Tuesday, May 19, 2015

YES EQUALITY FOR ALL - But understand why you have had to vote at all and the reason you have still remains in the Public Square


Facebook page: YesEquality!

A view: Why homosexuality is determined as ‘evil’ in religious texts. Contradictions are not allowed in cultural codex that’s why.

A key indicator that a cultural genocide codex construct exists as a method of resolving diametrically opposed values in the same political space is the degree to which its cultural codex constructs seek to control the most intimate of human relationships sex. This is a function of the cultures (Mans) determination to maximise their genetic reflection into next generations but one suspects really this if it is an underlying subconscious imperative, the conscious drive is much more of a self-serving force in delivering to man the pleasure of sex with the least effort to do so

As cultural codex cannot broach contradictions, as such contradictions bring the whole codex into question for if the logic is not valid in one part why should it for any of the other codex construct, the cultural categorisation engine therefore needs to identify, characterise precisely who are to benefit and lose. As it is Mans control over women’s sexuality which is the dominant precept the existence of a women-women partnership/marriage and man-man partnership/marriage determines an equality within the latter two and not in the first.

It therefore has nothing to do with homosexuality being intrinsically evil it is because to determine valid within a codex construct the two relationships of equality Benefit Women-Benefit-Woman and Benefit Man-Benefit Man means the inequality of the first, Benefit-Man, Lose-Women becomes manifest, a contradiction and therefore cannot exist within the codex.

This is what drives a real phobia against homosexuals for those who determine women, subject to Mans ‘Leadership’ which really means Mans control over women’s sexuality cannot have their own relationship construct contradicted in their presence. For it means Man will lose power and Women will gain power.

I would argue the degree any cultural codex attempts to subjugate women to Mans determination will indicate the degree one could expect this culture presents a threat to you as an out-group as such iniquitous constructs necessarily require an iniquitous means of enforcing the construct internally and acceptance externally relative to the iniquity of the construct.

So for me the measure of any culture or society is the relative degree they subjugate women to Mans will and with them inevitably homosexuals for my view dictates the construct of women and homosexuals are integrally linked. So if we can remove from the Public Square such codex determining women as less we will not only achieve equality in time for women, but at the same time have homosexuals determined rightly as the norm and gosh did you just notice terror has somewhat diminished?

I could be wrong.

Vote yes for equality by all means but my view is unless the acceptance of iniquity of women is completely swept aside, not only in law but in reality. the need of Man to have homosexuals deemed as an out-group will remain relative to the iniquity suffered by women.

YES EQUALITY FOR ALL. The fight alas never finishes as the cultural codex informing these iniquitous constructs are 'Free' to flourish in our Public Squares do not ever think what has been gained over centuries cannot be swept aside in a matter of months.

Sunday, May 10, 2015

Women's Rights News: "I do not understand why they hate women over there (Afghanistan). - Plato did. It is the same reason they hate them 'here', everywhere the misogynistic cultural construct of women is allowed to flourish.

"(We) need feminism because I am stuck in a men dominated war zone in Afghanistan! I can't go outside I can't go to college.if I choose education for myself and try going outside they will call me a bitch and whore! They will hit me beat me and kill me! If I choose a man for myself to get married to they will kill us both because it will bring shame to my family choosing a life partner by myself! They will call me a bad girl if I pluck my eyebrows before marriage! I can't leave house without my parents permission and after marriage I can't leave my house without my husband's permission not even for my parent's house, if I do it without their permission they will kill me! I wish I never belonged to Afghanistan! Yes i understand I need to be strong and I am trying my best but sometimes I feel so helpless and weak!"
Women's Rights News  Post 10/5/2015

A response to the post: "
I do not understand why they hate women over there."

I do it is the same reason they hate them 'here', everywhere the misogynistic cultural construct of women is allowed to flourish even supported by so called Democratic States which espouse their core beliefs are Liberty and Equality.

Why is the same question asked regards cultural derived terrorism and the answer is the same as Plato pointed out so long ago regards the terrible abuse women had to suffer in his time.

"It is still not entirely clear what led the two men.." - It Has Been Completely Clear Since 348 BCE, Does Plato Really Have To Rise From The Dead To Shame Twenty-First Century Psychologists Particularly Social Psychologists Into Being Honest.

The attached following reveals the danger of accepting one analogised behaviour perceived to be benign or a 'free' choice for women and not understanding that same behaviour is based upon a cultural construct of women which enables much much worse to occur and each behaviour is non-contradictory of the other and supportive of it.

“To make one exception means to make them all.” - Clothing such as the Muslim headscarf, hijab, burqa... is a political cultural statement and informs adherence and respect for the ideological constructs attached to it which hold tragic consequences for women.

Wednesday, May 6, 2015

This is a Theory not a Hypotheses: "It is still not entirely clear what led the two men.." - It Has Been Completely Clear Since 348 BCE, Does Plato Really Have To Rise From The Dead To Shame Twenty-First Century Psychologists Particularly Social Psychologists Into Being Honest.

Plato Risen From the Dead 2015
"It is still not entirely clear what led the two men..."
Gunman in Texas Shooting Was F.B.I. Suspect in Jihad Inquiry NYT By MANNY FERNANDEZ, RICHARD PÉREZ-PEÑA and FERNANDA SANTOSMAY 4, 2015

“It is the cultural codex stupid, written in error by poets misrepresenting themselves as Gods scribes, change it or change nothing.” said Plato annoyed he had to rise from the dead after more than two thousand years simply to tell psychologists and particularly social psychologists what they already know yet still they watch from the footpath.

The fact I have to watch this statement be regurgitated each time an atrocity occurs be it in space US, Australia, Kenya. Nigeria, Syria, Pakistan, The Philippines. Malaysia, Thailand, ..... or be it across time up through middle Europe across Africa, in China .... is quite sickening when Plato told us thousands of years ago, a Chinese Emperor knew quite clearly and we have no qualms about determining it applies to a certain well known secular cultural codex.

If a cultural codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) template) has an iniquitous construct be it regards Other or in particular women it will be played out within the Public Square if the ideology which contain these iniquitous constructs are allowed to flourish within our Public Square.

As Plato said along with the Chinese Emperor unless these cultural codex iniquitous constructs are removed from the Public Square they will be reflected within the behavioral variance of the culture concerned.

The 'few' are created and sustained by the 'many' otherwise the 'few' would not exist and it would be my view the greater the relative degree of inequity the ideological codex informs regards Other and women the greater the need to have a violent enforcement mechanism to impose its acceptance internal and external. For who accepts such constructs willingly?

Is this clear enough.

Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why it is One Is and One Is-Not. Yet both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."

Sunday, May 3, 2015

Australian Labor Parties Idea of Democracy - Better known as a Plibersek Choice


"Which raises the other huge dilemma in all of this is - in a representative democracy, whose interests does your elected representative actually represent?

Is it religious organisations that you may not belong to, parties that you may not belong to or a union you don't belong to?

Or is it yours?"

Same-sex debacle shows the deal ain't real Larry Graham WAtoday May 4, 2015


"Related to this is the sense that the nation is no longer working together: too many people and institutions seem to be working for themselves."
Democracy under threat as trust in system broken THE AUSTRALIAN MAY 04, 2015


Lest we particularly Labor forget what the ANZACs believed they were fighting for:

Tanya Plibersek is reflecting the extreme polarizations of those who believe they not only know the 'Truth' they therefore have a 'God/Secular given right to force Other to follow their 'rational' model or else.

I believe it is time, in this time, where everyone in turn can be and is determined a troll, not human, 'uneducated' a bigot to reflect upon the difference between 'the tyranny of the one view' Tanya Plibersek, albeit one may perceive an idea as a 'good', and a real ' Democracy as determined by Lincoln.

Yes you may not like, even be bigoted against the ideas of Other presented as well as the nature of the delivery but this is not a bad thing the fact it occurs, it can occur, if you take time to reflect may be an advantage to yourself as well as your society.

Of course everything is relative, there are genocide, misogynistic, and various real or imagined phobic constructs operating within the Public Square, given the nature of which will understandably require the State to enforce a singular view to protect citizens from each other and protect citizens from themselves that is a State’s role, but the nature of coming to these decisions of moral singularity in a Democracy, at least if it is to be one, requires each citizen to be given equal opportunity to speak their mind however unpalatable that may be at arriving at a Democratic decision.

Otherwise what are we really operating under, yes a Plibersek.

The State should be the sole owner of coercive power within a Democracy the participants in Democracy must not have that power for the Society ceases to be Democratic for each citizen if such as Tanya Plibersek can justifiably under a warped Democratic 'rational' model which determine Pliberseks as the holder of Truth can silence Other, determine Others view non-existent, superfluous to determining the very nature of Others own existence which is the 'sacred gift' the idea of Democracy enables.

‘It was one of Lincoln’s ways of working out his chief value to the country, and that value was his clear sense from the start it was our democratic scheme that was at stake, and that if it was to be saved, every citizen who could aid must help to give all that was in them.

Lincoln seems to have put it something like this to himself:

“Everybody in the country has had a part in bringing this thing about; everybody feels they have a right to say how things shall be handled; everybody that is worth their salt is going to exercise that right, and they are going to do it according to the kind of person they are – according to their temperament, their training, their self-control, their meanness, and their goodness. If we are going to put this thing through and prove that citizens can govern themselves, we must get from them what they can give, and we must let them give it in their own way.
” Source: The Life of Lincoln, Tachell

Well this is what a Democracy is from Lincolns view but Tanya Plibersek has shown by even being in a position to consider her actions as appropriate reveals what Australian citizens politic 'rational' model actually is.

True Democracy: The Right to misjudge and be misjudged, the Right to insult and be insulted, the Right to abuse and be abused....

Thursday, April 23, 2015

Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why it is One Is and One Is-Not. Yet both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."

Explain Why one Is and the other Is-Not.


Cultural Genocide Codex Constructs of Other




Hitler MEIN KAMPF=Nazi
Mohammed QURAN=Muslims
Other unable to be convinced of the error and evil of their ways
"But a Jew can never be rescued from his fixed notions."


''How futile it was to try to win over such people with argument, seeing that their very mouths distorted the truth, disowning the very words they had just used and adopting them again a few moments afterwards to serve their own ends in the argument!”
002.006 As to those who reject Faith, it is the same to them whether thou warn them or do not warn them; they will not believe.

002.007 God hath set a seal on their hearts and on their hearing, and on their eyes is a veil; great is the penalty they (incur).

002:018  They are utterly deaf, dumb, and blind; they can no longer recover.

003.118 O ye who believe! Take not into your intimacy those outside your ranks: They will not fail to corrupt you. They only desire your ruin: Rank hatred has already appeared from their mouths: What their hearts conceal is far worse.

003.119 ... When they meet you, they say, "We believe": But when they are alone, they bite off the very tips of their fingers at you in their rage. Say: "Perish in your rage;..
Exemplar Nazi (Hitler) & Muslim (Mohammed) Cultural Authorisation for exclusion and murder of Other.
“In my opinion the most culpable .. those who did not think it worth while .. placing his seducer and corrupter against the wall.” etc
006.049 But those who reject our signs,- them shall punishment touch, for that they ceased not from transgressing.

008,012 Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them.

003.028 Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from God…

003.004 Then those who reject Faith in the Signs of God will suffer the severest penalty, and God is Exalted in Might, Lord of Retribution.

003.178 Let not the Unbelievers think that our respite to them is good for themselves: We grant them respite that they may grow in their iniquity: But they will have a shameful punishment.

003.147 All that they said was: "Our Lord! Forgive us our sins and anything We may have done that transgressed our duty: Establish our feet firmly, and help us against those that resist Faith."

Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."

Etc,
Nazi (Hitler) & Muslim (Mohammed) Justification for subjugation and murder of Other: The Nazi & Muslim categorisation of the nature of Other.
moral pestilence, poison, despoilers, germ- carriers in poisoning human souls, shameful, fabricators, falsehood, cunning and despicable, derogatory, evil, cold-blooded, thick-skinned and shameless, alien race, evil spirits, absurdity of their teaching, obstinacy, tricks of logic, falsehoods, evil counsellors, perfidy, etc.
“rejecters of Faith!”= unbelieving women (idolaters), Unbelievers do (but) beckon you to the Fire, Deaf, dumb, and blind, they are the fools, in utter darkness, deceive themselves, their hearts is a disease, hangout with their evil ones, wander like blind ones, bartered Guidance for error, lost true direction, in utter darkness, make mischief therein and shed blood, transgressors, Be ye apes, despised and rejected., ignorant (fool)!, illiterates, do nothing but conjecture, seek gain in evil, God's curse is on them for their blasphemy, sold their souls, in insolent envy, wrong-doers, most greedy of life, idolaters, perverse, blasphemers, buyers of (magic), they conceal, evil-doers, in schism, wrong, wickedness,.. etc
Genocide Outcomes Analogised from the Nazi (Hitler) & Muslim (Mohammed) Cultural Codex Construct of Other.
Please note the following are only a very small list of examples derived from each of the analogised genocide outcomes from Nazi and Muslim culture codex.

“Jewish homes were ransacked, as were shops, towns and villages, as SA stormtroopers and civilians destroyed buildings with sledgehammers, leaving the streets covered in pieces of smashed windows—the origin of the name "Night of Broken Glass." Ninety-one Jews were killed, and 30,000 Jewish men—a quarter of all Jewish men in Germany—were taken to concentration camps, where they were tortured for months, with over 1,000 of them dying. Around 1,668 synagogues were ransacked, and 267 set on fire. In Vienna alone 95 synagogues or houses of prayer were destroyed.” etc

The Holocaust (also called Ha-Shoah in Hebrew) refers to the period from January 30, 1933 - when Adolf Hitler became chancellor of Germany - to May 8, 1945, when the war in Europe officially ended. During this time, Jews in Europe were subjected to progressively harsher persecution that ultimately led to the murder of 6,000,000 Jews (1.5 million of these being children) and the destruction of 5,000 Jewish communities. These deaths represented two-thirds of European Jewry and one-third of all world Jewry.
The Jews who died were not casualties of the fighting that ravaged Europe during World War II. Rather, they were the victims of Germany's deliberate and systematic attempt to annihilate the entire Jewish population of Europe, a plan Hitlercalled the “Final Solution” (Endlosung).

Massacre of Kalavryta

The Massacre of Kalavryta (
Greek: Σφαγή των Καλαβρύτων), or the Holocaust of Kalavryta (Ολοκαύτωμα των Καλαβρύτων), refers to the extermination of the male population and the total destruction of the town of Kalavryta, in Greece, by German occupying forces during World War II, on 13 December 1943. Aside from the deportation and murder of over 80% of Greece's Jewish population, it is the most serious case of war crimes committed during the Axis occupation of Greece during World War II.

Ethiopian Christians beheaded and shot 2015

Kenya: 147 Killed in University Attack, Officials Say 2015

2014, two people were killed in a siege of a cafe in central Sydney

Pakistan bloody slaughter of more than 140 people — mostly children — in a school massacre. 2014

The 2002 Indonesian Island of Bali bombings killing 202 people etc

USCIRF Annual Report 2011 - The Commission's Watch List: Indonesia

“Indonesia's well-known tradition of religious tolerance and pluralism is being challenged by religious radicalism and extremist groups who have found converts in the country, leading to sectarian and societal violence, terrorism, and religious freedom violations. Indonesians rejected extremism at the polls, but it often goes unchallenged by many political, civic, and religious leaders. During the reporting period, nearly 40 places of worship belonging to religious minorities were closed, either forcibly by extremist groups or through the denial of building permits by government officials. Extremist groups also instigated violence against religious minorities, including an attack that led to the death of three Ahmadiyah adherents. New provincial bans on Ahmadiyah practice have been put in place in East and West Java and South Sumatra. Despite some strong public statements and arrests, the reactive approach taken by the Indonesian government has not been an effective deterrent to the violence perpetuated by non-state actors against religious minorities. Indonesian government officials also continue to employ the "blasphemy law" (Article 156(a)) to harass and detain individuals considered religiously "deviant" and continue to allow the enforcement of local laws restricting the rights of women and some non-Muslims, particularly in Aceh.” etc

Nazi (Hitler) & Muslim (Mohammed) Cultural Denial of Culpability for the individual adherent and culture as a whole.
Please note: All text within a cultural codex containing a genocide construct of Other which may in anyway infer Other is not targeted for destruction will be found to be qualified immediately after and/or swim in an ocean of textual and exemplar behaviour which clearly negates its authenticity. This is because the definition of ‘innocent’ and ‘neighbours’ do not include non-believers. Any dispute therefore within the culture as to the authenticity of a pro Other view will be quickly and definitively overwhelmed in an argument between what Other view as liberal-moderate adherents of a cultural codex containing a genocide construct of Other and the so called radical.
"The Jews are guilty! The Jews are guilty!" .. "We have nothing to contribute to it, it will come by itself, because it has to come." said Paul Joseph Goebbels Reich Minister of Propaganda in Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945

The next sentence:

actions will be carried out "without pity without mercy" and the rest.

Auschwitz and the rest

Quran, Surah 8 Al-Anfal The Spoils of War 17 It is not ye who slew them; it is Allah: when thou threwest (a handful of dust), it was not thy act, but Allah's: in order that He might test the Believers by a gracious trial from Himself: for Allah is He Who heareth and knoweth (all things). etc

002.256 Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error: whoever rejects evil and believes in God hath grasped the most trustworthy hand- hold, that never breaks. And God heareth and knowethall things.

The next sentence:

"Of those who reject faith the patrons are the evil ones .." and the rest.

Note Non-religious not included.

Armenian Genocide and the rest
Nazi (Hitler) & Muslim (Mohammed) Apologists of Foundation texts of terror, genocide and subjugation
"Experience has taught me that all argument is useless with fanatical young Nazi of this kind, and so I say nothing." Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

Despite the clear evidence in his own writings of the evidence of Other missing from the German streets Norman Hillson continues “the Germans (inclusive of the Nazi) that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Britain as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else”. Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

We assure ourselves 'moderates' are in charge for did they not tell us they were such, things could be worse?

“In fact, if the extremist’s elements had prevailed. I have not the least doubt that disruption would have been more drastic and that we should have real reason by now to fear German aggression from both a military as well as political point of view.” Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937
“It will be challenging to redirect those who identify with the IS ideology from violent extremism. Any program to redirect or divert young people must have realistic objectives, the most critical being to disengage IS supporters from violence rather than de-radicalise them.” Clarke Jones 2014

“The suggestion that faithful Muslims cannot thrive in a democracy is insulting, dangerous, and wrong,”
she (Clinton) said,

“Greens immigration spokeswoman Sarah Hanson-Young said both major parties had become "hysterical".

"These are a few dozen desperate people seeking our protection - they are hardly a national security risk," she said.”
Australian Greens immigration spokeswoman Sarah Hanson-Young – ‘a few dozen’?
Comment:
What happens are the apologists for cultures whose codex contain genocide constructs of Other correct in their view? Are there not just one but thousands of facts, evidence to determine at each turn they are not only wrong but such a view enables terror to escalate and proliferate not only internal within any Nation State but exported elsewhere as well?

The real cause of terror are not “fathers in work low-paid, unrewarding and unskilled jobs, often absent from home for long periods.” There are numerous examples of professional parent’s doctors and lawyers, teachers, parents of Muslim terrorists and even these doctors, lawyers and teachers becoming terrorists. It is not “mental illness” for the numbers dictate such terrorist behaviour would therefore be reflective in every other culture.

Neither is it simply “Other young people have been subject to stringent parenting, where 'foreign' culture and strict religious observance has been enforced. This kind of upbringing has conflicted with Australia's more secular outlook, often leaving them marginalised and in a bemused, helpless or frustrated state.” For other cultures have the same parenting style and seek to enforce cultural beliefs, ethics and values upon their children, and feel they are marginalized, whether factual or otherwise, yet these children do not involve themselves in genocide against Other.

Also it is important to reflect upon whether or not the aggressive nature of such parenting may be in essence inherent in cultures with iniquitous constructs of not only Other but women and therefore require such parenting behavior to instill the conditioning required for the individual adherents to accept, maintain and enforce such relatively draconian constructs which enables a mental schema more easily able to switch to terror against Other.

Nor is the cause of terror “For some, simply identifying as IS supporters has given them a feeling of elevation in their social standing among friends and community. It has, in their minds, made them strong and invincible.” For all cultures contain hierarchical and categorised legitimatised positions of power within peer groups and across peer groups within the same culture but these do not lead to genocide against Other.

Nor is the cause of terror “Many have been left to their own devices without guidance or direction from a positive role model.” For in cultural terms ‘Many have been left in their own families, educational and religious institutions with guidance or direction from an Islamic/Muslim cultural codex perspective a positive role model.’. The latter is the cause of terror.

There is a single pathway to radicalisation – is the Nazi (Hitler) and Muslim (Mohammed) cultural codex construct of Other everything else are excuses and correlations which have no connection to the actual root cause of terror. The cultural genocide constructs of Other are removed from the Public Square or the terror and genocide against Other will intensify with Other reacting in kind. Until as Lincoln informed us either tyranny takes the Public Square or Liberty and Equality.

There is a common thread in current public policy of a denial of cultural culpability for the terror emanating from a cultures adherents ‘Few’. The Australian and other Western Governments therefore must accept that the State have failed in their primary duty to protect their citizens by not only allowing a culture adhering to a codex of genocide within but also the financial and other resources required to advance its political power and with it potential to deliver terror against Other citizens and therefore the State have lost all political legitimacy and must be overthrown by democratic means as quickly as possible to restore peace and harmony to the Public Square rather than the ‘managed’ terror the State is currently enabling into citizens streets.

Explain to me again how is it one ideology informs the exact same cultural codex construct of Other with the same inevitable terror against Other but the 'Many' who create and sustain the 'Few' which deliver terror from one ideology are determined innocent and at the very same time the ,'Many' who create and sustain the 'Few' which deliver terror from the other ideology are determined as guilty?

Explain to me again how is it if you claim to be fearful of one ideology informing terror in your streets you are determined as having a mental illness a phobia (an irrational fear) as well as be determined a bigot, but at the same time you are praised as being rational when you claim to be fearful of what the other ideology with exactly the same construct of Other may and does inform in your streets if it is allowed to flourish?

Explain to me why one ideology is determined to be based upon an genocide construct of Other and the other ideology is not, even though the cultural codex constructs of Other are exactly the same? 


"German President Joachim Gauck for the first time Thursday called the World War I massacre of 1.5 million Armenians a genocide....

"Women, men, children, and the elderly were indiscriminately sent on death marches, banished without any protection or food to the steppe and the desert, burned alive, chased, beaten, and shot to death," he said. "This planned and calculated criminal act targeted Armenians for a sole reason: because they were Armenians."

The German parliament is due to vote on a genocide motion Friday, which Ankara has downplayed as a potential point of diplomatic confrontation with Berlin. Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu recently said the German government has already indicated it will not use the word."

German President: Armenian Deaths 'Genocide' by Dorian Jones, VOA, April 23, 2015

This is a Theory not a Hypotheses: The Supreme Council of Kenya Muslims (SUPKEM), Islamic Council of Victoria and Vehid Causevic Need to Accept Culpability For Muslim Terror and Stop Shifting Blame For Their Own Evil To Other

Explain to me again why it is two cultures which commit genocide justified and authorized as we see above by their respective cultural codex constructs of Other but only one of the cultures is able to have the 'word' genocide utilized to categorize their behavior?

Explain to me again why it is two cultures with exactly the same inherent construct of Other and one is encouraged and supported with Others resources within the Public Square so its cultures 'Many' families, educational, religious institutions can and do create and sustain the 'Few' to deliver terror against fellow citizens Other within and without the same space and the other culture is purposefully restricted because it is understood its cultural codex construct of Other, which is exactly the same as the other culture, if allowed unfettered access to the Public Square will in time and space inform terror and genocide as the other culture has and is?

Explain to me again why it is two cultures with exactly the same inherent construct of Other which clearly inform terror against Other yet it is accepted one is a culture of Peace and the other is a culture of Evil. And also why it is accepted that the 'Many' of one are liberal-moderates and the 'Many' of the other are evil radical fascists?

Yet the terror the unfathomable grief even at nation against nation level driven by one of these genocide constructs informs the missing the violence against Other and still the Norman Hillsons of 1937 exist once again in the form of Clarke Jones 2014 to sickeningly claim "that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Other as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else”.

The terror continues and intensifies as both Norman Hillsons of 1937 and Clarke Jones 2014 explicitly acknowledge the missing and the reflected unyielding nature of the underlying codex construct of Other in both cultures "argument is useless with fanatical young" and 'challenging to redirect those who identify with the IS ideology from violent extremism' and still both persist in enabling and even supporting the very culture which delivers such tragic outcomes for humanity and as they do determine themselves and their supporters as holding a moral high ground built upon burning buildings broken bodies and lives.


"Complicating the problem was the terror group’s messages - which are often underpinned by common Muslim ideas such as Sharia as an Islamic law, but with a more extremist element.

“Part of the challenge in countering the ISIS narrative is to counter ideas that Muslims generally subscribe to and accept,” Prof Rane said."
Returning Islamic State foreign fighters face jail, Abbott says THE AUSTRALIAN MAY 19,
2015


And I add with as much restraint as I can find the fool that is Prof Rane goes on to suggest "returned fighters would speak with credibility to those susceptible to ISIS propaganda" after detailing why it is not possible and the fact is these 'reformed' will be seen as Others stooges and traitors to their culture of commonly held ideas. The Quran determines these people if it is at all possible from the first pages as even worse than Other - how do you expect their views will be treated as well as themselves.

Worse still the suggestion to reward insidious behavior against humanity of those who purposefully participated in genocide I find such as Prof Rane suggesting such as these can be utilised for 'good' extremely offensive. What of the victims, burned alive in cages, beheaded on beaches, sex slaves,.... all for a 'narrative' which cannot stand against just the normative sacred beliefs held by Muslims as detailed above which drives this Muslim terror. I am sickened by this world were the victims are forgotten in this postmodernist version of multiculturalism where we are forcefully told and have to accept on pain of being called a bigot diametrically opposed values in the same space will inform peace and security - well where is it? We had peace and security we have not got it now because......


This is what can and is analogised from the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex construct of Other and women Prof Rane and happened also where these so so helpful 'reformed' terrorists have been - Boko Haram Militants Raped Hundreds of Female Captives in Nigeria NYT By ADAM NOSSITER MAY 18, 2015

"Carmen Ortiz, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, said after the decision that Tsarnaev's crime was not motivated by religion; it was motivated by politics. She said the gravity of the crime, the murder of a child, a police officer and two young women merited the death penalty.

"This was an act of terror," she said. ...

Tsarnaev (Muslim terrorist-Boston April 15, 2013
) wrote in the boat: "I don't like killing innocent people, but in this case it is allowed" and "I can't stand to see such evil go unpunished."

Boston Marathon bomber sentenced to death G. Jeffrey MacDonald, Special to USA TODAY 5:48 p.m. EDT May 15, 2015

Definitions:
Ideology: is a set of opinions or beliefs of a group or an individual, refers to a set of political beliefs or a set of ideas that characterize a particular culture.

Religion: is an organized collection of beliefs, cultural systems, and world views that relate humanity to an order of existence.

Politics: is the practice and theory of influencing other people.

Influence: the capacity to have an effect on the character, development, or behaviour of someone or something, or the effect itself.

Terrorism: is violence that is consciously carried out by the perpetrator(s) primarily in order to influence the attitudes and behavior of a wider target audience (or multiple target audiences)


Culture: The totality of socially transmitted behavior patterns, arts, beliefs, institutions, and all other products of human work and thought. Culture is learned and shared within social groups and is transmitted by nongenetic means.


Culture informs:
Culture is not only what people think, it is also what they do. Ideally, cultural explanations would also strive to be mutually non-contradictory ...

Culture, although it cannot ‘do’ anything on its own, provides a framework through which people are motivated to act. Subsequently, incidents of violence are individually and socially understood through narrative, that is, through the stories which are developed by participants, observers and the institutions which deal with them (such as the courts and media). These narratives, in turn, can express motivations or justifications for further violence or, alternatively, for its avoidance or suppression.”
Wood, J. Carter (2007). Conceptualizing cultures of violence and cultural change. In: Carroll, Stuart ed. Cultures of Violence: Interpersonal Violence in Historical Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.

"Culture uses artifacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members. It is the filter through which we see and understand our current reality (Edgar, 1980). .... They also establish boundaries between groups (Oyserman & Lee, 2007)"
Psychology Burton, Western, Kowalski, 2012

"Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our "categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
....
"every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"
SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglass Hofstadter, Emmanuel Sander, 2013

Politics is the practice (action) of influencing people, terror is the political method utilised to influence attitude and behavior. The political action-behavior of a person is determined by "culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforcing ... labels", categorisation, "that belong intrinsically to things and entities"
 without which the person "would have no basis on which to take any action." Culture not only "provides a framework through which people are motivated to act." culture "establishes boundaries between groups" and how they will be managed and cultural narratives to justify violence.

Religion is an ideology if it contains set of opinions or beliefs refers to a set of political beliefs or a set of ideas that characterize a particular culture
, Islam is in essence a political ideology as it has two dimensions: 1. Goals: how society should work, 2. Methods: the most appropriate ways to achieve the ideal arrangement. The Islamic religion contains set of ,beliefs, ethics, values and a set of ideas characterizing the Muslim culture.

Carmen Ortiz, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, claim that "Tsarnaev's crime was not motivated by religion; it was motivated by politics" cannot be true because politics cannot motivate a person to action, politics is method which informs the action terror not motivation. Motivation the "basis on which to take any action." is defined by culture in this case the Islamic/Muslim culture.

Culture -religion- provides Tsarnaev's justification "but in this case it is allowed" (The fact is the Islamic/Muslim codex enables it is always "allowed" against Other even Muslims determined as such  - culture "establish boundaries between groups" and the justification for violence at those boundaries) and for his action (cultural determined punishment method -
"deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them" ) terror a political method of achieving influence and Tsarnaev's motivation "I can't stand to see such evil go unpunished.". Culture defines 'evil' which is the motivation to apply the culturally appropriate punishment. In the act of killing the 'innocent' they are no longer innocent they never were nor can be as the Muslim text above clearly determines. The clear characterization of evil Other, numerous codex text exhortations as to the efficacy of 'fighting', the attacks on those who do not do so  and the assurance Tsarnaev is not doing the killing by his hand it is Allah's own hand I perceive is culturally constructed to ameliorate the cognitive dissonance and make easier psychologically the killing of Other by Muslims.

Evil intrinsically encapsulates perpetrator, action and victim, punishment the perpetrator, action, victim and punishment have to be culturally categorized for the notion of evil the motivating force justification and authority for culturally defined punishment to be applied. Individuals do not invent these complex interlinked category constructs themselves which are supported by a network of cultural interconnected non-contradictory beliefs, ethics and values which enabled the Muslim culturalised 
Tsarnaev to kill Other.

It is hard not to despair when the Quran in particular enables so easily the killing of Other apart from Muhammad's exemplar behavior supercharging such atrocities. You look at people still admiring Muhammad, Stalin, and Hitler and you have to seriously consider if there is something seriously askew with the capacity of humans to take on such exemplars as a good. For me it just reinforces how powerful culture is in determining our behavioral variances, and beliefs even against 'truth' right in front of us.


Why the lie 'not religion', 'not culture' when it has to be?

This is not a conspiracy theory it is simply how the world as it stands works

Thursday, April 9, 2015

This is a Theory not a Hypotheses: The Supreme Council of Kenya Muslims (SUPKEM), Islamic Council of Victoria and Vehid Causevic Need to Accept Culpability For Muslim Terror and Stop Shifting Blame For Their Own Evil To Other


Is the loss of just a single child and the unfathomable grief it tragically brings to a mother, to a father, to a sister, to a brother, to a nation, worth 'managing' a cultures terror in our Public Square to enable terror to escalate?
What the 'Many' of a culture deliver via the 'Few' they create by their own 'Many' hands.

“Islam was never a religion of peace. Islam is the religion of fighting,” he said.
Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi implores Muslims to ‘go to war everywhere’ in new audio recording news.com.au MAY 15, 2015

Gosh who would have ever thought 'never a religion of peace' somewhere someone between the lulls determined as proof the Islamic/Muslim culture is one of 'peace' were being subject to the Islamic/Muslim cultural genocide codex construct of Other.


Kenya: State Needs to Change Counter-Terror TacticsAllAfrica The Star, Nairobi, The writer Hassan Ole Naado is the deputy secretary general of the Supreme Council of Kenya Muslims.

The Supreme Council of Kenya Muslims (SUPKEM) Needs to Accept Culpability For Muslim Terror and Stop Shifting Blame For Their Own Evil To Other.

Being hateful of, being bigoted against, being fearful of a cultural codex which can and does inform such atrocities time after time against Other (inclusive of their own being determined the same) across generations, across the world is a wise and rational thing to do if one wants real peace and harmony in their streets, homes, communities, education and religious institutions.

Islam is not captured. The 'Few' consistently, constantly come from the 'many' as they must.

If the Islamic/Muslim codex was actually peaceful there would be no terror as the mental schema to be analogized into the murder of Kenyan university students would simply not exist. How can you hijack something to cause terror if terror did not inherently exist in the entity in the first place? It is psychologically impossible yet here you are claiming it is so. Despite the protestation of the 'many' of their innocence evil still emanates in such a manner that determines them culturally culpable for which families, communities, education and religious institutions does this evil emanate from?

Tell us where is this divide of this so called Is-Islam Not-Islam from exactly the same codex source utilised by all with in the Islamic/Muslim behavioral variance which determines them innocent you have to assume exists for your argument to be valid?

Tell us how in no way the beliefs, ethics, and values held by the 'innocent' Muslims frame the mental schema support for the terror against Other emanating from their very ranks?

"The time has come for us to be honest with ourselves and indeed each other. The radicalisation that breeds terrorism is not conducted in the bush at night. It occurs in the full glare of day in homes, in madrasas and in mosques with rogue imams. We must ask the question — where are the parents and families (communities, education and religious institutions) of those who are being radicalized?" said Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president "Our task of countering terrorism has been made all the more difficult by the fact that the planners and financiers of this brutality are deeply embedded in our communities."

"A Garissa-based official said the government was aware Abdullahi, a former University of Nairobi law student, had joined the militant group al Shabaab after graduating in 2013."
Kenya says son of a government official was among gunmen in Garissa attack
by EDITH HONAN GARISSA, Kenya — Reuters Published Sunday, Apr. 05 2015

"addressing the socio-economic .. that breed violent extremism" This is a complete lie because if it was true every culture which suffers the same if not worse would be informing the same behavioral variance as they do not it simply cannot be the cause. The fact is we have even in Kenya itself educated persons who had work actually pulling the trigger. Though you are correct in determining 'ideological factors breed violent extremism' yet you claim the Islamic/Muslim culture is not to blame even though it is their ideology which determines them to be an Islamic/Muslim culture which informs terror where other cultures do not in the same space.

So what Most Muslims do not involve themselves directly in terror this is not at all unusual culturally. Terror as a political weapon on such a scale has to be justified and authorized from a cultural codex a 'rational' model and have been utilised in such a manner by exemplars previously otherwise how does an individual know how to go from being non-violent to violent against Other. Individuals do no invent their own beliefs, ethics and values.

Your argument can be applied to a secular ideology and it was in the exactly the same way in the 1930s as you are doing now to excuse the so called liberal-moderates of an ideology with a genocide construct of Other where the terrorists consistently come from their ranks. Why should any culture have to put up with a another culture in their midst which has a cultural codex which can and does produce the 'few' to cause such tragedy?

Is the loss of just a single child and the unfathomable grief it tragically brings to a mother, to a father, to a sister, to a brother, to a nation, worth 'managing' a cultures terror in our Public Square to enable terror to escalate rather than confronting it and holding to account the cultures 'many' responsible for the 'few' continually being derived from their families, communities, educational and religious institutions?

If such families, communities, educational and religious institutions were really adherents of a cultural codex of peace there would be no terror, no codex construct of Other able to form mental schema of hate, bigotry to be analogized into reality to chase down our children in school yards, to chase down our children in university dormitories to be mercilessly murdered.

"The time has come for us to be honest with ourselves and indeed each other." - Change the Architect and Builder or Change Nothing.

"Neighbours described the parents as warm, friendly and community-minded. ...
"We have lived here for roughly eight years, and they have been our neighbours the whole time. Seriously never had any issues with them, they have been great neighbours. The son ... he's helped me fix the fence, they bring our bins up for us. We have even said to our kids if anything ever happened to us they could go next door and they'd help."

Neighbours say they woke to screams as Melbourne (Australia) terror raids started Liam Mannix SMH April 19, 2015 - 12:31AM

At Maslows level 1 one can between any cultures expect reciprocity you can "go next door and they'd help" but what exists above Maslows level 1 with the existence of diametrically opposed beliefs, ethics and values which means from the exact same space in time this can and will happen "she glanced out her window – and saw at least six men, all dressed in black, carrying torches and weapons.".

Is being determined as having a mental illness a phobia and irrational fear of such 'helpful' neighbors adherents of a cultural codex containing a genocide construct of Other as the Islamic codex does be determined itself as irrational?


Have I sinned? What is a Genocide Construct of Other and Why it is formed?

It is impossible under any 'rational' model, other than under the postmodernist 'rational' model which claims cultural derived evil no longer exists, for statement (1) to be true if statement (2) made by Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president in the following quote is true.

Kenyatta (Kenya's president) stressed his belief that (1) “Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance.” He said (2) “the radicalization that breeds terrorism” is conducted “in the full glare of day.”
Setbacks Press Somalia’s Shabab Fighters to Kill Inexpensively in Kenya (NY Times)
Published by Tadias Magazine April 6th, 2015


It is impossible under any 'rational' model, other than under the postmodernist 'rational' model which claims cultural derived evil no longer exists, for statement (1) made by Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president above to be true if the statement below in the following quote is true. 

"A Garissa-based official said the government was aware Abdullahi, a former University of Nairobi law student, had joined the militant group al Shabaab after graduating in 2013."
Kenya says son of a government official was among gunmen in Garissa attack 
by EDITH HONAN GARISSA, Kenya — Reuters Published Sunday, Apr. 05 2015

It is impossible under any 'rational' model, other than under the postmodernist 'rational' model which claims cultural derived evil no longer exists, for statement (1) made by Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president above to be true if the image at the beginning showing so many children murdered by Muslims above actually exists as truth rather than a pretence.

It is impossible under any 'rational' model, other than under the postmodernist 'rational' model which claims cultural derived evil no longer exists, for statement (1) made by Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president above to be true if the following text is true "she glanced out her window – and saw at least six men, all dressed in black, carrying torches and weapons."


You cannot inform peace and terror at the same time as an individual or culture and be determined rationally as an individual or culture of peace. As you cannot be half slave and half free and consider yourself free no matter how much you attempt and succeed in convincing yourself otherwise. For Other can see the burning buildings, broken bodies and lives and the chains before us.

"The time has come for us to be honest with ourselves and indeed each other." 


The absolute duplicity and culturally derived Islamic/Muslim denial is manifest in the following two quotes from Australian newspapers

"Young Australians are joining terror groups because their "blood is boiling" at domestic persecution and international atrocities committed by the West, a local Muslim leader has warned."
Persecution pushing young Australian Muslims to the margins of society, says leader
Rachel Olding SMH April 10, 2015


"Federal police allege Mr Causevic and Mr Besim planned to attack a police officer with a car and knife at an Anzac Day service in Melbourne, and then seize the officer's gun and use it to shoot others, until they themselves were shot.

The Deluded, the Culpable  the Absurd
They planned their attack for Anzac Day, police allege, to maximise publicity"
Anzac Day terror accused teens plotted to run down, behead police, court told Adam Cooper SMH May 5, 2015

"Outside court Mr Causevic's father Vehid Causevic, described the charges against his son as a political "set up".

"This is clear message from prime minister here … every young Muslim who goes five times per day to mosque will be charged like terrorist," Mr Causevic said."

Anzac Day terror plot accused teen Harun Causevic refused bail The Age, Rania Spooner and Mark Russell May 8, 2015

"Behaviour of man arrested in Melbourne counterterrorism raids improved after attending Islamic centre, father says.

Haidar attended the Al Furqan Islamic study centre and Harun Causevic started going there in July 2014.

Mr Causevic said the changes in his son were all positive.

“Before he started to pray, Harun was in the house aggressive, he broke [things], like a child. But after when he started to pray he really changed behaviour, 100 per cent,” he said.

“Now he was very good, always. Never, never yells, never, never do bad in house."

Father of suspect in counter-terrorism raid speaks EMMA YOUNGER The NewDaily Apr 19, 2015


The deluded, the culpable, the absurd that is Mr Causevic's father Vehid Causevic enabling the indoctrination of his children based upon a cultural codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) template) containing a cultural genocide construct of Other inclusive of a misogynistic construct of women and complaining a person inclusive of his son attending five times a day the cultural alignment and reinforcement ideological mechanism of such beliefs, ethics, values which create the mental schema to inform genocide against Other, a Mosque should not be immediately determined as a potential threat to Other.

One has to ask how is it under a secular genocide construct adherents such as Mr Causevic's father Vehid Causevic would be hounded from the streets and his 'views' as to a 'plot' by Other and claims attending an ideological institution incessantly which inherently determines within it codex as 'rational' a genocide construct of Other would be treated with open public derision they deserve?

Is not the following excerpt from the "Memoirs of a Social Democrat" by Philip Scheidemann, Germany 1929 tragically familiar, and obscenely so when we come to realise the reflection of exactly the same is coming straight from the Islamic/Muslim culture and yet we continue to support such a culture to flourish in our own streets to inform terror.

We can rightly act against one ideological form, with extreme prejudice to remove it from the Public Square even gain praised for doing so, 
yet the other ideology any action, even words against it are determined as an evil act and cause for accusing someone of having a mental illness a phobia, an irrational fear. When completing the excerpt below I want you to again reflect on why and who are being irrational.

"For weeks two patriots (Nazi) had been lying in wait for me, considering the quickest way of sending me into a better world....they attacked me on a walk in the lonely Habichtswald Germany). One concealed behind a tree with an army revolver in his hand to help his mate with a bullet, in case the prussic acid that the latter was to squirt in my face should fail to take effect.... squirting prussic acid ... I lay unconscious on the ground...

The first telegram congratulating me on my escape was from Rathenau, who a few weeks later fell victim to a better planned attack.....

There was even a feeble law passed to Protect the Republic, that Imperial judges later on increasingly employed against the Left, .... In many ways the the Republic's policy was finicking and not understandable. I recollect the concessions already made with regard the Republican flag

Many years later the two fellows were caught, ... At the trial I stated that I did not want a severe sentence as the two miscreants were only victims of the Nationalist (Nazi) Press outcry against me. As a matter of fact, both of them quoted in defence of their attempt the calumnies that appeared in the papers (Nazi) of the Right. ..

I repeatedly received official warnings of attacks .. intended attempts by private individuals , as, e.g. by a philosophical writer and a Professor of Medicine. In one case a women was deputed to quench my vital spark; in all other cases it was alleged that students and broken-down officers were concerned."

Memoirs of a Social Democrat by Philip Scheidemann 1929


Is there not a resemblance in the tools a culture whose codex contains a genocide construct of Other utilises to impose its inherent cultural codex constructs within the streets, the 'few', are not the nature of the 'few' familiar, are the 'many' Nationalist (Nazi) standing behind the tree, does this excuse them in the culpability of the crime these 'few' commit and what Other is in the end to face?

Do we not see again excused behavior blamed upon 'hate preachers' the 'Nationalist (Nazi) Press' and 'brainwashing' communication via literature - the "papers (Nazi) of the Right" (1920s, 1930s,1940s) - on the 'internet' (2015).

Are we to be impressed the Nazi with only 'telegrams', just paper 'brainwashed' so many 'young' and not so 'young' academics, medical doctors, women, students, broken officers so effectively. Is the 'internet' really the problem? Take it away what happens? Nothing? What is still left in the Public Square? The cultural codex genocide construct of ........ 

The actual content of this communication derived from the culture as a whole espousing clearly identifiable constructs contained within the cultures codex to justify and authorise adherent behaviour - yet we actually continue to provide resources for such a culture to increasingly inform terror in our own streets and defend their right to continue.

Ignoring the provable existence of the not-so-gullible and the educated, was the view the 'young' and the gullible, uneducated, were just 'brainwashed' simply 'angels' led astray and should be let off with lighter sentences and a good talking to (de-radicalisation) as clearly happened in Germany 1920s and is the paradigm being pushed now in Australia really worked given the cultural genocide construct of Other was left in the Public Square.

Determining you can create a 'new' narrative when the 'narrative' you are trying to replace is a sacred codex construct and has a failsafe mechanism attached to it which determines this is exactly what Other will try and sets the nature of the adherent view and response is an exercise in dangerous futility.

"sophisticated network"- the mental schema has already been set reflected from the core codex construct of Other - all that is required are the 'key' phrases utilised from the beginning as I believe START research has found to trigger the justified and authorised 'provocation' Islamic/Muslim construct.

These can be simply conjured from within the mind of the adherent themselves when responding to expected stimuli which fits codex analogised templates - does not even have to have contact with a 'hate-preacher', the internet, etc... just sees something as they walk in the streets. And it is inevitable those phrases will be used, brought to mind, and responded to, as they have been from the seventh century, for the iniquitous codex constructs of Other and women are not going to be accepted by Other willingly. Even silence as we know is no protection.

We are dealing with a cultural codex genocide construct of Other where the 'few' are created and sustained by the 'many', accept this truth, identify this genocide construct in the cultural codex which must exist to create the mental schema to inform such behavior, remove it from the Public Square or change nothing.

A father of the two 'patriots' would get away with the same nonsense today 'describing the charges against his son as a political "set up".'? Or would the culture be allowed unfettered access even State support to flourish within the Public Square yet this is what we are doing in the West and you wonder why all the matrices on Muslim terror are increasing.

Attending a Nazi indoctrination center five times a day is not a problem? The persons behavior improves at home and in his community but has the threat to Other increased significantly or diminished? Social Democrat Philip Scheidemann is responsible for the attack against him because he himself plotted it - insanity yet this is what we allow in our Public Square today as 'rational'.

"POLICE swooped and arrested a doctor’s teenage son in Melbourne before bombs were found at his Greenvale home, foiling an “imminent terror plot”."

A friend of the arrested teen’s family said they were respectable, and did not believe he could have done wrong.

“(He has) no bad preacher. He is a very quiet boy. He cannot drive. His father is a doctor and cannot allow him to do anything wrong,” the friend said.

“He has to look after his son properly."

Police find homemade bombs, arrest teen in Greenvale anti-terror raids
ANTHONY DOWSLEY, SIMON BENSON, DAVID HURLEY HERALD SUN MAY 09, 2015 9:42AM


"The boy’s parents seemed oblivious to any concerns, but a glance at his Facebook page laid out a disturbing evolution of thought as successive posts reveal a transformation from the usual teenage banter to hardline rants about the oppression of Muslims, the bombing of Islamic State and the killing of innocent women and children in Iraq by the West.

..
“Some things are worth f..king dying for and there is no f..king way the media can get away with calling my family, my blood, my own kind ‘terrorists’ f..k the system and f..k everyone who supports this sort of behaviour.” (female cousin)"
Police pounced on teenager’s home after bomb tip by Cameron Stewart, Rachel Baxendale THE AUSTRALIAN MAY 11, 2015

Again in the doctors son, in Vehid Causevic's son, in.... we see the construct of the 'marginalised', construct of the 'family respectable', construct of the 'very quite boy' - 'angle who would do no harm' the construct of "started to pray he really changed behaviour, 100 per cent,” he said. 
“Now he was very good" blown to shreds. 

"Prayer" and increased ideological fervour derived from a cultural codex containing a genocide construct may change the behavior to 'good' within a cultures own family and community but its potential to supercharge prejudice aligned. justified and authorised by the cultures codex and institutions against Other is manifest. 


Of course 'The boy’s parents were oblivious to any concerns', where were this doctors son and family on the very day when the anti-terror raid occurred "visiting a mosque with his mother before the raid". The very belief, ethics and values cultural alignment institution providing the very construct justification and authorisation which leads inexorably to terror against Other. The very nature of the the view of the son is therefore integrally justified and authorised by the very codex the parents are themselves adherents of. The nature of the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex construct of Other is the same for both, 'rants' against Other are a codex normative and therefore will exist within the Islamic/Muslim cultural behavioral variance.

There is always this shock, 'How could the parents not know.', he/she was an 'angel' or had recently changed into one. Its called a cultural 'rational' model what you may see from you cultural viewpoint as 'obvious' signs simply fit into another cultures normative behavior, even exemplar behavior.

"Every set of beliefs introduces its own logic and its own constraints.

..to a decision scientist, “rational” means “consistency with some model.” Rational decisions are not necessarily dispassionate, nor well reasoned, nor selfish. They are not even necessarily good decisions, from others’ perspectives. They simply are consistent."

"Distinguishing Spiritual from Temporal Power, Inventing the Individual, The origins of Western Liberalism, Larry Siedentop, 2014

How are members of a culture imbued with the exact same inherent construct of Other going know their son is a terrorist when all these sons are doing are taking on the altruistic cultural enforcer role templated by their very own cultural codex - which may turn them into 'angels' in families-in culture and pure terror for Other outside? What are the families seeing? Alignment to norms within their own ‘rational’ model.

Believing 'They the parents should have known.' assumes all cultural ideologies inform the exact same behavioral outcomes which we can all discern in exactly the same way as aberrant. It assumes culture no longer exists.

The notion of gullible, uneducated, just turned in a matter of weeks, alone in their bedrooms is a lie for it denies the reality the cultural mental schema for the bridge to terror has to already exist via a culturalisation process already completed otherwise every person gullible, uneducated, alone in their bedrooms would be turned to inform terror in a matter of weeks, at this very moment across all cultures in the same proportion would be burning fellow humans in cages - are they?

The following is how cultures affect an adherents behavior by creating adherents 'categorization engine' and clearly such a process does not happen over a few weeks.

"Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our "categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
....
"every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities" who then provides the "basis on which to take any action." ?

SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglass Hofstadter, Emmanuel Sander, 2013

"Culture uses artifacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members. It is the filter through which we see and understand our current reality (Edgar, 1980). These are the structures of identity that help people organise and make sense of everyday life (Wark, 1997). They also establish boundaries between groups (Oyserman & Lee, 2007)"
Psychology Burton, Western, Kowalski, 2012

Cultural codex - a cultures "artifacts, rituals and text" form the basis for a cultures categorization which seek to form "precise and sharp boundaries" for adherent action.

“Culture is not only what people think, it is also what they do. Ideally, cultural explanations would also strive to be mutually non-contradictory with relevant approaches from the social and natural sciences. This means taking into account both the nature of the individual mind as well as the dynamics of social interaction. Thus, ‘cultures’ should be understood as historically accumulated collections of beliefs and practices which are socially produced and aimed at meeting psychological needs. .....

Culture, although it cannot ‘do’ anything on its own, provides a framework through which people are motivated to act. Subsequently, incidents of violence are individually and socially understood through narrative, that is, through the stories which are developed by participants, observers and the institutions which deal with them (such as the courts and media). These narratives, in turn, can express motivations or justifications for further violence or, alternatively, for its avoidance or suppression.”

Wood, J. Carter (2007). Conceptualizing cultures of violence and cultural change. In: Carroll, Stuart ed. Cultures of Violence: Interpersonal Violence in Historical Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.

"Culture, of course, is related to violence in general and not only to structural violence. For example, culture influences the determination of "thresholds" which pressure on a person must overcome in order to move that person from being controllable, or even positive, to being negative (that is, into violence)."
The Culture of Violence, Chp 3. On the relationship between violence and culture - Galtung's concept

It is the culture itself as a whole which clearly determines outcomes which enables the mental schema to be created and utilised to cross to terror the 'hate preachers' do not in fact have to exist the codex itself justifies and authorises terror. Where do you think 'hate preachers' get their script from the exact same source utilised by those crossing to terror otherwise 'hate preachers' would not be able to communicate with the required cultural signs, and symbols fellow adherents would even recognise as valid cultural codex constructs of analogised normative behavior existing justified and authorised within the Islamic/Muslim cultural behavioral variance.

This paradigm of 'hate preachers' is one which seeks to externalise culpability for our/culures own actions, it determines evil is external to the individual who is 'weak' gullible, uneducated in the devious connivance of the 'evil' preacher to sway the innocent to the dark-side. It is pure denial on the part of the perpetrators and their supporters - It is the same excuse of the individual 'They made me do it.'  and their supporters 'You are so right, you just need 'mentoring/counseling' and all will be right with the world.'


Shame about the victims who are not diminished in time or space. Trouble is as psychological research has found changing someones belief system is nigh impossible to alter despite all the claims to the contrary. The point is as child psychologists point out it is advisable not to set up these hardwired pathways in the first place. Which means?

Though it is true at its core culture actually produces terrorists via their cultural schema templates who do we hold to account who is culpable for the behavior informed I say both. For it has to be seen justice is served to firstly inform a cost which must recognize the degree the the victim, individual, community, nation have suffered and secondly holds individuals accountable for the behavior they themselves inform against others, and thirdly and last as a deterrence (as little as their cultural codex allows for this to have any effect).

Very importantly the culture as a whole whose culture codex constructs enabled the mental schema to inform such behavior has to be immediately held culpable, and in conjugation with the State hunt down the offending codex constructs and remove them from the Public Square, otherwise their culture will be subject to ever increasing restrictions to prevent the behavior being repeated.


Justice will never be served appropriately if the cultural codex which informed the adherent behavior remains in place for is it justice to enable the continuance of terror to inform more victims?

The deluded deniability in the Vehid Causevic sons female cousins response in the quote above reflects the inherent denial construct within the Islamic codex the Quran where justifiably holding Muslim 'terrorists' to account "calling .., my own kind (Muslims) ‘terrorists’" is an Other plot against an Islamic/Muslim codex justified authorized cultural act "worth f..king dying for". This is an example of the existence of a diametrically opposed 'rational' ethical model in the same space.

"The findings of the study indicate that citizens (Hofstede and Hofstede (2005)) of Islamic countries share similar cultural values that vary significantly with those of the Western countries."
Conceptualizing the Islamic Personality Model, Abdul Kadir Othman, Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah, Nurhazirah Hashim, Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

This is why terror exists and will continue to until this cultural codex is removed from the Public Square. For as Lincoln said 'A House Divided (ethically - diametrically opposed values) Cannot Stand.'.


When one looks up at the image above of how many others each and every day and the images of horror Mr Causevic, Mr Besim and the doctors son all Muslims would have created, the grotesque absurdity of such a view the Muslim youth are 'marginalised' and this is the cause of Islamic/Muslim cultural derived terror is manifest.

It is an Islamic/Muslim cultural genocide construct of Other where both Muslims and Other become victims, for such a construct in time can and does determine every one as less, evil unable to be convinced of the error of their ways and rightfully destined to 'grievous harm' or 'severest penalty'.

"A Jundullah spokesman said it carried out the attack because it considered the victims "kafir" or non-Muslim. He threatened more attacks in the coming days against Ismailis, Shias and Christians."
Pakistan gunmen kill 43 on Karachi Ismaili Shia bus BBC 31-5-2015


The West inclusive of Other Australians have reacted to the most grotesque violence which is inherent in the Islamic/Muslim cultural behavioral variance, not only in one space not only in one time, the West is reacting to the images of pure terror against Other, inclusive of actions against Muslims defined as Other as the Islamic codex enables, that have stretched from the seventh century to this very hour. How could an Other culture not react against such a diabolical cultural construct of Other?

Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why it is One Is and One Is-Not. Yet both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."


Why in reaction should not Others "blood be boiling" at the domestic persecution and international atrocities committed by the Islamic/Muslim culture? Yet who is continually to be found in the streets of Western and Non-Western nations committing atrocities?

Who I ask are in Western including Australian streets intent on visiting violence upon fellow citizens being arrested in increasing frequency Muslims or non-Muslims? This is the reality.

Own it you are responsible yes you, you due to the fact you keep your diabolical Islamic/Muslim genocide construct of Other alive in the Public Square.

This is not a conspiracy theory it is simply how the world as it stands works