Thursday, January 29, 2015

I am not very happy you have enabled the killing of my country persons in a cafe in Sydney and will continue to do so by continuing to utilise the 'Few'/'Moderate'/'Not Islam' policy paradigm.

The Muslim Liberal-Moderate destined to fail to deliver as they are not Islamic cultural codex justified and authorised Islamic cultural altruistic enforcers.
Why is the Muslim terror accelerating, how could our policy makers get it so wrong. Simple proving the positive, proving you are right and not what should be done under the Western scientific method proving your hypothesis false. It is simple subjectively driven type 1 errors. It appears for inter-cultural science we utilize the 'Duty to Certainty' rather than 'Duty to Doubt'.

This is a challenge for those idiots, and I say this with the utmost respect, responsible for the policy farce the "deradicalisation programs among young Muslims." can you see you dangerous twits why the following article determines your policy is just a multiculturalist feel good program destined to fail and I would suggest even possibly make things worse? Do you see the evidence within the 'Few'/'Moderate'/'Not Islam' has failed as it was always going to. The assumptions are flawed.

Muslim leaders need 'keyboard warriors' to help fight Islamic State Date January 27, 2015 SMH by Deborah Snow and Rachel Olding

Want a little help:

This action of making this so called Muslim 'moderate' Jamal Rifi Australian of the year is exactly the same as making a 'moderate' Nazi, German of the year in 1930 after the Nazis killed Other in a dance hall. Obscene.

Nursery Rhymes on Cultures Knee - Western Version: Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me. Islamic Version: Words, images, body language will ‘provoke’ me to break your bones with swords and guns and I will certainly hurt you.

"they had a duty to do more to fight extremism" Why is this demand extremely important and could be the policy tipping point those of us who know the Only the 'Few'/'Moderate'/'Not Islam' policy paradigm was doomed to failure

Have I sinned? What is a Genocide Construct of Other and Why it is formed?


You have noticed in Iraq the inevitable return has resulted in what being asked -sound familiar? What is responsible what messianic template drives each side sunni and shia. Yet the demand on the West is to pay for continually resolving the results of what construct?

Do the 'moderates' reflecting back Others ethics direct traffic? Is a possible reason the inherent Islamic/Muslim cultural codex existence of the notion of being 'provoked' justifies authorises violence internal and external have anything to do with Islamic/Muslim derived outcomes and their impact internal and external? 'provoked' exists necessarily because of the iniquitous nature of the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex as violence in the end is the only way to guarantee adherence internal and compliance and silence external?

Do you know why we only have one 'Liberal'-'moderate' reflecting back Western values and no one else is standing?

I am not very happy you have enabled the killing of my country persons in a cafe in Sydney and will continue to do so by continuing to utilise the 'Few'/'Moderate'/'Not Islam' policy paradigm.


This is not about persons it is about cultural codex enabling murder being removed from the Public Square. It is my opinion not one child's death is worth the existence of this culture codex as it stands within our midst they have passed their quota as far as I am concerned.


“All-American Muslim represents propaganda that riskily hides the Islamic agenda’s clear and present danger to American liberties and traditional values,” the group told CNN…
Muslims Everywhere Are Pissed After Lowes Makes Huge Statement Against Islam Posted on 1/26/2015 by Jews News


Seriously you twats (It appears I have lost all residual respect) if Lowes can work it out without massive research budgets why can't you.

Outlier: An observation that differs so much from other observations as to arouse suspicions that it was generated from a different mechanism.-Douglas Hawkins 

Anomaly: anything that differs from expectations, whether the expectations resulted from experiences, or otherwise, incongruity, incompatibility

concomitant: a phenomenon that naturally accompanies or follows something.

An outcome is only an outlier/anomaly if its existence is not concomitant with the inherent nature of the organism, process, system which caused it to exist. In removing such from being related to the whole necessarily assumes it is derived "from a different mechanism", system etc., i.e. Not Islam.

Those who are responsible for the ‘Few’/’Moderate’/Not Islam’ policy paradigm have to prove to justify the continued killing of Other in Australian streets as elsewhere is are the ‘Few’ not concomitant with ‘moderates’ and ‘Is Islam’. That is it is nigh impossible for the ‘Few’ to be derived from the ‘moderate’ space and in no way having in this case being derived from ‘moderate’ space and therefore as we are being told necessarily subject to Is-Islam can become radicalized to support the murder of Other. 

The question therefore is not simply if in terms of numbers percentages the ‘Few’ are small in comparison to the whole, as social psychology would tend to say this is the norm, it is clearly the wrong question, the question is are these ‘Few’ not or are concomitant to the ‘moderate’ Is-Islam space.


My perception is there is no such thing as Is-Islam and Not-Islam so the whole question is already based on at least one false assumption to start. But at least for your conscience sake dear policy makers utilizing ‘Only the Few/’moderate’/’Not Islam’ policy paradigm it is a question you are required to answer if you do not have to continually wash your hands under the tap.

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

This action of making this so called Muslim 'moderate' Jamal Rifi Australian of the year is exactly the same as making a 'moderate' Nazi, German of the year in 1930 after the Nazis killed Other in a dance hall. Obscene.

The above are the results of the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex of which Jamal Rifi is an adherent and humanity honors this?
The Australian Newspaper 2015: Australian of the Year Jamal Rifi: ‘Our shared values must unite us all’ by Natasha Robinson THE AUSTRALIAN JANUARY 24, 2015

German of the Year (1930) Gunter Müller (Nazi): ‘Our shared values must unite us all’ 

The Nazi 'Few' murdered three in dance hall 1930.

Australian of the Year (2015) Jamal Rifi (Muslim): ‘Our shared values must unite us all’

The Muslim 'Few' murdered two in a cafe 2015.


It is impossible as the Islamic values are significantly different than Western values as clearly shown by research.

"The findings of the study indicate that citizens (Hofstede and Hofstede (2005)) of Islamic countries share similar cultural values that vary significantly with those of the Western countries."

Conceptualizing the Islamic Personality Model, Abdul Kadir Othman, Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah, Nurhazirah Hashim, Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

Recent research has also shown regards democracy a significant difference between Islamic and Western desire for Democracy.

The above are reasons why terror exists, as with the US civil war two diametrically opposed values in the Public Square as Lincoln said either one or the other would take the Public Square in the end.

Proof:
Sydney siege: Killed hostages identified as lawyer Katrina Dawson and Lindt cafe manager Tori Johnson and the rest.

How many burning buildings and broken bodies and lives do you want, are you waiting until they are shoved in your face when you own family pays the terrible price other families do every day?

As social psychology research clearly shows- Cultures justify and authorise terror the individual adherent 'Few' as individuals or in groups deliver it.

This action of making this so called 'moderate' Australian of the year is exactly the same as making a 'moderate' Nazi, German Of the year in the 1930s after the Nazis killed Other in a dance hall. Obscene.


The inconvenient truth and more will die because this farce continues: Only the 'Few'/'Moderate'/'Not Islam'.

What does in small part the Islamic ideology Jamal Rifi is an avowed adherent of inform in time and space apart from the two Australian dead in a Sydney cafe and how many more in Bali and elsewhere?:



  • 19 countries in 2014 punished their citizens for acts of apostasy, and in 12 of those countries those acts were punishable by death.
  • Pakistan has prosecuted more than 1000 people for blasphemy since 1988. Dozens of those found guilty remain on death row.
  • Blasphemy is considered a crime in 55 countries, subject to a prison sentence in 39, and death in six.
  • In June, the Egyptian government launched a campaign to spread awareness of “the dangers of atheism,” calling it a “threat to society.” In November, police raided and closed down what they labeled an “atheist café,” arresting several nonbelievers. Karim al-Banna, 21, was sentenced to three years in prison for revealing on his Facebook page that he was an atheist. See Egypt’s War on Atheism By MONA ELTAHAWY JAN 2015 NTY
  • Saudi Arabia has enacted a new law equating atheism with terrorism. In addition, despite an international outcry, an activist was recently sentenced to 10 years in prison and 1,000 lashings for launching and running a website that criticized Islam and served as a forum for discussing religion.
  • In Malaysia, the Prime Minister has called “humanism and secularism as well as liberalism” as deviant.
  • An Indonesian man, Alexander Aan, served 19 months in prison after going public with his atheism.
The Australian supports these outcomes? Actually believes they do not represent the 'real' Islam Jamal Rifi is a professed advocate of. How can you delineate the culpability of any Muslim anymore than you can a Nazi?

Have I sinned? What is a Genocide Construct of Other and Why it is formed?

@Dorothy "I wondered why Muslim Australians have never, to my knowledge, organized similar mass protests against the apparent corruption of their religion by Islamist extremists, to justify barbaric acts of terrorism."

"wonder no longer" - Because Dorothy the islamic/Muslim cultural codex, if only this papers journalists would care to reflect on it, does not give the liberal-moderate end of the Islamic Muslim behavioral variance reflecting back in decreasing degrees Others own values the justification and authorisation to be cultural altruistic enforcers. If it did there would be no terror as the whole behavioral variance would be weighted to the liberal-moderate end and not the radical-extremist end.

This is why the demonstrations will not happen maybe small BBQs with a few Muslims wearing "Love Other" T-Shirts giving comfort to those on this newspaper but as the terror accelerates as it will given we stick to current policy it becomes clearer pandering to the likes of Dr Rifi is like depending on the doorman of a large corporation to have the chairman do you a favour.

Sunday, January 25, 2015

Under the 'Few'/'Moderate'/'Not Islam' policy paradigm inept dangerous Western cultural gatekeepers "looking for excuses" after each new Muslim cultural atrocity continues.

Education on ‘front line’ of France's battle against terror Ian Langsdon, AFP France 24

Under the 'Few'/'Moderate'/'Not Islam' policy paradigm inept dangerous Western cultural gatekeepers "looking for excuses" after each new Muslim cultural atrocity continues.

Prime Minister Manuel Valls said France had to wake up to the “territorial, ethnic and social apartheid” plaguing the country. “This is not about looking for excuses,”

It is "looking for excuses" as cultures other than Islam have even worse “territorial, ethnic and social apartheid” issues for instance the Australian aborigines and other indigenous groups around the world yet they do not go off and commit genocide in other countries nor do they turn on their fellow cultures in their own space and visit terror upon them.

This means the 'real' cause is not “territorial, ethnic and social apartheid” it is a taboo of not admitting cultures justify and authorise terror (as it is a political act) and the individual adherent 'Few' as individuals or in groups deliver it. Cultures inform the ethical behavioral boundaries its adherents operate in not individuals, not the 'Few'.

This means the Islamic/Muslim culture is responsible via its cultural codex otherwise the Islamic/Muslim terror would not occur. Social psychologists know this to be true yet to mention it means you are a bigot and suffering from a mental illness a phobia. Sanity becomes insanity.

The Islamic/Muslim cultural codex construct of Other is deleted or the terror continues - this continues to be a taboo observation despite the evidence.


Clearly you cannot change what a citizens believes is 'truth' but you can change how the citizen gets to believe what is 'truth'. 

The trouble is prejudice is developed much earlier in a citizens life than most are aware so by the time the citizen arrives in the State controlled schooling system the damage as far as Other is concerned is already done. Leave the cultural codex construct of Other within the Public Square nothing changes in the long run, it may at the best be delivered at a slower rate.

Cultures have no ‘Master Plan’ there never is but there is invariably a cultural codex stipulated principle ALL should convert to the True belief,

Friday, January 23, 2015

Nursery Rhymes on Cultures Knee - Western Version: Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me. Islamic Version: Words, images, body language will ‘provoke’ me to break your bones with swords and guns and I will certainly hurt you.

       Western Nursery Rhyme Outcome                                    Islamic Nursery Rhyme Outcome
Nursery Rhymes on Cultures Knee:

Western 1872 version: Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.

"Sticks and Stones" is an English language children's rhyme. It persuades the child-adult victim of name-calling to ignore the taunt, to refrain from physical retaliation, and to remain calm and good-natured.

Role in Western culture
This sentiment is reflected in/reflects the Western common law of civil assault, which holds that mere name-calling does not give rise to a cause ‘provocation’ of action, while putting someone in fear of physical violence does.

The corner stone values of Democracy

Western 2015 version: Swords and guns may break my bones, but words, images, body language will never hurt me.

Western “Duty to Doubt” Be doubtful, Be sceptical, Be critical.

Certainty is the root of all evil.

Accept being doubted, accept being viewed as untrustworthy, and accept being criticised without resorting to violence.

The state has a monopoly on the legitimate use of coercion.

The corner stone values of Tyranny

Islamic version 7th century C.E– 2015: Words, images, body language will ‘provoke’ me to break your bones with swords and guns and I will certainly hurt you.

Role in Islamic culture
This sentiment is reflected in/reflects the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex to justify assault and murder, which holds that mere name-calling justifiably gives rise to a cause ‘provocation’ of action, whilst no fear of physical violence exits.

Islamic “Duty to Certainty” Be certain, Be compliant, Be silent.


Doubt is the root of all evil.

Other accept the certainty Islam is right, Other accept compliance to Islamic dictates, Other accept silence as to the veracity of the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) template) or accept violence ‘provoked’ by Others failure to accept.

The state does not have de facto monopoly on the legitimate use of coercion.

What will happen, what has happened particularly to women when there is a demand as a societal norm the ‘victim’ should have acted ‘responsibly’ to prevent ‘provocation’ of the perpetrators violence, the victim therefore deserves what they get?

“To make one exception means to make them all.”
Blaming the Victim: Charlie Hebdo and Free Speech By Nicole Gelinas, January 18, 2015 New York Post


As with a person as with a culture utilising such a notion of 'provocation' which justifies violent action where no threat of violence exists this construct will invariably run through the whole of cultural method for dealing with internal and external nonconformity to cultural codex dictates.

This is what we want in Western Democratic streets a return to a “Duty to Certainty” and the terror which always follows in its wake as we have had clear proof of for centuries and even in our own time?

"Forty-five churches were torched over the weekend in Niger's capital during deadly protests over the publication of a Prophet Mohammed cartoon by the French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo, police say.

The protests, which left five people dead and 128 people injured in Niamey, also saw a Christian school and orphanage set alight, said Adily Toro, a spokesman for the national police."

Charlie Hebdo: 10 killed, 45 churches torched during protests over Prophet Mohammed cartoon in Niger; Chechnya rally draws 1 million, Russia says – ABC

ABC in showing just half the new Charlie Hebdo front page in news broadcasts sent what message? Respect? Respect for whom, the victims or the cultural perpetrator? By your action ABC you are informing what norm now in the Australian Public Square?

You do of course understand ABC - Cultures justify and authorise terror the individual adherent ‘Few’, as individuals or in groups deliver it. Who is then ‘responsible’ the victim, the individual ‘Few’ or the culture which created the individual ‘Few’ and is still doing so?

Enough, is Enough! A CHARLIE HEBDO T-Shirt Design for every occasion.

"Peace and Love, do not provoke me or I will kill you, maim you and burn down your institutions." the 'Few' millions chant.


"Peace and Love, do not provoke me or I will kill you, maim you and burn down your institutions." the 'Few' millions chant.

Determining those who point out you are holding a bloodied sword in the left hand and a cultural codex containing a genocide construct of Other in the right hand as you proclaim loudly "My Muslim culture is a culture of Peace and Love, you by bringing to prominence what I hold in my hands are therefore hate mongers and islamophobes, I am justifiably provoked to kill you, maim you and burn down your institutions." is 'rational' under a Islamic/Muslim cultural model but insanity under a Western 'rational' model.

There will be a possibility for Peace and Love only when the Islamic/Muslim culture are rid of the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex genocide construct of Other until then your words are much more than hypocritical from a Western 'rational' model perspective as you continue holding a bloodied sword in the left hand and a cultural codex containing a genocide construct of Other in the right hand shouting "Peace and Love, do not provoke me or I will kill you, maim you and burn down your institutions.."

Muslim Party Leader Says Islam is “Peace and Love”, Calls for Killing Cartoonists January 9, 2015 by Daniel Greenfield, FRONTPAGE MAG

"Forty-five churches were torched over the weekend in Niger's capital during deadly protests over the publication of a Prophet Mohammed cartoon by the French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo, police say.

The protests, which left five people dead and 128 people injured in Niamey, also saw a Christian school and orphanage set alight, said Adily Toro, a spokesman for the national police."

Charlie Hebdo: 10 killed, 45 churches torched during protests over Prophet Mohammed cartoon in Niger; Chechnya rally draws 1 million, Russia says - ABC

"Islam is “Peace and Love”, Calls for Killing Cartoonists" this is the Islamic/Muslim cultural 'rational' model as opposed to the Western 'rational' model "Political Party Leader Says Democracy is “Peace and Love”, Calls cartoonist for a copy to add to the Party leaders collection"

To claim this is not the real Islam is, however to the degree one believes such a view to be true, denies the reality of the existence of the statement itself apart from the millions of the Muslim 'Few' publically showing support for such actions. It is the same logic as determining the moon does not exist and has been made up to confuse the ignorant.

This is the reality the burning buildings and broken bodies and lives perpetrated by the Muslim culture and this is why:

Have I sinned? What is a Genocide Construct of Other and Why it is formed?

The Only the 'Few'/'moderate'/'Not Islam' policy paradigm has failed as it is based upon false assumptions and must be turned on its head to even start to remove this Islamic/Muslim cultural genocide codex construct of Other from the Public Square.

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

"they had a duty to do more to fight extremism" Why is this demand extremely important and could be the policy tipping point those of us who know the Only the 'Few'/'Moderate'/'Not Islam' policy paradigm was doomed to failure

"Islam can be "part of British identity", arguing they had a duty to do more to fight extremism and root out anyone preaching hatred. Muslim groups said the letter unfairly singled them out."
UK plea to imams to fight extremism draws charge of Islamophobia DNA Monday, 19 January 2015

"they had a duty to do more to fight extremism" Why is this demand extremely important and could be the policy tipping point those of us who know the Only the 'Few'/'Moderate'/'Not Islam' policy paradigm was doomed to failure because no cultural behavioral variance is the same, some consistently constantly from generation to generation include terror against Other and should not therefore be allowed into any Public Square.

It would appear there is a realisation by a Western Government, the UK Government:

firstly a public recognition the Islamic/Muslim cultural institution the Mosque within which the Imams are supposedly the cultural altruistic enforcers and as such should have a prominent role to play in setting Islamic benchmark beliefs, ethics, values and,

secondly importantly "do more" clearly indicates the Government is starting to realise either these 'moderate' Imams are not 'moderates' at all or worse have just realised a truth 'moderates' be they Imams or anyone else within the Muslim community reflecting back Others ethics have not been given the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex authority to be cultural altruistic enforcers as if they were the terror would not exist because the 'real' Islam ethical mean would be at the moderate end not at the radical.


This is really in cross-cultural terms 'We are not satisfied with your behavior to date expect further communication if things do not improve.'. 'Things' are not going to improve this is a cultural war regards diametrically opposed values in the same space. It appears some needed Charlie Hebdo to reflect they may have been mistaken in their view.


Those wanting to prevent Mosques going ahead in their space can utilise this as proof Mosques are problematic and once established cannot be counted on to stop terror in fact can either be seen to encourage it or at the very least not move against those advancing radical ideas the reason being the radical is the Islamic/Muslim justified and authorised cultural enforcer the radicals are the ones with the power in the endgame to direct the direction of Muslim ethics.

Proof of this can be found on UK's own soil given what happened in the schools in Birmingham UK in how radical Islamists took over the schools and the so called 'moderates' had no power or cultural codex leg to stand on to stop what these so called 'moderates' were shown in the subsequent report to be clearly aware of.


The policy paradigm of Only the 'Few'/'moderate'/'Not Islam' has to be turned on its head before the journey on the long road to a Western Islamic terror free Public Square can commence. It will not be a journey without its perils and tragic days but at least there is a real justified hope peace and harmony will be restored and we can once again sit in our cafes safe in the knowledge we will not be murdered because we are Other.

Cultures have no ‘Master Plan’ there never is but there is invariably a cultural codex stipulated principle ALL should convert to the True belief,


Cultures have no ‘Master Plan’ there never is but there is invariably a cultural codex stipulated principle ALL should convert to the True belief, the ‘right’ ethics values and informed behavior, combined with cultural codex justified and authorized methods of having Other convert.

A developing culture which contains diametrically opposed beliefs, ethics, values in relation to cultures in the same space will develop increasingly forceful mechanisms to prevent defection and achieve alignment, submission of Other to the cultures world view.

Each culture has differing developed methods of conversion of Other related directly to the degree the culture codex construct of Other differs from Others own True belief, the ‘right’ ethics values and informed behavior.

Each culture has differing developed constructs of the nature of Other related directly to the degree the cultures codex differs from Others own True beliefs, the ‘right’ ethics values and informed behavior to justify and authorise adherents utilization of the cultural methods to have Other convert and in some cases be eliminated.

For example both the Nazi codex and the Islamic codex values differ so much from the cultures around them they have developed genocide constructs of Other embodying both the cultures codified nature of Other as well as the methods of elimination. As clearly tools inherent in methods at particular times utilized to dispatch Other are not as effective these codex are necessarily analogized to suit purpose in time and space.

Have I sinned? What is a Genocide Construct of Other and Why it is formed?

Conversion of Other does not happen overnight such cultures with such diametrically opposed values to Other have to accommodate and reflect back Others values initially if the culture wishes to survive even to the extent of proclaiming their allegiance to the existing Other currently in control of political power. Proclaiming they are no threat and in fact publically support the Other cultures right to hold opposing values to their own.

Islam is the only culture I am aware of which has actually recorded in its Islamic codex justification and authorisation of deception/lying as to the Islamic/Muslims cultures true intent regards Other though at least in this regard the Islamic/Muslims culture are being honest regards such a necessity for cultural survival at least with themselves - it would appear in codifying such duplicity the Islamic/Muslims culture did not recognise the fact Other are not so 'deaf, dumb and blind' they cannot realise intuitively from what has happened to Other elsewhere in time and space nor the fact Other can read about their fate and the duplicity in the Islamic/Muslims cultures codex. Lying (Taqiyya and Kitman)


What is the reality? Ask the Roman/Greek Byzantines. Ask the Jews in Egypt in the seventh-eight centuries AD. Ask the German people in the 1930s. Ask the Iranian people in 1979. Ask the US citizen in the 1860s. Ask the Turkish people in 2001…..

It is therefore a terrible mistake to interpret cultural terror at specific points in time and space as "not part of some master plan, just one man (group) with no agenda other than to get attention!!" be it in the streets of Sydney, France, Britain, US, Canada, Nigeria, Kenya, … as being ideologically disconnected events not at all associated with a culture seeking control of the political space to amend or delete Others beliefs, ethics and values not only in the space the action occurred but elsewhere as well.

Research has found this Islamic method in resolving the intransigence of Other to submit to Islamic values, as well as the call to utilise the method has not changed since the seventh century. The reason for the utilization of the Islamic method from the beginning as it is now is because Islamic/Muslim cultural values have been found by research to be significantly different than Western values.

The assumption and encouraged to be accepted as a multicultural derived truth is Islamic/Muslim values are in essence the same as Western values they are not, some Other are simply taking the 'moderate' end of the Islamic/Muslim cultural behavioral spectrum which is to a greater degree reflecting back their own cultural values at face value and calling it 'Is Islam' where really it is in the main in value terms 'Is Other' completely ignoring the rest of the Islamic/Muslim behavioral variance, very comforting and fits with the multicultural 'rational' but a very dangerous thing to do with a culture whose codex contains a genocide construct of Other.

In fact most people arrogantly simply assume their cultural category definitions are the same and may and clearly have in the Muslim Sydney Cafe killing of two Other accepted the multicultural and Islamic/Muslim cultures story line significant behavioral deviations from Others norm as insanity without question. Arrogantly because most cultures believe their definition of course is the universal standard and the benefits so obvious how could it not be. Empires, cultures have disappeared because of such arrogance. If the cultural values where more alike than not there would be no Muslim terror in the streets as there would be no disagreements as to the values which should exist there.

"The findings of the study indicate that citizens (Hofstede and Hofstede (2005)) of Islamic countries share similar cultural values that vary significantly with those of the Western countries."
Conceptualizing the Islamic Personality Model, Abdul Kadir Othman, Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah, Nurhazirah Hashim, Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia


The key question which our inept cultural gatekeepers are going to have to confront - Does the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) template) enable in time the Islamic/Muslim cultural acceptance of the values which frame our Western method of Governance Democracy. Research has found although questions are asked across cultures as to this question the answers are in fact similar proportionally across all cultures despite some of these cultures in the main existing under authoritarian non-democratic constructs, particularly in Islamic culture areas, once the answers are qualified to account for 'reality' there has been found to be a significant difference between the initial response and the qualified response between actual Islamic and Western Cultures desire for Democracy.


The most pertinent data on the responses on Democracy and the subsequent qualification for me also underlines the disconnect proportionally from what an individual under an Islamic politic may desire or actually believe they exist in and the reality the social construct within which they exist delivers. For me this is further proof the so called 'moderates' reflecting Others ethics as to Liberty and equality simply are not as claimed the 'Is Islam' the Islamic society they inhabit  in the endgame bares no resemblance to a Western Democracy and the values which underpin it.


Those who propose if Christianity can be brought into a harmonious, although bloody fought for secular religious agreement of sorts that such a thing is possible in time with Islam for me ignores the fact inherent in Christian doctrine were factors which enabled the notion of human liberty and the secular religious divide to exist in such a way Democracy came into being, whereas these same factors do not exist as far as I can tell in the Islamic codex construct. The individual Muslim is not able on their own to determine what the Islamic codex means and live apart from the Muslim community, there is no give to caesar, the State what is due to the State and to God what is due to God, the template for the secular religious divide.

Islam is the State, The UK Government sending a letter to the Muslim Imams is based upon a Western Construct Caesar-Church these Muslim Imams according to the Islamic codex are government, Caesars in waiting what the UK Government is asking is simply not going to be met because in proclaiming from the Mosque minbar (pulpit) "demonstrating how faith in Islam can be part of British identity" these Imams contradict their own Islamic codex, Islam is not part of anything other than of and in itself, Imams would immediately in following such an Other directive destroy the very Islamic construct which determines these Imams are the authority and not subject to Others direction.

It is no surprise to me such a letter the UK Government sent however rational from an Other perspective as the Muslim terrorists are actually coming out of these Imams institutions is seen as an attack on Islam which in essence it is a Other State censure - it would therefore not surprise me if this letter 'provokes' violence. It is another example of how 'freedom'/'Democracy' when qualified for 'reality' have significantly different meanings. One just has to reflect on those shouting exactly the same words in the streets in the Arab so called spring they ended up being diametrically opposed in meaning particularly for women.


It has got to be honestly faced there is a choice here as there was with slavery in the US when there were significant difference in values between North and South as Lincoln said in time one or other of these values will take the space - the West has to choose. It is no longer a matter of being able to have both Muslim values and Western values within the same space - terror will and is the result and it will only get worse and come from both directions as some Other citizens see terror and the fear which is derived from it actually works as a Denmark publishing house stated when it refused to reprint Charlie Hebdo cartoons.

If the inept Western cultural gatekeepers do not change their 'Only the Few/'Moderate'/'Not Islam' policy paradigm with the incremental caving into Islamic/Muslim cultures demands for Western definitions of Free Speech, liberty and equality to align with the Islamic/Muslim cultural definitions otherwise the Islamic/Muslim culture will be 'provoked' to violence, terror in Western streets, a state which is manifestly obvious to their own citizens, the West will increasingly experience their own version of John Brown in response to the betrayal as violence appears to be the only mechanism which focuses the current inept Western cultural gatekeepers attention.

To determine such terrorism which is from both directions and in my opinion destined to worsen therefore in our Western streets and elsewhere are singular criminal acts not cultural acts is in essence a lie.

What are those values being fought for and against:


one is the construct of woman's place in society, i.e. being subject to mans 'leadership'

secondly 
the other is the positionality of Other in an Islamic/Muslim cultural schema,as we see Other are not going to be placed there without being forced to do so which is why force (violence fear) is necessarily the Islamic/Muslim method of forcing Other to align or be removed, and 

thirdly, importantly the method of Islamic/Cultural enforcement the 'victim' is 'responsible' not to provoke 'grievous harm' or 'severest penalty' by challenging the codex (text and exemplar (messianic) templates) or the inherent hierarchy authority of Man the codex informs over women justifying violent behavior in response.


At its core there is an attempt by the Islamic/Muslim culture to force the West back to a very dark place:

A war is currently occurring in Western Public Squares for the retention of the Western scientific method of “Duty to Doubt” Be doubtful, Be skeptical, Be critical, against the increasing imposition of the Tyranny method of “Duty to Certainty” Be certain, Be compliant, Be silent, assisted in major part by our very own Western inept cultural gatekeepers.

These Western inept cultural gatekeepers with their Only the ‘Few’/’moderate’/’Not Islam’ policy paradigm have to be removed and quickly.


Each act of terror and invariably sametime political actions of demanding adherence to the attacking cultures values underwritten by the fear the culture has itself enabled are cumulative in their impact and cannot be seen as emanating from the 'evil' - Not Culture as opposed to the 'good' Is Culture. As the cultural codex which forms both is exactly the same which is why you see the worst of humanity emanating from the very Islamic/Muslim families, communities and institutions which set the benchmarks of beliefs, ethics values and boundaries of behavior claiming to be only interested in peace and harmony with Other.

At last at least one Western Government is coming to realise the awful reality a cultural genocide construct exists in the Public Square and it is clearly linked to the Imams, heads of Mosques, the cultural altruistic enforcers. The UK Government is realising the Mosques are not benign nor apart from enabling terror mental schemas to be created via the benchmarking of beliefs, ethics and value within the Muslim communities and their enforcement.

"they had a duty to do more to fight extremism" Why is this demand extremely important and could be the policy tipping point those of us who know the Only the 'Few'/'Moderate'/'Not Islam' policy paradigm was doomed to failure

Some of the culture might even believe as individuals they are "interested in peace and harmony with Other." but individuals are not cultures, and given the cultural terror exists it is a baseless claim as it has been from the beginning because in such a genocide construct when push comes to shove the so called 'moderates' in the Islamic/Muslim cultures behavioral variance wearing 'I Love Other' T-Shirts cannot take on the rolls of cultural altruistic enforcers because the cultural codex does not give the 'moderate' justification nor authority to be a cultural altruistic enforcer but the radicals do.

If one wants proof of this investigate the report on what happened in the Birmingham schools in the UK when the radical Islamists within the Islamic/Muslim behavioral variance took control - did the 'moderate' more importantly could the 'moderate' have ultimate control of the Islamic/Muslim cultures ethical direction?

No it did not, therefore throwing hope and good scarce resources after bad at the 'moderate' end of the Muslim behavioral variance, actually paying 'moderates' who are not even given the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex justification and authorisation to be cultural altruistic enforcers is not only a waste of hope and resources it is downright dangerous to Other.

The policy paradigm of Only the 'Few'/'moderate'/Not Islam has to be turned on its head before the journey on the long road to a Western Islamic terror free Public Square can commence. It will not be a journey without its perils and tragic days but at least there is a real justified hope peace and harmony will be restored and we can once again sit in our cafes safe in the knowledge we will not be murdered because we are Other.

Those in the ABC and SBS who seek to legitimise the notion of the Islamic/Muslim culture being 'provoked' .. had better start realising as with a bullying child they are legitimising the Islamic/Muslim behaviour terror against Other.

"We need to try and understand why the Paris and Verviers attacks were committed" - We already know why it was, is, and will be committed.

Perspectives against extremism by By BLERI LLESHI BRUSSELS, 16. JAN 2015

"We need to try and understand why the Paris and Verviers attacks were committed"

We already know why it was, is, and will be committed.

It called an cultural codex informed cultural behavioral variance the exact same one which has existed since the seventh century. Young or old it makes no difference the 'few' will be created from such a cultural codex genocide construct of Other to inform terror.

Cultures justify and authorise terror the individual adherent 'Few', as individuals or in groups deliver it.

As in the civil war in the US a war where two diametrically opposed value systems existed there is a civil war raging in Western Streets for the retention of Western values against the imposition of Islamic values to replace them.

As with John Browns action at Harpers Ferry in the Abolitionist cause taking a single terrorist incident and trying to divorce it from the clash of civilizations/values which has been going on since the seventh century is an absurdity, particularly if you think this is going to be resolved with a little research project, therapy and throwing money at it. In time either one values system takes the Public Square or the Other as Lincoln clearly pointed out.

The method utilised by the Islamists is justified and authorised method of resolving the intransigence of Other to submit to Islamic values which are research has found to be significantly different than Western values. This Islamic method as well as the call to utilise the method has not changed research has found since the seventh century.

What are those values being fought for and against one is the construct of woman's place in society, i.e. being subject to mans 'leadership' the other is the positionality of Other in an Islamic/Muslim cultural schema as we see Other are not going to be placed there without being forced to do so which is why force (violence fear) is necessarily the Islamic/Muslim method of forcing Other to align or be removed - expulsion or murder.

Also at its core there is an attempt by the Islamic/Muslim culture to force the West to a very dark place:

A war is currently occurring in Western Public Squares for the retention of the Western scientific method of “Duty to Doubt” Be doubtful, Be skeptical, Be critical, against the increasing imposition of the Religious method of “Duty to Certainty” Be certain, Be compliant, Be silent, assisted in major part by our very own Western inept cultural gatekeepers.


Make sense? Yes it informs a bleak future but only if the Only a ‘Few’/’Moderate’/’Not Islam’ paradigm persists because this is the Clash of Civilizations which was predicted believing somehow it will be resolved in navel gazing and then reverting to the exact same method to resolve it is absurd.

Those in the ABC and SBS who seek to legitimise the notion of the Islamic/Muslim culture being 'provoked' .. had better start realising as with a bullying child they are legitimising the Islamic/Muslim behaviour terror against Other.



Monday, January 19, 2015

Everything is working so well.


So the book on Cooperation, The Political Psychology of Effective Interaction, 2008 were correct when they stated:

".existing scientific evidence seemed to suggest that many of our public policies are based on incorrect or incomplete assumptions about human nature and about factors that promote a happy, healthy, and productive society."

It goes on to say:

" It often seems that public policies are designed in such a way that they have the effect of impeding rather than maximising human happiness, and making cooperation both more difficult and less rewarding than narrow, self-interested activity."

Maybe the greatest problem facing humanity at this point of time are not Global Warming, Islamic terrorism, poverty, environment ... it is humanities own failure to understand their decision making processes via whatever cultural system now in place are leading humanity to self-destruct.

Maybe humanity should have a Global Review of Decision Making Processes to create a new decision making process which will work in humanities favor rather than against it otherwise this downward spiral will continue.

Of course not someone might lose their position in a lucrative cultural hierarchy shame about Global Warming, Islamic terrorism, poverty, environment ....

Everything is working so well.

Saturday, January 17, 2015

I am signing this petition because our forebears, those who courageously bore arms and those who stoically bore industry have been betrayed.

Petition: Apply the Precautionary Principle, and refuse permission for any mosque application, anywhere on the Sunshine Coast.

I am signing this petition because our forebears, those who courageously bore arms and those who stoically bore industry to enable us to have the means and more importantly the peace and security to sit quietly in any café in safety to reflect upon our past and imagine a better future have been betrayed by our dangerous inept cultural gatekeepers by allowing a genocide and misogynistic construct Islam to flourish within and without our gates to increasingly inform terror and destruction against their own Western derived culture, informing a massive redirection of scarce resources better spent on education, health, infrastructure, ... required to protect citizens from this dangerous Islamic/Muslim culture.

I am signing this petition because Islam/Muslim culture is a genocide and misogynistic construct and its presence in our Australian Public Square has led to the killing of two Australians on our own soil and hundreds elsewhere and if the 'few'/'moderate' paradigm continues to underwrite policy many more into the future.

Have I sinned? What is a Genocide Construct of Other and Why it is formed?

'Complete Proof' within the Islamic behavioral variance 'spectrum' women being 'free' to choose their own clothing style is a lie and why.


I am signing this petition because the radical Muslim ‘fan base’ grows as the 'few'/'moderate' paradigm fails, which allows Muslim institutions to advance this diabolical construct of Other, as the 'few'/'moderate' paradigm must fail as the Muslim 'moderate' reflecting back Others own ethics, wearing "I Love Australia" T-shirts, in the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) template) are not given the justification nor authority to be cultural altruistic enforcers.

If they were as these Muslim 'moderates' and their supporters claim, able to be Islamic/Muslim cultural altruistic enforcers, there would be no terror. Social psychologists are going to have to stop being watchers from the footpath and come clean on the truth of this as clearly by simple observation apart from reading the codex itself clearly points to Muslim 'moderates' having no cultural power to direct the ethical mean of the Muslim culture.

I am signing this petition because no amount of money or hope therefore thrown at the 'moderate' end of the Muslim behavioral variance is going to prevent terror.

History has clearly been written to be ignored and it appears most of the research of any worth in social psychology research as well. One word for these social psychologists 'analogy'. Hopefully they will understand if not we are really in trouble.

I am signing this petition because humanity needs no more Islamic/Muslim institutions to advance genocide and misogynistic Muslim behavior within humanities midst.


Not one child lost is worthy of the existence of such a culture within the Australian or any other Public Square.

No victim is the price of a cultures admittance to the Public Square.

Differing Definitions Of Liberty And Equality Cannot Remain For Long Within Any Public Square

Enough, is Enough! A T-Shirt Design for every occasion.

Friday, January 16, 2015

Are any Western policy makers and particularly women journalists realising what this return to the paradigm of justified violence derived from the provocation and the subsequent victim being 'responsible' for incitement means for women in particular.


More to the point "a punch awaits women and Other" and worse as we know when such an excuse of 'provocation' is utilised to justify violence.

"Now even the Pope says he would PUNCH someone who insulted his mother as he says there are 'limits to freedom of speech' following Charlie Hebdo attack" 

Are any Western policy makers and particularly women journalists realising what this return to the paradigm of justified violence derived from the provocation and the subsequent victim being 'responsible' for incitement means for women in particular. Psychology would deem it is simply impossible to quarantine the logic of a mental schema justifying one form of behavior from another.

Start to think below the surface. Why is a mental schema of determining the victim 'responsible' for provocation of another person to violence ever required? Could it be an iniquitous construct and/or unsubstantiated logic exists for a belief informing negative outcomes for Other (inclusive of women)?

You really want to introduce into the Western Public Squares the victim is 'responsible' for the violence committed against them? Where previously Western culture accepted as a norm perceived provocation from whatever source and of whatever content is no excuse for violence. Think what reintroducing the 'victim' has to act responsibly or they (generally women and now with the Muslim culture Other as well) deserve what they get.

Where are the feminists of the 1960s when you need them - this a Man construct to protect Mans institutions and power.

Thursday, January 15, 2015

Those in the ABC and SBS who seek to legitimise the notion of the Islamic/Muslim culture being 'provoked' .. had better start realising as with a bullying child they are legitimising the Islamic/Muslim behaviour terror against Other.


There are much worse images through time and space than the above predicated upon the construct of 'provoked' yet we pander to this culture of death which is Islam by legitimising such actions through legislation and notions being 'provoked' is 'understandable'.

What is not being questioned here is why does a culture secular or religious require a cultural codex which informs a mental schema of 'provocation' which informs violent response? Nobody that I can see is asking why is it there in the first place? We are simply accepting such a construct is valid, given history I believe this is a very dangerous assumption to make.

Importantly when one reflects the logic, the violence tied inextricably to such a cultural construct of 'provocation' will be found elsewhere to enforce internal and external compliance via fear of Other, to gender constructs and obligations to ritual (reinforcement alignment) and codex stipulated behavior, regards the Islamic/Muslim culture womens demeanour and action against Other jihad etc.

Why 'will be' not 'maybe' found elsewhere as a cultural control and enforcement mechanism? It is because once such a construct of 'provocation' to violence determined as rightfully triggered by Others (women's), the victims, lack of 'responsible' behavior cannot be contradicted elsewhere as it would create severe cognitive dissonance on the part of the adherents as the ethical, value difference of no violence is justified against that of violence is justified are clearly diametrically opposed as was the slave-not slave in the US Public Square in the 1800s. So this construct of 'provocation' to violence underwrites the Muslim adherence internal and alignment of Other through fear. You really think it is wise to support at any point a notion of being 'responsible' regards such a culture which utilises such inherent violence?


The shadows define us be it individual or culture we must therefore not take subjective derived portraits, particularly self-portraits at face-value.

It is my perception a war is currently occurring in Western Public Squares for the retention of the Western scientific method of “Duty to Doubt” Be doubtful, Be sceptical, Be critical, against the increasing imposition of the Religious method of “Duty to Certainty” Be certain, Be compliant, Be silent, assisted in major part by our very own Western inept cultural gatekeepers.

The West spent centuries and many lives removing the “Duty of Certainty” from our Public Squares and here we are again.

I am afraid of what this will inform in major part for woman's place in society. Sensitivity to such constructs for me in showing of half the image of the new Charlie Hebdo's front page by the ABC reinforces the notion the attack, the killing of innocents was in part half justified this if carried forward is the death knell of the Western developed definition of freedom particularly for women - half free determines what?

"Now even the Pope says he would PUNCH someone who insulted his mother as he says there are 'limits to freedom of speech' following Charlie Hebdo attack"
By OLLIE GILLMAN FOR MAILONLINE PUBLISHED: 21:33 EST, 15 January 2015

Are any Western policy makers and particularly women journalists realising what this return to the paradigm of justified violence derived from the provocation and the subsequent victim being 'responsible' for incitement means for women in particular. Psychology would deem it is simply impossible to quarantine the logic of a mental schema justifying one form of behavior from another.

Start to think below the surface. Why is a mental schema of determining the victim 'responsible' for provocation of another person to violence ever required? Could it be an iniquitous construct and/or unsubstantiated logic exists for a belief informing negative outcomes for Other (inclusive of women)?



The notion of Islamic 'provocation' justifying and authorising violence, blaming the violence against the victim for not acting 'responsibly' is utilised to justify what else in the Islamic/Muslim culture? To say this is not the 'real' Islam or is not Islam at all as Obama is now stating what I ask is the categorisation in terms of the authority hierarchy of DR Abd Al-Aziz?


Let us examine the potential veracity of such statements of denial of attribution of a cultures creation of terror either by Other who take the culture adherents leaders word as valid despite the missing, burning buildings and broken bodies and lives.

'Let’s call them what they are,' Obama's spokesman said on Tuesday. 'These terrorists are individuals who would like to cloak themselves in the veil of a particular religion. 
'But based on the fact that the religious leaders of that religion have roundly condemned their actions, those religious leaders have indicated that their actions are entirely inconsistent with Islam,' he said.
Religion that dare not speak its name: British PM warns of global 'Islamist extremist terrorist threat' while America's president still won't mention Islam
By FRANCESCA CHAMBERS FOR DAILYMAIL.COM PUBLISHED: 17 January 2015

“the Germans (inclusive of the Nazi) that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Britain as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else”. Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

Tanzpalast Eden Trial: On November 22, 1930, an SA Rollkommando attacked a popular dance hall frequented predominantly by left-wing workers. The victims were members of a migrant workers' association that was holding a meeting at the Tanzpalast Eden ("Eden Dance Palace") in Berlin. Three people were killed and 20 injured in an attack that was planned in advance.)” Hans Litten: From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hans Achim Litten in cross-examined Hitler 1931 in a court case involving two workers stabbed by four Brownshirts (paramilitary wing of the Nazi Party). Litten understood clearly in his interrogation words and sentences are not written in foundation codex for no reason they are to inform ethics driving actions of adherents.

Excerpts from the trial[edit]Litten: (...) Did you know that in the circles of the SA there is talk of a special rollkommando?

Hitler: I haven't heard anything about a rollkommando. (...)

Litten: You said that there will be no violent acts on the part of the National Socialist Party. Didn't Goebbels create the slogan, "one must pound the adversary to a pulp?"

Hitler: This is to be understood as "one must dispatch and destroy opposing organizations". (...)

(The presiding judge read a question formulated by Litten): Did Hitler, as he named Goebbels Reich Minister of Propaganda, know of the passage from his book, where Goebbels declares that fear of the coup d'état cannot be permitted, that parliament should be blown up and the government hunted to hell and where the call to revolution was made again, letter-spaced?

Hitler: I can no longer testify under oath, if I knew Goebbels' book at the time. The theme (...) is absolutely of no account to the Party, as the booklet doesn't bear the Party emblem and is also not officially sanctioned by the Party. (...)

Obama and those who support his view firstly need to explain if Not-Islam given the following is true as social psychology determines "Cultures justify and authorise terror the individual adherent 'few' as individuals and in groups deliver it." which culture is informing the terrorists behavior given terrorism is a political act necessarily requiring a culture to frame such behavior?

Importantly has Obama and those who support his view found the 'theme' of justification and authorisation for the terror against Other 'is absolutely of no account to the Party (Islam) , as the booklet (Quran) doesn't bear the Party (Islamic) emblem and is also not officially sanctioned by the Party (Islamic/Muslim culture). (...)'?

Is there nowhere in the Islamic text, in particular the core Islamic textual codex the Quran where justification and authorisation for the murder of Other exists to enable the terror against Other to occur and determines the claims by "these religious leaders" "no violent acts on the part of the National Socialist Party (Islamic/Muslim culture) it is Not-Islam as valid?

Lets check:
Have I sinned? What is a Genocide Construct of Other and Why it is formed?


You really want to introduce into the Western Public Squares the victim is 'responsible' for the violence committed against them? Where previously Western culture accepted as a norm perceived provocation from whatever source and of whatever content is no excuse for violence. Think what reintroducing the 'victim' has to act 'responsibly' or they (generally women and now with the Muslim culture Other as well) deserve what they get.

Where are the feminists of the 1960s when you need them - this a Man construct to protect Mans institutions and power.



Those in the ABC and SBS who seek to legitimise the notion of the Islamic/Muslim culture being 'provoked' via their own views and those they selectively choose to interview determining the media need to be 'responsible' had better start realising as with a bullying child they are legitimising the Islamic/Muslim behaviour terror against Other.

The fact is this ability of the Islamic/Muslim culture to be able to derive a mental schema of culturally perceived 'provocation' to justify and authorise violence is there for a reason and it is because violence is needed to align Muslim adherents to Muslim norms particularly women to iniquitous constructs of being subject to Muslim Mans 'leadership' and Other via the Muslim codex being determined as less evil etc. and therefore able to be excluded politically and even physically by expulsion or murder clearly requires the legitimisation of a construct of 'provocation' to excuse Islamic/Muslim violent behavior which is clearly necessary for reason, Western derived reason, will not suffice to convince Other such outcomes are in their interests.

Underwriting such behavior, excusing it, via legislation against insulting a culture, hurting a cultures feelings as can be seen in Pakistan simply legitimises even the police killing of those accused of causing offence.

It would be wise for our Western inept cultural gatekeepers to reflect on a free speech construct which was deemed to be absolutely necessary in a Democracy when in the past as now two diametrically opposed values regards 'freedom' existed in the same Public Square.

"It was one of Lincoln’s ways of working out his chief value to the country, and that value was his clear sense from the start it was our democratic scheme that was at stake, and that if it was to be saved, every citizen who could aid must help to give all that was in them.

Lincoln seems to have put it something like this to himself:

Everybody in the country has had a part in bringing this thing about; everybody feels they have a right to say how things shall be handled; everybody that is worth their salt is going to exercise that right, and they are going to do it according to the kind of person they are – according to their temperament, their training, their self-control, their meanness, and their goodness. If we are going to put this thing through and prove that citizens can govern themselves, we must get from them what they can give, and we must let them give it in their own way.”
Source: The Life of Lincoln, Tachell

Stephen Fry put it this way:

Stephen Fry on Charlie Hebdo

I put it this way:

The Right to misjudge and be misjudged, the Right to insult and be insulted, the Right to abuse and be abused, the Right to sneer and be sneered at these Rights are the foundation stones of a true Democracy remove them and theocratic or secular tyranny of a single thought will be their replacement.

The same act of ABC half folding determining Western media 'responsibility' for provocation sends what message to Saudi Arabia regards another media person Saudi blogger Raif Badawi determined under the Islamic construct as 'responsible' for provoking 1000 lashes? This is not a construct which once agreed to saves you from harm for is half still enough for such a construct? You cannot be half free and half slave.

T
ony Abbott open to revisiting Bolt laws, but rejects immediate changes in light of Charlie Hebdo by Latika Bourke SMH January 14, 2015

Rather than Abbott waiting to remove the legislative legitimisation of Islamic/Muslim right to be 'provoked' Abbott needs to move immediately to do so for such an act of reticence culpably continues to say 'Islamic/Muslim' terror is if not acceptable from a Western perspective it is understandable given the 'Islamic/Muslim construct of 'provocation' which legitimises Islamic/Muslim cultures violent reaction.

Rewarding a violent petulant child or culture for their behavior which this legislation and support for the notion ‘the Islamic/Muslim culture has been understandably ‘provoked’ has the exact same result.

True Democracy: The Right to misjudge and be misjudged, the Right to insult and be insulted, the Right to abuse and be abused....
 

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

Sunday, January 11, 2015

Differing Definitions Of Liberty And Equality Cannot Remain For Long Within Any Public Square


Differing definitions of Liberty and Equality cannot remain for long within any Public Square.

"Freedom of Speech, thought, and expression have been, can be and are being, prevented and destroyed"

This is the point 'Freedom' of anything does not exist there is only ever the relative independence fellow humans (culture) and nature allow at any point in time.

To believe such values are inviolable and somehow a 'right' is a mistake because the definition of such values are culturally driven a Western culture and an Islamic culture adherent can and do shout in the streets as we saw in the so called Arab Spring the exact same phrases did they mean the same political constructs regards Other and women would be formed within the streets?

It has to be realised to retain your cultural version of Freedom, Thought, Expression, Liberty and Equality .. you had better make damn sure you do not enable another cultural entity within the same Public Square which in time and space is able to obtain sufficient power to redefine what you falsely thought was indestructible.


We have seen this on the streets before it is the same construct and unless we move now what will happen?

Why did France fail to prevent the Paris terror attacks?

The 'Few'/'Moderate' paradigm at work again as it was in the 1930's.

Look how exaggerated the impact of the 'Few' are.

France deploys 10,000 troops amid hunt for attack accomplices France24


Shame about our education systems, health systems, communication systems,...we will simply have to keep building up our 'low' impact security systems until we are all employed as security agents. Shame about the other stuff.

We observe once again: "Experience has taught me that all argument is useless with fanatical young Nazi of this kind, and so I say nothing." Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

We know that not only does Other say nothing in fear of attack, from the young and inevitably the not-so-young fanatic/fundamentalist 'few', as in Birmingham, nor do adherents claiming to be 'moderates', adherents open supporters of exactly the same ideology. The radicals not the 'moderates' under a genocide construct have the Islamic codex cultural altruistic enforcer power despite being the 'few'.

"A group of fundamentalist "activists", mostly men of Pakistani origin, infiltrated the management of at least 10 schools in Birmingham, sometimes breaking the law in order to
introduce Muslim worship and sex segregation, according to a highly critical report.

Their activities were unimpeded by council officials who were fearful of allegations of
Islamophobia, who forced ousted teachers to sign gagging clauses rather than treating their complaints seriously as whistleblowers, Ian Kershaw, the authority's independent adviser, concluded."
Fears of Islamophobia gave activists free rein in Birmingham schools Helen Pidd, Patrick Wintour and Lyndsay Warner The Guardian, Saturday 19 July 2014

"• Parents do not have the confidence to argue against the articulate and forceful activists who seek to impose their views, for fear of being branded as disloyal to their faith or their community."
Schools face new curbs on extremism after Birmingham Trojan horse affair Patrick Wintour, Political editor The Guardian, Wednesday 23 July 2014


As in Birmingham as in Iran the construct does not change in transition between two differing stages of relative power in the Public Square yet the Islamic template is the same the 'moderates' lack power derived from the Islamic codex to enforce their will against the Islamic construct of power from within a Democratic construct although a pseudo version.

The Iranian President has no relative justification and authorisation in Iran as the 'moderates' in time and space in Western Democratic nations to enforce 'moderate' values reflective of Others own. Yet Western policy despite the evidence of increasing terror and the political manifestations as to were the real power exists in such places as Birmingham and Iran as just two of many examples still persist with the clearly dangerous "Only the Few/'moderate' policy paradigm.

"The Paaydari is central among his targets. The grouping of conservative lawmakers, many close to former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has emerged as the major obstacle to much of Rouhani’s agenda.

“The Paaydari is not large, but they are like the shock troops,” said Ahmad Bakhshayesh, a conservative legislator. “What they lack in numbers they more than make up in intensity.”

Rouhani Invokes People Power to End Sniping by Rivals By Kambiz Foroohar , Bloomburg, Jan 13, 2015


And yet we determine forcefully despite increasing violence against Other and the missing and therefore the clear lack of 'moderate' cultural power: “the Germans (inclusive of the Nazi) that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Britain as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else”. Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

We assure ourselves 'moderates' are in charge for did they not tell us they were such, things could be worse?

“In fact, if the extremist’s elements had prevailed. I have not the least doubt that disruption would have been more drastic and that we should have real reason by now to fear German aggression from both a military as well as political point of view.” Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937


We determine simply not provoking the adherents of a genocide construct and reason will win the day not understanding provoking or not provoking makes no difference and the 'rational' upon which reason is derived from one cultural codex can and is quite different than another.

Muslim Party Leader Says Islam is “Peace and Love”, Calls for Killing Cartoonists
January 9, 2015 by Daniel Greenfield, FRONTPAGE MAG

"Islam is “Peace and Love”, Calls for Killing Cartoonists" this is the Islamic/Muslim cultural 'rational' model as opposed to the Western 'rational' model "Party Leader Says Democracy is “Peace and Love”, Calls cartoonist for a copy to add to the Party leaders collection"

To claim this is not the real Islam is, however to the degree one believes such a view to be true, denies the reality of the existence of the statement itself. It is the same logic as determining the moon does not exist and has been made up to confuse the ignorant. 


Humans deal in analogies affected by context there will always be variation in interpretation of any codex text but at the same time the culture defines and enforces boundaries to these analogies.

Each person in a cultural behavioral variance can rightly claim to be representing the 'true' interpretation of the codex as long as they can show the link directly to it. Anyone who has read the Quran knows with relative certainty "Islam is “Peace and Love”, Calls for Killing Cartoonists" is a Islamic rational supported by the text because Other as in all genocide constructs are not regarded as valid constituents of the culture and therefore "Peace and Love” is rightfully denied to them but murder of them for defecting or simply holding to their beliefs is not. Words and sentences in any codex are there to serve a cultural purpose and informed behavior.

To determine Islamic terrorists are insane is therefore a terrible mistake for these Muslim terrorists are simply following their Islamic 'rational' cultural model which only appears from Others 'rational' model perspective as insane.


Do Western policy makers really believe we can afford to do this for long as the Islamic/Muslim culture in time and space reaches its well traveled tipping points? Start to realise there are no 'moderates' under such a genocide construct which is Islam as there are none under the exact same Nazi construct of Other.

If the 'moderate' reflecting back Others values were justified and authorised Islamic cultural altruistic enforcers there would be no terror attacks. There are increasing Muslim terror attacks so the power to direct Islamic/Muslim culture lies at the radical end not the so called 'moderate' end as it does with all cultural codex containing a genocide construct of Other.

In my view it is very important to understand the inherent nature of the justification and authority to be 'provoked' into violent reaction by any cultural codex is a indication of the threat such a culture poses not only externally but internally against its own to conform (particularly in the case of Islam women are particularly vulnerable given the level of authorisation to violence as a means of forcing alignment already in place) and accept the beliefs values which enable such violence to be applied to obtain the alignment to cultural norms internally and externally as dictated by the cultural codex.

Any society which underwrites legislatively notions of a culture being 'provoked' in an attempt to halt the feelings of provocation simply reinforces the justification for such a stance normative, legal, judicial, institutional, which as we see in Pakistan has the police force killing people in jails for such provocation. The fact is once you start down this legislative track the reaction remains and intensifies and demands for even more stringent restrictions which then underwrite even greater violent reaction in future.

What has happened in France is a warning any restriction on free speech legislated previously to account for the violence which may be 'provoked' must be rescinded for what is the level of incitement that will be accepted by such a construct as Islam - none - as the double speak and prevarication of many of the Muslim leaders as to condemning violence then qualifying with 'need to be responsible'.

The question then is how 'responsible' will ever be good enough to prevent violence, when any questioning of the veracity of the Islamic codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) templates) is determined as an act punishable by death - Mohammad's actions as the exemplar underwrite this Muslim behavior.


Get rid of the 'Few'/'Moderate' paradigm as a basis for policy or we will all be wearing security uniforms living in concrete bunkers without any heat chasing chickens.

Enough, is Enough! A T-Shirt Design for every occasion.

Have I sinned? What is a Genocide Construct of Other and Why it is formed?