST, 14 June 2016

Sacramento Baptist Pastor Applauds Orlando Shooting
Fox40, BY SONSEEAHRAY TONSALL, JUNE 13, 2016

Freedom of Religion remains as a valid beneficial moral human construct in the twenty-first century when it informs all of the above and worse?

"Will targeted nightclub shooting begin an overdue conversation about religions' attitudes toward gays?"
After Orlando, time to recognize that anti-gay bigotry is not religious freedom: By Neil Macdonald, CBC News Posted: Jun 13, 2016

Freedom of Religion has failed, it delivers #Orlando ↑ social hostility with #terror


Religious roots of hatred resurface in Orlando-If there was one message in the massacre cultures need to be held responsible for their development process.

Tuesday, June 14, 2016

Religious roots of hatred resurface in Orlando-If there was one message in the massacre cultures need to be held responsible for their development process.



"If there was one message in the massacre, it seemed to be that LBGT people are still not safe, and that religious teachings — or at least a narrow reading of them — may be a contributing factor to hatred against gays."
Religious roots of hatred resurface in Orlando, RNS, Religious News Service, By Yonat Shimron | June 12, 2016

I believe you should change 'may be a' to 'is the'. Why? Because if you reflect on why LGBT are targeted by certain religions you will find in the same religions a cultural codex construct of women which determines women subject to man's 'leadership', control of women's sexuality and authorisation of violence in certain religions to maintain control. I would argue the degree a culture seeks to subjugate women to man's control will be reflected in the relative cultural altruistic enforcers/aligners/punishers violence against LGBT. Why?

You see the mere existence of LGBT's contradicts/challenges the unequal relationship status religions tend to award men over women - not surprising for who writes these codex. Man-Man, Woman-Woman relationship immediately informs an inherent relationship of equality and the religious construct of subjugation of one entity over the other confronted by this inherent equality breaks down for how can you still claim women in particular are to be justifiably subject when sitting opposite you are relationship paradigms which informs the opposite? Cultural systems cannot abide contradiction of its core tenets for if one tenet can be determined unjustified/contradicted in light of evidence what of the other tenets can they still be seen as unchallengeable and further cultures cannot abide contradiction of core tenets because the beneficiary, and there has to be one, individual or group otherwise the relationship schema would not exist, loses. In this case ….?

LGBT therefore have to be determined as

“Romans 1:28-32, which says: “God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done. They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. … Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them..”

A handful of biblical passages condemn homosexuality. These include perhaps the most oft repeated: “If a man practices homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman, both men have committed a detestable act. They must both be put to death, for they are guilty of a capital offense” (Leviticus 20:13).

Likewise, the Quran condemns homosexuality and recommends stoning as a form of punishment:

“For ye practice your lusts on men in preference to women: ye are indeed a people transgressing beyond bounds. … And we rained down on them a shower (of brimstone)” (Quran 7:80-84).”

But for many modern readers of Scripture, such passages are meant to be read in the context of the time and should not be taken literally.”

Religious roots of hatred resurface in Orlando, RNS, Religious News Service, By Yonat Shimron | June 12, 2016

God you will find has even given up on them “God gave them over” or not even tried because they are so evil and incalcitrant not even worth raising the issue – kill them.

The logic of “such passages are meant to be read in the context of the time” brings every codex textual construct into question for each person can then decide inclusive of the very text above what constitutes the sacred to be or not to be utilized as ethics-values-beliefs and methodology to inform an adherent’s behavior. Is it a sacred text or not, surely as the true-perfect believers are certain it all is because they could care less regards Modernity as we see everyday. If cultural codex is used today it applies today to determine it should not is of little consequence to the victims.

Why is this issue possibly the most important regards the religious designation of woman subject to man? The reason is certain research has found violence at its core is not driven by ‘marginalization’ but status seeking within cultural designated frameworks and the degree of cultural separation of men and women may have a profound effect on the relative levels of violence emanating from cultures.

"Literature on aggression often suggests that individual deficiencies, such as social incompetence, psychological difficulties, or troublesome home environments, are responsible for aggressive behavior. In this article, by contrast, we examine aggression from a social network perspective, arguing that social network centrality, our primary measure of peer status, increases the capacity for aggression and that competition to gain or maintain status motivates its use. We test these arguments using a unique longitudinal dataset that enables separate consideration of same- and cross-gender aggression. We find that aggression is generally not a maladjusted reaction typical of the socially marginal; instead, aggression is intrinsic to status and escalates with increases in peer status until the pinnacle of the social hierarchy is attained. Over time, individuals at the very bottom and those at the very top of a hierarchy become the least aggressive youth. We also find that aggression is influenced not so much by individual gender differences as by relationships with the other gender and patterns of gender segregation at school. When cross-gender interactions are plentiful, aggression is diminished. Yet these factors are also jointly implicated in peer status: in schools where cross-gender interactions are rare, cross-gender friendships create status distinctions that magnify the consequences of network centrality."
Status Struggles, Network Centrality and Gender Segregation in Same- and Cross-Gender Aggression, Robert Faris, Diane Felmlee, American Sociological Review February 2011 vol. 76 no. 1 48-73

It should therefore be found given the research above significant differences in behavior particularly as it relates to reaction to transgression will be found in cultures who have relatively restrictive male female interaction so as to enable relatively higher levels of aggression. The following research may be an indication this is happening – although it may have also something to do with the strength of the network system enforcing negative ethics-values-beliefs regards Other and women as well.

"..children raised in religious households, who are perceived to be more empathetic and sensitive to justice, are in fact less altruistic to their own class mates .... children from religious households also differ in their ratings of deserved punishment for interpersonal harm (F(2, 847) = 5.80, p < 0.01, h2 = 0.014); this was qualified by significantly harsher ratings of punishment by children from Muslim households than children from non-religious households (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between children from Christian households and non-religious households.".

The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World, November 05, 2015

It would appear to me if we really want peace and harmony in our streets we had better start insisting women’s equal participation-power at all levels of society in all cultural entities in such a way that it does not leave men alone to make great asses of themselves and leave thousands of victims in their wake in the process and underwrite collusive men’s control over women by creating and enforcing segregation into us and them.

If certain cultures inform systemically significantly higher levels of aggression via their development processes should we just leave them alone knowing what we think we know and simply await the inevitable tragic event be repeated and repeated because Other 'Gods' possibly inform the same albeit nowhere near as much? What's another 50? We stick to the script Not-Culture Not-Religion to the bitter end and hopefully someone takes a bullet for me.

I believe the nature of the Islamic/Muslim segregation of men from women with clear graphic spacial notion of man's centrality in mass formation is an inherent violent threat against women and is used as a cultural device to reinforce women's fear via stark collusive images of Muslim men and acts to have men remain on dogma-regards mens centrality and women's subject position. As well such inherent Islamic/Muslim structures of continuing segregation of men being culturally forced together via the strong network system reflected by the fifth pillar for prayer leads to such repetition of mechanical cognitive reinforcement as to leave no room for uncertainty with continuance of status anxiety where the very cultural codex gives each 'true' Muslim the means by which to identify the true-perfect believer, such an environment I believe ratchets levels of aggression not only collusively to maintain and reinforce women's subservience, to defend-promote one's true-believer status within a masculine competitive environment but also culturally required to defend a paradigm which cannot be justified rationally against existing Other cultures social constructs which inform diametrically opposed, contradictory ethics-values-beliefs methodology and reveal obvious tangible benefits and protection particularly for women and LGBT. These Other cultures Political/Social paradigms are a clear and immediate threat to the Islamic/Muslims core tenets and in particular Muslim men's hold onto sexual control of women and this aggression therefore will be, not may be unleashed by individuals or as organised groups as for goodness sake has occurred since the seventh century.

So it is a combination of the nature of the Islamic/Muslim lifetime development process inclusive of the very spacial structures, and the cultural codex itself determining women as subject and under the control of Muslim men in turn leads by necessity to a terror-genocide construct of Other and other Muslims perceived as not sticking to the script.


The Islamic Party of Australia Hizb-ut Tahrir posted their draft Islamic Constitution of Australia

 – The articles of this constitution are characterised by the fact that they are exclusively and purely Islamic opinions and thoughts. They contain nothing whatsoever that is non Islamic, nor are they influenced by anything that is non-Islamic. They are rather Islamic in every sense and nothing else, and they are based upon nothing but the foundations and texts of Islam.
Draft Islamic Constitution of Australia

"The group (Islamic Party of Australia Hizb-ut Tahrir), which reportedly described last week the slaying of the magazine staff by Parisian terrorists as a "cure".."
Hizb ut-Tahrir holding public meeting in Lakemba over Charlie Hebdo by Natalie O'Brien smh, January 18, 2015

"The Chairman of Islam Net, Fahad Ullah Qureshi asked the audience, and the answer was clear. The attendees were common Sunni Muslims. They did not consider themselves as radicals or extremists. They believed that segregation was the right thing to do, both men and women agreed upon this. They even supported stoning or whatever punishment Islam or prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) commanded for adultery or any other crime. They even believed that these practices should be implemented around the world. Now what does that tell us? Either all Muslims and Islam is radical, or the media is Islamophobic and racist in their presentation of Islam."
It's Not the ''Radical Shaykh'' it's Islam - Fahad Qureshi May 19, 2013

Fear of the Islamic/Muslim political/social outcomes for Other cultures and women if you actually believe in Modernities hard fought definitions of Equality and Liberty has to be rational otherwise I would contend given the growing numbers of bloody bodies of fellow citizens in our streets and the developed or developing Islamic/Muslim political constructs clearly detailed as informing endemic social hostility even terror-genocide you have a death wish for your own way of life and suffering a sever case of pathological altruism. Religion does inform terror-genocide as it informs other infamy subjugation of women and elimination of LGBT for the Islamic/Muslim culture is founded upon men's centrality and until this ceases the terror-genocide of Other and subjugation of women will continue.

Freedom of Religion has failed and is delivering rising social hostility, as Lincoln predicted either one of the other in time will take the space for such significant ethic-value-beliefs differences cannot remain in the same space for long.


The argument has never been about an attack upon multicultural societies, upon diversity nor upon race this would be ridiculous, for in this globalized world of course many cultures need to exist in the same space and most do but tragically some cultures not only do not live harmoniously with Other they cannot due to their cultural codex construct of Other.

It can no longer be a matter of 'educating' citizens as to their responsibilities and behaviours regards each other as individuals in Democracies which necessarily contain many cultures due to our globalized world, as cultures set the behavioural variance within which their adherents exist it is a matter of reviewing what a cultures responsibilities and behaviours regards each other culture in their same space have to be and abide by for any culture to be accepted to and remain in a Democratic multicultural space.

"'T
he good news is that there's 50 less pedophiles in this world': Fundamentalist Christian pastor films hate-filled rant in wake of Orlando gay club massacre "
By CHRIS KITCHING FOR DAILYMAIL.COM PUBLISHED: 01:18 EST, 14 June 2016

Sacramento Baptist Pastor Applauds Orlando Shooting
Fox40, BY SONSEEAHRAY TONSALL, JUNE 13, 2016

Freedom of Religion remains as a valid beneficial moral human construct in the twenty-first century when it informs all of the above and worse? 

"Will targeted nightclub shooting begin an overdue conversation about religions' attitudes toward gays?"

After Orlando, time to recognize that anti-gay bigotry is not religious freedom: By Neil Macdonald, CBC News Posted: Jun 13, 2016

YES EQUALITY FOR ALL - But understand Ireland why you have had to vote at all and the reason you have still remains in the Public Square - Slovenia revokes gay marriage law